Vladimir
Putin: NATO and Satanism Are Ideologically Indistinguishable
Does the
American Cabal of Empire and New World Order truly believe Russia will fail to
defend its national honor, history, culture, autonomy, and homeland from this
unfolding onslaught?
We
all know by now that Vladimir Putin, as flaming Neocon Lee Smith conceded in a
mischievous and smarmy way last October, is “the new sheriff in town.”[1] The Observer has
lamentably reported the same thing: “Today, Russia is king of the mount.”[2]
One can say
that Putin has become the new sheriff because no leader in the Western world is
man enough to fight against what has now become practically unreasonable,
morally intolerable, politically impermissible, and intellectually repugnant. Putin
basically has no choice but to fight against the ideological tidal wave
threatening to wash out Russia, Syria, and much of the Middle East. As one
writer put it last year, Putin
“has his back
against the wall…he can’t throw in the towel because Russia’s facing an
existential crisis. If he loses, then Russia’s going to wind up on the same
scrap heap as Afghanistan, Iraq or Libya. You can bet on it. So the only thing
he can do is win. Period. Victory isn’t an option, it’s a necessity.”[3]
Since victory
is a necessity, Putin has been able to obliterate agents of the New World Order
from a strictly rational point of view. Charlie Rose, Fareed Zakaria,
and other US and British journalists have all learned their lessons by now: You
cannot challenge Putin on a moral and intellectual plane without embarrassing
or humiliating yourself.
Remember what
Putin told John Simpson of the BBC when he asked Putin that
Western countries believe that Russia is being aggressive? “Have you any common sense at
all?,” Putin said. Putin had more damning things to say:
“US
strategic aviation with nuclear weapons onboard continued to encircle us. For
what? We have only 2 military bases abroad. They are in areas of known
terrorism dangers…US bases on the other hand are all over the world. And you
are telling me that I am the aggressor? What are the US forces doing in Europe,
including nuclear weaponry? What business have they got there?
“Listen
to me. Our military budget, while slightly increased from last year, is about
$50 billion. The military budget of the Pentagon is almost 10 times that
amount….And you’re telling me that I’m the aggressor? Is it us putting our
forces on the border of the US? Is it NATO that is moving their bases closer to
us?
“Does
anyone even listen to us, or try to have some kind of dialogue with us? The
repeated answer we get is, ‘Mind your own business, and each country can choose
its own security measure.’ Very well, so will we.”
Putin moved on
to add that “there are rules,” and breaking those rules ought to be illegal.
That is how a rational system or government works. But instead of punishing the
parties that have broken the rules, Putin said, the US and NATO want to punish
Russia. “That is illegal,” he said.
In other
words, the US and NATO are actually using an essentially irresponsible and
intolerable principle which makes practical reason inexorably irrelevant and
unnecessary in political affairs. And once politicians ignore practical reason,
then rational dialogue and peaceful resolutions are impossible. Putin has been
pleading with NWO agents for reasonable dialogue for more than three years, and
his plea has fallen on death ears. He said publicly:
“We
want to develop normal relations in the sphere of security, in the fight
against terrorism, and in the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. We want to
work together with [the US] on threats such as drug trafficking, organized
crime, the spread of infectious disease.”
Since the New
World Order and its agents have been living in a matrix, reason has become
obsolete. John Simpson obviously knew that NATO was and still is spreading its
armies all over Europe, most specifically around Russian borders. NATO
Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has recently declared:
“Today
we have decided to declare initial operational capability of the NATO ballistic
missile defense system. This means that the US ships based in Spain, the radar
in Turkey and the interceptor site in Romania are now able to work together
under NATO command and NATO control.”[4]
But
Stoltenberg risibly propounded that this move “represents no threat to Russia’s
strategic nuclear deterrent”![5] In the same breath, he talked about “Russian
aggression” in the region and that NATO’s arm forces and weapons “will be
robust and they will be multinational. They make clear that an attack on one
ally will be considered an attack on the whole alliance.”[6]
And here is
the funny thing: NATO says that Russia’s “threat” is bigger than ISIS’,[7] and Zionist outlets such asNewsweek can
brag about inflicting “a major setback on Russian President Vladimir Putin at
the Warsaw Summit on July 8 and 9,”[8] but NATO “represents no threat to Russia’s
strategic nuclear deterrent”! CIA directors John Brennan has even given a
lecture at the Brookings Institution postulating that the United States has “to
be going into foreign airspace without the prior consent of the government.”[9] But that is not a threat to any country at all.
Does that make
sense at all? Are New World Order agents that stupid? Can’t Stoltenberg see
that this is why people are now saying that NATO is the problem, not the
solution?[10] Stoltenberg must know that, as former CIA
analyst and whistleblower John Kiriakou has pointed out, NATO’s move would
create “dangerous tensions.”[11]
In response to
this “dangerous tensions,” Russian officials said that it is
“absurd to talk about any threat coming
from Russia at a time when dozens of people are dying in the center of Europe
and when hundreds of people are dying in the Middle East daily [due to NATO’s
aggression].”
As Putin put
to a Russian journalist a few months ago: “I am telling you as an expert,
who has worked with these things for many years. There are very basic things
one cannot be unaware of. I
don’t believe they don’t know them.”
True. New
World Order agents know what they are doing. They just don’t want to live in a
world where human will is subordinated to reason. They want bloodshed. They
want more territories, and they want more money to be wasted. That is one
reason why Jewish Neocon Charles Krauthammer has recently written in the Chicago
Tribune that NATO has to put “a kink in Putin’s aggressive behavior.”[12] Krauthammer:
“NATO
will now deploy four battalions to front-line states. In Estonia, they will be
led by Britain; in Lithuania, by Germany; in Latvia, by Canada; in Poland, by
the United States. Not nearly enough, and not permanently based, but
nonetheless significant.”[13]
But again the
aggressor is Russia, not NATO? You see, Charles Krauthammer does not lack the
sophistication to see that this is complete nonsense. He graduated from Oxford
and Harvard, and obviously he took logic 101 and knows something called common
sense. But his essentially Talmudic ideology does not allow him to see the
obvious.
Jewish writer
Sidney Blumenthal argues that the political ideology of the Neoconservative
movement finds its “disputatious heritage of the Talmud.”[14] In a similar vein, Jewish writer Elizabeth
Wurtzel describes people like herself as “hopeless Talmudists.”[15]
Krauthammer is
obviously a representative of this. He actually admits that he was heavily
influenced by Maimonides when he was at McGill University, under Rabbi David
Hartman.[16]
This
brings us to our central point, which we have articulated in
numerous other articles. Whenever an entity or groups refuse to subordinate
their passion to practical reason, then you can be sure that they are going to
be irrational. When individuals or groups are irrational (deliberately), then
the next logical step follows: they are going to use deliberate lies and
fabrications to get things done. As Nietzsche himself realized, it takes energy
to reject rationality and logic.
So, when
organizations like NATO categorically reject reason and
deliberately embrace bold lies as principles to live by, then they tacitly
endorse Satanism. Whenever reason becomes obsolete, then Satanism is right
around the corner.[17]
This is why
Putin and thinking people everywhere cannot reason people out of an idea which
was not formed on the basis of reason. This is why Putin is getting frustrated
with the American Empire.[18] And this is why the Ayatollah Khomeini did not
hesitate to call America the “Great Satan” way back in 1979.
The Zionist
system, Khomeini articulated then, has taken over US foreign policy, and this coup
d’état had and still has a detrimental impact on Iran itself. The
Zionist system, Khomeini argued, wants to be everywhere. It wants to wrap
around the face of every single country and suck its blood.[19]
Of course,
Khomeini was not against decent Americans who were being manipulated by the
Zionist system which always favors Israel above international law and reason.
He was against a regime which had no intention of doing that which is right. E.
Michael Jones writes that “Khomeini was referring to Iraq, which had already
launched a full-scale attack on Iran, as the proxy of America and Israel.”[20]
Did Khomeini
know that it was also America (and Britain) that covertly and mercilessly
disposed Mohammad Mosaddegh in 1953?[21]
In any event,
Khomeini’s prophecy has come back with a vengeance. The Neocons, who are
representatives of “The Great Satan,” destroyed Iraq in 2003, destroyed
Afghanistan, destroyed Libya, and intended to destroy Syria. Putin conflicted
the Neocon game when he intervened in Syria. They have never been able to
forgive him ever since he became the new sheriff in town. Your turn, Mark Dankof.
Dankof: My
feelings are apparently shared by Mr. Putin himself. The Russian government has
quite rightly began moving against the NGO’s linked to
George Soros and other well-heeled subversives in the largely
Jewish Tribal establishment promoting the toxic brew of Zionism, Central
Banking, and Cultural Marxism which has completely enveloped the West and
destroyed the older European Christian influences of both Europe and the United
States eradicated by both World Wars in the 20th century and their aftermath.
The economic
sanctions, cultural subversion, and hourly global agitation-propaganda
campaign aimed at the Putin government and the Russian nation are now joined by
the methodologies of black intelligence operations in places like Ukraine
in February of 2014, and the overt military threat posed by the continued
deployment of NATO and American military assets in Eastern Europe ever closer
to Russian borders, augmented by the ongoing recruitment of
countries on the Russian periphery for membership in NATO, including overtures
to Montenegro, Ukraine, and Georgia.
Given the
specifics of Article V of the NATO charter, and the clear possibility of
Russian military activity to legitimately protect their own backyard, the
spectre of the likelihood of a NATO and American military conflict with Russia
is made even more probable by these provocative and unjustifiable moves which
have nothing to do with the Cold War doctrine of deterrence.
The
Guardian’s post on the recent Anaconda 2016 NATO
war games in Poland, and the recent switching on of the U. S. ballistic missile shield in
Deveselu, Romania, have brought the breaking of
Bush 41’s promises to Gorbachev and the later unilateral American cancellation
of the provisions of the ABM treaty to an entirely new level of dishonesty and
recklessness.
All of these
gentlemen underscore two essential ingredients inherent in American and NATO
policy where Russia is concerned: Duplicity and absolute madness.
The Parry piece notes the absolutely Orwellian character of the
recent Warsaw Summit Communique of the Western powers which
condemn “Russian aggression” by noting the non-existent intelligence
data and supporting analysis for the mantras of the Communique which
repristinate memories of the Weapons of Mass Destruction fraud
in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq in 2003, the constant glossalalia of
top officials of NATO and American Neo-Conservatives on the subject of Putin
and Russia, and the incessant drone of falsehoods repeated daily in the lapdog
mainstream Western media.
He states
unequivocally:
“The leaders –
at least the key ones – know that there is no credible intelligence that
Russian President Vladimir Putin provoked the Ukraine crisis in 2014 or that he
has any plans to invade the Baltic states, despite the fact that nearly every
‘important person’ in Official Washington and other Western capitals declares
the opposite of this to be reality.
“But there
have been a few moments when the truth has surfaced. For instance, in the days
leading up to the just-completed NATO summit in Warsaw, General Petr
Pavel, chairman of the NATO Military Committee, divulged that the deployment of
NATO military battalions in the Baltic states was a political, rather than
military, act.
“It is not
the aim of NATO to create a military barrier against broad-scale Russian
aggression, because such aggression is not on the agenda and no intelligence
assessment suggests such a thing,” Pavel told a
news conference.
“What Pavel
blurted out was what I have been told by intelligence sources over the past
two-plus years – that the endless drumbeat of Western media reports about
‘Russian aggression’ results from a clever demonization campaign against Putin
and a classic Washington ‘group think’ rather than from a careful intelligence
analysis.”
It is critical
to understand that the lies and agitation-propaganda being spun by the official
American governmental and media narrative on who the aggressor and malefactor
is in the present crisis mirrors the official line on how 9-11
happened and
who was responsible for bringing it about. It mirrors the official line
on American Neo-Conservative and Zionist untruth about Iran and the historical
tragedies in the American relationship with that country since 1953.
It mirrors the
falsehoods of the United States and Israel about what really happened in
Palestine in the late 1940s. It mirrors the official lies perpetrated about
the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and
the Kennedy Assassination. For that matter, one can reach farther back in the
linear historical stream to the official line perpetrated on Abraham Lincoln and
the American War Between the States held so dear by American Neo-Conservatives
and Lovers of Empire.
Mr. Putin’s
frustration with the duplicity of the United States and NATO is compounded by
the inherent madness in the direction taken by the West in all of this. This
comes forth very clearly in the brief clip of his airing of frustrations aimed
at the Western media after the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum of
June 17th.
What
is breathtaking is their full participation not simply in the lies, but in
their stupefying failure to see the slope toward world war and apocalypse
obviously steepening in the continued pushing of the envelope by the United
States, NATO, and the EU in making global conflict and some form of nuclear
exchange likely. And over what?
It certainly
isn’t the legitimate national defense of the United States and Western Europe.
It has everything to do with the ongoing exportation of a brand of coercive
globalism and World Government which threaten Russian autonomy as a sovereign
nation-state free of the tentacles of the Beast. The implication may well be
that failure to subdue the Bear by economic sanctions, demonization, and
cultural subversion, will leave overt military aggression as the weapon of
final resort.
Duplicity
is more than matched by literal madness and insanity. Does the American
Cabal of Empire and New World Order truly believe Russia will fail to
defend its national honor, history, culture, autonomy, and homeland from this
unfolding onslaught? Has The Cabal and its fawning paid
agents in the Western media forgotten that Russia, unlike Iraq, Syria,
Afghanistan, Libya, and Iran, is a nuclear power with a bona fide army and navy
to match?
Putin’s
directed remarks to foreign correspondents on June 17th in St. Petersburg
underscore his disbelief in the Pavlovian dogs of Western media. The tone of
his voice, his facial intonations and body language give special power to the
desperately heartfelt statements in that press conference, like “I don’t
know how to get through to you people. . . . How do you not
understand that the world is being pulled in an irreversible direction? .
. .”
This “irreversible
direction” can only be reversed by a wholesale domestic American and
European revolt against The Cabal. It has not yet happened
despite the wholesale destruction of the demographic, economic, cultural,
spiritual, and political fortunes of millions in the West in the last 100 years
of history.
What remains
to be seen is whether or not the threat of fire raining down on European and
American cities will be enough to produce sufficient will and resolve to resist
the tyranny of The Cabal and the seemingly irreversible and
insane course it has charted toward cataclysm, or whether the Culture
of Death and the nihilism produced by that culture for those entrapped
in addictions to sexual decadence, drugs, and worship of technology will render
meaningful resistance impossible.
Solzhenitsyn
seems ominously prophetic when he tells us that
“We
are approaching the brink; already a universal spiritual demise is upon us; a
physical one is about to flare up and engulf us and our children, while we
continue to smile sheepishly and babble.”
[1] Lee Smith, “Putin Is the New Sheriff in Town,” Weekly
Standard, October 6, 2015.
[2] Micah Halpern, “Putin’s Russia Acts Like Ancient
Rome,” Observer, July 14, 2016.
[3] Mike Whitney, “Putin Throws Down the Gauntlet,” Counterpunch,
December 15, 2015.
[4] “NATO missile defense goes live in Europe,
isolating Russia not the goal – Stoltenberg,” Russia Today, July 8,
2016.
[5] Ibid; see also “NATO Leaders Push United Front
Against Russia Despite Faltering EU,” Military.com, July 7, 2016.
[6] “NATO missile defense goes live in Europe,
isolating Russia not the goal – Stoltenberg,” Russia Today, July 8,
2016
[7] Bryan MacDonald, “Why has NATO chosen Russia as
its enemy instead of ISIS?,” Russia Today, July 14, 206.
[8] John E. Herbst, “NATO Catches on to Putin’s Game
in Europe,” Newsweek, July 15, 2016.
[9] Quoted in “CIA: US Must Be Able to Enter Foreign
Airspace Without Prior Notification,” Sputnik News, July 13, 2015.
[10] Stephen Kinzer, “Is NATO Necessary?,” Boston
Globe, July 5, 2016; Edward Lozansky and Jim Jatras, “Is NATO part of the
solution or is it the problem?,” Washington Times, July 12, 2016.
[11] “NATO Summit Approved Buildup Against Russia
Unseen Since Nazi Era,” Sputnik News, July 9, 2016; see also
“Deploying NATO Battalions in Baltic States Attempt to Blackmail Russia,” Sputnik
News, July 9, 2016. What’s more, much of the West is still spreading lies
about both Russia and Iran, even though everyone now knows that Saudi Arabia
one country that the United States needs to keep an eye on. Jack More, “German
Intelligence: Iran Has Attempted to Buy Illegal Nuclear Technology After 2015
Deal,” Newsweek, July 8, 2016; “Iran seeking illegal nuke, missile
technology: German intelligence,” Times of Israel, July 8, 2016.
NATO just gave 1 billion dollars “to boost US security effort in Afghanistan.”
“NATO gives $1bn to boost US security effort in Afghanistan,” Russia
Today, July 9, 2016; “For biggest threat to Middle East, look at Saudi
Arabia,” Boston Globe, July 26, 2015.
[12] Charles Krauthammer, “Putting a kink in Putin’s
aggressive behavior,” Chicago Tribune, July 14, 2016.
[14] Sidney Blumenthal, The Rise of the
Counter-Establishment: From Conservative Ideology to Political Power (New
York: HarperCollins, 1998), 124.
[15] Elizabeth Wurtzel, “Standing Against a Tide of
Hatred,” Guardian, January 16, 2009.
[16] Hilary Leilea Krieger, “The unfashionable
Charles Krauthammer,” Jerusalem Post, June 10, 2009.
[17] For a great article on this, see E. Michael
Jones, “The Great Satan and Me: Reflections on Iran and Postmodernism’s
Faustian Pact,” Culture Wars, July/August 2015.
[18] “Putin regrets repeated refusal of US to
cooperate with Russia in Syria,” Russia Today, July 14, 2016.
[19] Cited Jones, “The Great Satan and Me:
Reflections on Iran and Postmodernism’s Faustian Pact,” Culture Wars,
July/August 2015.
[20] Ibid.[21] See for example Ervand Abrahamian, The
Coup: 1953, the CIA, and the Roots of Modern U.S.-Iranian Relations (New
York: The Free Press, 2013); Stephen Kinzer, All the Shah’s Men: An
American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror(Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley
& Sons, 2003 and 2008)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.