Turkey’s
Lose-Lose Coup Attempt
July
16, 2016
Turkish
President Erdogan has abetted jihadist terror and cracked down on political
dissent – making him a contributor to Mideast troubles – but a military
coup is the wrong way to remove him, says ex-CIA official Graham E. Fuller.
By
Graham E. Fuller
The
dismaying coup events in Turkey may take some time to be resolved. But one
thing is already clear — this attempt at military intervention, however the
final scenario plays itself out, is a disastrous lose-lose event for everyone
in Turkey.
If
the military coup against President Recep Tayyip Erdogan “succeeds,” we will
have witnessed the return to the ugly tradition of military intervention
involving at least four past coups against legitimately elected governments.
Nearly all observers (including myself) believed that the half century of regular
military coups were finally over.
President
Barack Obama walks along the Colonnade at the White House with then-Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey, Dec. 7, 2009. (Official White House
Photo by Pete Souza)
The
governing AK Party had seemingly successfully banished the military at
long last back to the barracks, with the grateful support of most of the
country. If this coup “succeeds,” it plunges Turkey back into the same trap of
“tutelary oversight” by the military that had been the ugly hallmark of earlier
Turkish governance.
Coups
generally leave disastrous legacies in countries that are working towards
established democracy. How legitimate can any successor government be, when
elected with the assistance of the military that pulled the plug on the last
government?
AKP
supporters who represent the biggest single political bloc in Turkey right now
are appropriately enraged at this blatantly illegal effort to overthrow
their legitimately elected government. If those seeking to remove Erdogan are
doing so on the basis of his domestic religious policies, it will confirm the
belief of the large traditional religious segment of the population that the
military and the old guard secularists and “Ataturkists,” as usual, are
anti-Islam.
At
a time when externally supported jihadi Islamist movements like ISIS have
wreaked havoc in Turkey through their devastating terrorist acts, the factor of
religion in domestic politics will be ratcheted up several notches in an
dangerous way.
Erdogan
will appear a victim to his party’s large number of followers — even a “martyr”
if he is jailed. A jailed Erdogan — a legitimately elected president — will be
a dangerous presence to any successor government that will operate under the
stigma of serving at the discretion of the military.
Class
and ideological lines in Turkey will be intensified and move into the realm of
more regular political violence. The unresolved Kurdish struggle is likely to
grow more violent as well.
A
Challenge for Secularists
Turkish
liberals and secularist Kemalists who had come to loathe Erdogan face the
choice of either accepting another coup crippling the democratic order, or
supporting Erdogan as a legitimate leader despite their intense dislike of his
policies.
Today’s
Turkey blends the ancient with the modern.
For
many liberals, a coup will be perceived as institutionally worse than Erdogan’s
arbitrary, autocratic, willful, erratic and self-serving policies of the past
few years.
The
military will likely be deeply divided over the issue, also not a healthy as
the tradition of military intervention into politics is resuscitated yet again.
Some kind of broad civil conflict could well emerge that will require military
intervention to keep order.
If
Erdogan succeeds in crushing the coup, the outlook is hardly better. The
military actors involved will have demonstrated their incompetence and their
constitutional unreliability. Their institutional prestige will suffer
markedly. Worse, Erdogan’s illiberal and authoritarian tendencies, which
had grown increasingly disturbing over the past few years, will be hugely
strengthened. He will
grow more paranoid and self-obsessed.
The
events will provide him with far more compelling grounds for further crushing
of political opposition. Erdogan had already moved to undercut a free press and
an independent judiciary and has been seeking to arrogate to himself new powers
of a “super-presidency” via constitutional change.
An
Erdogan who has survived a coup attempt will be far harsher, vindictive and
illiberal and will unleash greater political and judicial powers against
political opposition.
Erdogan’s
mistakes, failings and the growing corruption of his government have already
massively discredited his administration. He has been in the process of
discrediting and undermining the long series of remarkable accomplishments of
his party’s first decade of rule.
It
is imperative that Erdogan be removed from power the same way he came to power
— by the ballot box. His increasingly irresponsible administration must be
voted down and out of office, putting effective end to his claim to being a
successful leader any more.
Removing
Erdogan by force protects him from the final repudiation — by the voters. No
one knows exactly at what point the majority of voters would have turned
against him, but that is the process by which all democracies remove failing
politicians whose term of office comes to an end. A coup rescues him from such
electoral defeat.
Spread
of Terrorism
The
military, or those elements that attempted the coup, may justify their
intervention on the basis of rising disorder in Turkey due to the recent spread
of terrorism. Erdogan’s disastrous foreign policies over the past few years,
and especially in Syria greatly contributed to the rise of jihadi
terrorism in Turkey, largely carried out by non-Turks. (These recent foreign
policy failures stand in bold contrast to his inspired and successful foreign
policies of his early years.)
F-15
Eagles taxi to the runway at 3rd Main Jet Base, Turkey, on June 18,
2015.(U.S. Air Force photo/Tech. Sgt. Eric Burks)
The
coup plotters could conceivably gain some public support for their actions by
claiming the need to maintain order in the country in the wake of
devastating foreign-inspired terrorist attacks, rather than simply opposing
Erdogan’s domestic policies. But if they justify their actions on the basis of
“protecting Turkish secularism” they fall into the same tired Kemalist
ideological line that has justified every single Turkish coup in modern
history.
However
much Erdogan has exploited religion in his policies, his other failings are far
more serious, and “defense of secularism” provides no credible justification
for military action.
Whether
the coup “succeeds” or fails, it has already done irreparable damage to
Turkey’s political tradition and its political future. It besmirches Turkey’s
international standing which had seemingly emerged into the bloc of democratic
states that had appeared to put an end to force and military intervention in
their domestic politics.
However
this coup event comes out, Turkey and Turkish politics have lost badly. Erdogan
indeed deserves to be defeated on many grounds. But it must be by the ballot
box, not by a military coup.
Graham
E. Fuller is a former senior CIA official, author of numerous books on the
Muslim World; his latest book is Breaking Faith: A novel of espionage
and an American’s crisis of conscience in Pakistan. (Amazon, Kindle) grahamefuller.com
000
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.