JULIAN ASSANGE SLAMS “CORRUPT” HILLARY CLINTON IN FIRST INTERVIEW FOLLOWING WIKILEAKS DNC EMAIL RELEASE + transcript

Wednesday, Jul 27, 2016 2 comment(s)

JULIAN ASSANGE SLAMS “CORRUPT” HILLARY CLINTON IN FIRST INTERVIEW FOLLOWING WIKILEAKS DNC EMAIL RELEASE

DEMOCRACY NOW!

Forbidden Knowledge TV | Jul 27, 2016 | Alexandra Bruce

WikiLeaks Editor-in-Chief, Julian Assange joins Democracy Now! on the Monday following the Friday release of 20,000 DNC emails, which reveal how the Democratic Party worked to undermine and defeat Bernie Sanders' campaign. 

Assange slams Hillary Clinton as "corrupt":

"It's important that there be examples of accountability. The resignation [of DNC Chair, Debbie Wasserman Schultz] was an example of that..." Hillary has tried to immediately produce a counter example by putting out a statement, within hours, saying that Debbie Wasserman Schultz is a great friend, and that she'll incorporate her into the Clinton campaign, while she also helps Schultz with her re-election campaign to Congress.

"So that's a very interesting signal by Hillary Clinton, that if you act in a corrupt way that benefits Hillary Clinton, you will be taken care of. Why does she need to put that out?...It's a very destructive signal for a future presidency..."

Romanian hacker, Guccifer has claimed responsibility for the DNC breach. He was extradited to the US in May 2016 for hacking the email- and social media accounts of some US officials and several members of the Bush family, releasing eerie self-portraits painted by George W Bush. 

Guccifer has plead guilty in US Federal Court to Unauthorized Access to a Protected Computer and Aggravated Identity Theft, as part of a plea bargain with Federal Prosecutors. He claims to have hacked Hillary's server while in the Alexandria City Prison near Washington, DC, where he's ben detained since last May and scheduled to be sentenced on September 1st.

Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, Robby Mook has put "national security" spin on it. (So much for Hillary's claims that there were never any work-related or high-security emails on her home server!) Citing "experts", whom he refused to name, Mook alleged that the emails were "leaked by the Russians to help Donald Trump." 

Assange says he's seen the allegations of one of these so-called "experts", a man the WikiLeaks staff jokingly refers to as the "NSA dick pic guy." John Schindler, a former NSA agent-cum-Conservative pundit skyrocketed to Twittersphere stardom (if you can call it that!) by being rabidly anti-Snowden, when that story initially broke in 2013. Assange says that Schindler at that time "started to produce incredible conspiracy theories about WikiLeaks [e.g., that Russia had supplied them with the DNC emails].

Unfortunately for Schindler, he was subsequently caught up in a sexting scandal, in which he allegedly sent a Twitter message with an attached picture of his privates to a woman follower who was not his wife. "That's why they don't want to name their sources," says Assange, "because they are people like this!"

There is a very hilarious Gawker link that I could put here with that cringeworthy thread (and image) - but this isn't that kind of site. You can look it up, though! :-)

After deleting his social media accounts and laying low for a while, Schindler has just re-emerged with his old chestnut about Russian involvement in the DNC hack on July 25th in The Observer.

What's much more disturbing than these revelations of embarrassing, unethical and potentially illegal conduct is this pervasive propaganda that "the Russians" are behind the the DNC hack.

The FBI has now jumped on the bandwagon, saying it will investigate whether the Russians were indeed involved, in addition to investigating if Hillary's close associates had also been "attacked" by the Russians.

Recall that FBI Director, James Comey has already said under oath that there was no "direct evidence" that Russia or "any other power" had successfully hacked into Clinton's server!

All of this, in my view screams that the Deep State is desperate for the US to go to war with Russia - which Hillary has made clear that she would very happily oblige in carrying out, as Commander-in-Chief. 

In a recent twist to this story, Donald Trump said on Wednesday, "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing." The Clinton campaign histrionically seized on Trump's off-the-cuff realpolitik by accusing him of encouraging Russian espionage against the US and encouraging Russian meddling in domestic politics. 

(As if the Russians don't already have that information! Who are they kidding?)

Pete Hoekstra, a former Michigan Congressman and former Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee said, "Trump is bringing up a fairly valid point: Hillary Clinton with her personal email at the State Department, has put the Russians in an enviable position. Most likely, the Russians have all that info on Hillary."

But WHO is REALLY in kahoots with the Russian government? It was Hillary Clinton who, as Secretary of State signed off a deal, that has now given Vladimir Putin control of 20% of ALL the US' uranium production. Soon after that deal was made, Bill Clinton made a $500k speech in Moscow! This is how mindless and insane their greed is! Not only does she want a nuclear war with Russia, she's basically arming them - and making a tidy profit in the process! Please, these people are sputtering lunatics, they must go away!

TRANSCRIPT

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: The Democratic National Convention is opening today in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, amid massive party turmoil. Democratic National Committee chairwoman and Florida Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz has resigned following the release of nearly 20,000 emails revealing how the Democratic Party favored Hillary Clinton and worked behind the scenes to discredit and defeat Bernie Sanders. The emails were released Friday by WikiLeaks.

In one email, DNC Chief Financial Officer Brad Marshall suggested someone ask Sanders about his religion ahead of the Kentucky and West Virginia contests. Brad Marshall wrote, quote, "It might may no difference, but for KY and WVA can we get someone to ask his belief. Does he believe in a God. He had skated on saying he has a Jewish heritage. I think I read he is an atheist. This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist," unquote. In another email, Debbie Wasserman Schultz calls Sanders’ campaign manager Jeff Weaver a, quote, "Damn liar."

AMY GOODMAN: A third email shows National Press Secretary Mark Paustenbach writing, quote, "Wondering if there’s a good Bernie narrative for a story, which is that Bernie never ever had his act together, that his campaign was a mess," unquote. Multiple emails show the DNC complaining about MSNBC coverage of the party and of Communications Director Luis Miranda once writing, quote, "F***ing Joe claiming the system is rigged, party against him, we need to complain to their producer," unquote, referring to Joe Scarborough. Other emails suggest the DNC was gathering information on Sanders’ events and that a super PAC was paying people to counter Sanders supporters online.

On Sunday, Bernie Sanders reacted to the emails during an interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos.

SEN. BERNIE SANDERS: I told you a long time ago that the—that the DNC was not running a fair operation, that they were supporting Secretary Clinton. So what I suggested to be true six months ago turns out, in fact, to be true. I’m not shocked, but I am disappointed. ... What I also said many months ago is that, for a variety of reasons, Debbie Wasserman Schultz should not be chair of theDNC. And I think these emails reiterate that reason why she should not be chair. I think she should resign, period. And I think we need a new chair who is going to lead us in a very different direction.

AMY GOODMAN: WikiLeaks has not revealed the source of the leaked emails, although in June a hacker using the name Guccifer 2.0 claimed responsibility for the hacking into the DNC’s computer network. On Sunday, however, Clinton’s campaign manager claimed the emails were leaked, quote, "by the Russians for the purpose of helping Donald Trump," unquote.

We go now to London for an exclusive interview with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who has been holed up in the Ecuadorean Embassy for more than four years. He was granted political asylum by Ecuador, but he fears if he attempts to go to Ecuador, if he attempts to step foot outside the Ecuadorean Embassy, that he will be arrested by British police and ultimately extradited to the United States to face, well, it’s believed, possibly treason charges for the documents WikiLeaks has released.

Julian Assange, editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks, welcome to Democracy Now! Can you talk about this email—these emails, these 20,000 emails you have released?

JULIAN ASSANGE: Yeah, it’s quite remarkable what has happened the last few days. I think this is a quite a classical release, showing the benefit of producing pristine data sets, presenting them before the public, where there’s equal access to all journalists and to interested members of the public to mine through them and have them in a citable form where they can then be used to prop up certain criticisms or political arguments. Often it’s the case that we have to do a lot of exploration and marketing of the material we publish ourselves to get a big political impact for it. But in this case, we knew, because of the pending DNC, because of the degree of interest in the U.S. election, we didn’t need to establish partnerships with The New York Times or The Washington Post. In fact, that might be counterproductive, because they are partisans of one group or another. Rather, we took the data set, analyzed it, verified it, made it in a presentable, searchable form, presented it for all journalists and the public to mine. And that’s exactly what has happened.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: And, Julian, your reaction to the announced resignation of Debbie Wasserman Schultz shortly after the release of these emails?

JULIAN ASSANGE: Well, I mean, that’s interesting. We have seen that with a lot of other publications. I guess there’s a question: What does that mean for the U.S. Democratic Party? It is important for there to be examples of accountability. The resignation was an example of that. Now, of course, Hillary Clinton has tried to immediately produce a counter-example by putting out a statement, within hours, saying that Debbie Wasserman Schultz is a great friend, and she’s incorporating her into her campaign, she’s going to be pushing for her re-election to the Congress.

So that’s a very interesting signaling by Hillary Clinton that if you act in a corrupt way that benefits Hillary Clinton, you will be taken care of. Why does she need to put that out? Certainly, it’s not a signal that helps with the public at all. It’s not a signal that helps with unity at the DNC, at the convention. It’s a signal to Hillary Clinton partisans to keep on going on, you’ll be taken care of. But it’s a very destructive signal for a future presidency, because it’s—effectively, it’s expanding the Overton window of corruption. It doesn’t really matter what you do, how you behave; as long as that is going to benefit Hillary Clinton, you’ll be protected.

AMY GOODMAN: I mean, it’s very interesting, because Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine appeared together, as Mike Pence and Donald Trump did the week before, on 60 Minutes. And Hillary Clinton distanced herself from all these emails and the DNC, saying, "These people didn’t work for me." And yet immediately upon the forced resignation of Deborah Wasserman Schultz, she said she’s a good friend, and immediately hired her. But, Julian, I was wondering if you can say, from your point of view, what do you think are the most significant emails that have been released, that you have released?

JULIAN ASSANGE: Well, actually, I think the most significant ones haven’t been reported on, although The Washington Post late last night and McClatchy did a first initial stab at it. And this is the spreadsheets that we released covering the financial affairs of the DNC. Those are very rich documents. There’s one spreadsheet called "Spreadsheet of All Things," and it includes all the major U.S.—all the major DNCdonors, where the donations were brought in, who they are, identifiers, the total amounts they’ve donated, how much at a noted or particular event, whether that event was being pushed by the president or by someone else. That effectively maps out the influence structure in the United States for the Democratic Party, but more broadly, because the—with few exceptions, billionaires in the United States make sure they donate to both parties. That’s going to provide a scaffold for future investigative journalism about influence within the United States, in general.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Julian, on that issue, clearly, a lot of the emails talk about the actual amounts of money that were being offered to donors for the opportunity to—I mean, asked of donors for the opportunity to sit at different events next to President Obama, especially, the use of President Obama as a fundraiser. Now, most people in the political world will consider this business as usual, but the actual mechanics of how this operates and the degree to which the DNC coordinates with the president, his marketability, is—I don’t think has ever been revealed in this detail. Would you agree?

JULIAN ASSANGE: That’s right. And it’s not just that the president holds fundraisers. That’s nothing new. But rather, what you get for each donation of a particular sort. There’s even a phrase used in one of the emails of, quote, "pay to play." So, yeah, I think it’s extremely interesting. There’s emails back and forth also between the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC. So, you see quite elaborate structures of money being funneled to state Democratic Party officers and then teleported back, seemingly to get up certain stats, maybe to evade certain campaign funding restrictions.

In relation to what has become the most significant political discussion as a result of the publication, which is that the DNC higher-ups, including Debbie Wasserman Schultz, were clearly against Bernie Sanders and trying to subvert his campaign in a whole raft of ways, that’s true. That’s the—the atmosphere that is revealed by hundreds of emails is that it’s perfectly acceptable to produce trenchant internal criticisms of Bernie Sanders and discuss ways to undermine his campaign. So, whether that’s calling up the president of MSNBC—Debbie Wasserman Schultz called the president of MSNBC to haul Morning Joe into line, which it subsequently has done. I noticed this morning, Morning Joe actually discussed it themselves, trying to shore up their own presentation of, you know, a TV program that can’t be pushed around. But, in fact, they did not mention the call to the president. That was something that is still unspeakable. And it was a 180-degree flip in that coverage.

And you see other, you know, quite naked conspiracies against Bernie Sanders. While there’s been some discussion, for example, about—that there was a plan to use—to expose Bernie Sanders as an atheist, as opposed to being a religious Jew, and to use that against him in the South to undermine his support there. There was an instruction by the head of communications, Luis Miranda, to take an anti-Bernie Sanders story, that had appeared in the press, and spread that around without attribution, not leaving their fingerprints on it. And that was an instruction made to staff. So, it wasn’t just, you know, a plan that may or may not have been carried out. This was an instruction that was pushed to DNC staff to covertly get out into the media anti-Bernie Sanders stories. Another thing that—

AMY GOODMAN: On Sunday, Hillary—

JULIAN ASSANGE: Another aspect that is—

AMY GOODMAN: On Sunday, Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager, Robby Mook, cited experts saying that the DNC emails were leaked by the Russians in an attempt to help Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump. Mook was speaking to CNN. This is what he said.

ROBBY MOOK: What’s disturbing to us is that we—experts are telling us that Russian state actors broke into the DNC, stole these emails, and other experts are now saying that they are—the Russians are releasing these emails for the purpose of actually helping Donald Trump. I don’t think it’s coincidental that these emails were released on the eve our convention here. We also saw last week at the Republican convention that Trump and his allies made changes to the Republican platform to make it more pro-Russian. And we saw him talking about how NATO shouldn’t intervene to defend—necessarily should intervene to defend our Eastern European allies if they’re attacked by Russia. So, I think when you put all this together, it’s a disturbing picture.

AMY GOODMAN: So, that was Robby Mook citing experts saying the DNC emails were leaked by the Russians. You were the one who released these 20,000 emails, Julian Assange. Where did you get them?

JULIAN ASSANGE: Well, what’s not in that clip there by Robby is that, just afterwards, he was asked by Jake Tapper, "Who are these experts? Can you name them?" The answer was no, a refusal to name the experts. But we have seen one of the experts, so-called experts, that the Democratic Party is trying to base its incredible conspiracy theory on about WikiLeaks. And that is this—what we jokingly refer to as the NSA dick pic guy. He’s a former National Security Agency agent who started to produce conspiracy theories about us in 2013, when we were involved in the Edward Snowden rescue, as a means to try and undermine the Snowden publications, subsequently embroiled in some amateur pornography scandal. That’s why they don’t want to name their experts, because they are people like this.

In relation to sourcing, I can say some things. A, we never reveal our sources, obviously. That’s what we pride ourselves on. And we won’t in this case, either. But no one knows who our source is. It’s simply speculation. It’s, I think, interesting and acceptable to speculate who our sources are. But if we’re talking about the DNC, there’s lots of consultants that have access, lots of programmers. And the DNC has been hacked dozens and dozens of times. Even according to its own reports, it had been hacked extensively over the last few years. And the dates of the emails that we published are significantly after all, or all but one—it’s not clear—of the hacking allegations that the DNC says have occurred.

---

The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

Source: http://www.democracynow.org/2016/7/25/exclusive_wikileaks_julian_assange_on_releasing