© AP Photo/ Amanda Voisard
COLUMNISTS
15:05 05.10.2016(updated 15:13 05.10.2016) Get short URL Finian Cunningham
2368091051
With a swift, determined twist,
Russian leader Vladimir Putin has wrong-footed his American adversary,
pinning him to the ground over the Syrian crisis.
Writhing and flustered, the American opponent is protesting at being
upended. First, in the form of a contorted media campaign smearing
Russia’s military operations as somehow criminal. Second, the Americans
are breathlessly claiming that Russia’s “outrageous” support for Syrian
state forces is scuppering peace efforts.
Third, the Americans have tried to intimidate Russia by cutting
off diplomatic contact over Syria, which is a veiled attempt
to threaten Russia militarily, either from direct US intervention
in Syria or indirectly by upping supply of anti-aircraft
missiles to the proxy terror groups.
Russia is having none of this American menacing. It has proceeded
to ramp up the military offensive along with Syrian forces
to defeat the Western-backed terror groups in their last redoubt
in the northern Syrian city of Aleppo. If the anti-government
mercenaries are vanquished there, then the six-year foreign-fueled war
for regime change in Syria is all but over.
In the diplomatic sphere, US Secretary
of State John Kerry had engaged with his Russian counterpart Sergey
Lavrov for months. In diplomatic jargon, the two sides referred
to each other as “partners”. But in supporting opposing sides in the
war and having diametric objectives, the real relationship
between Washington and Moscow is clear: they are adversaries.
Russian President Vladimir Putin, an aficionado
of judo martial arts, once revealed part of his pugilist philosophy
learned from growing up on the mean streets of postwar St
Petersburg: if a fight is looming, then don’t hesitate to strike first.
Something of this philosophy has just played out in Syria. The ceasefire plan worked out by Kerry and Lavrov was never feasible. Both Russian and its Syrian ally can be commended for giving peace a chance by initially abiding by the cessation of violence declared on September 12.
A true leader knows when to use force and when to opt for a gentle touch.
|
But with the various foreign-backed insurgent
groups continuing violence with hundreds of violations of the
truce, it was evident that there was no chance of any kind
of peaceful resolution. Furthermore, the much-vaunted American appeals
for separation between so-called “moderate rebels” and proscribed
terrorist brigades was shown to be a fallacy. The Americans, their NATO
allies and regional client regimes have been all along supporting an
array of illegally armed insurgents – terrorists. There is no
separation.
The deadly US airstrike on a Syrian army base
in Deir ez-Zor on September 17 was the final proof that the
Americans were never serious about calling a ceasefire. It was always
about exploiting a much-needed relief for the foreign-backed terror
proxies, which Russia and Syrian forces had been hammering for the
past year.
Russia and Syria are now entitled to resume their defeat of the
terror brigades with even more vengeance because the failed ceasefire
proved the fraudulence of Washington’s position on Syria –
as not the backer of moderate rebels, but the sponsor
of terrorists, the same brand of terrorists who allegedly carried
out the 9/11 attacks in New York which supposedly justified the
past 15 years of US foreign wars. Now here’s where Russia’s move
in Syria becomes even more profound. Last weekend, after Western
media blitzing propaganda about humanitarian suffering in Aleppo,
Moscow issued a pointed statement warning that if the US-led military
coalition, which is illegally operating in Syria in the first
place, were to attack Syrian government forces again then that would entail
a “tectonic shift” for the region. The statement from Moscow was an
unmistakable warning that any further US-led military action in Syria
would mean all-out war.
This line in the sand has since been followed up this week
with the Russian ministry of defense disclosing that it has
installed the fearsome anti-aircraft, anti-missile S-300 defense system
in Syria.
Notably, too, the installation of the S-300 system came two days
after Washington said that it was cutting off diplomatic talks
with Russia over Syria. In other words, if Washington’s diplomatic
snub was meant to intimidate Russia, then it clearly didn’t work. The
stakes are much higher than just the conflict in Syria. For
at least five years since Washington jettisoned its putative “reset
policy” with Moscow, the US-led NATO military alliance has been pursuing
what can only be described as a policy of hostility
towards Russia, a policy whose tacit logic is eventual war. Washington
wants Russia to capitulate to its global hegemony, to revert
to its pathetic vassal status as was seen under the weak
post-Soviet leadership of Boris Yeltsin. When Putin assumed power 16
years ago, Russia stopped being an American shoeshine boy. The country
recovered its independence and national pride, as well as, crucially,
its military prowess. It is because of this independence that Washington
and its European lackeys have embarked on a geopolitical strategy
of undermining Russia in every conceivable way, through NATO
intimidation, political and media demonization, and economic sanctions. This
week, however, it appears that Putin has finally had enough of the
relentless bullying by an American tyrant that is so out of line it
has found itself hopelessly wrong-footed.
When Putin announced the end of the bilateral accord
with Washington to dispose of nuclear-weapon-grade plutonium,
he said with, correct assessment, that it was because the Americans had
failed to keep their side of that bargain, and, moreover, because
of the wider US hostility towards Russia on a raft
of international issues, including Syria.
Significantly, Russia is demanding that if the US wants to resume the
plutonium accord, then it must fulfill several conditions. They include
scaling back NATO forces on Russia’s borders, ending political
harassment, scrapping economic sanctions and compensating Russia for all
financial losses. The BBC described Russia’s demands as an “astonishing
list of conditions”.
The
point is that Russia knows that it has gained the upper-hand over its
American adversary. The Russian bear has patiently tolerated unremitting
provocations from the arrogant Americans for years.
Even the ultimate US provocation of threatening Russia with war has
failed to deter Moscow from pursuing what it knows is right:
to be treated with respect as an equal.
The past year has demonstrated that Russia has the military capability
to face down any American threat, including the abominable threat
of nuclear war, which the Americans have repeatedly menaced
through sly comments issued by its Pentagon chiefs.
It seems not a coincidence this week that Russia
announced defense drills involving 40 million of its citizens. In
effect, Russia appears to be saying to the US: we are not afraid
of anything, we are ready to defend our nation with even
better capability than you have, so don’t even think about going
to war.
Washington can bluster all it wants
about mulling military options in Syria, as it does
in Ukraine and elsewhere. But it’s futile bluster. Because Washington
knows now that Russia has slammed it with a geopolitical judo swing.
The worst thing an adversary can do is underestimate
an opponent. And the arrogant, ignorant Americans have certainly done that
with regard to Russia.
The views expressed in this article are solely
those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position
of Sputnik.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.