Under
heavy pressure from the USA, the UN General Assembly has adopted a
recommendation to stop the hostilities in Syria. It was amusing to observe the
hyper-activity of the members of the US delegation to the UN, who, without
waiting for the lift, tired themselves out rushing up the stairs of the
high-rise building, meeting their accomplices, trying to grab anything from the
table of the outgoing “lame duck” one last time. All this had the singular aim
that the resolution would be adopted at the UN or rather imposed on the
international community to cover up Washington’s dark, dirty business.
It
is reasonable that the question arises as to what this latest American hysteria
was connected and why the outgoing administration of the dishonourable US
President ordered that the UN General Assembly urgently adopt this resolution
on an immediate ceasefire in Aleppo. For, as it is well known, Moscow has
repeatedly stopped bombing the locations of terrorists and their Western
sponsors, and now the Syrian Army has suspended military operations in Eastern
Aleppo entirely. Tens of thousands of civilians have escaped the captivity of
terrorists via a special corridor out of the city and received extensive
humanitarian aid from Russia there and then.
This
is the latest example of specific Russian assistance to civilians, which is in
contrast to the demagogic reprimands made by the United States representative
and its “allies” at the United Nations. From December 10, the Russian Center
for Reconciliation of the Warring Parties in Syria organised the latest
evacuation of civilians from the Eastern districts of Aleppo to the safe zone via
humanitarian corridors in the Karim El-Hun and Mahayar region. According to the
Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation, the evacuated Syrians have been
accommodated in humanitarian centres where they are given hot meals.
Furthermore, if necessary, the citizens of Aleppo are offered medical care. The
report compiled by the Russian Ministry of Defence indicates that civilians are
leaving Eastern Aleppo in a “continuous flow” and are heading to regions of
Damascus under army control.
Now,
let’s take a closer look at the latest provocative act undertaken by the
dishonourable, soon-to-be-forgotten, outgoing old US administration. In
this case, everything can be easily explained and the “free democratic Western
media” is to blame. Journalists at Baltnews.lt learned about Washington’s
desperate attempts to hastily arrange safe passage to the Eastern part of the
city so that US intelligence officers and military advisors working for
terrorists could escape to Turkey. The US high-ranking officials’ aim is to save
US intelligence agent Bilal Abdul Kareem and his colleague from the siege in
Eastern Aleppo and then give them the opportunity to cross the Turkish border
on the Castello Road. In this case Baltnews.lt cites the Arabic website,
Al Hadath. The news agency reports that a second intelligence officer, whose
name is not given, coordinated the fighting of the armed opposition against the
Syrian army and now, when the militants of these subdivisions leave the
districts of the second largest city in Syria one after the other, it is likely
that an instructor will die or get captured.
Incidentally,
various news agencies previously reported that a large militant centre in
Aleppo was destroyed where there were about 30 citizens of the USA, Germany,
Turkey and Israel, responsible for coordinating the actions of the militants
and training them in combat tactics. However, neither their names nor the
special services they belonged to were revealed. And now, for the first time,
there has been news of American Muslim, Bilal Abdul Kareem, who is at the
epicentre of the fighting and the American authorities fear for his safety, and
who is actively coordinating the actions of the terrorists, which the United
States, consistently insist— or rather outright lie—they are waging war with.
The
decision made by President Barack Obama to lift the formal restrictions on
supplying arms, ammunition and military equipment to US allies in the fight
against terrorism in Syria was another obvious “contribution” made by the US
administration in the “war on terror”. It is wholly clear that the mass arms
supplies to the ‘moderate’ Syrian armed opposition will not actually bring
about victory over Daesh (ISIL), Jabhat al-Nusra and other terrorist
organisations, banned in Russia, but will only add fuel to the fire and prolong
the agony of civil war and its numerous victims.
Incidentally,
the very phrase “US allies in the fight against terrorist organisations in
Syria” invites attention. If it refers to moderate Syrian opposition, then it
means that arms are being supplied directly to the Syrian armed opposition
groups that the Pentagon would like to use for their own purposes in order to
overthrow the legally elected Syrian president Bashar al-Assad. Many experts
note that in Syria there is a rather fine line between the moderate opposition
fighters and militants of terrorist organisations. Therefore if US weapons fall
into the hands of the moderate opposition, they can end up in the hands of
terrorist organisations, which has often happened in the past. Incidentally,
these facts forced Washington to strongly defend terrorist groups in possession
of American weapons, by “supporting” overt criminals going by the term
“moderate” opposition.
That
is why the outgoing administration of the Nobel peace prize winner should
clearly understand the possible consequences of these actions and, above all,
stop supplying these types of weapon that, in the hands of international
terrorists and criminals, could be used to commit terrorist acts against
entirely innocent people and prolong this bloody civil war. In this case, this
means the various modern grenade launchers as well as MPADS. These weapons
supplied to the allegedly moderate Syrian opposition may later turn up in other
regions of the Middle East – Iraq, Afghanistan, and be used against the US
forces themselves.
The
latest events in Palmyra, temporarily captured by terrorists—in our
opinion—aided by the so-called US-led coalition, should be considered an
altogether unprecedented case. The Russian military said that more than four
thousand people took part in the latest attack. It was also observed that all
the extremists arrived in Palmyra from Raqqa, where US coalition troops
temporarily stopped (for some reason at this very moment) the attack on ISIL’s
position. If you take note that the Americans and their allies stopped fighting
in the Iraqi city of Mosul allowing the terrorist command to transfer their
units out of there to Palmyra, then there seems to be some kind of cooperation,
a union between the United States and ISIL. Apparently, however, this is not
surprising, since the Nobel peace prize winner himself admitted that US actions
in the Middle East led to the emergence and further prospering of this
terrorist organisation.
Incidentally,
many worldwide noted the seemingly clear animosity and kind of joy that the
Western media displayed when commenting on the retreat of government forces
supported by Russia from Palmyra and the emergence of terrorist groups there.
It is simply amazing that it turns out that in their anger at Russia, the
Western media have turned into the mouthpiece and propagandists of terrorism.
As it is well known, the left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing
But
perhaps soon the events in Syria will take a different turn. The newly-elected
American president, Donald Trump, has repeatedly stated that he is not
interested in overthrowing Bashar al-Assad, and he considers the effective and
active fight against terrorism and its ideologies the basis of his policy in
the region. If, in the future, Washington will conduct this very policy, the
efforts of two countries—the United States and Russia (which has long actually
been fighting criminals and terrorists, not just talking about it)—will be
enough to end the shameful phenomenon of terrorism and bring peace to the
Middle East.
Viktor Mikhin, a member of
the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.“
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.