Hillary Clinton: Electing a “Foreign Spy” for
President?
During her 4 years as Secretary of State of the
United States (2009-2014), Hillary Clinton controlled US foreign policy.
She had access to the most confidential information and state documents,
numbering in the tens of thousands, from all of the major government
departments and agencies, Intelligence, FBI, the Pentagon, Treasury and the
office of the President.
She had unfettered access to vital and secret
information affecting US policy in all the key regions of the empire.
Prof. James Petras
Today, Mme. Clinton’s critics have focused on the technical aspects of
her violations of State Department procedures and guidelines regarding handling
of official correspondences and her outright lies on the use of her own private
e-mail server for official state business, including the handling of highly
classified material in violation of Federal Records laws, as well as her hiding
official documents from the Freedom of Information Act and concocting her own
system exempt from the official oversight which all other government officials
accept.
For many analysts, therefore, the issue is procedural, moral and
ethical. Mme. Clinton had placed herself above and beyond the norms of
State Department discipline. This evidence of her arrogance, dishonesty
and blatant disregard for rules should disqualify her from becoming the
President of the United States. While revelations of Clinton’s
misuse of official documents, her private system of communication and
correspondence and the shredding of tens of thousands of her official interchanges,
including top secret documents, are important issues to investigate, these do
not address the paramount political question: On whose behalf was
Secretary Clinton carrying out the business of US foreign policy, out of the
review of government oversight?
The Political Meaning and Motivation of
Clinton’s High Crimes Against the State
Secretary Clinton’s private, illegal handling of official US documents
has aroused a major FBI investigation into the nature of her activities.
This is separate from the investigation by the Office of the Inspector General
and implies national security violations.
There are several lines of inquiry against Mme. Clinton:
(1) Did she work with, as yet unnamed, foreign governments
and intelligence services to strengthen their positions and against the
interest of the United States?
(2) Did she provide information on the operations and policy
positions of various key US policymakers to competitors, adversaries or allies
undermining the activities of military, intelligence and State Department officials?
(3) Did she seek to enhance her personal power within the US
administration to push her aggressive policy of serial pre-emptive wars over
and against veteran State Department and Pentagon officials who favored
traditional diplomacy and less violent confrontation?
(4) Did she prepare a ‘covert team’, using foreign or dual
national operative, to lay the groundwork for her bid for the presidency and
her ultimate goal of supreme military and political power?
Contextualizing Clinton’s Clandestine Operations
There is no doubt that Mme. Clinton exchanged minor as well as major
official documents and letters via her private e-mail system. Personal,
family and even intimate communications may have been carried on the same
server. But the key issue is that a large volume of highly confidential
government information flowed to Clinton via an unsecured private ‘back
channel’ allowing her to conduct state business secretly with her
correspondents.
Just who were Secretary Clinton’s most enduring, persistent and
influential correspondents? What types of exchanges were going on, which
required avoiding normal oversight and a wanton disregard for security?
Clinton’s covert war policies, which included the violent overthrow of
the elected Ukraine government, were carried out by her ‘Lieutenant’
Under-Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, a virulent neo-conservative holdover
from the previous Bush Administration and someone committed to provoking Russia
and to enhancing Israel’s power in the Middle East. Clinton’s highly
dangerous and economically destabilizing ‘brainchild’ of militarily encircling
China, the so-called ‘pivot to Asia’, would have required clandestine exchanges
with elements in the Pentagon – out of the State Department and possibly
Executive oversight.
In other words, within the Washington political circuit, Secretary
Clinton’s escalation of nuclear war policies toward Russia and China required
secretive correspondences which would not necessarily abide with the policies
and intelligence estimates of other US government agencies and with private
business interests.
Clinton was deeply engaged in private exchanges with several unsavory
overseas political regimes, including Saudi Arabia, Israel, Honduras and Turkey
involving covert violent and illegal activities. She worked with the
grotesquely corrupt opposition parties in Venezuela, Argentina and Brazil
Clinton’s correspondence with the Honduran armed forces and brutal
oligarchs led to the military coup against the elected President Zelaya, its
violent aftermath and the phony election of a pliable puppet. Given the
government-death squad campaign against Honduran civil society activists,
Clinton would certainly want to cover up her direct role in organizing the
coup. Likewise, Mme. Clinton would have destroyed her communications with
Turkish President Erdogan’s intelligence operations in support of Islamist
terrorist-mercenaries in Syria and Iraq.
Secretary Clinton’s e-mail would have shown her commitment to the Saudis
when they brutally invaded Bahrain and Yemen to suppress independent civil
society organizations and regional political rivals.
But it is Clinton’s long-term, large-scale commitment to Israel that
goes far beyond her public speeches of loyalty and fealty to the Jewish
state. Hillary Clinton’s entire political career has been intimately
dependent on Zionist money, Zionist mass media propaganda and Zionist
Democratic Party operations.
In exchange for Clinton’s dependence on political support from the
Zionist power configuration in the US, she would have become the major conduit
of confidential information from the US to Israel and the
transmission belt promoting Israel-centric policies within the US government.
The entire complex of Clinton-Israel linkages and correspondences has
compromised the US intelligence services, the State Department and Pentagon.
Secretary Clinton went to extraordinary lengths to serve Israel, even
undermining the interests of the United States. It is bizarre that
she would resort to such a crude measure, setting up a private e-mail server to
conduct state business. She blithely ignored official State Department
policy and oversight and forwarded over 1,300 confidential documents and 22
highly sensitive top-secret documents related to the ‘Special Access
Program’. She detailed US military and intelligence documents on US
strategic policies on Syria, Iraq, Palestine and other vital regimes. The
Inspector General’s report indicates that ‘she was warned’ about her
practice. It is only because of the unusual stranglehold Tel Aviv and
Israel’s US Fifth Column have over the US government and judiciary that her actions
have not been prosecuted as high treason. It is the height of hypocrisy
that government whistleblowers have been persecuted and jailed by the Obama
Administration for raising concerns within the Inspector General system of
oversight, while Secretary Clinton is on her way to the Presidency of the
United States!
Conclusion
Many of Clinton’s leading critics, among them two dozen former CIA
agents, have presented a myth that Hillary’s main offence is
her ‘carelessness’ in handling official documents and her deliberate deceptions
and lies to the government.
These critics have trivialized, personalized and
moralized what is really deliberate, highly politicized state
behavior. Mme. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was not ‘careless
in managing an insecure mail server’. If Clinton was engaged in
political liaison with foreign officials she deliberately used a private email
server to avoid political detection by security elements within the US
government. She lied to the US government on the use and destruction of
official state documents because the documents were political exchanges between
a traitor and its host.
The 22 top secret reports on ‘Special Access Programs’ which
Clinton handled via her private computer provided foreign governments with the
names and dates of US operatives and proxies; allowed for counter-responses
inflicting losses of billions of dollars in program damages and possibly lost
lives.
The Inspector General Report (IGP) deals only with the surface
misdeeds. The Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) has gone a step
further in identifying the political linkages, but faces enormous obstacles
from Hillary’s domestic allies in pursuing a criminal investigation. The
FBI, whose director is a political appointee, has suffered a series of
defeats in its attempts to investigate and prosecute spying to Israel,
including the AIPAC espionage case of Rosen and Weismann and in their long held
opposition to the release of the notorious US-Israeli spy, Jonathan
Pollard. The power of the Zionists within the government halted their
investigation of a dozen Israeli spies captured in the US right after the
attacks of September 11, 2001.
Clinton’s choice of conducting secret private communications,
despite several years of State Department warnings to abide by their
strict security regulations, is an indication of her Zionist power base, and
not a mere reflection of her personal hubris or individual arrogance.
Clinton has circulated more vital top-secret documents and classified
material than Jonathan Pollard.
President Obama and other top Cabinet officials share her political
alliances, but they operate through ‘legitimate’ channels and without
compromising personnel, missions, funding or programs.
The executive leadership now faces the problem of how to deal with a
traitor, who may be the Democratic Party nominee for US President, without
undermining the US quest for global power. How do the executive leadership and
intelligence agencies back a foreign spy for president, who has been deeply
compromised and can be blackmailed? This may explain why the FBI, NSA,
and CIA hesitate to press charges; hesitate to even seriously investigate,
despite the obvious nature of her offenses. Most of all it explains why
there is no indication of the identity of Secretary Clinton’s correspondents in
the various reports so far available.
As
Sherlock Holmes would say, “We are entering in deep waters, Watson”.
The original source of this article is Global Research
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.