A Traitor’s Story
The story described by the author about the possible
escape or abduction of girls from a North Korean restaurant to China, brought about a series of comments, some of
which contained the assertion that “it is impossible for a North Korean woman
to end up in the South against her will, and then afterwards demand to be
returned back.” Unfortunately, a similar story is currently the cause for
widespread petition. It involves Kim Ryon-hui, a citizen of North Korea, who is demanding to be returned home from
South Korea. How could this happen?
46-year-old
Kim worked as a dressmaker, and came from a fairly wealthy family by Pyongyang
standards. Four years ago, she travelled to China to visit relatives and
receive medical treatment as she was suffering from some kind of kidney
disease. The treatment proved to be long and far from free-of-charge. Kim did
not want to ask her relatives for help, and her waitress’ salary (Kim got a job
in a restaurant in Shenyang) was not enough to cover the cost of the expensive
treatment.
Around
this time, brokers appeared in Kim’s life. These are people who, according to
South Korean official statements, engage in the noble smuggling of North
Koreans to the “peninsula of freedom.” One broker told her that Chinese
citizens often travel to South Korea and earn a lot of money there. Kim wanted
to restore her health and go home and thought that by going to South Korea for
a couple of months, she would be able to earn enough for her treatment and then
return home. Therefore, this gullible woman was deceived from the outset –
Chinese Koreans, who often pretend to be refugees, are actively sought out and
captured in the South. What’s more, a lot of problems arise owing to illegal
immigrants from China.
Kim
joined a group of refugees who were supposed to move to the South. At that
point, she did not realize that as soon as she signed the documents according
to which she would relinquish her North Korean citizenship, she would have no
way back.
Anyway,
as soon as she began to suspect something, the broker took away her North
Korean passport, and the other “refugees” told her that if she left the group
and got caught, everything would fall into the hands of Chinese state security,
and they would have big problems. So she was forced to stay within the group,
and thus ended up in the South.
Kim did
not really understand what was really meant by defector status, but on arrival
in South Korea, it was revealed to her that there was no way back, and
propaganda already labeled her as having “chosen freedom.” To leave the
rehabilitation center, Kim had to sign documents in which she rejected
communism, and in which she declared that she was willing to abide by South
Korean law and become a citizen of the South Korean Republic.
Becoming
a political refugee was absolutely not part of Mrs. Kim’s plans, whose family
had been left behind. Therefore, she began to demand that they return her back
home. However, according to South Korean regulations, this was not possible –
defectors cannot leave the country once they have received citizenship. Kim
called the North Korean consulate in Shenyang. She also looked for smugglers
who could get her back. However, eventually, she hit upon a highly unusual and,
in fact, incredibly stupid option – she declared herself a North Korean spy,
hoping that after she had been deported to the North, the problem would be
solved and the case closed. However, according to South Korean law, a spy who
has been captured does not await deportation, but jail time. As a result, in
December 2014, she was sentenced to two years in prison for espionage and
passport forgery. 9 months after she had been imprisoned (during which time Kim
fell into severe depression and attempted suicide), the sentence was
conditionally suspended.
Soon
after Kim had been released, her story drew the attention of journalists and
progressive circles. There was a wave of interested people who were largely
sympathetic to her, including Christian pastors as well as CNN reporter Will
Ripley, who sat with Kim in a detailed interview. During the interview, Kim, in
particular, said: “I have nothing to say, but I couldn’t even imagine that I
would end up creating such a big problem for myself.”
CNN correspondents arrived in Pyongyang and managed
to talk with her husband and daughter, who had not seen her for
fouryears. This video and Kim’s response are available
online. Her relatives did not brand her as a traitor, but instead, displayed
the usual reaction that people who have been separated and missing their loved
one for a long time usually show. Nor did they start saying that she had gone
missing in China in order to hide the fact that she had escaped. Actually, it
is also of note that that after the news of Kim’s escape had broken out, her
father and daughter were not punished.
Kim misses her father and daughter, and lives in
Daegu, where she works at the waste processing plant as an operator, and
periodically undergoes medical examinations, all the while continuing to try
and return home. On March 7, 2016, Kim tried to get political asylum at
the Vietnamese Embassy ( ). Two hours later, the police brought her back.
At one
particular press conference, Kim said: All this freedom, wealth and other
temptations of local life mean nothing compared to my family and home that I
left back in the North. I want to return to my family, even if I get there and
die of starvation.” “Most of all, I would like all of North Korea to understand
that I am not and was never a traitor, and I never forgot about the motherland
for even a moment.”
What does
the author think about this? Well, we have a woman who can’t be described as
particularly smart, who was attracted by false promises by a broker and ended
up remaining in the South against her will. What prevented the South Korean
authorities from bringing her back home immediately, thereby demonstrating
their generosity and willingness not to use human error for propaganda?
This
would have been a beautiful and important step: see, some other countries have
started to turn the story around into a story about choosing freedom and
completely disregard and destroy a person’s life because of modern-day
propaganda. But we live in a democratic country, and respect human free choice,
even if someone wants to “go back into the darkness.” We do not agree with that
choice, but we cannot prevent it – this is the essence of freedom. After all,
the South periodically returns fishermen to the North who, because of a storm
or navigational error, end up stranded in South Korean waters. Some of these
fishermen choose to stay, but quite often, people say “no” to the offer to stay
and they are returned back to the North. The most recent story of this kind
occurred just recently, on June 8, 2016
A North
Korean fishing vessel crossed the Northern border line in the Eastern Sea, but
when it became clear that the fishermen had simply sailed off course and
expressed their desire to return to the North, they were ushered into North
Korean territory that very day.
How is
this situation fundamentally different?
Of
course, the fate of Kim, who is seeking to return home, is rather an exception
to the rule, although it is not the only example of how the people who spend
time in the South for one reason or another begin to seek ways to get back to
the North. In spite of a much better standard of living, material well-being,
as it turns out, can’t be used as a measure of absolutely everything. Not
everyone can manage to get by with “second class” citizen status. Generally
speaking, the average South Korean can suffer irreparable damage to his
reputation if ever he admitted to being married to a Northerner.
So we
would like to see Kim Ryon-hui’s story with a happy ending. We wish this woman
with a tragic fate success in finally reuniting with her loving family that has
been waiting for her for a long time, and that the South Korean government
displays wisdom and prudence.
Konstantin
Asmolov, Ph.D. in History, Chief Research Fellow at the Center for Korean
Studies of the Institute of Far Eastern Studies of the Russian Academy of
Sciences, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”http://journal-neo.org/2016/06/21/a-traitor-s-story/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.