News about US Election Frauds, Collusion and Other Shenanigans to get Hillary Clinton Elected
By courtesy of Jean Hudon
This
compilation will be of keen interest to those who closely follow the primaries
in the US and the upcoming presidential elections...
As
a complement to the material sent to me by Dan Stafford (further below), check
also...
Why Many
Bernie Sanders Supporters Will Soon be Abandoning the Democratic Party -
And Why Their Super-Delegates Will Some Day Regret Sabotaging His Candidacy
(...)
Is Donald Trump, who spent most of the past few decades as a Democrat and
personal friend to the Clinton family, trying to drive the Republican party
into a ditch? Simple logic would suggest he is not - a Trump presidential
campaign that goes down in flames would put him in a place of deep dislike
among much of the American people, and the effect on his brand, businesses, and
celebrity would be bad enough for him personally that he probably would never
attempt such an elaborate scheme, even to help his closest friends. But as
George Will pointed out, it matters little what Trump's original intention was.
His campaign is turning into exactly the kind that someone would run if they
wanted to deliberately hand the election to the Democrats. Trump has already
gone out of his way to offend several important groups - women, a war hero, the
mighty media, Mexicans, and again, Mexicans.
Of
course, this is all by design to ensure Hillary Clinton will win by a landslide
and have a free rein to impose her will on the US and and much of the world and
further the Illuminati's agenda discussed last weekend at the Bilderberg's
meeting in Germany. (see Bilderberg
Chooses Hillary Clinton for 2016?)
BUT!!!...
Julian
Assange, the founder of Wikileaks, claimed on Sunday that he is preparing to
release another slate of emails recovered from Hillary Clinton's private server
that could possibly provide enough evidence for her indictment. (...) Assange
also called Clinton a "liberal war hawk," citing emails in which she
advocated for overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi in Libya. "They predicted that
the postwar outcome would be something like it is Š she has a long history of
being a liberal war hawk," Assange said.Assange believes that Clinton is
starting to feel the pressure from organizations like Wikileaks who have
demanded her to be more transparent. "She has pushed for the prosecution
of Wikileaks," Assange noted about Clinton. "We do see her as a bit
of problem for freedom of the press more generally."
Julian Assange
Knows FBI Won't Indict Hillary, Will Seek Concessions From Her Administration (14
Jun 2016)
Julian
Assange: Next Leak of Hillary Clinton Emails Will Be Enough to Indict Her,
but... (doubts the FBI will do so... in his
opinion, the FBI would choose not to indict her in hopes of gaining favor with
a Clinton administration.)
POTUS
delays critical email release to protect Entitled Establishment Darling ...
Despite his repeated claims of not influencing the Department of Justice and
FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email server scandal, Obama
has helped shield her throughout the fiasco. The White House has protected
Clinton's emails with the most potential to incriminate or impugn Clinton's
self-portrayed public image.
*
* * * * *
The
following material has been sent to me by Dan Stafford <aquarianm@gmail.com>
Stanford
University Confirms Democratic Election Fraud (June 16, 2016)
A
bombshell study released by Stanford University confirms evidence of election
fraud during the 2016 Democratic Party primaries. According to a paper released
this week entitled, "Are we witnessing a dishonest election?," a
state comparison based on the voting procedures used during the election reveals
endemic election fraud within the system. Given the stakes in the outcome of
the American presidential elections, ensuring the integrity of the electoral
process is of the utmost importance. Are the results we are witnessing in the
2016 primary elections trustworthy? While Donald Trump enjoyed a clear and
early edge over his Republican rivals, the Democratic contest between former
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Senator Bernard Sanders has been far
more competitive. At present, Secretary Clinton enjoys an apparent advantage
over Sanders. Is this claimed advantage legitimate? We contend that it is not,
and suggest an explanation for the advantage: States that are at risk for
election fraud in 2016 systematically and overwhelmingly favor Secretary
Clinton. We provide converging evidence for this claim. First, we show that it
is possible to detect irregularities in the 2016 Democratic Primaries by
comparing the states that have hard paper evidence of all the placed votes to
states that do not have this hard paper evidence. Second, we compare the final
results in 2016 to the discrepant exit polls. Furthermore, we show that no such
irregularities occurred in the 2008 competitive election cycle involving
Secretary Clinton against President Obama. As such, we find that in states
wherein voting fraud has the highest potential to occur, systematic efforts may
have taken place to provide Secretary Clinton with an exaggerated margin of
support. CLIP
EXPOSED:
Leaked Emails Show DNC Colluded with Media to Push Clinton Nomination - Occupy
Liberals (June 16, 2016)
Despite
claims of neutrality, recently leaked emails show the Democratic National
Committee was putting its thumb on the scale for Hillary Clinton for over a
year. When it was revealed that "Guccifer 2.0"
(named after Romanian hacker Guccifer, who confessed to hacking into Hillary
Clinton's private email server multiple times) hacked the DNC's servers, the
main story was about leaked opposition research on Donald Trump. But on the
same site Guccifer published the Trump research, "2016 GOP presidential
candidates," there were also DNC talking points suggesting the party's
central organization had been working since May of 2015 to make Hillary Clinton
the nominee. CLIP - Check also Guccifer 2.0
claims responsibility for cyber attack on Democrats
Could
California Flip for Bernie Sanders? (June 15, 2016)
Nearly
2 Million Votes Are Still Uncounted - Bernie Supporters Are Gathering
Volunteers to Help Count the Remaining Ballots - Concern about Election Fraud
in California and Other States Is Growing
2.5
Million Untallied Votes in CA, Mass Voter Purge in OH, and Other Stuff That
Still Matters (6/10/2016)
On
today's BradCast, while the Democratic Party and the mainstream corporate media
may have moved on --- and Elizabeth Warren may feel ready to be
Commander-in-Chief if tapped as Vice President --- there are millions of
still-untallied ballots in the state of California. Meanwhile, in the key
Presidential swing-state of Ohio, Democrats are being disproportionately purged
from the voting rolls by state Republicans in advance of the 2016 general
election. Yes, democracy actually still matters, and that includes counting the
ballots of all the legal voters who wish to vote, counting them accurately, and
in a way that we can know they have been counted accurately. While we've been
reporting this week, often exclusively, on the huge number of still untallied
ballots --- both Provisional and Vote-by-Mail ballots --- here in Los Angeles
County, ever since Tuesday's Presidential Primary, new data now reveals the
totals are even higher than we've so far reported, both in L.A. and across the
state. With some 3.5 million ballots now tallied in the Democratic Primary, and
a 500,000 vote (appx. 13%) margin for Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders,
there are still some 2.5 million ballots that have yet to be tallied at all. We
discuss what that means and why it matters on today's program. CLIP
Judge
confirms 'criminal investigation' into Clinton emails (June 14, 2016)
The
FBI is conducting a high-stakes "criminal investigation" into former
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's email practices, a federal judge confirmed
Tuesday in a memo that said her tech guru can keep his immunity
agreement Emmet G. Sullivan, who has now reviewed the immunity
agreement between Bryan Pagliano and the Justice Department, said the document
should remain sealed "because the government's criminal investigation
through which Mr. Pagliano received limited immunity is ongoing and
confidential." PROMOTED CONTENTRecommended by Mr. Pagliano, who set up and
maintained the secret server Mrs. Clinton used to conduct government business,
has agreed to cooperate with the FBI in its probe in exchange for being
shielded from prosecution. But Judge Sullivan has ordered Mr. Pagliano testify
as part of an open-records lawsuit trying to figure out why the State
Department struggled to preserve and released Mrs. Clinton's emails, which were
official records supposed to be stored under federal law. Mr. Pagliano has indicated
he will refuse to answer any questions, asserting his Fifth Amendment right
against self-incrimination. He and his lawyers had asked that the deposition
not be videotaped, fearing it could be used eventually in political attacks
against Mrs. Clinton. Judge Sullivan, though, rejected that, saying the session
with Judicial Watch, the group that's pursuing the open-records lawsuit, can be
taped. But the video will be sealed until the judge decides later what to do
with it. "Mr. Pagliano is an important witness and we're pleased his
testimony will be videotaped," Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said.
The
Math of the Convention - National Convention: The Math, as it stands on June
15, 2016 https://johnlaurits.com/2016/06/15/the-math-of-the-convention/
(...)
29 States Haven't Certified Their Results &16 State Conventions Remain
(...) Something to Keep in MindŠRemember: now that all of the 4,051 pledged
delegates are "accounted for" (they shouldn't be, but that's another
issueŠ), every delegate that we gain - whether from state conventions, from
recounts, from updated California results, or from whatever else - each
delegate is taken from $hillary's total and added to Bernie Sanders' total. In
other words, while there are 385 delegates between C/inton & Sanders, we
only need half of that number to catch up - make sense? We don't need to gain
385 delegates - we only need to gain 193 delegates to take the lead. ... The bottom
line is this: as a movement, we are going to try to grab those 193 delegates in
any way that we can - that may seem like a really difficult thing to do &
that's because it pretty much is. It is not impossible, however. There is a
good amount of time between now & the convention - a lot of things could
happen in that time & we're going to have to use it well, if our social
revolution is to succeed! CLIP
Trust
Vote
(...)
IMPORTANT NOTE: Although we have taken note of the shift here from Sanders to
Clinton, we are NOT in any way stating who has done the shifting. WE DO NOT
KNOW WHO HAS DONE THE SHIFTING OF THE ELECTRONIC VOTE TOTALS. This situation
has galvanized three organizations, The Institute for American Democracy and
Election Integrity (ADE) , the Columbus Institute of Contemporary Journalism,
and Democracy Counts to set up our own exit polls and audits to track apparent
election results in California. Richard Charnin, a mathematician and
statistician and author of the book, Matrix of Deceit, has been reporting on
the apparent shifting of electronic vote totals and the non-release of raw data
from Edison since 2004. Richard Charnin, well-known for what he calls the
"Red Shift" which has been a shift between exit polls and electronic
vote total differences of about 4-5% each year. This constitutes a shift to the
political right.
(...)
As computer security expert Stephen Spoonamore notes in the video above, when
exit poll data varies more than 2% from electronic vote totals, the electronic
vote totals are questionnable. If fact, 2% is used as the boundary
by the US government when determining that the election in another country
other than the US has possibly been stolen. Please note the exit poll
differences up above that are more than 2%. These differences
point to questionable results for the electronic vote totals. For whatever
reason, the Media Consortium and Edison Research have decided to cancel the
exit polls for the remaining 2016 primaries. Some suspect these exit polls have
been canceled because these exit poll differences have become suspect. Others
believe it is because the Media Consortium has viewed these primaries as
unimportant with respect to the final results of the primaries for the
presidential candidates. Thus the remaining primary elections will not have the
larger exit polls to reflect on the accuracy of the electronic vote totals.
Check
also....
Election
Justice USA affirmed that a Capitol Weekly early-voter exit poll conducted
across the state of California yielded a 23 percent discrepancy in Los Angeles
vote-by-mail ballots compared to the actual results. During the polling of the
early round of mail-in voters, Hillary Clinton had a lead over Bernie Sanders
in the Los Angeles area that was less than 10 percent. Election Justice USA, a
voter advocacy non-profit organization, says that the discrepancy is enough to
demand a hand audit of the early mail-in ballots. "The discrepancy cannot
be easily explained by demographic factors: the results of the Capitol Weekly
exit poll were weighted by age and race. Moreover, the exit poll had 21,000
respondents and was praised by mainstream elections journalists.While no exit
poll can prove fraud, a significant exit polling discrepancy such as this
constitutes cause for alarm, and certainly one of this magnitude. It's also
sufficient cause for immediate action: voters should bring pressure to bear on
officials and demand an expanded hand audit." CLIP
Media
Coverage of the Primaries Was Awful, Harvard Study Confirms (June 14, 2016)
A
recently released Harvard study is accusing major print and broadcast media of
improperly influencing the presidential primaries in the months leading up to
the first contests.
Inspired
By Bernie, 'Sanders Democrats' Are Winning Primary Elections
http://www.inquisitr.com/3208429/inspired-by-bernie-sanders-democrats-are-winning-primary-elections/
It
looks like the sleeping giant is finally awakening. Throughout the nation,
Sanders Democrats, A.K.A. "Berniecrats," are winning local and
statewide elections. Throughout his campaign, Sanders has called for a
political revolution, the kind of revolution that inspires people to run for
office and inspires others to vote for them.
/https://www.niagarafallsreview.ca/content/dam/thestar/news/canada/2021/09/25/huawei-executive-meng-wanzhou-receives-warm-welcome-upon-return-to-china/_1_meng_wanzhou_2.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.