Arab Spring: The Fall of All Freedom
The United States of America leads western allies in
an unholy war on not just the Arab world, but against any nation that stands in
the way of total domination. The evidence of an underlying master plan grows
more prevalent each day. No one seems to have characterized what the ends of
this campaign will look like, but the stunningly diabolical strategy the Bush
and Obama presidencies undertook are there for all to see. Here is a window
into the greatest power play in history.
I was a bit surprised this morning,
when I came to the realization Libya’s Muammar Mohammed Abu Minyar Gaddafi was
among the richest men who ever lived. Experts now claim that Gaddafi was worth
somewhere in the neighborhood of $200 billion dollars when US backed rebels
tortured and killed him in October of 2011. Though I understood how Obama and
Hillary Clinton had played a role in his death, I had originally discounted
rumors and speculation he was killed over his billions, and over his leaning
away from the dollar as a preferred international exchange medium were
boundless. Today I discover Executive Order
13566 for the
first time, and Gaddafi’s death makes all the more sense in the overall
context. As it turns out, the Libyan leader was among the richest on Earth, and
the plan to do away with him originated at the highest levels of world
leadership. What’s more, a clear and systematic sequence of events can be
linked, a chain of evidence leads to the White House and beyond. Executive
Order 13566 was executed February 25th, 2011, just eight days after major
protests broke out against Gaddafi’s government. The order reads in part:
“I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the
United States of America, find that Colonel Muammar Qadhafi, his
government, and close associates have taken extreme measures against the people
of Libya, including by using weapons of war, mercenaries, and wanton violence
against unarmed civilians. I further find that there is a serious
risk that Libyan state assets will be misappropriated by Qadhafi, members of
his government, members of his family, or his close associates if those assets
are not protected.”
On this same day Stuart Levey, the
Treasury undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence who drafted
Executive Order 13566, put in action the plan to sequester billions stored in
banks around the U.S. Once US embassy personnel had been evacuated from Libya,
Obama’s people sprung into action with the help of bank employees who had been
waiting through the night. In all, some $30 billion in cash and liquid assets
were seized. As of the Summer of 2015, Gaddafi assets in the amount of $60 billion
had been seized by banks in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom.
These funds are now in limbo, as a nebulous leadership of the Libyan
Investment Authority (LIA) hides amid a shadowy world of global financiers. To
be blunt, the Gaddafi billions pay no benefit to the people of Libya, but only
to the bankers and speculators who leveraged the funds originally. $60 billion
in “loans” let’s say, may never be called in. At least this is a layman’s way
of understanding what is going on. Today multi-billion dollar lawsuits
against the likes of
Hillary Clinton supporters Goldman Sachs, infighting over who is in control of
the LIA, and countless under the table dealings further darken what was and is
a monumental stain on US international relationships. If this were the 1930s
and mafia land, there would be newspaper headlines accusing Barack Obama of
committing a heist on behalf of Wall Street. And the more evidence that crosses
WikiLeaks wires, the more clear Arab Spring’s real goals become. In one of the
most bizarre geo-political catastrophes ever, a British court may well decide
who is in charge of Gaddafi’s billions. The horde that the Obama White House
said belonged to the people of Libya, currently belongs on bankers’ balance
sheets. These banking and investment ties betray the more militaristic geo-policy
being played by the Obama White House.
The American, British, and EU
leadership have been busy as bees fueling chaos in the Arab world. As a by
product, the refugee and west versus east mess that blazes now further inhibit
peace and prosperity. It took me all of 10 seconds to find linkages and
curiosities via WikiLeaks. This cable from 2008 reveals the UK government
sanctioning three Libyan Islamists from an organization known as the Libyan
Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), a group known to have attempted the
assassination of Gaddafi, in order to install a more fundamentally extremist
regime. Interestingly, the US was not sought as a co-sponsor for labeling three
members terrorists under United Nations Security Council resolution 1267. Of
particular interest is a man named Maftah Mohamed ElMabruk, a key member of
LIFG, now an Al Qaeda cell group, who was protected by the British previously.
The names and alleged complicity in terror in this document stand in stark
contrast to the fact three Libyan terrorists were later found to be supplying
arms to the Syrian opposition of the regime of Bashar al-Assad. As it turned
out, the LIFG, working on behalf of the Libyan Islamist Abel Hakim Belhadj, was
being run by none other than Britain’s Blair and MI6.
It was the LIFG that MI6 used to
carry out several operations inside Libya, including the 1996 attempt to
assassinate Colonel Qaddafi. The group originated alongside al-Qaeda inside
Afghanistan, about the time US policymakers lured the USSR into that country in
what Carter administration National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski
bragged: “We now have the opportunity of giving to
the USSR its Vietnam war.” American policy having come full
circle, it’s crystal clear the American people have been totally misled. The useless
struggles of the past are now ushered into the spotlight. What’s even more
contemptible is the fact the EU is moving to restore valididity for these
jihadists. This story tells of one UN sanctioned LIFG operative named
Abdulbasit Abdulrahim being supported by the same EU refugees now pour
into. Whether or not Abdulrahim was a member of the LIFG or not, the idea the
US can make someone a terrorist one minute, and that the same terrorist is
redeemed by the EU the next, it speaks volumes for any argument against
paranoid security states. The Bush and Obama administrations have pushed the
boundaries of believability into the stratosphere.
The overthrow of Gaddafi by the
American administration, with the help of the United Nations, will go down in
history as the kindling of the most catastrophic foreign policy scheme in
history. The evidence surfacing now can only lead us to one conclusion. Take
the fact the former head of the LIFG, Norman Benotman is currently the
president of Quillam Foundation in London, and the fact he was in Tripoli
working with the British government at the time of Gaddafi’s demise, attest to
the dastardly and deep game of subterfuge affecting us all. Benotman Tweets today, in prolific and cryptic 140 characters that appear
insane, or at best unbalanced. Without delving into this character’s mysterious
past, suffice it to point out that Quilliam was established in 2007 by Ed
Husain, Maajid Nawaz and Rashad Zaman Ali, three former members of the Islamist
group Hizb ut-Tahrir. Named for the controversial William Quilliam, the society is based on the concept of a global
caliphate, its namesake having sworn allegiance to the Ottoman Empire. Though
the Quilliam organization appears outwardly to be a shill puppet of Britain’s
anti-extremist Islam operation, some experts wonder if the organization is not
operating in a “duality” of purpose. Either way, the intended goals of LIFG
have been well served by Benotman and other assets. From my perspective as a
dissenter to the mainstream propaganda, simply discovering Quilliam’s founding
father is Maajid Nawaz, Op-Ed master at the ubiquitous tabloid The Daily
Beast, is enough to categorize the organization as part of the problem, and no
the solution to world chaos. Ties in between Nawaz, the Next Gen Foundation Quilliam shares offices with in the US, and
ultimately former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, they whisper “double
agent” to me. This is only speculative on my part though. I won’t start
connecting the dots that lead to Google, the Clinton Foundation, and the neoconservative
lifelines holding up Clinton for President either. Our whole system becomes
suspect, as certainly it
must.
Finally, this WikiLeaks revelation further amplifies the Obama administration’s
duplicity in Gaddafi’s remise. Hillary Clinton’s staff was closely monitoring
the effects the Obama bank seizures were having on the Gaddafi government. Now
that the greater interest in Gaddafi billions by the likes of Clinton fans
Goldman Sachs has come to light, one has to wonder at the former Secretary of
State’s interests. Were these billions earmarked like other Clinton business
focused directives? WikiLeaks is an evidence treasure trove on Clinton
opportunism, one that only recently showed her conflict of interest where
places like Libya and corporate business are concerned. It seems fair to
predict that these American leaders, their counterparts in London, may soon be
under indictment for more than just illegal email servers. Clinton appeared
more interested in Gaddafi gold than in a peaceful resolution for Libya. I
quote from her communiqué of April 1, 2011, just after President Obama seized
upwards of $60 billion:
“On April 2, 2011 sources with access
to advisors to Salt al-Islam Qaddafi stated in strictest confidence that while
the freezing of Libya’s foreign bank accounts presents Muammar Qaddafi with
serious challenges, his ability to equip and maintain his armed forces and
intelligence services remains intact. According to sensitive information
available to this these individuals, Qaddafi’s government holds 143 tons of
gold, and a similar amount in silver. During late March, 2011 these stocks were
moved to SABHA (south west in the direction of the Libyan border with Niger and
Chad); taken from the vaults of the Libyan Central Bank in Tripoli.”
Is the United States of America
assuming the role of Imperialist super-nation? Based on what I’ve learned in
the last three years, this was always our role. Spreading democracy and the
“American Way” was once something most of my countrymen would have been proud
to live, work, fight and die for. Unfortunately for the brave souls interred at
Arlington Cemetery, democracy had nothing whatever to do with our leadership’s
goals. Gaddafi was portrayed for us, from the Potomac to studios in Hollywood,
as an arch villain US Navy Seals should snuff out. Libya was always he rogue,
with Tom Clancy novels and blockbuster movies tightly focused, so Americans
would turn a blind eye when the time came.
Well, the time has come. The Middle
East is a hornet’s nest, one overflowing onto the shores of once peaceful and
prosperous nations. Russia is being forced to rearm, China has gone from a
touted globalization partner into a big red scary enemy again. In Europe the
rightist rational is being fed a new human fodder, Muslims who can take the
place of Jews as the next holocaust is set in motion. Barack Obama won the
Novel Peace Prize as a joke, as a test, for the elites to jab at their
protectorate – and when we did not laugh out loud they knew for sure – the
world was ripe for the picking. Is Barack Obama to blame for a coming World War
III? He is until those really underneath are brought to justice.
We are witness to the fall, the fall
of the ideal of freedom.
Phil Butler, is a policy
investigator and analyst, a political scientist and expert on Eastern Europe,
exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.
http://journal-neo.org/2016/09/06/arab-spring-the-fall-of-all-freedom/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.