PREVIOUS FREE PAGES BLOG

PREVIOUS FREE PAGES BLOG
DIPLOMATIC FREE PAGES - click image
 

CROATIAN   ENGLISH   GREEK   NEDERLANDS   POLSKI   PORTUGUESE   ROMANIAN  SPANISH  РУССКИЙ

What part will your country play in World War III?

By Larry Romanoff

The true origins of the two World Wars have been deleted from all our history books and replaced with mythology. Neither War was started (or desired) by Germany, but both at the instigation of a group of European Zionist Jews with the stated intent of the total destruction of Germany. The documentation is overwhelming and the evidence undeniable. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)

That history is being repeated today in a mass grooming of the Western world’s people (especially Americans) in preparation for World War IIIwhich I believe is now imminent

READ MORE

 

Friday, February 17, 2017

Donald Trump’s Press Conference by Donald Trump

Donald Trump’s Press Conference

 | WASHINGTON D. C. (ÉTATS-UNIS)  
JPEG - 65.8 kb
Donald Trump: Thank you very much. I just wanted to begin by mentioning that the nominee for Secretary of the Department of Labor will be Mr. Alex Acosta. He has a law degree from Harvard Law School, was a great student. Former clerk for Justice Samuel Alito. And he has had a tremendous career. He’s a member, and has been a member, of the National Labor Relations Board, and has been through Senate confirmation three times, confirmed — did very, very well. And so Alex, I’ve wished him the best. We just spoke. And he’s going to be — I think he’ll be a tremendous Secretary of Labor.
And also, as you probably heard just a little while ago, Mick Mulvaney, former congressman, has just been approved — weeks late, I have to say that. Weeks, weeks late. Office of Management and Budget. And he will be, I think, a fantastic addition. Paul Singer has just left. As you know, Paul was very much involved with the anti-Trump, or, as they say, "Never Trump." And Paul just left and he’s given us his total support. And it’s all about unification. We’re unifying the party, and hopefully we’re going to be able to unify the country. It’s very important to me. I’ve been talking about that for a long time, but it’s very, very important to me. So I want to thank Paul Singer for being here and for coming up to the office. He was a very strong opponent, and now he’s a very strong ally. And I appreciate that.
I think I’ll say a few words, and then we’ll take some questions. And I had this time — we’ve been negotiating a lot of different transactions to save money on contracts that were terrible, including airplane contracts that were out of control and late and terrible. Just absolutely catastrophic in terms of what was happening. And we’ve done some really good work. We’re very proud of that.

And then right after that, you prepare yourselves and we’ll do some questions — unless you have no questions. That’s always a possibility.
I’m here today to update the American people on the incredible progress that has been made in the last four weeks since my inauguration. We have made incredible progress. I don’t think there’s ever been a President elected who, in this short period of time, has done what we’ve done.
A new Rasmussen poll, in fact — because the people get it; much of the media doesn’t get it. They actually get it, but they don’t write it — let’s put it that way. But a new Rasmussen poll just came out just a very short while ago, and it has our approval rating at 55 percent and going up. The stock market has hit record numbers, as you know. And there has been a tremendous surge of optimism in the business world, which is — to me means something much different than it used to. It used to mean, oh, that’s good. Now it means that’s good for jobs. Very different. Plants and factories are already starting to move back into the United States and big league — Ford, General Motors, so many of them.
I’m making this presentation directly to the American people with the media present, which is an honor to have you this morning, because many of our nation’s reporters and folks will not tell you the truth and will not treat the wonderful people of our country with the respect that they deserve. And I hope going forward we can be a little bit different, and maybe get along a little bit better, if that’s possible. Maybe it’s not, and that’s okay too.
Unfortunately, much of the media in Washington, D.C., along with New York, Los Angeles, in particular, speaks not for the people but for the special interests and for those profiting off a very, very obviously broken system. The press has become so dishonest that if we don’t talk about it, we are doing a tremendous disservice to the American people — tremendous disservice. We have to talk about it to find out what’s going on, because the press honestly is out of control. The level of dishonesty is out of control.
I ran for President to represent the citizens of our country. I am here to change the broken system so it serves their families and their communities well. I am talking, and really talking, on this very entrenched power structure, and what we’re doing is we’re talking about the power structure, we’re talking about its entrenchment. As a result, the media is going through what they have to go through to oftentimes distort — not all the time — and some of the media is fantastic, I have to say; they’re honest and fantastic. But much of it is not — the distortion. And we’ll talk about it, and you’ll be able to ask me questions about it.
But we’re not going to let it happen, because I’m here again to take my message straight to the people. As you know, our administration inherited many problems across government and across the economy. To be honest, I inherited a mess — it’s a mess — at home and abroad. A mess. Jobs are pouring out of the country. You see what’s going on with all of the companies leaving our country, going to Mexico and other places — low-pay, low-wages. Mass instability overseas, no matter where you look. The Middle East, a disaster. North Korea — we’ll take care of it, folks. We’re going to take care of it all. I just want to let you know I inherited a mess.
Beginning on day one, our administration went to work to tackle these challenges. On foreign affairs, we’ve already begun enormously productive talks with many foreign leaders — much of it you’ve covered — to move forward toward stability, security, and peace in the most troubled regions of the world, which there are many.
We’ve had great conversations with the United Kingdom — and meetings — Israel, Mexico, Japan, China, and Canada. Really, really productive conversations. I would say far more productive than you would understand. We’ve even developed a new council with Canada to promote women’s business leaders and entrepreneurs. It’s very important to me, very important to my daughter Ivanka.
I have directed our defense community, headed by our great general, now Secretary Mattis — he’s over there now, working very hard — to submit a plan for the defeat of ISIS, a group that celebrates the murder and torture of innocent people in large sections of the world. It used to be a small group, and now it’s in large sections of the world. They’ve spread like cancer. ISIS has spread like cancer. Another mess I inherited.
And we have imposed new sanctions on the nation of Iran, who’s totally taken advantage of our previous administration. And they’re the world’s top sponsor of terrorism. And we’re not going to stop until that problem is properly solved. And it’s not properly solved now. It’s one of the worst agreements I’ve ever seen drawn by anybody.
I’ve ordered plans to begin for the massive rebuilding of the United States military. I’ve had great support from the Senate. I’ve had great support from Congress generally. We’ve pursued this rebuilding in the hopes that we will never have to use this military. And I will tell you that is my — I would be so happy if we never had to use it. But our country will never have had a military like the military we’re about to build and rebuild. We have the greatest people on Earth in our military, but they don’t have the right equipment. And their equipment is old. I used it, I talked about it at every stop. Depleted — it’s depleted. It won’t be depleted for long.
And I think one of the reasons I’m standing here instead of other people is that, frankly, I talked about we have to have a strong military. We have to have strong law enforcement also. So we do not go abroad in the search of war. We really are searching for peace, but it’s peace through strength.
At home, we have begun the monumental task of returning the government back to the people on a scale not seen in many, many years. In each of these actions, I’m keeping my promises to the American people. These are campaign promises. Some people are so surprised that we’re having strong borders. Well, that’s what I’ve been talking about for a year and a half — strong borders. They’re so surprised — "oh, you’re having strong borders." Well, that’s what I’ve been talking about to the press and to everybody else.
One promise after another after years of politicians lying to you to get elected. They lie to the American people in order to get elected. Some of the things I’m doing probably aren’t popular, but they’re necessary for security and for other reasons. And then coming to Washington and pursuing their own interests, which is more important to many politicians.
I’m here following through on what I pledged to do. That’s all I’m doing. I put it out before the American people. Got 306 Electoral College votes. I wasn’t supposed to get 222. They said there’s no way to get 222; 230 is impossible. Two hundred and seventy, which you need, that was laughable. We got 306 because people came out and voted like they’ve never seen before. So that’s the way it goes. I guess it was the biggest Electoral College win since Ronald Reagan.
In other words, the media is trying to attack our administration because they know we are following through on pledges that we made, and they’re not happy about it for whatever reason. But a lot of people are happy about it. In fact, I’ll be in Melbourne, Florida, five o’clock on Saturday, and I heard — just heard that the crowds are massive that want to be there.
I turn on the TV, open the newspapers, and I see stories of chaos. Chaos! Yet, it is the exact opposite. This administration is running like a fine-tuned machine, despite the fact that I can’t get my Cabinet approved, and they’re outstanding people. Like Senator Dan Coates whose there — one of the most respected men of the Senate — he can’t get approved. How do you not approve him? He’s been a colleague, highly respected — brilliant guy, great guy, everybody knows it — but waiting for approval.
So we have a wonderful group of people that’s working very hard, that’s being very much misrepresented about, and we can’t let that happen. So if the Democrats, who have — all you have to do is look at where they are right now — the only thing they can do is delay, because they’ve screwed things up royally, believe me.
Let me list to you some of the things that we’ve done in just a short period of time. I just got here. I got here with no Cabinet. Again, each of these actions is a promise I made to the American people. So we’ll go over just some of them, and we have a lot happening next week and in the weeks coming. We’ve withdrawn from the job-killing disaster known as Trans-Pacific Partnership. We’re going to make trade deals, but we’re going to have one-on-one deals — bilateral. We’re going to have one-on-one deals.
We’ve directed the elimination of regulations that undermine manufacturing, and called for expedited approval of the permits needed for America and American infrastructure, and that means plants, equipment, roads, bridges, factories. People take 10, 15, 20 years to get disapproved for a factory. They go in for a permit — it’s many, many years. And then at the end of the process — they spend tens of millions of dollars on nonsense — and at the end of the process, they get rejected. Now, they may be rejected with me, but it’s going to be a quick rejection. It’s not going to take years. But mostly, it’s going to be an acceptance. We want plants built, and we want factories built, and we want the jobs. We don’t want the jobs going to other countries.
We’ve imposed a hiring freeze on nonessential federal workers. We’ve imposed a temporary moratorium on new federal regulations. We’ve issued a game-changing new rule that says for each one new regulation, two old regulations must be eliminated. Makes sense. Nobody has ever seen regulations like we have. If you go to other countries and you look at industries they have, and you say, let me see your regulations, and they’re a fraction, just a tiny fraction of what we have. And I want regulations because I want safety, I want all environmental situations to be taken properly care of. It’s very important to me. But you don’t need four or five or six regulations to take care of the same thing.
We’ve stood up for the men and women of law enforcement, directing federal agencies to ensure they are protected from crimes of violence. We’ve directed the creation of a task force for reducing violent crime in America, including the horrendous situation — take a look at Chicago and others — taking place right now in our inner cities. Horrible. We’ve ordered the Department of Homeland Security and Justice to coordinate on a plan to destroy criminal cartels coming into the United States with drugs. We’re becoming a drug-infested nation. Drugs are becoming cheaper than candy bars, and we’re not going to let it happen any longer.
We’ve undertaken the most substantial border security measures in a generation to keep our nation and our tax dollars safe, and are now in the process of beginning to build a promised wall on the southern border. Met with General, now Secretary, Kelly yesterday and we’re starting that process. And the wall is going to be a great wall, and it’s going to be a wall negotiated by me. The price is going to come down, just like it has on everything else I’ve negotiated for the government. And we’re going to have a wall that works. We’re not going to have a wall like they have now, which is either nonexistent or a joke.
We’ve ordered a crackdown on sanctuary cities that refuse to comply with federal law and that harbor criminal aliens, and we’ve ordered an end to the policy of catch and release on the border. No more release, no matter who you are — release. We’ve begun a nationwide effort to remove criminal aliens, gang members, drug dealers, and others who pose a threat to public safety. We are saving American lives every single day. The court system has not made it easy for us. And we’ve even created a new office in Homeland Security dedicated to the forgotten American victims of illegal immigrant violence, of which there are many.
We’ve taken decisive action to keep radical Islamic terrorists out of our country. Though parts of our necessary and constitutional actions were blocked by a judge’s, in my opinion, incorrect and unsafe ruling, our administration is working night and day to keep you safe — including reporters safe — and is vigorously defending this lawful order. I will not back down from defending our country. I got elected on defense of our country. And I keep my campaign promises. And our citizens will be very happy when they see the result. They already are. I can tell you that.
Extreme vetting will be put in place, and it already is in place in many places. In fact, we had to go quicker than we thought because of the bad decision we received from a circuit that has been overturned at a record number. I’ve heard 80 percent — I find that hard to believe; that’s just a number I heard — that they’re overturned 80 percent of the time. I think that circuit is in chaos and that circuit is, frankly, in turmoil. But we are appealing that and we are going further.
We’re issuing a new executive action next week that will comprehensively protect our country, so we’ll be going along the one path and hopefully winning that. At the same time, we will be issuing a new and very comprehensive order to protect our people, and that will be done some time next week, toward the beginning or middle at the latest part.
We’ve also taken steps to begin construction of the Keystone Pipeline and Dakota Access Pipelines — thousands and thousands of jobs — and put new "Buy American" measures in place to require American steel for American pipelines. In other words, they build a pipeline in this country and we use the powers of government to make that pipeline happen. We want them to use American steel. And they’re willing to do that, but nobody ever asked before I came along. Even this order was drawn and they didn’t say that. And I’m reading the order, I’m saying, why aren’t we using American steel? And they said, that’s a good idea. We put it in.
To drain the swamp of corruption in Washington, D.C. I’ve started by imposing a five-year lobbying ban on White House officials and a lifetime ban on lobbying for a foreign government. We’ve begun preparing to repeal and replace Obamacare. Obamacare is a disaster, folks. It’s a disaster. You can say, oh, Obamacare — I mean, they fill up our alleys with people that you wonder how they get there, but they’re not the Republican people that our representatives are representing. So we’ve begun preparing to repeal and replace Obamacare and are deep in the midst of negotiations on a very historic tax reform to bring our jobs back. We’re bringing our jobs back to this country big league. It’s already happening, but big league.
I’ve also worked to install a Cabinet over the delays and obstruction of Senate Democrats. You’ve seen what they’ve done over the last long number of years. That will be one of the great Cabinets ever assembled in American history. You look at Rex Tillerson — he’s out there negotiating right now. General Mattis I mentioned before, General Kelly. We have great, great people. Mick is with us now. We have great people.
Among their responsibilities will be ending the bleeding of jobs from our country and negotiating fair trade deals for our citizens. Now, look, fair trade — not free — fair. If a country is taking advantage of us, we’re not going to let that happen anymore. Every country takes advantage of us, almost. I may be able to find a couple that don’t. But for the most part, that would be a very tough job for me to do.
Jobs have already started to surge. Since my election, Ford announced it will abandon its plans to build a new factory in Mexico and will instead invest $700 million in Michigan, creating many, many jobs. Fiat-Chrysler announced it will invest $1 billion in Ohio and Michigan, creating 2,000 new American jobs. They were with me a week ago. You know — you were here. General Motors, likewise, committed to invest billions of dollars in its American manufacturing operation, keeping many jobs here that were going to leave. And if I didn’t get elected, believe me, they would have left. And these jobs and these things that I’m announcing would never have come here.
Intel just announced that it will move ahead with a new plant in Arizona that probably was never going to move ahead with. And that will result in at least 10,000 American jobs. Walmart announced it will create 10,000 jobs in the United States just this year because of our various plans and initiatives. There will be many, many more. Many more. These are a few that we’re naming.
Other countries have been taking advantage of us for decades — decades and decades and decades, folks. And we’re not going to let that happen anymore. Not going to let it happen.
And one more thing. I have kept my promise to the American people by nominating a justice of the United States Supreme Court, Judge Neil Gorsuch, who is from my list of 20, and who will be a true defender of our laws and our Constitution — highly respected, should get the votes from the Democrats — you may not see that, but he’ll get there one way or the other. But he should get there the old-fashioned way, and he should get those votes.
This last month has represented an unprecedented degree of action on behalf of the great citizens of our country. Again, I say it — there has never been a presidency that’s done so much in such a short period of time. And we haven’t even started the big work that starts early next week. Some very big things are going to be announced next week.
So we’re just getting started. We will be giving a speech, as I said, in Melbourne, Florida, at 5:00 p.m. I hope to see you there. And with that, I’d just say, God bless America, and let’s take some questions.
Mara. Mara, go ahead. You were cut off pretty violently at our last news conference.
Question: Did you fire Mike Flynn?
Donald Trump: Mike Flynn is a fine person, and I asked for his resignation. He respectfully gave it. He is a man who — there was a certain amount of information given to Vice President Pence, who is with us today. And I was not happy with the way that information was given.
He didn’t have to do that, because what he did wasn’t wrong, what he did in terms of the information he saw. What was wrong was the way that other people, including yourselves in this room, were given that information, because that was classified information that was given illegally. That’s the real problem. And you can talk all you want about Russia, which was all a fake news, fabricated deal to try and make up for the loss of the Democrats, and the press plays right into it. In fact, I saw a couple of the people that were supposedly involved with all of this — they know nothing about it. They weren’t in Russia, they never made a phone call to Russia, they never received a phone call. It’s all fake news. It’s all fake news.
The nice thing is I see it starting to turn, where people are now looking at the illegal, Mara — and I think it’s very important — the illegal giving out classified information. And let me just tell you, it was given out, like, so much. I’ll give you an example. I called, as you know, Mexico. It was a very confidential, classified call, but I called Mexico. And in calling Mexico, I figured, oh, well, that’s — I spoke to the President of Mexico, had a good call. All of a sudden it’s out for the world to see. It’s supposed to be secret. It’s supposed to be either confidential or classified in that case. Same thing with Australia. All of a sudden people are finding out exactly what took place.
The same thing happened with respect to General Flynn. Everybody saw this, and I’m saying — the first thing I thought of when I heard about it is, how does the press get this information that’s classified? How do they do it? You know why? Because it’s an illegal process, and the press should be ashamed of themselves. But, more importantly, the people that gave out the information to the press should be ashamed of themselves. Really ashamed.
Yes, go ahead.
Question: Why did you keep your Vice President in the dark for almost two weeks?
Donald Trump: Because when I looked at the information, I said, I don’t think he did anything wrong. If anything, he did something right. He was coming into office, he looked at the information. He said, huh, that’s fine, that’s what they’re supposed to do. They’re supposed to be — and he didn’t just call Russia. He called and spoke to, both ways — I think there were 30-some-odd countries. He’s doing the job.
You know, he was just doing his job. The thing is he didn’t tell our Vice President properly, and then he said he didn’t remember. So either way, it wasn’t very satisfactory to me. And I have somebody that I think will be outstanding for the position, and that also helps, I think, in the making of my decision.
But he didn’t tell the Vice President of the United States the facts, and then he didn’t remember. And that just wasn’t acceptable to me.
Yes.
Question: President Trump, since you brought up Russia, I’m looking for some clarification here. During the campaign, did anyone from your team communicate with members of the Russian government or Russian intelligence? And if so, what was the nature of those conversations?
Donald Trump: Well, the failing New York Times wrote a big, long front-page story yesterday. And it was very much discredited, as you know. It was — it’s a joke. And the people mentioned in the story — I notice they were on television today saying they never even spoke to Russia. They weren’t even a part, really — I mean, they were such a minor part — I hadn’t spoken to them. I think the one person, I don’t think I’ve ever spoken to him. I don’t think I’ve ever met him. And he actually said he was a very low-level member of, I think, a committee for a short period of time. I don’t think I ever met him. Now, it’s possible that I walked into a room and he was sitting there, but I don’t think I ever met him. I didn’t talk to him, ever. And he thought it was a joke.
The other person said he never spoke to Russia, never received a call. Look at his phone records, et cetera, et cetera. And the other person, people knew that he’d represented various countries, but I don’t think he represented Russia — but knew that he represented various countries. That’s what he does. I mean, people know that. That’s Mr. Manafort, who’s, by the way — who’s, by the way, a respected man. He’s a respected man. But I think he represented the Ukraine, or Ukraine government, or somebody. But everybody — people knew that. Everybody knew that. So these people — and he said that he has absolutely nothing to do and never has with Russia. And he said that very forcefully. I saw his statement. He said it very forcefully. Most of the papers don’t print it because that’s not good for their stories.
So the three people that they talked about all totally deny it. And I can tell you, speaking for myself, I own nothing in Russia. I have no loans in Russia. I don’t have any deals in Russia. President Putin called me up very nicely to congratulate me on the win of the election. He then called me up extremely nicely to congratulate me on the inauguration, which was terrific. But so did many other leaders — almost all other leaders from almost all other countries. So that’s the extent.
Russia is fake news. Russia — this is fake news put out by the media. The real news is the fact that people, probably from the Obama administration because they’re there — because we have our new people going in place right now. As you know, Mike Pompeo is now taking control of the CIA. James Comey at FBI. Dan Coats is waiting to be approved. I mean, he is a senator, and a highly respected one. And he’s still waiting to be approved. But our new people are going in.
And just while you’re at, because you mentioned this, Wall Street Journal did a story today that was almost as disgraceful as the failing New Times’s story yesterday. And it talked about — you saw it, front page. So, Director of National Intelligence just put out — acting — a statement: “Any suggestion that the United States intelligence community” — this was just given to us — “is withholding information and not providing the best possible intelligence to the President and his national security team is not true.”
So they took this front-page story out of The Wall Street Journal — top — and they just wrote the story is not true. And I’ll tell you something, I’ll be honest — because I sort of enjoy this back and forth, and I guess I have all my life, but I’ve never seen more dishonest media than, frankly, the political media. I thought the financial media was much better, much more honest. But I will say that I never get phone calls from the media. How do they write a story like that in The Wall Street Journal without asking me? Or how do they write a story in The New York Times, put it on front page? That was like that story they wrote about the women and me — front page. Big massive story. And it was nasty.
And then they called. They said, "We never said that. We like Mr. Trump." They called up my office — we like Mr. Trump; we never said that. And it was totally — they totally misrepresented those very wonderful women, I have to tell you — totally misrepresented. I said, give us a retraction. They never gave us a retraction. And, frankly, I then went on to other things.
Go ahead.
Question: Mr. President —
Donald Trump: You okay?
Question: I am. Just wanted to get untangled. Very simply, you said today that you had the biggest electoral margins since Ronald Reagan with 304 or 306 electoral votes. In fact, President Obama got 365 in 2008.
Donald Trump: Well, I’m talking about Republican. Yes.
Question: President Obama, 332. George H.W. Bush, 426 when he won as President. So why should Americans trust —
Donald Trump: Well, no, I was told — I was given that information. I don’t know. I was just given. We had a very, very big margin.
Question: I guess my question is, why should Americans trust you when you have accused the information they receive of being fake when you’re providing information that’s fake?
Donald Trump: Well, I don’t know. I was given that information. I was given — actually, I’ve seen that information around. But it was a very substantial victory. Do you agree with that?
Question: You’re the President.
Donald Trump: Okay, thank you. That’s a good answer. Yes.
Question: Mr. President, thank you so much. Can you tell us in determining that Lieutenant General Flynn — there was no wrongdoing in your mind, what evidence was weighed? Did you have the transcripts of these telephone intercepts with Russian officials, particularly Ambassador Kislyak, who he was communicating with? What evidence did you weigh to determine there was no wrong doing?
And further than that, sir, you’ve said on a couple of occasions this morning that you were going to aggressively pursue the sources of these leaks.
Donald Trump: We are.
Question: Can we ask what you’re doing to do? And also, we’ve heard about a review of the intelligence community headed by Stephen Feinberg. What can you tell us about that?
Donald Trump: Well, first of all, about that, we now have Dan Coats, hopefully soon Mike Pompeo and James Comey, and they’re in position. So I hope that we’ll be able to straighten that out without using anybody else. The gentleman you mentioned is a very talented man, very successful man. And he has offered his services, and it’s something we may take advantage of. But I don’t think we’ll need that at all because of the fact that I think that we’re going to be able to straighten it out very easily on its own.
As far as the general is concerned, when I first heard about it, I said, huh, that doesn’t sound wrong. My counsel came — Don McGahn, White House Counsel — and he told me, and I asked him, and he can speak very well for himself. He said he doesn’t think anything is wrong. He really didn’t think — it was really what happened after that, but he didn’t think anything was done wrong. I didn’t either, because I waited a period of time and I started to think about it. I said, well, I don’t see — to me, he was doing the job.
The information was provided by — who I don’t know — Sally Yates — and I was a little surprised because I said, doesn’t sound like he did anything wrong there. But he did something wrong with respect to the Vice President, and I thought that was not acceptable. As far as the actual making the call — in fact, I’ve watched various programs and I’ve read various articles where he was just doing his job. That was very normal. At first, everybody got excited because they thought he did something wrong. After they thought about it, it turned out he was just doing his job.
So — and I do — and, by the way, with all of that being said, I do think he’s a fine man.
Yes, Jon.
Question: On the leaks, sir —
Donald Trump: Go ahead, finish off, then I’ll get you, Jon.
Question: Sorry, what will you do on the leaks? You have said twice today —
Donald Trump: Yes, we’re looking at it very, very seriously. I’ve gone to all of the folks in charge of the various agencies, and we’re — I’ve actually called the Justice Department to look into the leaks. Those are criminal leaks. They’re put out by people either in agencies. I think you’ll see it stopping because now we have our people in. You know, again, we don’t have our people in because we can’t get them approved by the Senate. We just had Jeff Sessions approved in Justice, as an example. So we are looking into that very seriously. It’s a criminal act.
You know what I say — when I was called out on Mexico, I was shocked. Because all this equipment, all this incredible phone equipment. When I was called out on Mexico, I was — honestly, I was really, really surprised. But I said, you know, it doesn’t make sense, that won’t happen. But that wasn’t that important to call, it was fine. I could show it to the world and he could show it to the world — the President who is a very fine man, by the way. Same thing with Australia. I said, that’s terrible that it was leaked but it wasn’t that important. But then I said, what happens when I’m dealing with the problem of North Korea? What happens when I’m dealing with the problems in the Middle East? Are you folks going to be reporting all of that very, very confidential information — very important, very — I mean, at the highest level, are you going to be reporting about that too?
So I don’t want classified information getting out to the public. And in a way, that was almost a test. So I’m dealing with Mexico. I’m dealing with Argentina. We were dealing on this case with Mike Flynn. All this information gets put into the Washington Post and gets put into the New York Times. And I’m saying, what’s going to happen when I’m dealing on the Middle East? What’s going to happen when I’m dealing with really, really important subjects like North Korea? We’ve got to stop it. That’s why it’s a criminal penalty.
Yes, Jon.
Question: Thank you, Mr. President. I just want to get you to clarify just a very important point. Can you say definitively that nobody on your campaign had any contacts with the Russians during the campaign? And, on the leaks, is it fake news or are these real leaks?
Donald Trump: Well, the leaks are real. You’re the one that wrote about them and reported them. I mean, the leaks are real. You know what they said — you saw it. And the leaks are absolutely real. The news is fake because so much of the news is fake.
So one thing that I felt it was very important to do — and I hope we can correct it, because there is nobody I have more respect for — well, maybe a little bit — than reporters, than good reporters. It’s very important to me, and especially in this position. It’s very important. I don’t mind bad stories. I can handle a bad story better than anybody as long as it’s true. And over a course of time, I’ll make mistakes and you’ll write badly and I’m okay with that. But I’m not okay when it is fake. I mean, I watch CNN — it’s so much anger and hatred and just the hatred. I don’t watch it anymore because it’s very good — he’s saying no. It’s okay, Jim. It’s okay, Jim. You’ll have your chance. But I watch others too. You’re not the only one, so don’t feel badly.
But I think it should be straight. I think it should be — I think it would be, frankly, more interesting. I know how good everybody’s ratings are right now, but I think that actually would be — I think that it would actually be better.
People — I mean, you have a lower approval rate than Congress. I think that’s right. I don’t know, Peter, is that one right? Because you know, I think they have lower — I heard, lower than Congress.
But honestly, the public would appreciate it. I’d appreciate it. Again, I don’t mind bad stories when it’s true. But we have an administration where the Democrats are making it very difficult. I think we’re setting a record, or close to a record in the time of approval of a Cabinet. I mean, the numbers are crazy. When I’m looking — some of them had them approved immediately. I’m going forever, and I still have a lot of people that we’re waiting for.
And that’s all they’re doing, is delaying. And you look at Schumer and the mess that he’s got over there, and they have nothing going. The only thing they can do is delay. And you know, I think they’d be better served by approving and making sure that they’re happy and everybody is good. And sometimes, I mean — I know President Obama lost three or four, and you lose them on the way. And that’s okay. That’s fine.
But I think they would be much better served, Jon, if they just went through the process quickly. This is pure delay tactics. And they say it, and everybody understands it.
Yeah, go ahead, Jim.
Question: The first part of my question on contacts. Do you definitively say that nobody —
Donald Trump: Well, I had nothing to do with it. I have nothing to do with Russia. I told you, I have no deals there. I have no anything.
Now, when WikiLeaks, which I had nothing to do with, comes out and happens to give — they’re not giving classified information. They’re giving stuff — what was said at an office about Hillary cheating on the debates — which, by the way, nobody mentions. Nobody mentions that Hillary received the questions to the debates.
Can you imagine — seriously, can you imagine if I received the questions? It would be the electric chair, okay? “He should be put in the electric chair.” You would even call for the reinstitution of the death penalty, okay? Maybe not you, Jon.
Yes, we’ll do you next, Jim. I’ll do you next. Yes?
Question: Thank you, Mr. President. I just want to clarify one other thing.
Donald Trump: Sure.
Question: Did you direct Mike Flynn to discuss the sanctions with the Russian ambassador?
Donald Trump: No, I didn’t. No, I didn’t.
Question: (Inaudible.) (Off mic.)
Donald Trump: No, I didn’t.
Question: Did you fire him because (inaudible) —
Donald Trump: Excuse me — no, I fired him because of what he said to Mike Pence, very simple. Mike was doing his job. He was calling countries and his counterparts. So it certainly would have been okay with me if he did it. I would have directed him to do it if I thought he wasn’t doing it. I didn’t direct him but I would have directed him because that’s his job.
And it came out that way — and, in all fairness, I watched Dr. Charles Krauthammer the other night say he was doing his job. And I agreed with him. And since then I’ve watched many other people say that.
No, I didn’t direct him, but I would have directed him if he didn’t do it, okay?
Jim.
Question: Mr. President, thank you very much. And just for the record, we don’t hate you, I don’t hate you. If you could pass that along.
Donald Trump: Okay. Well, ask Jeff Zucker how he got his job, okay?
Question: If I may follow up on some of the questions that have taken place so far, sir.
Donald Trump: Well, not too many. We do have other people. You do have other people, and your ratings aren’t as good as some of the other people that are waiting.
Question: They’re pretty good right now, actually.
Donald Trump: Okay. Go ahead, Jim.
Question: If I may ask, sir, you said earlier that WikiLeaks was revealing information about the Hillary Clinton campaign during the election cycle. You welcomed that at one point.
Donald Trump: I was okay with it.
Question: You said you loved WikiLeaks. At another campaign press conference you called on the Russians to find the missing 30,000 emails. I’m wondering, sir, if you —
Donald Trump: Well, she was actually missing 33,000, and then that got extended with a whole pile after that, but that’s okay.
Question: Maybe my numbers are off a little bit too.
Donald Trump: No, no, but I did say 30,000, but it was actually higher than that.
Question: If I may ask you, sir, it sounds as though you do not have much credibility here when it comes to leaking if that is something that you encouraged in the campaign.
Donald Trump: Okay, fair question. Ready?
Question: So if I may ask you that — if I may ask a follow-up —
Donald Trump: No, no, but are you — let me do one at a time. Do you mind?
Question: Yes, sir.
Donald Trump: All right. So in one case you’re talking about highly classified information. In the other case you’re talking about John Podesta saying bad things about the boss. I will say this: If John Podesta said that about me and he was working for me, I would have fired him so fast your head would have spun. He said terrible things about her. But it wasn’t classified information.
But in one case you’re talking about classified. Regardless, if you look at the RNC, we had a very strong — at my suggestion — and I give Reince great credit for this — at my suggestion, because I know something about this world, I said I want a very strong defensive mechanism. I don’t want to be hacked. And we did that, and you have seen that they tried to hack us and they failed.
The DNC did not do that. And if they did it, they could not have been hacked. But they were hacked, and terrible things came. And the only thing that I do think is unfair is some of the things were so — they were — when I heard some of those things, I said — I picked up the papers the next morning, I said, oh, this is going to front page. It wasn’t even in the papers.
Again, if I had that happen to me, it would be the biggest story in the history of publishing or the head of newspapers. I would have been the headline in every newspaper.
I mean, think of it. They gave her the questions for the debate, and she should have reported herself. Why didn’t Hillary Clinton announce that, "I’m sorry, but I have been given the questions to a debate or a town hall, and I feel that it’s inappropriate, and I want to turn in CNN for not doing a good job"?
Question: And if I may follow up on that, just something that Jonathan Karl was asking you about — you said that the leaks are real, but the news is fake. I guess I don’t understand. It seems that there is a disconnect there. If the information coming from those leaks is real, then how can the stories be fake?
Donald Trump: Well, the reporting is fake. Look, look —
Question: And if I may ask — I just want to ask one other question.
Donald Trump: Jim, you know what it is? Here’s the thing. The public isn’t — they read newspapers, they see television, they watch. They don’t know if it’s true or false because they’re not involved. I’m involved. I’ve been involved with this stuff all my life. But I’m involved. So I know when you’re telling the truth or when you’re not.
I just see many, many untruthful things. And I tell you what else I see. I see tone. You know the word “tone.” The tone is such hatred. I’m really not a bad person, by the way. No, but the tone is such — I do get good ratings, you have to admit that. The tone is such hatred.
I watched this morning a couple of the networks, and I have to say “Fox & Friends” in the morning, they’re very honorable people. They’re very — not because they’re good, because they hit me also when I do something wrong. But they have the most honest morning show. That’s all I can say. It’s the most honest. But the tone, Jim. If you look — the hatred. I mean, sometimes — sometimes somebody gets —
Question: (Off mic.)
Donald Trump: Well, you look at your show that goes on at 10 o’clock in the evening. You just take a look at that show. That is a constant hit. The panel is almost always exclusive anti-Trump. The good news is he doesn’t have good ratings. But the panel is almost exclusive anti-Trump. And the hatred and venom coming from his mouth, the hatred coming from other people on your network.
Now, I will say this. I watch it. I see it. I’m amazed by it. And I just think you’d be a lot better off — I honestly do. The public gets it, you know. Look, when I go to rallies, they turn around, they start screaming at CNN. They want to throw their placards at CNN.
I think you would do much better by being different. But you just take a look. Take a look at some of your shows in the morning and the evening. If a guest comes out and says something positive about me, it’s brutal.
Now, they’ll take this news conference. I’m actually having a very good time, okay? But they’ll take this news conference — don’t forget that’s the way I won. Remember, I used to give you a news conference every time I made a speech, which was like every day.
Question: (Off mic.)
Donald Trump: No, that’s how I won. I won with news conferences and probably speeches. I certainly didn’t win by people listening to you people, that’s for sure.
But I am having a good time. Tomorrow they will say, Donald Trump rants and raves at the press. I’m not ranting and raving. I’m just telling you, you’re dishonest people. But — but I’m not ranting and raving. I love this. I’m having a good time doing it. But tomorrow the headlines are going to be: Donald Trump Rants and Raves. I’m not ranting and raving.
Question: If I may just —
Donald Trump: Go ahead.
Question: One more follow-up because —
Donald Trump: Should I let him have a little bit more? What do you think, Peter?
Question: Just because of this —
Donald Trump: Peter, should I have let him have a little bit more? Sit down. Sit down.
Question: Just because of the attack —
Donald Trump: We’ll get it.
Question: Just because of the attack of fake news and attacking our network, I just want to ask you, sir —
Donald Trump: I’m changing it from fake news, though.
Question: Doesn’t that undermine —
Donald Trump: Very fake news now. (Laughter.)
Question: But aren’t you —
Donald Trump: Yes, go ahead.
Question: Real news, Mr. President. Real news.
Donald Trump: And you’re not related to our new —
Question: I am not related, sir, no. (Laughter.) I do like the sound of Secretary Acosta, I must say.
Donald Trump: I looked — you know, I looked at that name. I said, wait a minute, is there any relation there? Alex Acosta.
Question: I’m sure you checked that out, sir.
Donald Trump: No, I checked it. I said — they said, no, sir. I said, do me a favor, go back and check the family tree.
Question: But aren’t you concerned, sir, that you are undermining the people’s faith in the First Amendment freedom of the press, the press in this country when you call stories you don’t like “fake news”? Why not just say it’s a story I don’t like?
Donald Trump: I do that.
Question: When you call it fake news, you’re undermining confidence —
Donald Trump: No, I do that. No, no, I do that.
Question: — in our news media.
Donald Trump: Here’s the thing.
Question: Isn’t that important?
Donald Trump: Okay, I understand — and you’re right about that except this. See, I know when I should get good and when I should get bad. And sometimes I’ll say, wow, that’s going to be a great story, and I’ll get killed. I know what’s good and bad. I’d be a pretty good reporter — not as good as you. But I know what’s good. I know what’s bad.
And when they change it and make it really bad — something that should be positive. Sometimes something that should be very positive, they’ll make okay. They’ll even make it negative. So I understand it because I’m there. I know what was said. I know who is saying it. I’m there. So it’s very important to me.
Look, I want to see an honest press. When I started off today by saying that it’s so important to the public to get an honest press. The press — the public doesn’t believe you people anymore. Now, maybe I had something to do with that, I don’t know. But they don’t believe you.
If you were straight and really told it like it is, as Howard Cosell used to say, right? Of course, he had some questions also. But if you were straight, I would be your biggest booster, I would be your biggest fan in the world — including bad stories about me. But if you go — as an example, you’re CNN — I mean, it’s story after story after story is bad. I won. I won. And the other thing: Chaos. There’s zero chaos. We are running — this is a fine-tuned machine. And Reince happens to be doing a good job. But half of his job is putting out lies by the press.
I said to him yesterday, this whole Russia scam that you guys are building so that you don’t talk about the real subject, which is illegal leaks. But I watched him yesterday working so hard to try and get that story proper. And I’m saying, here’s my Chief of Staff, a really good guy, did a phenomenal job at RNC. I mean, we won the election, right? We won the presidency. We got some senators. We got some — all over the country, you take a look, he’s done a great job.
And I said to myself, you know — and I said to somebody that was in the room — I said, you take a look at Reince, he’s working so hard just putting out fires that are fake fires. They’re fake. They’re not true. And isn’t that a shame, because he’d rather be working on health care. He’d rather be working on tax reform, Jim. I mean that. I would be your biggest fan in the world if you treated me right. I sort of understand there’s a certain bias, maybe by Jeff or somebody — for whatever reason. And I understand that. But you’ve got to be at least a little bit fair. And that’s why the public sees it — they see it. They see it’s not fair. You take a look at some of your shows and you see the bias and the hatred. And the public is smart. They understand it.
Okay, yeah, go ahead.
Question: We have no doubt that your latest story is (inaudible). But for those who believe that there is something to it, is there anything that you have learned over these last few weeks that you might be able to reveal that might ease their concerns that this isn’t fake news? And secondly —
Donald Trump: I think they don’t believe it. I don’t think the public would. That’s why the Rasmussen poll just has me through the roof. I don’t think they believe it. Well, I guess one of the reasons I’m here today is to tell you the whole Russian thing — that’s a ruse. That’s a ruse. And, by the way, it would be great if we could get along with Russia, just so you understand that. Now, tomorrow you’ll say, Donald Trump wants to get along with Russia, this is terrible. It’s not terrible — it’s good.
We had Hillary Clinton try and do a reset. We had Hillary Clinton give Russia 20 percent of the uranium in our country. You know what uranium is, right? It’s this thing called nuclear weapons and other things. Like, lots of things are done with uranium, including some bad things. Nobody talks about that. I didn’t do anything for Russia. I’ve done nothing for Russia. Hillary Clinton gave them 20 percent of our uranium. Hillary Clinton did a reset, remember, with the stupid plastic button that made us all look like a bunch of jerks? Here, take a look. He looked at her like, what the hell is she doing with that cheap plastic button? Hillary Clinton — that was a reset. Remember? It said "reset."
Now, if I do that, oh, I’m a bad guy. If we could get along with Russia, that’s a positive thing. We have a very talented man, Rex Tillerson, who is going to be meeting with them shortly. And I told him, I said, I know politically it’s probably not good for me. Hey, the greatest thing I could do is shoot that ship that’s 30 miles offshore right out of the water. Everyone in this country is going to say, oh, it’s so great. That’s not great. That’s not great. I would love to be able to get along with Russia.
Now, you’ve had a lot of Presidents that haven’t taken that tact. Look where we are now. Look where we are now. So, if I can — now, I love to negotiate things. I do it really well and all that stuff, but it’s possible I won’t be able to get along with Putin. Maybe it is. But I want to just tell you, the false reporting by the media, by you people — the false, horrible, fake reporting makes it much harder to make a deal with Russia. And probably Putin said, you know — he’s sitting behind his desk and he’s saying, you know, I see what’s going on in the United States, I follow it closely; it’s got to be impossible for President Trump to ever get along with Russia because of all the pressure he’s got with this fake story. Okay? And that’s a shame. Because if we could get along with Russia — and, by the way, China and Japan and everyone — if we could get along, it would be a positive thing, not a negative thing.
Question: Tax reform —
Question: Mr. President, since you —
Donald Trump: Tax reform is going to happen fairly quickly. We’re doing Obamacare — we’re in final stages. We should be submitting the initial plan in March, early March, I would say. And we have to, as you know, statutorily and for reasons of budget, we have to go first. It’s not like — frankly, the tax would be easier, in my opinion, but for statutory reasons and for budgetary reasons, we have to submit the health care sooner. So we’ll be submitting health care sometime in early March, mid-March. And after that, we’re going to come up — and we’re doing very well on tax reform.
Yes.
Question: Mr. President, you mentioned Russia. Let’s talk about some serious issues that have come up in the last week that you have had to deal with as President of the United States.
Donald Trump: Okay.
Question: You mentioned the vessel, the spy vessel, off the coast of the United States.
Donald Trump: Not good.
Question: There was a ballistic missile test that many interpreted as a violation —
Donald Trump: Not good.
Question: — of the agreement between the two countries. And a Russian plane buzzed a U.S. destroyer.
Donald Trump: Not good.
Question: I listened to you during the campaign —
Donald Trump: Excuse me, excuse me, when did it happen? It happened when — if you were Putin right now, you would say, hey, we’re back to the old games with the United States. There’s no way Trump can ever do a deal with us because the — you have to understand, if I was just brutal on Russia right now, just brutal, people would say, you would say, oh, isn’t that wonderful. But I know you well enough. Then you would say, oh, he was too tough, he shouldn’t have done that. Look, of all —
Question: I’m just trying to find out your orientation to those —
Donald Trump: Wait a minute. Wait, wait. Excuse me just one second.
Question: I’m just trying to find out what you’re doing to do about them, Mr. President.
Donald Trump: All of those things that you mentioned are very recent, because probably Putin assumes that he’s not going to be able to make a deal with me because it’s politically not popular for me to make a deal. So Hillary Clinton tries to reset, it failed. They all tried. But I’m different than those people.
Go ahead.
Question: How are you interpreting those moves? And what do you intend to do about them?
Donald Trump: Just the way I said it.
Question: Have you given Rex Tillerson any advice or counsel on how to deal?
Donald Trump: I have. I have. And I’m so beautifully represented. I’m so honored that the Senate approved him. He’s going to be fantastic.
Yes, I think that I’ve already —
Question: Is Putin testing you, do you believe, sir?
Donald Trump: No, I don’t think so. I think Putin probably assumes that he can’t make a deal with me anymore because politically it would be unpopular for a politician to make a deal. I can’t believe I’m saying I’m a politician, but I guess that’s what I am now. Because, look, it would be much easier for me to be tough on Russia, but then we’re not going to make a deal.
Now, I don’t know that we’re going to make a deal. I don’t know. We might, we might not. But it would be much easier for me to be so tough — the tougher I am on Russia, the better. But you know what, I want to do the right thing for the American people. And to be honest, secondarily, I want to do the right thing for the world.
If Russia and the United States actually got together and got along — and don’t forget, we’re a very powerful nuclear country and so are they. There’s no upside. We’re a very powerful nuclear country and so are they. I’ve been briefed. And I can tell you, one thing about a briefing that we’re allowed to say because anybody that ever read the most basic book can say it: Nuclear holocaust would be like no other. They’re a very powerful nuclear country and so are we.
If we have a good relationship with Russia, believe me, that’s a good thing, not a bad thing.
Question: So when you say they’re not good, do you mean that they are —
Donald Trump: Who did I say is not good?
Question: No, when I read off the three things that have recently happened and each one of them you said they’re not good.
Donald Trump: No, it’s not good, but they happened.
Question: But do they damage the relationship? Do they undermine this country’s ability to work with Russia?
Donald Trump: They all happened recently, and I understand what they’re doing, because they’re doing the same thing. Now, again, maybe I’m not going to be able to do a deal with Russia, but at least I will have tried. And if I don’t, does anybody really think that Hillary Clinton would be tougher on Russia than Donald Trump? Does anybody in this room really believe that? Okay.
But I tell you one thing: She tried to make a deal. She had the reset. She gave all the valuable uranium away. She did other things. You know, they say I’m close to Russia. Hillary Clinton gave away 20 percent of the uranium in the United States. She’s close to Russia. I gave — you know what I gave to Russia? You know what I gave? Nothing.
Question: Can we conclude there will be no response to these particular provocations?
Donald Trump: I’m not going to tell you anything about what response I do. I don’t talk about military response. I don’t say I’m going into Mosul in four months. "We are going to attack Mosul in four months." Then three months later: "We are going to attack Mosul in one month." "Next week, we are going to attack Mosul." In the meantime, Mosul is very, very difficult. Do you know why? Because I don’t talk about military, and I don’t talk about certain other things. You’re going to be surprised to hear that. And, by the way, my whole campaign, I’d say that. So I don’t have to tell you —
Question: There will be a response?
Donald Trump: I don’t want to be one of these guys that say, “Yes, here’s what we’re going to do.” I don’t have to do that.
Question: There will be a — in other words, there will be a response, Mr. President?
Donald Trump: I don’t have to tell you what I’m going to do in North Korea. Wait a minute. I don’t have to tell you what I’m going to do in North Korea. And I don’t have to tell you what I’m going to do with Iran. You know why? Because they shouldn’t know. And eventually you guys are going to get tired of asking that question. So when you ask me, what am I going to do with the ship — the Russian ship, as an example — I’m not going to tell you. But hopefully, I won’t have to do anything. But I’m not going to tell you. Okay.
Question: Thanks.
Question: Can I just ask you — thank you very much, Mr. President — the Trump —
Donald Trump: Where are you from?
Question: BBC.
Donald Trump: Okay. Here’s another beauty.
Question: That’s a good line. Impartial, free, and fair.
Donald Trump: Yeah, sure.
Question: Mr. President —
Donald Trump: Just like CNN, right?
Question: Mr. President, on the travel ban — we could banter back and forth. On the travel ban, would you accept that that was a good example of the smooth running of government, that fine-tuned —
Donald Trump: Yeah, I do. I do. And let me tell you about the travel —
Question: Were there any mistakes in that?
Donald Trump: Wait, wait, wait. I know who you are. Just wait. Let me tell you about the travel ban. We had a very smooth rollout of the travel ban, but we had a bad court. We got a bad decision. We had a court that’s been overturned — again, maybe wrong, but I think it’s 80 percent of the time. A lot. We had a bad decision. We’re going to keep going with that decision. We’re going to put in a new executive order next week sometime. But we had a bad decision. That’s the only thing that was wrong with the travel ban.
You had Delta with a massive problem with their computer system at the airports. You had some people that were put out there, brought by very nice buses, and they were put out at various locations. Despite that, the only problem that we had is we had a bad court. We had a court that gave us what I consider to be, with great respect, a very bad decision. Very bad for the safety and security of our country. The rollout was perfect.
Now, what I wanted to do was do the exact same executive order but said one thing — and I said this to my people: Give them a one-month period of time. But General Kelly, now Secretary Kelly, said, if you do that, all these people will come in, in the month — the bad ones. You do agree, there are bad people out there, right? They’re not everybody that’s like you. You have some bad people out there.
So Kelly said, you can’t do that. And he was right. As soon as he said it, I said, wow, never thought of it. I said, how about one week? He said, no good. You got to do it immediately, because if you do it immediately, they don’t have time to come in. Now, nobody ever reports that, but that’s why we did it quickly.
Now, if would have done it a month, everything would have been perfect. The problems is we would have wasted a lot of time, and maybe a lot of lives, because a lot of bad people would have come into our country.
Now, in the meantime, we’ve vetting very, very strongly. Very, very strongly. But we need help, and we need help by getting that executive order passed.
Question: Just a brief follow-up. And if it’s so urgent, why not introduce —
Donald Trump: Yes, go ahead.
Question: Thank you. I just was hoping that we could get a yes- or-no answer on one of these questions involving Russia. Can you say whether you are aware that anyone who advised your campaign had contacts with Russia during the course of the election?
Donald Trump: Well, I told you, General Flynn obviously was dealing. So that’s one person. But he was dealing — as he should have been —
Question: During the election?
Donald Trump: No, no, nobody that I know of.
Question: So you’re not aware of any contacts during the course of the election?
Donald Trump: Look, look, how many times do I have to answer this question?
Question: Can you just say yes or no on it?
Donald Trump: Russia is a ruse. Yeah, I know you have to get up and ask a question, so important. Russia is a ruse. I have nothing to do with Russia, haven’t made a phone call to Russia in years. Don’t speak to people from Russia. Not that I wouldn’t, I just have nobody to speak to. I spoke to Putin twice. He called me on the election — I told you this — and he called me on the inauguration, and a few days ago. We had a very good talk, especially the second one — lasted for a pretty long period of time. I’m sure you probably get it because it was classified, so I’m sure everybody in this room perhaps has it. But we had a very, very good talk. I have nothing to do with Russia. To the best of my knowledge, no person that I deal with does.
Now, Manafort has totally denied it. He denied it. Now, people knew that he was a consultant over in that part of the world for a while, but not for Russia. I think he represented Ukraine or people having to do with Ukraine, or people that — whoever. But people knew that. Everybody knew that.
Question: But in his capacity as your campaign manager, was he in touch with Russian officials during the election?
Donald Trump: I have — you know what, he said no. I can only tell you what he — now, he was replaced long before the election. You know that, right? He was replaced long before the election. When all of this stuff started coming out, it came out during the election. But Paul Manafort, who’s a good man also, by the way — Paul Manafort was replaced long before the election took place. He was only there for a short period of time.
How much longer should we stay here, folks? Five more minutes, is that okay? Five?
Question: Mr. President, on national security —
Donald Trump: Wait, let’s see, who’s — I want to find a friendly reporter. Are you a friendly reporter? Watch how friendly he is. Wait, wait — watch how friendly he is. Go ahead. Go ahead.
Question: So, first of all, my name is (inaudible) from (inaudible) Magazine. And (inaudible). I haven’t seen anybody in my community accuse either yourself or any of the — anyone on your staff of being anti-Semitic. We have an understanding of (inaudible).
Donald Trump: Thank you.
Question: However, what we are concerned about, and what we haven’t really heard be addressed is an uptick in anti-Semitism and how the government is planning to take care of it. There have been reports out that 48 bomb threats have been made against Jewish centers all across the country in the last couple of weeks. There are people who are committing anti-Semitic acts or threatening to —
Donald Trump: You see, he said he was going to ask a very simple, easy question. And it’s not. It’s not. Not a simple question, not a fair question. Okay, sit down. I understand the rest of your question.
So here’s the story, folks. Number one, I am the least anti-Semitic person that you’ve ever seen in your entire life. Number two, racism — the least racist person. In fact, we did very well relative to other people running as a Republican.
Question: (Inaudible.)
Donald Trump: Quiet, quiet, quiet. See, he lied about — he was going to get up and ask a very straight, simple question. So you know, welcome to the world of the media. But let me just tell you something — that I hate the charge. I find it repulsive. I hate even the question because people that know me — and you heard the Prime Minister, you heard Netanyahu yesterday — did you hear him, Bibi? He said, I’ve known Donald Trump for a long time, and then he said, forget it.
So you should take that, instead of having to get up and ask a very insulting question like that.
Yeah, go ahead. Go ahead.
Question: Thank you. I’m Lisa from the PBS —
Donald Trump: See, it just shows you about the press, but that’s the way the press is.
Question: Thank you, Mr. President. Lisa Desjardins from the PBS Newshour.
Donald Trump: Good.
Question: On national security and immigration, can you give us more details on the executive order you planned for next week, even its broad outlines? Will it be focused on specific countries?
Donald Trump: It’s a very fair question.
Question: And in addition, on the DACA program for immigration, what is your plan? Do you plan to continue that program or to end it?
Donald Trump: We’re going to show great heart. DACA is a very, very difficult subject for me, I will tell you. To me, it’s one of the most difficult subjects I have, because you have these incredible kids, in many cases — not in all cases. In some of the cases they’re having DACA and they’re gang members and they’re drug dealers too. But you have some absolutely incredible kids — I would say mostly — they were brought here in such a way — it’s a very, very tough subject.
We are going to deal with DACA with heart. I have to deal with a lot of politicians, don’t forget, and I have to convince them that what I’m saying is right. And I appreciate your understanding on that.
But the DACA situation is a very, very — it’s a very difficult thing for me. Because, you know, I love these kids. I love kids. I have kids and grandkids. And I find it very, very hard doing what the law says exactly to do. And you know, the law is rough. I’m not talking about new laws. I’m talking the existing law is very rough. It’s very, very rough.
As far as the new order, the new order is going to be very much tailored to what I consider to be a very bad decision, but we can tailor the order to that decision and get just about everything, in some ways more. But we’re tailoring it now to the decision. We have some of the best lawyers in the country working on it. And the new executive order is being tailored to the decision we got down from the court. Okay?
Question: Mr. President, Melania Trump announced the reopening of the White House Visitors Office.
Donald Trump: Yes.
Question: And she does a lot of great work for the country as well. Can you tell us a little bit about what First Lady Melania Trump does for the country? And there is a unique level of interest in your administration, so by opening the White House Visitors Office, what does that mean to you?
Donald Trump: Now, that’s what I call a nice question. That is very nice. Who are you with?
Question: (Inaudible.)
Donald Trump: Good. I’m going to start watching. Thank you very much.
Melania is terrific. She was here last night. We had dinner with Senator Rubio and his wife, who is, by the way, lovely. And we had a really good discussion about Cuba because we have very similar views on Cuba. And Cuba was very good to me in the Florida election as you know, the Cuban people, Americans. And I think that Melania is going to be outstanding. That’s right, she just opened up the Visitors Center — in other words, touring of the White House.
She, like others that she’s working with, feels very, very strongly about women’s issues, women’s difficulties, very, very strongly. And she’s a very, very strong advocate. I think she’s a great representative for this country. And a funny thing happens because she gets so unfairly maligned. The things they say — I’ve known her for a long time. She was a very successful person. She was a very successful model. She did really well. She would go home at night and didn’t even want to go out with people. She was a very private person. She was always the highest quality that you’ll ever find. And the things they say — and I’ve known her for a long time — the things they say are so unfair. And actually, she’s been apologized to, as you know, by various media because they said things that were lies.
I’d just tell you this: I think she’s going to be a fantastic First Lady. She’s going to be a tremendous representative of women and of the people. And helping her and working with her will be Ivanka, who is a fabulous person and a fabulous, fabulous woman. And they’re not doing this for money. They’re not doing this for pay. They’re doing this because they feel it, both of them. And Melania goes back and forth, and after Barron finishes school — because it’s hard to take a child out of school with a few months left — she and Barron will be moving over to the White House. Thank you. That’s a very nice question.
Go ahead.
Question: Mr. President.
Donald Trump: Yes. Oh, this is going to be a bad question but that’s okay.
Question: No, it’s not going to be a bad question.
Donald Trump: Good, because I enjoy watching you on television.
Question: Well, thank you so much. Mr. President, I need to find out from you — you said something as it relates to inner cities. That was one of your platforms during your campaign.
Donald Trump: Fix the inner cities, yes.
Question: Fixing the inner cities. What will be that fix and your urban agenda, as well as your HBCU executive order that’s coming out this afternoon? See, it wasn’t bad, was it?
Donald Trump: That was very professional and very good.
Question: I’m very professional.
Donald Trump: We’ll be announcing the order in a little while, and I’d rather let the order speak for itself. But it will be something I think that will be very good for everybody concerned. But we’ll talk to you about that after we do the announcement.
As far as the inner cities, as you know, I was very strong on the inner cities during the campaign. I think it’s probably what got me a much higher percentage of the African American vote than a lot of people thought I was going to get. We did much higher than people thought I was going to get and I was honored by that, including the Hispanic vote, which was also much higher. And, by the way, if I might add, including the women’s vote, which was much higher than people thought I was going to get.
So we are going to be working very hard on the inner cities having to do with education, having to do with crime. We’re going to try and fix as quickly as possible — you know it takes a long time. It’s taken 100 years or more for some of these places to evolve, and they evolved many of them very badly.
But we’re going to be working very hard on health and health care; very, very hard on education. And also, we’re going to working in a stringent way, and a very good way, on crime. You go to some of these inner city places, and it’s so sad when you look at the crime. You have people — and I’ve seen this, and I’ve sort of witnessed it. In fact, in two cases, I have actually witnessed it. They lock themselves into apartments, petrified to even leave, in the middle of the day. They’re living in hell. We can’t let that happen. So we’re going to be very, very strong.
It’s a great question, and it’s a very difficult situation, because it’s been many, many years. It’s been festering for many, many years. But we have places in this country that we have to fix. We have to help African American people that, for the most part are stuck there — Hispanic American people. We have Hispanic American people that are in the inner cities, and they’re living in hell.
I mean, you look at the numbers in Chicago. There are two Chicagos, as you know. There’s one Chicago that’s incredible, luxurious and all, and safe. There’s another Chicago that’s worse than almost any of the places in the Middle East that we talk about, and that you talk about every night on the newscasts. So we’re going to do a lot of work on the inner cities. I have great people lined up to help with the inner cities.
Question: Well, when you say — when you say the inner cities, are you going to include the CBC, Mr. President, in your conversations with your urban agenda, your inner city agenda, as well as your —
Donald Trump: Am I going include who?
Question: Are you going to include the Congressional Black Caucus and the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, as well as —
Donald Trump: Well, I would. I tell you what, do you want to set up the meeting? Do you want to set up the meeting?
Question: No, no, no.
Donald Trump: Are they friends of yours?
Question: I’m just a reporter.
Donald Trump: No, go ahead, set up the meeting.
Question: I know some of them, but I’m sure they’re watching right now.
Donald Trump: Let’s go set up a meeting. I would love to meet with the Black Caucus. I think it’s great — the Congressional Black Caucus. I think it’s great. I actually thought I had a meeting with Congressman Cummings, and he was all excited, and then he said, oh, I can’t move, it might be bad for me politically, I can’t have that meeting. I was all set to have the meeting. You know, we called him and called him, and he was all set. I spoke to him on the phone. Very nice guy.
Question: I hear he wanted that meeting with you as well.
Donald Trump: He wanted it. But we called, called, called, called — they can’t make a meeting with him. Every day, I walked in, I said, I would like to meet with him. Because I do want to solve the problem. But he probably was told by Schumer or somebody like that — some other lightweight — he was probably told — he was probably told, don’t meet with Trump, it’s bad politics. And that’s part of the problem of this country.
Okay, one more. Go ahead.
Question: Yes, Mr. President, two questions —
Donald Trump: No, no. One question. Two, we can’t handle. This room can’t handle two. Go ahead, give me the better of your two.
Question: (Inaudible) it’s not about your personality or your beliefs. We’re talking about (inaudible) around the country, some of it by supporters in your name. What do you —
Donald Trump: And some of it — and can I be honest with you? And this has to do with racism and horrible things that are put up. Some of it written by our opponents. You do know that. Do you understand that? You don’t think anybody would do a thing like that. Some of the signs you’ll see are not put up by the people that love or like Donald Trump, they’re put up by the other side, and you think it’s like playing it straight. No. But you have some of those signs, and some of that anger is caused by the other side. They’ll do signs and they’ll do drawings that are inappropriate. It won’t be my people. It will be the people on the other side to anger people like you. Okay.
Go ahead.
Question: You are the President now. What are you going to do about it?
Donald Trump: Who is that? Where is that? Oh, stand up. You can —
Question: What are you going to do about the tensions that have been discussed?
Donald Trump: Oh, I’m working on it. No, I’m working on it very hard.
Question: Are you going to give a speech?
Donald Trump: No, no, look. Hey, just so you understand, we had a totally divided country for eight years, and long before that, in all fairness to President Obama. Long before President Obama, we have had a very divided. I didn’t come along and divide this country. This country was seriously divided before I got here.
We’re going to work on it very hard. One of the questions that was asked — I thought it was a very good question — was about the inner cities. I mean, that’s part of it. But we’re going to work on education. We’re going to work on lack — you know, we’re going to stop — we’re going to try and stop the crime. We have great law enforcement officials. We’re going to try and stop crime. We’re not going to try and stop, we’re going to stop crime.
But it’s very important to me. But this isn’t Donald Trump that divided a nation. We went eight years with President Obama, and we went many years before President Obama. We lived in a divided nation. And I am going to try — I will do everything within my power to fix that.
I want to thank everybody very much. It’s a great honor to be with you. Thank you. Thank you very much. (Applause.) Mike Flynn is a fine person, and I asked for his resignation. He respectfully gave it. He is a man who — there was a certain amount of information given to Vice President Pence, who is with us today. And I was not happy with the way that information was given.
He didn’t have to do that, because what he did wasn’t wrong, what he did in terms of the information he saw. What was wrong was the way that other people, including yourselves in this room, were given that information, because that was classified information that was given illegally. That’s the real problem. And you can talk all you want about Russia, which was all a fake news, fabricated deal to try and make up for the loss of the Democrats, and the press plays right into it. In fact, I saw a couple of the people that were supposedly involved with all of this — they know nothing about it. They weren’t in Russia, they never made a phone call to Russia, they never received a phone call. It’s all fake news. It’s all fake news.
The nice thing is I see it starting to turn, where people are now looking at the illegal, Mara — and I think it’s very important — the illegal giving out classified information. And let me just tell you, it was given out, like, so much. I’ll give you an example. I called, as you know, Mexico. It was a very confidential, classified call, but I called Mexico. And in calling Mexico, I figured, oh, well, that’s — I spoke to the President of Mexico, had a good call. All of a sudden it’s out for the world to see. It’s supposed to be secret. It’s supposed to be either confidential or classified in that case. Same thing with Australia. All of a sudden people are finding out exactly what took place.
The same thing happened with respect to General Flynn. Everybody saw this, and I’m saying — the first thing I thought of when I heard about it is, how does the press get this information that’s classified? How do they do it? You know why? Because it’s an illegal process, and the press should be ashamed of themselves. But, more importantly, the people that gave out the information to the press should be ashamed of themselves. Really ashamed.
Yes, go ahead.
Question: Why did you keep your Vice President in the dark for almost two weeks?
Donald Trump: Because when I looked at the information, I said, I don’t think he did anything wrong. If anything, he did something right. He was coming into office, he looked at the information. He said, huh, that’s fine, that’s what they’re supposed to do. They’re supposed to be — and he didn’t just call Russia. He called and spoke to, both ways — I think there were 30-some-odd countries. He’s doing the job.
You know, he was just doing his job. The thing is he didn’t tell our Vice President properly, and then he said he didn’t remember. So either way, it wasn’t very satisfactory to me. And I have somebody that I think will be outstanding for the position, and that also helps, I think, in the making of my decision.
But he didn’t tell the Vice President of the United States the facts, and then he didn’t remember. And that just wasn’t acceptable to me.
Yes.
Question: President Trump, since you brought up Russia, I’m looking for some clarification here. During the campaign, did anyone from your team communicate with members of the Russian government or Russian intelligence? And if so, what was the nature of those conversations?
Donald Trump: Well, the failing New York Times wrote a big, long front-page story yesterday. And it was very much discredited, as you know. It was — it’s a joke. And the people mentioned in the story — I notice they were on television today saying they never even spoke to Russia. They weren’t even a part, really — I mean, they were such a minor part — I hadn’t spoken to them. I think the one person, I don’t think I’ve ever spoken to him. I don’t think I’ve ever met him. And he actually said he was a very low-level member of, I think, a committee for a short period of time. I don’t think I ever met him. Now, it’s possible that I walked into a room and he was sitting there, but I don’t think I ever met him. I didn’t talk to him, ever. And he thought it was a joke.
The other person said he never spoke to Russia, never received a call. Look at his phone records, et cetera, et cetera. And the other person, people knew that he’d represented various countries, but I don’t think he represented Russia — but knew that he represented various countries. That’s what he does. I mean, people know that. That’s Mr. Manafort, who’s, by the way — who’s, by the way, a respected man. He’s a respected man. But I think he represented the Ukraine, or Ukraine government, or somebody. But everybody — people knew that. Everybody knew that. So these people — and he said that he has absolutely nothing to do and never has with Russia. And he said that very forcefully. I saw his statement. He said it very forcefully. Most of the papers don’t print it because that’s not good for their stories.
So the three people that they talked about all totally deny it. And I can tell you, speaking for myself, I own nothing in Russia. I have no loans in Russia. I don’t have any deals in Russia. President Putin called me up very nicely to congratulate me on the win of the election. He then called me up extremely nicely to congratulate me on the inauguration, which was terrific. But so did many other leaders — almost all other leaders from almost all other countries. So that’s the extent.
Russia is fake news. Russia — this is fake news put out by the media. The real news is the fact that people, probably from the Obama administration because they’re there — because we have our new people going in place right now. As you know, Mike Pompeo is now taking control of the CIA. James Comey at FBI. Dan Coats is waiting to be approved. I mean, he is a senator, and a highly respected one. And he’s still waiting to be approved. But our new people are going in.
And just while you’re at, because you mentioned this, Wall Street Journal did a story today that was almost as disgraceful as the failing New Times’s story yesterday. And it talked about — you saw it, front page. So, Director of National Intelligence just put out — acting — a statement: “Any suggestion that the United States intelligence community” — this was just given to us — “is withholding information and not providing the best possible intelligence to the President and his national security team is not true.”
So they took this front-page story out of The Wall Street Journal — top — and they just wrote the story is not true. And I’ll tell you something, I’ll be honest — because I sort of enjoy this back and forth, and I guess I have all my life, but I’ve never seen more dishonest media than, frankly, the political media. I thought the financial media was much better, much more honest. But I will say that I never get phone calls from the media. How do they write a story like that in The Wall Street Journal without asking me? Or how do they write a story in The New York Times, put it on front page? That was like that story they wrote about the women and me — front page. Big massive story. And it was nasty.
And then they called. They said, "We never said that. We like Mr. Trump." They called up my office — we like Mr. Trump; we never said that. And it was totally — they totally misrepresented those very wonderful women, I have to tell you — totally misrepresented. I said, give us a retraction. They never gave us a retraction. And, frankly, I then went on to other things.
Go ahead.
Question: Mr. President —
Donald Trump: You okay?
Question: I am. Just wanted to get untangled. Very simply, you said today that you had the biggest electoral margins since Ronald Reagan with 304 or 306 electoral votes. In fact, President Obama got 365 in 2008.
Donald Trump: Well, I’m talking about Republican. Yes.
Question: President Obama, 332. George H.W. Bush, 426 when he won as President. So why should Americans trust —
Donald Trump: Well, no, I was told — I was given that information. I don’t know. I was just given. We had a very, very big margin.
Question: I guess my question is, why should Americans trust you when you have accused the information they receive of being fake when you’re providing information that’s fake?
Donald Trump: Well, I don’t know. I was given that information. I was given — actually, I’ve seen that information around. But it was a very substantial victory. Do you agree with that?
Question: You’re the President.
Donald Trump: Okay, thank you. That’s a good answer. Yes.
Question: Mr. President, thank you so much. Can you tell us in determining that Lieutenant General Flynn — there was no wrongdoing in your mind, what evidence was weighed? Did you have the transcripts of these telephone intercepts with Russian officials, particularly Ambassador Kislyak, who he was communicating with? What evidence did you weigh to determine there was no wrong doing?
And further than that, sir, you’ve said on a couple of occasions this morning that you were going to aggressively pursue the sources of these leaks.
Donald Trump: We are.
Question: Can we ask what you’re doing to do? And also, we’ve heard about a review of the intelligence community headed by Stephen Feinberg. What can you tell us about that?
Donald Trump: Well, first of all, about that, we now have Dan Coats, hopefully soon Mike Pompeo and James Comey, and they’re in position. So I hope that we’ll be able to straighten that out without using anybody else. The gentleman you mentioned is a very talented man, very successful man. And he has offered his services, and it’s something we may take advantage of. But I don’t think we’ll need that at all because of the fact that I think that we’re going to be able to straighten it out very easily on its own.
As far as the general is concerned, when I first heard about it, I said, huh, that doesn’t sound wrong. My counsel came — Don McGahn, White House Counsel — and he told me, and I asked him, and he can speak very well for himself. He said he doesn’t think anything is wrong. He really didn’t think — it was really what happened after that, but he didn’t think anything was done wrong. I didn’t either, because I waited a period of time and I started to think about it. I said, well, I don’t see — to me, he was doing the job.
The information was provided by — who I don’t know — Sally Yates — and I was a little surprised because I said, doesn’t sound like he did anything wrong there. But he did something wrong with respect to the Vice President, and I thought that was not acceptable. As far as the actual making the call — in fact, I’ve watched various programs and I’ve read various articles where he was just doing his job. That was very normal. At first, everybody got excited because they thought he did something wrong. After they thought about it, it turned out he was just doing his job.
So — and I do — and, by the way, with all of that being said, I do think he’s a fine man.
Yes, Jon.
Question: On the leaks, sir —
Donald Trump: Go ahead, finish off, then I’ll get you, Jon.
Question: Sorry, what will you do on the leaks? You have said twice today —
Donald Trump: Yes, we’re looking at it very, very seriously. I’ve gone to all of the folks in charge of the various agencies, and we’re — I’ve actually called the Justice Department to look into the leaks. Those are criminal leaks. They’re put out by people either in agencies. I think you’ll see it stopping because now we have our people in. You know, again, we don’t have our people in because we can’t get them approved by the Senate. We just had Jeff Sessions approved in Justice, as an example. So we are looking into that very seriously. It’s a criminal act.
You know what I say — when I was called out on Mexico, I was shocked. Because all this equipment, all this incredible phone equipment. When I was called out on Mexico, I was — honestly, I was really, really surprised. But I said, you know, it doesn’t make sense, that won’t happen. But that wasn’t that important to call, it was fine. I could show it to the world and he could show it to the world — the President who is a very fine man, by the way. Same thing with Australia. I said, that’s terrible that it was leaked but it wasn’t that important. But then I said, what happens when I’m dealing with the problem of North Korea? What happens when I’m dealing with the problems in the Middle East? Are you folks going to be reporting all of that very, very confidential information — very important, very — I mean, at the highest level, are you going to be reporting about that too?
So I don’t want classified information getting out to the public. And in a way, that was almost a test. So I’m dealing with Mexico. I’m dealing with Argentina. We were dealing on this case with Mike Flynn. All this information gets put into the Washington Post and gets put into the New York Times. And I’m saying, what’s going to happen when I’m dealing on the Middle East? What’s going to happen when I’m dealing with really, really important subjects like North Korea? We’ve got to stop it. That’s why it’s a criminal penalty.
Yes, Jon.
Question: Thank you, Mr. President. I just want to get you to clarify just a very important point. Can you say definitively that nobody on your campaign had any contacts with the Russians during the campaign? And, on the leaks, is it fake news or are these real leaks?
Donald Trump: Well, the leaks are real. You’re the one that wrote about them and reported them. I mean, the leaks are real. You know what they said — you saw it. And the leaks are absolutely real. The news is fake because so much of the news is fake.
So one thing that I felt it was very important to do — and I hope we can correct it, because there is nobody I have more respect for — well, maybe a little bit — than reporters, than good reporters. It’s very important to me, and especially in this position. It’s very important. I don’t mind bad stories. I can handle a bad story better than anybody as long as it’s true. And over a course of time, I’ll make mistakes and you’ll write badly and I’m okay with that. But I’m not okay when it is fake. I mean, I watch CNN — it’s so much anger and hatred and just the hatred. I don’t watch it anymore because it’s very good — he’s saying no. It’s okay, Jim. It’s okay, Jim. You’ll have your chance. But I watch others too. You’re not the only one, so don’t feel badly.
But I think it should be straight. I think it should be — I think it would be, frankly, more interesting. I know how good everybody’s ratings are right now, but I think that actually would be — I think that it would actually be better.
People — I mean, you have a lower approval rate than Congress. I think that’s right. I don’t know, Peter, is that one right? Because you know, I think they have lower — I heard, lower than Congress.
But honestly, the public would appreciate it. I’d appreciate it. Again, I don’t mind bad stories when it’s true. But we have an administration where the Democrats are making it very difficult. I think we’re setting a record, or close to a record in the time of approval of a Cabinet. I mean, the numbers are crazy. When I’m looking — some of them had them approved immediately. I’m going forever, and I still have a lot of people that we’re waiting for.
And that’s all they’re doing, is delaying. And you look at Schumer and the mess that he’s got over there, and they have nothing going. The only thing they can do is delay. And you know, I think they’d be better served by approving and making sure that they’re happy and everybody is good. And sometimes, I mean — I know President Obama lost three or four, and you lose them on the way. And that’s okay. That’s fine.
But I think they would be much better served, Jon, if they just went through the process quickly. This is pure delay tactics. And they say it, and everybody understands it.
Yeah, go ahead, Jim.
Question: The first part of my question on contacts. Do you definitively say that nobody —
Donald Trump: Well, I had nothing to do with it. I have nothing to do with Russia. I told you, I have no deals there. I have no anything.
Now, when WikiLeaks, which I had nothing to do with, comes out and happens to give — they’re not giving classified information. They’re giving stuff — what was said at an office about Hillary cheating on the debates — which, by the way, nobody mentions. Nobody mentions that Hillary received the questions to the debates.
Can you imagine — seriously, can you imagine if I received the questions? It would be the electric chair, okay? “He should be put in the electric chair.” You would even call for the reinstitution of the death penalty, okay? Maybe not you, Jon.
Yes, we’ll do you next, Jim. I’ll do you next. Yes?
Question: Thank you, Mr. President. I just want to clarify one other thing.
Donald Trump: Sure.
Question: Did you direct Mike Flynn to discuss the sanctions with the Russian ambassador?
Donald Trump: No, I didn’t. No, I didn’t.
Question: (Inaudible.) (Off mic.)
Donald Trump: No, I didn’t.
Question: Did you fire him because (inaudible) —
Donald Trump: Excuse me — no, I fired him because of what he said to Mike Pence, very simple. Mike was doing his job. He was calling countries and his counterparts. So it certainly would have been okay with me if he did it. I would have directed him to do it if I thought he wasn’t doing it. I didn’t direct him but I would have directed him because that’s his job.
And it came out that way — and, in all fairness, I watched Dr. Charles Krauthammer the other night say he was doing his job. And I agreed with him. And since then I’ve watched many other people say that.
No, I didn’t direct him, but I would have directed him if he didn’t do it, okay?
Jim.
Question: Mr. President, thank you very much. And just for the record, we don’t hate you, I don’t hate you. If you could pass that along.
Donald Trump: Okay. Well, ask Jeff Zucker how he got his job, okay?
Question: If I may follow up on some of the questions that have taken place so far, sir.
Donald Trump: Well, not too many. We do have other people. You do have other people, and your ratings aren’t as good as some of the other people that are waiting.
Question: They’re pretty good right now, actually.
Donald Trump: Okay. Go ahead, Jim.
Question: If I may ask, sir, you said earlier that WikiLeaks was revealing information about the Hillary Clinton campaign during the election cycle. You welcomed that at one point.
Donald Trump: I was okay with it.
Question: You said you loved WikiLeaks. At another campaign press conference you called on the Russians to find the missing 30,000 emails. I’m wondering, sir, if you —
Donald Trump: Well, she was actually missing 33,000, and then that got extended with a whole pile after that, but that’s okay.
Question: Maybe my numbers are off a little bit too.
Donald Trump: No, no, but I did say 30,000, but it was actually higher than that.
Question: If I may ask you, sir, it sounds as though you do not have much credibility here when it comes to leaking if that is something that you encouraged in the campaign.
Donald Trump: Okay, fair question. Ready?
Question: So if I may ask you that — if I may ask a follow-up —
Donald Trump: No, no, but are you — let me do one at a time. Do you mind?
Question: Yes, sir.
Donald Trump: All right. So in one case you’re talking about highly classified information. In the other case you’re talking about John Podesta saying bad things about the boss. I will say this: If John Podesta said that about me and he was working for me, I would have fired him so fast your head would have spun. He said terrible things about her. But it wasn’t classified information.
But in one case you’re talking about classified. Regardless, if you look at the RNC, we had a very strong — at my suggestion — and I give Reince great credit for this — at my suggestion, because I know something about this world, I said I want a very strong defensive mechanism. I don’t want to be hacked. And we did that, and you have seen that they tried to hack us and they failed.
The DNC did not do that. And if they did it, they could not have been hacked. But they were hacked, and terrible things came. And the only thing that I do think is unfair is some of the things were so — they were — when I heard some of those things, I said — I picked up the papers the next morning, I said, oh, this is going to front page. It wasn’t even in the papers.
Again, if I had that happen to me, it would be the biggest story in the history of publishing or the head of newspapers. I would have been the headline in every newspaper.
I mean, think of it. They gave her the questions for the debate, and she should have reported herself. Why didn’t Hillary Clinton announce that, "I’m sorry, but I have been given the questions to a debate or a town hall, and I feel that it’s inappropriate, and I want to turn in CNN for not doing a good job"?
Question: And if I may follow up on that, just something that Jonathan Karl was asking you about — you said that the leaks are real, but the news is fake. I guess I don’t understand. It seems that there is a disconnect there. If the information coming from those leaks is real, then how can the stories be fake?
Donald Trump: Well, the reporting is fake. Look, look —
Question: And if I may ask — I just want to ask one other question.
Donald Trump: Jim, you know what it is? Here’s the thing. The public isn’t — they read newspapers, they see television, they watch. They don’t know if it’s true or false because they’re not involved. I’m involved. I’ve been involved with this stuff all my life. But I’m involved. So I know when you’re telling the truth or when you’re not.
I just see many, many untruthful things. And I tell you what else I see. I see tone. You know the word “tone.” The tone is such hatred. I’m really not a bad person, by the way. No, but the tone is such — I do get good ratings, you have to admit that. The tone is such hatred.
I watched this morning a couple of the networks, and I have to say “Fox & Friends” in the morning, they’re very honorable people. They’re very — not because they’re good, because they hit me also when I do something wrong. But they have the most honest morning show. That’s all I can say. It’s the most honest. But the tone, Jim. If you look — the hatred. I mean, sometimes — sometimes somebody gets —
Question: (Off mic.)
Donald Trump: Well, you look at your show that goes on at 10 o’clock in the evening. You just take a look at that show. That is a constant hit. The panel is almost always exclusive anti-Trump. The good news is he doesn’t have good ratings. But the panel is almost exclusive anti-Trump. And the hatred and venom coming from his mouth, the hatred coming from other people on your network.
Now, I will say this. I watch it. I see it. I’m amazed by it. And I just think you’d be a lot better off — I honestly do. The public gets it, you know. Look, when I go to rallies, they turn around, they start screaming at CNN. They want to throw their placards at CNN.
I think you would do much better by being different. But you just take a look. Take a look at some of your shows in the morning and the evening. If a guest comes out and says something positive about me, it’s brutal.
Now, they’ll take this news conference. I’m actually having a very good time, okay? But they’ll take this news conference — don’t forget that’s the way I won. Remember, I used to give you a news conference every time I made a speech, which was like every day.
Question: (Off mic.)
Donald Trump: No, that’s how I won. I won with news conferences and probably speeches. I certainly didn’t win by people listening to you people, that’s for sure.
But I am having a good time. Tomorrow they will say, Donald Trump rants and raves at the press. I’m not ranting and raving. I’m just telling you, you’re dishonest people. But — but I’m not ranting and raving. I love this. I’m having a good time doing it. But tomorrow the headlines are going to be: Donald Trump Rants and Raves. I’m not ranting and raving.
Question: If I may just —
Donald Trump: Go ahead.
Question: One more follow-up because —
Donald Trump: Should I let him have a little bit more? What do you think, Peter?
Question: Just because of this —
Donald Trump: Peter, should I have let him have a little bit more? Sit down. Sit down.
Question: Just because of the attack —
Donald Trump: We’ll get it.
Question: Just because of the attack of fake news and attacking our network, I just want to ask you, sir —
Donald Trump: I’m changing it from fake news, though.
Question: Doesn’t that undermine —
Donald Trump: Very fake news now. (Laughter.)
Question: But aren’t you —
Donald Trump: Yes, go ahead.
Question: Real news, Mr. President. Real news.
Donald Trump: And you’re not related to our new —
Question: I am not related, sir, no. (Laughter.) I do like the sound of Secretary Acosta, I must say.
Donald Trump: I looked — you know, I looked at that name. I said, wait a minute, is there any relation there? Alex Acosta.
Question: I’m sure you checked that out, sir.
Donald Trump: No, I checked it. I said — they said, no, sir. I said, do me a favor, go back and check the family tree.
Question: But aren’t you concerned, sir, that you are undermining the people’s faith in the First Amendment freedom of the press, the press in this country when you call stories you don’t like “fake news”? Why not just say it’s a story I don’t like?
Donald Trump: I do that.
Question: When you call it fake news, you’re undermining confidence —
Donald Trump: No, I do that. No, no, I do that.
Question: — in our news media.
Donald Trump: Here’s the thing.
Question: Isn’t that important?
Donald Trump: Okay, I understand — and you’re right about that except this. See, I know when I should get good and when I should get bad. And sometimes I’ll say, wow, that’s going to be a great story, and I’ll get killed. I know what’s good and bad. I’d be a pretty good reporter — not as good as you. But I know what’s good. I know what’s bad.
And when they change it and make it really bad — something that should be positive. Sometimes something that should be very positive, they’ll make okay. They’ll even make it negative. So I understand it because I’m there. I know what was said. I know who is saying it. I’m there. So it’s very important to me.
Look, I want to see an honest press. When I started off today by saying that it’s so important to the public to get an honest press. The press — the public doesn’t believe you people anymore. Now, maybe I had something to do with that, I don’t know. But they don’t believe you.
If you were straight and really told it like it is, as Howard Cosell used to say, right? Of course, he had some questions also. But if you were straight, I would be your biggest booster, I would be your biggest fan in the world — including bad stories about me. But if you go — as an example, you’re CNN — I mean, it’s story after story after story is bad. I won. I won. And the other thing: Chaos. There’s zero chaos. We are running — this is a fine-tuned machine. And Reince happens to be doing a good job. But half of his job is putting out lies by the press.
I said to him yesterday, this whole Russia scam that you guys are building so that you don’t talk about the real subject, which is illegal leaks. But I watched him yesterday working so hard to try and get that story proper. And I’m saying, here’s my Chief of Staff, a really good guy, did a phenomenal job at RNC. I mean, we won the election, right? We won the presidency. We got some senators. We got some — all over the country, you take a look, he’s done a great job.
And I said to myself, you know — and I said to somebody that was in the room — I said, you take a look at Reince, he’s working so hard just putting out fires that are fake fires. They’re fake. They’re not true. And isn’t that a shame, because he’d rather be working on health care. He’d rather be working on tax reform, Jim. I mean that. I would be your biggest fan in the world if you treated me right. I sort of understand there’s a certain bias, maybe by Jeff or somebody — for whatever reason. And I understand that. But you’ve got to be at least a little bit fair. And that’s why the public sees it — they see it. They see it’s not fair. You take a look at some of your shows and you see the bias and the hatred. And the public is smart. They understand it.
Okay, yeah, go ahead.
Question: We have no doubt that your latest story is (inaudible). But for those who believe that there is something to it, is there anything that you have learned over these last few weeks that you might be able to reveal that might ease their concerns that this isn’t fake news? And secondly —
Donald Trump: I think they don’t believe it. I don’t think the public would. That’s why the Rasmussen poll just has me through the roof. I don’t think they believe it. Well, I guess one of the reasons I’m here today is to tell you the whole Russian thing — that’s a ruse. That’s a ruse. And, by the way, it would be great if we could get along with Russia, just so you understand that. Now, tomorrow you’ll say, Donald Trump wants to get along with Russia, this is terrible. It’s not terrible — it’s good.
We had Hillary Clinton try and do a reset. We had Hillary Clinton give Russia 20 percent of the uranium in our country. You know what uranium is, right? It’s this thing called nuclear weapons and other things. Like, lots of things are done with uranium, including some bad things. Nobody talks about that. I didn’t do anything for Russia. I’ve done nothing for Russia. Hillary Clinton gave them 20 percent of our uranium. Hillary Clinton did a reset, remember, with the stupid plastic button that made us all look like a bunch of jerks? Here, take a look. He looked at her like, what the hell is she doing with that cheap plastic button? Hillary Clinton — that was a reset. Remember? It said "reset."
Now, if I do that, oh, I’m a bad guy. If we could get along with Russia, that’s a positive thing. We have a very talented man, Rex Tillerson, who is going to be meeting with them shortly. And I told him, I said, I know politically it’s probably not good for me. Hey, the greatest thing I could do is shoot that ship that’s 30 miles offshore right out of the water. Everyone in this country is going to say, oh, it’s so great. That’s not great. That’s not great. I would love to be able to get along with Russia.
Now, you’ve had a lot of Presidents that haven’t taken that tact. Look where we are now. Look where we are now. So, if I can — now, I love to negotiate things. I do it really well and all that stuff, but it’s possible I won’t be able to get along with Putin. Maybe it is. But I want to just tell you, the false reporting by the media, by you people — the false, horrible, fake reporting makes it much harder to make a deal with Russia. And probably Putin said, you know — he’s sitting behind his desk and he’s saying, you know, I see what’s going on in the United States, I follow it closely; it’s got to be impossible for President Trump to ever get along with Russia because of all the pressure he’s got with this fake story. Okay? And that’s a shame. Because if we could get along with Russia — and, by the way, China and Japan and everyone — if we could get along, it would be a positive thing, not a negative thing.
Question: Tax reform —
Question: Mr. President, since you —
Donald Trump: Tax reform is going to happen fairly quickly. We’re doing Obamacare — we’re in final stages. We should be submitting the initial plan in March, early March, I would say. And we have to, as you know, statutorily and for reasons of budget, we have to go first. It’s not like — frankly, the tax would be easier, in my opinion, but for statutory reasons and for budgetary reasons, we have to submit the health care sooner. So we’ll be submitting health care sometime in early March, mid-March. And after that, we’re going to come up — and we’re doing very well on tax reform.
Yes.
Question: Mr. President, you mentioned Russia. Let’s talk about some serious issues that have come up in the last week that you have had to deal with as President of the United States.
Donald Trump: Okay.
Question: You mentioned the vessel, the spy vessel, off the coast of the United States.
Donald Trump: Not good.
Question: There was a ballistic missile test that many interpreted as a violation —
Donald Trump: Not good.
Question: — of the agreement between the two countries. And a Russian plane buzzed a U.S. destroyer.
Donald Trump: Not good.
Question: I listened to you during the campaign —
Donald Trump: Excuse me, excuse me, when did it happen? It happened when — if you were Putin right now, you would say, hey, we’re back to the old games with the United States. There’s no way Trump can ever do a deal with us because the — you have to understand, if I was just brutal on Russia right now, just brutal, people would say, you would say, oh, isn’t that wonderful. But I know you well enough. Then you would say, oh, he was too tough, he shouldn’t have done that. Look, of all —
Question: I’m just trying to find out your orientation to those —
Donald Trump: Wait a minute. Wait, wait. Excuse me just one second.
Question: I’m just trying to find out what you’re doing to do about them, Mr. President.
Donald Trump: All of those things that you mentioned are very recent, because probably Putin assumes that he’s not going to be able to make a deal with me because it’s politically not popular for me to make a deal. So Hillary Clinton tries to reset, it failed. They all tried. But I’m different than those people.
Go ahead.
Question: How are you interpreting those moves? And what do you intend to do about them?
Donald Trump: Just the way I said it.
Question: Have you given Rex Tillerson any advice or counsel on how to deal?
Donald Trump: I have. I have. And I’m so beautifully represented. I’m so honored that the Senate approved him. He’s going to be fantastic.
Yes, I think that I’ve already —
Question: Is Putin testing you, do you believe, sir?
Donald Trump: No, I don’t think so. I think Putin probably assumes that he can’t make a deal with me anymore because politically it would be unpopular for a politician to make a deal. I can’t believe I’m saying I’m a politician, but I guess that’s what I am now. Because, look, it would be much easier for me to be tough on Russia, but then we’re not going to make a deal.
Now, I don’t know that we’re going to make a deal. I don’t know. We might, we might not. But it would be much easier for me to be so tough — the tougher I am on Russia, the better. But you know what, I want to do the right thing for the American people. And to be honest, secondarily, I want to do the right thing for the world.
If Russia and the United States actually got together and got along — and don’t forget, we’re a very powerful nuclear country and so are they. There’s no upside. We’re a very powerful nuclear country and so are they. I’ve been briefed. And I can tell you, one thing about a briefing that we’re allowed to say because anybody that ever read the most basic book can say it: Nuclear holocaust would be like no other. They’re a very powerful nuclear country and so are we.
If we have a good relationship with Russia, believe me, that’s a good thing, not a bad thing.
Question: So when you say they’re not good, do you mean that they are —
Donald Trump: Who did I say is not good?
Question: No, when I read off the three things that have recently happened and each one of them you said they’re not good.
Donald Trump: No, it’s not good, but they happened.
Question: But do they damage the relationship? Do they undermine this country’s ability to work with Russia?
Donald Trump: They all happened recently, and I understand what they’re doing, because they’re doing the same thing. Now, again, maybe I’m not going to be able to do a deal with Russia, but at least I will have tried. And if I don’t, does anybody really think that Hillary Clinton would be tougher on Russia than Donald Trump? Does anybody in this room really believe that? Okay.
But I tell you one thing: She tried to make a deal. She had the reset. She gave all the valuable uranium away. She did other things. You know, they say I’m close to Russia. Hillary Clinton gave away 20 percent of the uranium in the United States. She’s close to Russia. I gave — you know what I gave to Russia? You know what I gave? Nothing.
Question: Can we conclude there will be no response to these particular provocations?
Donald Trump: I’m not going to tell you anything about what response I do. I don’t talk about military response. I don’t say I’m going into Mosul in four months. "We are going to attack Mosul in four months." Then three months later: "We are going to attack Mosul in one month." "Next week, we are going to attack Mosul." In the meantime, Mosul is very, very difficult. Do you know why? Because I don’t talk about military, and I don’t talk about certain other things. You’re going to be surprised to hear that. And, by the way, my whole campaign, I’d say that. So I don’t have to tell you —
Question: There will be a response?
Donald Trump: I don’t want to be one of these guys that say, “Yes, here’s what we’re going to do.” I don’t have to do that.
Question: There will be a — in other words, there will be a response, Mr. President?
Donald Trump: I don’t have to tell you what I’m going to do in North Korea. Wait a minute. I don’t have to tell you what I’m going to do in North Korea. And I don’t have to tell you what I’m going to do with Iran. You know why? Because they shouldn’t know. And eventually you guys are going to get tired of asking that question. So when you ask me, what am I going to do with the ship — the Russian ship, as an example — I’m not going to tell you. But hopefully, I won’t have to do anything. But I’m not going to tell you. Okay.
Question: Thanks.
Question: Can I just ask you — thank you very much, Mr. President — the Trump —
Donald Trump: Where are you from?
Question: BBC.
Donald Trump: Okay. Here’s another beauty.
Question: That’s a good line. Impartial, free, and fair.
Donald Trump: Yeah, sure.
Question: Mr. President —
Donald Trump: Just like CNN, right?
Question: Mr. President, on the travel ban — we could banter back and forth. On the travel ban, would you accept that that was a good example of the smooth running of government, that fine-tuned —
Donald Trump: Yeah, I do. I do. And let me tell you about the travel —
Question: Were there any mistakes in that?
Donald Trump: Wait, wait, wait. I know who you are. Just wait. Let me tell you about the travel ban. We had a very smooth rollout of the travel ban, but we had a bad court. We got a bad decision. We had a court that’s been overturned — again, maybe wrong, but I think it’s 80 percent of the time. A lot. We had a bad decision. We’re going to keep going with that decision. We’re going to put in a new executive order next week sometime. But we had a bad decision. That’s the only thing that was wrong with the travel ban.
You had Delta with a massive problem with their computer system at the airports. You had some people that were put out there, brought by very nice buses, and they were put out at various locations. Despite that, the only problem that we had is we had a bad court. We had a court that gave us what I consider to be, with great respect, a very bad decision. Very bad for the safety and security of our country. The rollout was perfect.
Now, what I wanted to do was do the exact same executive order but said one thing — and I said this to my people: Give them a one-month period of time. But General Kelly, now Secretary Kelly, said, if you do that, all these people will come in, in the month — the bad ones. You do agree, there are bad people out there, right? They’re not everybody that’s like you. You have some bad people out there.
So Kelly said, you can’t do that. And he was right. As soon as he said it, I said, wow, never thought of it. I said, how about one week? He said, no good. You got to do it immediately, because if you do it immediately, they don’t have time to come in. Now, nobody ever reports that, but that’s why we did it quickly.
Now, if would have done it a month, everything would have been perfect. The problems is we would have wasted a lot of time, and maybe a lot of lives, because a lot of bad people would have come into our country.
Now, in the meantime, we’ve vetting very, very strongly. Very, very strongly. But we need help, and we need help by getting that executive order passed.
Question: Just a brief follow-up. And if it’s so urgent, why not introduce —
Donald Trump: Yes, go ahead.
Question: Thank you. I just was hoping that we could get a yes- or-no answer on one of these questions involving Russia. Can you say whether you are aware that anyone who advised your campaign had contacts with Russia during the course of the election?
Donald Trump: Well, I told you, General Flynn obviously was dealing. So that’s one person. But he was dealing — as he should have been —
Question: During the election?
Donald Trump: No, no, nobody that I know of.
Question: So you’re not aware of any contacts during the course of the election?
Donald Trump: Look, look, how many times do I have to answer this question?
Question: Can you just say yes or no on it?
Donald Trump: Russia is a ruse. Yeah, I know you have to get up and ask a question, so important. Russia is a ruse. I have nothing to do with Russia, haven’t made a phone call to Russia in years. Don’t speak to people from Russia. Not that I wouldn’t, I just have nobody to speak to. I spoke to Putin twice. He called me on the election — I told you this — and he called me on the inauguration, and a few days ago. We had a very good talk, especially the second one — lasted for a pretty long period of time. I’m sure you probably get it because it was classified, so I’m sure everybody in this room perhaps has it. But we had a very, very good talk. I have nothing to do with Russia. To the best of my knowledge, no person that I deal with does.
Now, Manafort has totally denied it. He denied it. Now, people knew that he was a consultant over in that part of the world for a while, but not for Russia. I think he represented Ukraine or people having to do with Ukraine, or people that — whoever. But people knew that. Everybody knew that.
Question: But in his capacity as your campaign manager, was he in touch with Russian officials during the election?
Donald Trump: I have — you know what, he said no. I can only tell you what he — now, he was replaced long before the election. You know that, right? He was replaced long before the election. When all of this stuff started coming out, it came out during the election. But Paul Manafort, who’s a good man also, by the way — Paul Manafort was replaced long before the election took place. He was only there for a short period of time.
How much longer should we stay here, folks? Five more minutes, is that okay? Five?
Question: Mr. President, on national security —
Donald Trump: Wait, let’s see, who’s — I want to find a friendly reporter. Are you a friendly reporter? Watch how friendly he is. Wait, wait — watch how friendly he is. Go ahead. Go ahead.
Question: So, first of all, my name is (inaudible) from (inaudible) Magazine. And (inaudible). I haven’t seen anybody in my community accuse either yourself or any of the — anyone on your staff of being anti-Semitic. We have an understanding of (inaudible).
Donald Trump: Thank you.
Question: However, what we are concerned about, and what we haven’t really heard be addressed is an uptick in anti-Semitism and how the government is planning to take care of it. There have been reports out that 48 bomb threats have been made against Jewish centers all across the country in the last couple of weeks. There are people who are committing anti-Semitic acts or threatening to —
Donald Trump: You see, he said he was going to ask a very simple, easy question. And it’s not. It’s not. Not a simple question, not a fair question. Okay, sit down. I understand the rest of your question.
So here’s the story, folks. Number one, I am the least anti-Semitic person that you’ve ever seen in your entire life. Number two, racism — the least racist person. In fact, we did very well relative to other people running as a Republican.
Question: (Inaudible.)
Donald Trump: Quiet, quiet, quiet. See, he lied about — he was going to get up and ask a very straight, simple question. So you know, welcome to the world of the media. But let me just tell you something — that I hate the charge. I find it repulsive. I hate even the question because people that know me — and you heard the Prime Minister, you heard Netanyahu yesterday — did you hear him, Bibi? He said, I’ve known Donald Trump for a long time, and then he said, forget it.
So you should take that, instead of having to get up and ask a very insulting question like that.
Yeah, go ahead. Go ahead.
Question: Thank you. I’m Lisa from the PBS —
Donald Trump: See, it just shows you about the press, but that’s the way the press is.
Question: Thank you, Mr. President. Lisa Desjardins from the PBS Newshour.
Donald Trump: Good.
Question: On national security and immigration, can you give us more details on the executive order you planned for next week, even its broad outlines? Will it be focused on specific countries?
Donald Trump: It’s a very fair question.
Question: And in addition, on the DACA program for immigration, what is your plan? Do you plan to continue that program or to end it?
Donald Trump: We’re going to show great heart. DACA is a very, very difficult subject for me, I will tell you. To me, it’s one of the most difficult subjects I have, because you have these incredible kids, in many cases — not in all cases. In some of the cases they’re having DACA and they’re gang members and they’re drug dealers too. But you have some absolutely incredible kids — I would say mostly — they were brought here in such a way — it’s a very, very tough subject.
We are going to deal with DACA with heart. I have to deal with a lot of politicians, don’t forget, and I have to convince them that what I’m saying is right. And I appreciate your understanding on that.
But the DACA situation is a very, very — it’s a very difficult thing for me. Because, you know, I love these kids. I love kids. I have kids and grandkids. And I find it very, very hard doing what the law says exactly to do. And you know, the law is rough. I’m not talking about new laws. I’m talking the existing law is very rough. It’s very, very rough.
As far as the new order, the new order is going to be very much tailored to what I consider to be a very bad decision, but we can tailor the order to that decision and get just about everything, in some ways more. But we’re tailoring it now to the decision. We have some of the best lawyers in the country working on it. And the new executive order is being tailored to the decision we got down from the court. Okay?
Question: Mr. President, Melania Trump announced the reopening of the White House Visitors Office.
Donald Trump: Yes.
Question: And she does a lot of great work for the country as well. Can you tell us a little bit about what First Lady Melania Trump does for the country? And there is a unique level of interest in your administration, so by opening the White House Visitors Office, what does that mean to you?
Donald Trump: Now, that’s what I call a nice question. That is very nice. Who are you with?
Question: (Inaudible.)
Donald Trump: Good. I’m going to start watching. Thank you very much.
Melania is terrific. She was here last night. We had dinner with Senator Rubio and his wife, who is, by the way, lovely. And we had a really good discussion about Cuba because we have very similar views on Cuba. And Cuba was very good to me in the Florida election as you know, the Cuban people, Americans. And I think that Melania is going to be outstanding. That’s right, she just opened up the Visitors Center — in other words, touring of the White House.
She, like others that she’s working with, feels very, very strongly about women’s issues, women’s difficulties, very, very strongly. And she’s a very, very strong advocate. I think she’s a great representative for this country. And a funny thing happens because she gets so unfairly maligned. The things they say — I’ve known her for a long time. She was a very successful person. She was a very successful model. She did really well. She would go home at night and didn’t even want to go out with people. She was a very private person. She was always the highest quality that you’ll ever find. And the things they say — and I’ve known her for a long time — the things they say are so unfair. And actually, she’s been apologized to, as you know, by various media because they said things that were lies.
I’d just tell you this: I think she’s going to be a fantastic First Lady. She’s going to be a tremendous representative of women and of the people. And helping her and working with her will be Ivanka, who is a fabulous person and a fabulous, fabulous woman. And they’re not doing this for money. They’re not doing this for pay. They’re doing this because they feel it, both of them. And Melania goes back and forth, and after Barron finishes school — because it’s hard to take a child out of school with a few months left — she and Barron will be moving over to the White House. Thank you. That’s a very nice question.
Go ahead.
Question: Mr. President.
Donald Trump: Yes. Oh, this is going to be a bad question but that’s okay.
Question: No, it’s not going to be a bad question.
Donald Trump: Good, because I enjoy watching you on television.
Question: Well, thank you so much. Mr. President, I need to find out from you — you said something as it relates to inner cities. That was one of your platforms during your campaign.
Donald Trump: Fix the inner cities, yes.
Question: Fixing the inner cities. What will be that fix and your urban agenda, as well as your HBCU executive order that’s coming out this afternoon? See, it wasn’t bad, was it?
Donald Trump: That was very professional and very good.
Question: I’m very professional.
Donald Trump: We’ll be announcing the order in a little while, and I’d rather let the order speak for itself. But it will be something I think that will be very good for everybody concerned. But we’ll talk to you about that after we do the announcement.
As far as the inner cities, as you know, I was very strong on the inner cities during the campaign. I think it’s probably what got me a much higher percentage of the African American vote than a lot of people thought I was going to get. We did much higher than people thought I was going to get and I was honored by that, including the Hispanic vote, which was also much higher. And, by the way, if I might add, including the women’s vote, which was much higher than people thought I was going to get.
So we are going to be working very hard on the inner cities having to do with education, having to do with crime. We’re going to try and fix as quickly as possible — you know it takes a long time. It’s taken 100 years or more for some of these places to evolve, and they evolved many of them very badly.
But we’re going to be working very hard on health and health care; very, very hard on education. And also, we’re going to working in a stringent way, and a very good way, on crime. You go to some of these inner city places, and it’s so sad when you look at the crime. You have people — and I’ve seen this, and I’ve sort of witnessed it. In fact, in two cases, I have actually witnessed it. They lock themselves into apartments, petrified to even leave, in the middle of the day. They’re living in hell. We can’t let that happen. So we’re going to be very, very strong.
It’s a great question, and it’s a very difficult situation, because it’s been many, many years. It’s been festering for many, many years. But we have places in this country that we have to fix. We have to help African American people that, for the most part are stuck there — Hispanic American people. We have Hispanic American people that are in the inner cities, and they’re living in hell.
I mean, you look at the numbers in Chicago. There are two Chicagos, as you know. There’s one Chicago that’s incredible, luxurious and all, and safe. There’s another Chicago that’s worse than almost any of the places in the Middle East that we talk about, and that you talk about every night on the newscasts. So we’re going to do a lot of work on the inner cities. I have great people lined up to help with the inner cities.
Question: Well, when you say — when you say the inner cities, are you going to include the CBC, Mr. President, in your conversations with your urban agenda, your inner city agenda, as well as your —
Donald Trump: Am I going include who?
Question: Are you going to include the Congressional Black Caucus and the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, as well as —
Donald Trump: Well, I would. I tell you what, do you want to set up the meeting? Do you want to set up the meeting?
Question: No, no, no.
Donald Trump: Are they friends of yours?
Question: I’m just a reporter.
Donald Trump: No, go ahead, set up the meeting.
Question: I know some of them, but I’m sure they’re watching right now.
Donald Trump: Let’s go set up a meeting. I would love to meet with the Black Caucus. I think it’s great — the Congressional Black Caucus. I think it’s great. I actually thought I had a meeting with Congressman Cummings, and he was all excited, and then he said, oh, I can’t move, it might be bad for me politically, I can’t have that meeting. I was all set to have the meeting. You know, we called him and called him, and he was all set. I spoke to him on the phone. Very nice guy.
Question: I hear he wanted that meeting with you as well.
Donald Trump: He wanted it. But we called, called, called, called — they can’t make a meeting with him. Every day, I walked in, I said, I would like to meet with him. Because I do want to solve the problem. But he probably was told by Schumer or somebody like that — some other lightweight — he was probably told — he was probably told, don’t meet with Trump, it’s bad politics. And that’s part of the problem of this country.
Okay, one more. Go ahead.
Question: Yes, Mr. President, two questions —
Donald Trump: No, no. One question. Two, we can’t handle. This room can’t handle two. Go ahead, give me the better of your two.
Question: (Inaudible) it’s not about your personality or your beliefs. We’re talking about (inaudible) around the country, some of it by supporters in your name. What do you —
Donald Trump: And some of it — and can I be honest with you? And this has to do with racism and horrible things that are put up. Some of it written by our opponents. You do know that. Do you understand that? You don’t think anybody would do a thing like that. Some of the signs you’ll see are not put up by the people that love or like Donald Trump, they’re put up by the other side, and you think it’s like playing it straight. No. But you have some of those signs, and some of that anger is caused by the other side. They’ll do signs and they’ll do drawings that are inappropriate. It won’t be my people. It will be the people on the other side to anger people like you. Okay.
Go ahead.
Question: You are the President now. What are you going to do about it?
Donald Trump: Who is that? Where is that? Oh, stand up. You can —
Question: What are you going to do about the tensions that have been discussed?
Donald Trump: Oh, I’m working on it. No, I’m working on it very hard.
Question: Are you going to give a speech?
Donald Trump: No, no, look. Hey, just so you understand, we had a totally divided country for eight years, and long before that, in all fairness to President Obama. Long before President Obama, we have had a very divided. I didn’t come along and divide this country. This country was seriously divided before I got here.
We’re going to work on it very hard. One of the questions that was asked — I thought it was a very good question — was about the inner cities. I mean, that’s part of it. But we’re going to work on education. We’re going to work on lack — you know, we’re going to stop — we’re going to try and stop the crime. We have great law enforcement officials. We’re going to try and stop crime. We’re not going to try and stop, we’re going to stop crime.
But it’s very important to me. But this isn’t Donald Trump that divided a nation. We went eight years with President Obama, and we went many years before President Obama. We lived in a divided nation. And I am going to try — I will do everything within my power to fix that.
I want to thank everybody very much. It’s a great honor to be with you. Thank you. Thank you very much. (Applause.) Donald Trump: Thank you very much. I just wanted to begin by mentioning that the nominee for Secretary of the Department of Labor will be Mr. Alex Acosta. He has a law degree from Harvard Law School, was a great student. Former clerk for Justice Samuel Alito. And he has had a tremendous career. He’s a member, and has been a member, of the National Labor Relations Board, and has been through Senate confirmation three times, confirmed — did very, very well. And so Alex, I’ve wished him the best. We just spoke. And he’s going to be — I think he’ll be a tremendous Secretary of Labor.
And also, as you probably heard just a little while ago, Mick Mulvaney, former congressman, has just been approved — weeks late, I have to say that. Weeks, weeks late. Office of Management and Budget. And he will be, I think, a fantastic addition. Paul Singer has just left. As you know, Paul was very much involved with the anti-Trump, or, as they say, "Never Trump." And Paul just left and he’s given us his total support. And it’s all about unification. We’re unifying the party, and hopefully we’re going to be able to unify the country. It’s very important to me. I’ve been talking about that for a long time, but it’s very, very important to me. So I want to thank Paul Singer for being here and for coming up to the office. He was a very strong opponent, and now he’s a very strong ally. And I appreciate that.
I think I’ll say a few words, and then we’ll take some questions. And I had this time — we’ve been negotiating a lot of different transactions to save money on contracts that were terrible, including airplane contracts that were out of control and late and terrible. Just absolutely catastrophic in terms of what was happening. And we’ve done some really good work. We’re very proud of that.
And then right after that, you prepare yourselves and we’ll do some questions — unless you have no questions. That’s always a possibility.
I’m here today to update the American people on the incredible progress that has been made in the last four weeks since my inauguration. We have made incredible progress. I don’t think there’s ever been a President elected who, in this short period of time, has done what we’ve done.
A new Rasmussen poll, in fact — because the people get it; much of the media doesn’t get it. They actually get it, but they don’t write it — let’s put it that way. But a new Rasmussen poll just came out just a very short while ago, and it has our approval rating at 55 percent and going up. The stock market has hit record numbers, as you know. And there has been a tremendous surge of optimism in the business world, which is — to me means something much different than it used to. It used to mean, oh, that’s good. Now it means that’s good for jobs. Very different. Plants and factories are already starting to move back into the United States and big league — Ford, General Motors, so many of them.
I’m making this presentation directly to the American people with the media present, which is an honor to have you this morning, because many of our nation’s reporters and folks will not tell you the truth and will not treat the wonderful people of our country with the respect that they deserve. And I hope going forward we can be a little bit different, and maybe get along a little bit better, if that’s possible. Maybe it’s not, and that’s okay too.
Unfortunately, much of the media in Washington, D.C., along with New York, Los Angeles, in particular, speaks not for the people but for the special interests and for those profiting off a very, very obviously broken system. The press has become so dishonest that if we don’t talk about it, we are doing a tremendous disservice to the American people — tremendous disservice. We have to talk about it to find out what’s going on, because the press honestly is out of control. The level of dishonesty is out of control.
I ran for President to represent the citizens of our country. I am here to change the broken system so it serves their families and their communities well. I am talking, and really talking, on this very entrenched power structure, and what we’re doing is we’re talking about the power structure, we’re talking about its entrenchment. As a result, the media is going through what they have to go through to oftentimes distort — not all the time — and some of the media is fantastic, I have to say; they’re honest and fantastic. But much of it is not — the distortion. And we’ll talk about it, and you’ll be able to ask me questions about it.
But we’re not going to let it happen, because I’m here again to take my message straight to the people. As you know, our administration inherited many problems across government and across the economy. To be honest, I inherited a mess — it’s a mess — at home and abroad. A mess. Jobs are pouring out of the country. You see what’s going on with all of the companies leaving our country, going to Mexico and other places — low-pay, low-wages. Mass instability overseas, no matter where you look. The Middle East, a disaster. North Korea — we’ll take care of it, folks. We’re going to take care of it all. I just want to let you know I inherited a mess.
Beginning on day one, our administration went to work to tackle these challenges. On foreign affairs, we’ve already begun enormously productive talks with many foreign leaders — much of it you’ve covered — to move forward toward stability, security, and peace in the most troubled regions of the world, which there are many.
We’ve had great conversations with the United Kingdom — and meetings — Israel, Mexico, Japan, China, and Canada. Really, really productive conversations. I would say far more productive than you would understand. We’ve even developed a new council with Canada to promote women’s business leaders and entrepreneurs. It’s very important to me, very important to my daughter Ivanka.
I have directed our defense community, headed by our great general, now Secretary Mattis — he’s over there now, working very hard — to submit a plan for the defeat of ISIS, a group that celebrates the murder and torture of innocent people in large sections of the world. It used to be a small group, and now it’s in large sections of the world. They’ve spread like cancer. ISIS has spread like cancer. Another mess I inherited.
And we have imposed new sanctions on the nation of Iran, who’s totally taken advantage of our previous administration. And they’re the world’s top sponsor of terrorism. And we’re not going to stop until that problem is properly solved. And it’s not properly solved now. It’s one of the worst agreements I’ve ever seen drawn by anybody.
I’ve ordered plans to begin for the massive rebuilding of the United States military. I’ve had great support from the Senate. I’ve had great support from Congress generally. We’ve pursued this rebuilding in the hopes that we will never have to use this military. And I will tell you that is my — I would be so happy if we never had to use it. But our country will never have had a military like the military we’re about to build and rebuild. We have the greatest people on Earth in our military, but they don’t have the right equipment. And their equipment is old. I used it, I talked about it at every stop. Depleted — it’s depleted. It won’t be depleted for long.
And I think one of the reasons I’m standing here instead of other people is that, frankly, I talked about we have to have a strong military. We have to have strong law enforcement also. So we do not go abroad in the search of war. We really are searching for peace, but it’s peace through strength.
At home, we have begun the monumental task of returning the government back to the people on a scale not seen in many, many years. In each of these actions, I’m keeping my promises to the American people. These are campaign promises. Some people are so surprised that we’re having strong borders. Well, that’s what I’ve been talking about for a year and a half — strong borders. They’re so surprised — "oh, you’re having strong borders." Well, that’s what I’ve been talking about to the press and to everybody else.
One promise after another after years of politicians lying to you to get elected. They lie to the American people in order to get elected. Some of the things I’m doing probably aren’t popular, but they’re necessary for security and for other reasons. And then coming to Washington and pursuing their own interests, which is more important to many politicians.
I’m here following through on what I pledged to do. That’s all I’m doing. I put it out before the American people. Got 306 Electoral College votes. I wasn’t supposed to get 222. They said there’s no way to get 222; 230 is impossible. Two hundred and seventy, which you need, that was laughable. We got 306 because people came out and voted like they’ve never seen before. So that’s the way it goes. I guess it was the biggest Electoral College win since Ronald Reagan.
In other words, the media is trying to attack our administration because they know we are following through on pledges that we made, and they’re not happy about it for whatever reason. But a lot of people are happy about it. In fact, I’ll be in Melbourne, Florida, five o’clock on Saturday, and I heard — just heard that the crowds are massive that want to be there.
I turn on the TV, open the newspapers, and I see stories of chaos. Chaos! Yet, it is the exact opposite. This administration is running like a fine-tuned machine, despite the fact that I can’t get my Cabinet approved, and they’re outstanding people. Like Senator Dan Coates whose there — one of the most respected men of the Senate — he can’t get approved. How do you not approve him? He’s been a colleague, highly respected — brilliant guy, great guy, everybody knows it — but waiting for approval.
So we have a wonderful group of people that’s working very hard, that’s being very much misrepresented about, and we can’t let that happen. So if the Democrats, who have — all you have to do is look at where they are right now — the only thing they can do is delay, because they’ve screwed things up royally, believe me.
Let me list to you some of the things that we’ve done in just a short period of time. I just got here. I got here with no Cabinet. Again, each of these actions is a promise I made to the American people. So we’ll go over just some of them, and we have a lot happening next week and in the weeks coming. We’ve withdrawn from the job-killing disaster known as Trans-Pacific Partnership. We’re going to make trade deals, but we’re going to have one-on-one deals — bilateral. We’re going to have one-on-one deals.
We’ve directed the elimination of regulations that undermine manufacturing, and called for expedited approval of the permits needed for America and American infrastructure, and that means plants, equipment, roads, bridges, factories. People take 10, 15, 20 years to get disapproved for a factory. They go in for a permit — it’s many, many years. And then at the end of the process — they spend tens of millions of dollars on nonsense — and at the end of the process, they get rejected. Now, they may be rejected with me, but it’s going to be a quick rejection. It’s not going to take years. But mostly, it’s going to be an acceptance. We want plants built, and we want factories built, and we want the jobs. We don’t want the jobs going to other countries.
We’ve imposed a hiring freeze on nonessential federal workers. We’ve imposed a temporary moratorium on new federal regulations. We’ve issued a game-changing new rule that says for each one new regulation, two old regulations must be eliminated. Makes sense. Nobody has ever seen regulations like we have. If you go to other countries and you look at industries they have, and you say, let me see your regulations, and they’re a fraction, just a tiny fraction of what we have. And I want regulations because I want safety, I want all environmental situations to be taken properly care of. It’s very important to me. But you don’t need four or five or six regulations to take care of the same thing.
We’ve stood up for the men and women of law enforcement, directing federal agencies to ensure they are protected from crimes of violence. We’ve directed the creation of a task force for reducing violent crime in America, including the horrendous situation — take a look at Chicago and others — taking place right now in our inner cities. Horrible. We’ve ordered the Department of Homeland Security and Justice to coordinate on a plan to destroy criminal cartels coming into the United States with drugs. We’re becoming a drug-infested nation. Drugs are becoming cheaper than candy bars, and we’re not going to let it happen any longer.
We’ve undertaken the most substantial border security measures in a generation to keep our nation and our tax dollars safe, and are now in the process of beginning to build a promised wall on the southern border. Met with General, now Secretary, Kelly yesterday and we’re starting that process. And the wall is going to be a great wall, and it’s going to be a wall negotiated by me. The price is going to come down, just like it has on everything else I’ve negotiated for the government. And we’re going to have a wall that works. We’re not going to have a wall like they have now, which is either nonexistent or a joke.
We’ve ordered a crackdown on sanctuary cities that refuse to comply with federal law and that harbor criminal aliens, and we’ve ordered an end to the policy of catch and release on the border. No more release, no matter who you are — release. We’ve begun a nationwide effort to remove criminal aliens, gang members, drug dealers, and others who pose a threat to public safety. We are saving American lives every single day. The court system has not made it easy for us. And we’ve even created a new office in Homeland Security dedicated to the forgotten American victims of illegal immigrant violence, of which there are many.
We’ve taken decisive action to keep radical Islamic terrorists out of our country. Though parts of our necessary and constitutional actions were blocked by a judge’s, in my opinion, incorrect and unsafe ruling, our administration is working night and day to keep you safe — including reporters safe — and is vigorously defending this lawful order. I will not back down from defending our country. I got elected on defense of our country. And I keep my campaign promises. And our citizens will be very happy when they see the result. They already are. I can tell you that.
Extreme vetting will be put in place, and it already is in place in many places. In fact, we had to go quicker than we thought because of the bad decision we received from a circuit that has been overturned at a record number. I’ve heard 80 percent — I find that hard to believe; that’s just a number I heard — that they’re overturned 80 percent of the time. I think that circuit is in chaos and that circuit is, frankly, in turmoil. But we are appealing that and we are going further.
We’re issuing a new executive action next week that will comprehensively protect our country, so we’ll be going along the one path and hopefully winning that. At the same time, we will be issuing a new and very comprehensive order to protect our people, and that will be done some time next week, toward the beginning or middle at the latest part.
We’ve also taken steps to begin construction of the Keystone Pipeline and Dakota Access Pipelines — thousands and thousands of jobs — and put new "Buy American" measures in place to require American steel for American pipelines. In other words, they build a pipeline in this country and we use the powers of government to make that pipeline happen. We want them to use American steel. And they’re willing to do that, but nobody ever asked before I came along. Even this order was drawn and they didn’t say that. And I’m reading the order, I’m saying, why aren’t we using American steel? And they said, that’s a good idea. We put it in.
To drain the swamp of corruption in Washington, D.C. I’ve started by imposing a five-year lobbying ban on White House officials and a lifetime ban on lobbying for a foreign government. We’ve begun preparing to repeal and replace Obamacare. Obamacare is a disaster, folks. It’s a disaster. You can say, oh, Obamacare — I mean, they fill up our alleys with people that you wonder how they get there, but they’re not the Republican people that our representatives are representing. So we’ve begun preparing to repeal and replace Obamacare and are deep in the midst of negotiations on a very historic tax reform to bring our jobs back. We’re bringing our jobs back to this country big league. It’s already happening, but big league.
I’ve also worked to install a Cabinet over the delays and obstruction of Senate Democrats. You’ve seen what they’ve done over the last long number of years. That will be one of the great Cabinets ever assembled in American history. You look at Rex Tillerson — he’s out there negotiating right now. General Mattis I mentioned before, General Kelly. We have great, great people. Mick is with us now. We have great people.
Among their responsibilities will be ending the bleeding of jobs from our country and negotiating fair trade deals for our citizens. Now, look, fair trade — not free — fair. If a country is taking advantage of us, we’re not going to let that happen anymore. Every country takes advantage of us, almost. I may be able to find a couple that don’t. But for the most part, that would be a very tough job for me to do.
Jobs have already started to surge. Since my election, Ford announced it will abandon its plans to build a new factory in Mexico and will instead invest $700 million in Michigan, creating many, many jobs. Fiat-Chrysler announced it will invest $1 billion in Ohio and Michigan, creating 2,000 new American jobs. They were with me a week ago. You know — you were here. General Motors, likewise, committed to invest billions of dollars in its American manufacturing operation, keeping many jobs here that were going to leave. And if I didn’t get elected, believe me, they would have left. And these jobs and these things that I’m announcing would never have come here.
Intel just announced that it will move ahead with a new plant in Arizona that probably was never going to move ahead with. And that will result in at least 10,000 American jobs. Walmart announced it will create 10,000 jobs in the United States just this year because of our various plans and initiatives. There will be many, many more. Many more. These are a few that we’re naming.
Other countries have been taking advantage of us for decades — decades and decades and decades, folks. And we’re not going to let that happen anymore. Not going to let it happen.
And one more thing. I have kept my promise to the American people by nominating a justice of the United States Supreme Court, Judge Neil Gorsuch, who is from my list of 20, and who will be a true defender of our laws and our Constitution — highly respected, should get the votes from the Democrats — you may not see that, but he’ll get there one way or the other. But he should get there the old-fashioned way, and he should get those votes.
This last month has represented an unprecedented degree of action on behalf of the great citizens of our country. Again, I say it — there has never been a presidency that’s done so much in such a short period of time. And we haven’t even started the big work that starts early next week. Some very big things are going to be announced next week.
So we’re just getting started. We will be giving a speech, as I said, in Melbourne, Florida, at 5:00 p.m. I hope to see you there. And with that, I’d just say, God bless America, and let’s take some questions.
Mara. Mara, go ahead. You were cut off pretty violently at our last news conference.
Question: Did you fire Mike Flynn?
Donald Trump: Mike Flynn is a fine person, and I asked for his resignation. He respectfully gave it. He is a man who — there was a certain amount of information given to Vice President Pence, who is with us today. And I was not happy with the way that information was given.
He didn’t have to do that, because what he did wasn’t wrong, what he did in terms of the information he saw. What was wrong was the way that other people, including yourselves in this room, were given that information, because that was classified information that was given illegally. That’s the real problem. And you can talk all you want about Russia, which was all a fake news, fabricated deal to try and make up for the loss of the Democrats, and the press plays right into it. In fact, I saw a couple of the people that were supposedly involved with all of this — they know nothing about it. They weren’t in Russia, they never made a phone call to Russia, they never received a phone call. It’s all fake news. It’s all fake news.
The nice thing is I see it starting to turn, where people are now looking at the illegal, Mara — and I think it’s very important — the illegal giving out classified information. And let me just tell you, it was given out, like, so much. I’ll give you an example. I called, as you know, Mexico. It was a very confidential, classified call, but I called Mexico. And in calling Mexico, I figured, oh, well, that’s — I spoke to the President of Mexico, had a good call. All of a sudden it’s out for the world to see. It’s supposed to be secret. It’s supposed to be either confidential or classified in that case. Same thing with Australia. All of a sudden people are finding out exactly what took place.
The same thing happened with respect to General Flynn. Everybody saw this, and I’m saying — the first thing I thought of when I heard about it is, how does the press get this information that’s classified? How do they do it? You know why? Because it’s an illegal process, and the press should be ashamed of themselves. But, more importantly, the people that gave out the information to the press should be ashamed of themselves. Really ashamed.
Yes, go ahead.
Question: Why did you keep your Vice President in the dark for almost two weeks?
Donald Trump: Because when I looked at the information, I said, I don’t think he did anything wrong. If anything, he did something right. He was coming into office, he looked at the information. He said, huh, that’s fine, that’s what they’re supposed to do. They’re supposed to be — and he didn’t just call Russia. He called and spoke to, both ways — I think there were 30-some-odd countries. He’s doing the job.
You know, he was just doing his job. The thing is he didn’t tell our Vice President properly, and then he said he didn’t remember. So either way, it wasn’t very satisfactory to me. And I have somebody that I think will be outstanding for the position, and that also helps, I think, in the making of my decision.
But he didn’t tell the Vice President of the United States the facts, and then he didn’t remember. And that just wasn’t acceptable to me.
Yes.
Question: President Trump, since you brought up Russia, I’m looking for some clarification here. During the campaign, did anyone from your team communicate with members of the Russian government or Russian intelligence? And if so, what was the nature of those conversations?
Donald Trump: Well, the failing New York Times wrote a big, long front-page story yesterday. And it was very much discredited, as you know. It was — it’s a joke. And the people mentioned in the story — I notice they were on television today saying they never even spoke to Russia. They weren’t even a part, really — I mean, they were such a minor part — I hadn’t spoken to them. I think the one person, I don’t think I’ve ever spoken to him. I don’t think I’ve ever met him. And he actually said he was a very low-level member of, I think, a committee for a short period of time. I don’t think I ever met him. Now, it’s possible that I walked into a room and he was sitting there, but I don’t think I ever met him. I didn’t talk to him, ever. And he thought it was a joke.
The other person said he never spoke to Russia, never received a call. Look at his phone records, et cetera, et cetera. And the other person, people knew that he’d represented various countries, but I don’t think he represented Russia — but knew that he represented various countries. That’s what he does. I mean, people know that. That’s Mr. Manafort, who’s, by the way — who’s, by the way, a respected man. He’s a respected man. But I think he represented the Ukraine, or Ukraine government, or somebody. But everybody — people knew that. Everybody knew that. So these people — and he said that he has absolutely nothing to do and never has with Russia. And he said that very forcefully. I saw his statement. He said it very forcefully. Most of the papers don’t print it because that’s not good for their stories.
So the three people that they talked about all totally deny it. And I can tell you, speaking for myself, I own nothing in Russia. I have no loans in Russia. I don’t have any deals in Russia. President Putin called me up very nicely to congratulate me on the win of the election. He then called me up extremely nicely to congratulate me on the inauguration, which was terrific. But so did many other leaders — almost all other leaders from almost all other countries. So that’s the extent.
Russia is fake news. Russia — this is fake news put out by the media. The real news is the fact that people, probably from the Obama administration because they’re there — because we have our new people going in place right now. As you know, Mike Pompeo is now taking control of the CIA. James Comey at FBI. Dan Coats is waiting to be approved. I mean, he is a senator, and a highly respected one. And he’s still waiting to be approved. But our new people are going in.
And just while you’re at, because you mentioned this, Wall Street Journal did a story today that was almost as disgraceful as the failing New Times’s story yesterday. And it talked about — you saw it, front page. So, Director of National Intelligence just put out — acting — a statement: “Any suggestion that the United States intelligence community” — this was just given to us — “is withholding information and not providing the best possible intelligence to the President and his national security team is not true.”
So they took this front-page story out of The Wall Street Journal — top — and they just wrote the story is not true. And I’ll tell you something, I’ll be honest — because I sort of enjoy this back and forth, and I guess I have all my life, but I’ve never seen more dishonest media than, frankly, the political media. I thought the financial media was much better, much more honest. But I will say that I never get phone calls from the media. How do they write a story like that in The Wall Street Journal without asking me? Or how do they write a story in The New York Times, put it on front page? That was like that story they wrote about the women and me — front page. Big massive story. And it was nasty.
And then they called. They said, "We never said that. We like Mr. Trump." They called up my office — we like Mr. Trump; we never said that. And it was totally — they totally misrepresented those very wonderful women, I have to tell you — totally misrepresented. I said, give us a retraction. They never gave us a retraction. And, frankly, I then went on to other things.
Go ahead.
Question: Mr. President —
Donald Trump: You okay?
Question: I am. Just wanted to get untangled. Very simply, you said today that you had the biggest electoral margins since Ronald Reagan with 304 or 306 electoral votes. In fact, President Obama got 365 in 2008.
Donald Trump: Well, I’m talking about Republican. Yes.
Question: President Obama, 332. George H.W. Bush, 426 when he won as President. So why should Americans trust —
Donald Trump: Well, no, I was told — I was given that information. I don’t know. I was just given. We had a very, very big margin.
Question: I guess my question is, why should Americans trust you when you have accused the information they receive of being fake when you’re providing information that’s fake?
Donald Trump: Well, I don’t know. I was given that information. I was given — actually, I’ve seen that information around. But it was a very substantial victory. Do you agree with that?
Question: You’re the President.
Donald Trump: Okay, thank you. That’s a good answer. Yes.
Question: Mr. President, thank you so much. Can you tell us in determining that Lieutenant General Flynn — there was no wrongdoing in your mind, what evidence was weighed? Did you have the transcripts of these telephone intercepts with Russian officials, particularly Ambassador Kislyak, who he was communicating with? What evidence did you weigh to determine there was no wrong doing?
And further than that, sir, you’ve said on a couple of occasions this morning that you were going to aggressively pursue the sources of these leaks.
Donald Trump: We are.
Question: Can we ask what you’re doing to do? And also, we’ve heard about a review of the intelligence community headed by Stephen Feinberg. What can you tell us about that?
Donald Trump: Well, first of all, about that, we now have Dan Coats, hopefully soon Mike Pompeo and James Comey, and they’re in position. So I hope that we’ll be able to straighten that out without using anybody else. The gentleman you mentioned is a very talented man, very successful man. And he has offered his services, and it’s something we may take advantage of. But I don’t think we’ll need that at all because of the fact that I think that we’re going to be able to straighten it out very easily on its own.
As far as the general is concerned, when I first heard about it, I said, huh, that doesn’t sound wrong. My counsel came — Don McGahn, White House Counsel — and he told me, and I asked him, and he can speak very well for himself. He said he doesn’t think anything is wrong. He really didn’t think — it was really what happened after that, but he didn’t think anything was done wrong. I didn’t either, because I waited a period of time and I started to think about it. I said, well, I don’t see — to me, he was doing the job.
The information was provided by — who I don’t know — Sally Yates — and I was a little surprised because I said, doesn’t sound like he did anything wrong there. But he did something wrong with respect to the Vice President, and I thought that was not acceptable. As far as the actual making the call — in fact, I’ve watched various programs and I’ve read various articles where he was just doing his job. That was very normal. At first, everybody got excited because they thought he did something wrong. After they thought about it, it turned out he was just doing his job.
So — and I do — and, by the way, with all of that being said, I do think he’s a fine man.
Yes, Jon.
Question: On the leaks, sir —
Donald Trump: Go ahead, finish off, then I’ll get you, Jon.
Question: Sorry, what will you do on the leaks? You have said twice today —
Donald Trump: Yes, we’re looking at it very, very seriously. I’ve gone to all of the folks in charge of the various agencies, and we’re — I’ve actually called the Justice Department to look into the leaks. Those are criminal leaks. They’re put out by people either in agencies. I think you’ll see it stopping because now we have our people in. You know, again, we don’t have our people in because we can’t get them approved by the Senate. We just had Jeff Sessions approved in Justice, as an example. So we are looking into that very seriously. It’s a criminal act.
You know what I say — when I was called out on Mexico, I was shocked. Because all this equipment, all this incredible phone equipment. When I was called out on Mexico, I was — honestly, I was really, really surprised. But I said, you know, it doesn’t make sense, that won’t happen. But that wasn’t that important to call, it was fine. I could show it to the world and he could show it to the world — the President who is a very fine man, by the way. Same thing with Australia. I said, that’s terrible that it was leaked but it wasn’t that important. But then I said, what happens when I’m dealing with the problem of North Korea? What happens when I’m dealing with the problems in the Middle East? Are you folks going to be reporting all of that very, very confidential information — very important, very — I mean, at the highest level, are you going to be reporting about that too?
So I don’t want classified information getting out to the public. And in a way, that was almost a test. So I’m dealing with Mexico. I’m dealing with Argentina. We were dealing on this case with Mike Flynn. All this information gets put into the Washington Post and gets put into the New York Times. And I’m saying, what’s going to happen when I’m dealing on the Middle East? What’s going to happen when I’m dealing with really, really important subjects like North Korea? We’ve got to stop it. That’s why it’s a criminal penalty.
Yes, Jon.
Question: Thank you, Mr. President. I just want to get you to clarify just a very important point. Can you say definitively that nobody on your campaign had any contacts with the Russians during the campaign? And, on the leaks, is it fake news or are these real leaks?
Donald Trump: Well, the leaks are real. You’re the one that wrote about them and reported them. I mean, the leaks are real. You know what they said — you saw it. And the leaks are absolutely real. The news is fake because so much of the news is fake.
So one thing that I felt it was very important to do — and I hope we can correct it, because there is nobody I have more respect for — well, maybe a little bit — than reporters, than good reporters. It’s very important to me, and especially in this position. It’s very important. I don’t mind bad stories. I can handle a bad story better than anybody as long as it’s true. And over a course of time, I’ll make mistakes and you’ll write badly and I’m okay with that. But I’m not okay when it is fake. I mean, I watch CNN — it’s so much anger and hatred and just the hatred. I don’t watch it anymore because it’s very good — he’s saying no. It’s okay, Jim. It’s okay, Jim. You’ll have your chance. But I watch others too. You’re not the only one, so don’t feel badly.
But I think it should be straight. I think it should be — I think it would be, frankly, more interesting. I know how good everybody’s ratings are right now, but I think that actually would be — I think that it would actually be better.
People — I mean, you have a lower approval rate than Congress. I think that’s right. I don’t know, Peter, is that one right? Because you know, I think they have lower — I heard, lower than Congress.
But honestly, the public would appreciate it. I’d appreciate it. Again, I don’t mind bad stories when it’s true. But we have an administration where the Democrats are making it very difficult. I think we’re setting a record, or close to a record in the time of approval of a Cabinet. I mean, the numbers are crazy. When I’m looking — some of them had them approved immediately. I’m going forever, and I still have a lot of people that we’re waiting for.
And that’s all they’re doing, is delaying. And you look at Schumer and the mess that he’s got over there, and they have nothing going. The only thing they can do is delay. And you know, I think they’d be better served by approving and making sure that they’re happy and everybody is good. And sometimes, I mean — I know President Obama lost three or four, and you lose them on the way. And that’s okay. That’s fine.
But I think they would be much better served, Jon, if they just went through the process quickly. This is pure delay tactics. And they say it, and everybody understands it.
Yeah, go ahead, Jim.
Question: The first part of my question on contacts. Do you definitively say that nobody —
Donald Trump: Well, I had nothing to do with it. I have nothing to do with Russia. I told you, I have no deals there. I have no anything.
Now, when WikiLeaks, which I had nothing to do with, comes out and happens to give — they’re not giving classified information. They’re giving stuff — what was said at an office about Hillary cheating on the debates — which, by the way, nobody mentions. Nobody mentions that Hillary received the questions to the debates.
Can you imagine — seriously, can you imagine if I received the questions? It would be the electric chair, okay? “He should be put in the electric chair.” You would even call for the reinstitution of the death penalty, okay? Maybe not you, Jon.
Yes, we’ll do you next, Jim. I’ll do you next. Yes?
Question: Thank you, Mr. President. I just want to clarify one other thing.
Donald Trump: Sure.
Question: Did you direct Mike Flynn to discuss the sanctions with the Russian ambassador?
Donald Trump: No, I didn’t. No, I didn’t.
Question: (Inaudible.) (Off mic.)
Donald Trump: No, I didn’t.
Question: Did you fire him because (inaudible) —
Donald Trump: Excuse me — no, I fired him because of what he said to Mike Pence, very simple. Mike was doing his job. He was calling countries and his counterparts. So it certainly would have been okay with me if he did it. I would have directed him to do it if I thought he wasn’t doing it. I didn’t direct him but I would have directed him because that’s his job.
And it came out that way — and, in all fairness, I watched Dr. Charles Krauthammer the other night say he was doing his job. And I agreed with him. And since then I’ve watched many other people say that.
No, I didn’t direct him, but I would have directed him if he didn’t do it, okay?
Jim.
Question: Mr. President, thank you very much. And just for the record, we don’t hate you, I don’t hate you. If you could pass that along.
Donald Trump: Okay. Well, ask Jeff Zucker how he got his job, okay?
Question: If I may follow up on some of the questions that have taken place so far, sir.
Donald Trump: Well, not too many. We do have other people. You do have other people, and your ratings aren’t as good as some of the other people that are waiting.
Question: They’re pretty good right now, actually.
Donald Trump: Okay. Go ahead, Jim.
Question: If I may ask, sir, you said earlier that WikiLeaks was revealing information about the Hillary Clinton campaign during the election cycle. You welcomed that at one point.
Donald Trump: I was okay with it.
Question: You said you loved WikiLeaks. At another campaign press conference you called on the Russians to find the missing 30,000 emails. I’m wondering, sir, if you —
Donald Trump: Well, she was actually missing 33,000, and then that got extended with a whole pile after that, but that’s okay.
Question: Maybe my numbers are off a little bit too.
Donald Trump: No, no, but I did say 30,000, but it was actually higher than that.
Question: If I may ask you, sir, it sounds as though you do not have much credibility here when it comes to leaking if that is something that you encouraged in the campaign.
Donald Trump: Okay, fair question. Ready?
Question: So if I may ask you that — if I may ask a follow-up —
Donald Trump: No, no, but are you — let me do one at a time. Do you mind?
Question: Yes, sir.
Donald Trump: All right. So in one case you’re talking about highly classified information. In the other case you’re talking about John Podesta saying bad things about the boss. I will say this: If John Podesta said that about me and he was working for me, I would have fired him so fast your head would have spun. He said terrible things about her. But it wasn’t classified information.
But in one case you’re talking about classified. Regardless, if you look at the RNC, we had a very strong — at my suggestion — and I give Reince great credit for this — at my suggestion, because I know something about this world, I said I want a very strong defensive mechanism. I don’t want to be hacked. And we did that, and you have seen that they tried to hack us and they failed.
The DNC did not do that. And if they did it, they could not have been hacked. But they were hacked, and terrible things came. And the only thing that I do think is unfair is some of the things were so — they were — when I heard some of those things, I said — I picked up the papers the next morning, I said, oh, this is going to front page. It wasn’t even in the papers.
Again, if I had that happen to me, it would be the biggest story in the history of publishing or the head of newspapers. I would have been the headline in every newspaper.
I mean, think of it. They gave her the questions for the debate, and she should have reported herself. Why didn’t Hillary Clinton announce that, "I’m sorry, but I have been given the questions to a debate or a town hall, and I feel that it’s inappropriate, and I want to turn in CNN for not doing a good job"?
Question: And if I may follow up on that, just something that Jonathan Karl was asking you about — you said that the leaks are real, but the news is fake. I guess I don’t understand. It seems that there is a disconnect there. If the information coming from those leaks is real, then how can the stories be fake?
Donald Trump: Well, the reporting is fake. Look, look —
Question: And if I may ask — I just want to ask one other question.
Donald Trump: Jim, you know what it is? Here’s the thing. The public isn’t — they read newspapers, they see television, they watch. They don’t know if it’s true or false because they’re not involved. I’m involved. I’ve been involved with this stuff all my life. But I’m involved. So I know when you’re telling the truth or when you’re not.
I just see many, many untruthful things. And I tell you what else I see. I see tone. You know the word “tone.” The tone is such hatred. I’m really not a bad person, by the way. No, but the tone is such — I do get good ratings, you have to admit that. The tone is such hatred.
I watched this morning a couple of the networks, and I have to say “Fox & Friends” in the morning, they’re very honorable people. They’re very — not because they’re good, because they hit me also when I do something wrong. But they have the most honest morning show. That’s all I can say. It’s the most honest. But the tone, Jim. If you look — the hatred. I mean, sometimes — sometimes somebody gets —
Question: (Off mic.)
Donald Trump: Well, you look at your show that goes on at 10 o’clock in the evening. You just take a look at that show. That is a constant hit. The panel is almost always exclusive anti-Trump. The good news is he doesn’t have good ratings. But the panel is almost exclusive anti-Trump. And the hatred and venom coming from his mouth, the hatred coming from other people on your network.
Now, I will say this. I watch it. I see it. I’m amazed by it. And I just think you’d be a lot better off — I honestly do. The public gets it, you know. Look, when I go to rallies, they turn around, they start screaming at CNN. They want to throw their placards at CNN.
I think you would do much better by being different. But you just take a look. Take a look at some of your shows in the morning and the evening. If a guest comes out and says something positive about me, it’s brutal.
Now, they’ll take this news conference. I’m actually having a very good time, okay? But they’ll take this news conference — don’t forget that’s the way I won. Remember, I used to give you a news conference every time I made a speech, which was like every day.
Question: (Off mic.)
Donald Trump: No, that’s how I won. I won with news conferences and probably speeches. I certainly didn’t win by people listening to you people, that’s for sure.
But I am having a good time. Tomorrow they will say, Donald Trump rants and raves at the press. I’m not ranting and raving. I’m just telling you, you’re dishonest people. But — but I’m not ranting and raving. I love this. I’m having a good time doing it. But tomorrow the headlines are going to be: Donald Trump Rants and Raves. I’m not ranting and raving.
Question: If I may just —
Donald Trump: Go ahead.
Question: One more follow-up because —
Donald Trump: Should I let him have a little bit more? What do you think, Peter?
Question: Just because of this —
Donald Trump: Peter, should I have let him have a little bit more? Sit down. Sit down.
Question: Just because of the attack —
Donald Trump: We’ll get it.
Question: Just because of the attack of fake news and attacking our network, I just want to ask you, sir —
Donald Trump: I’m changing it from fake news, though.
Question: Doesn’t that undermine —
Donald Trump: Very fake news now. (Laughter.)
Question: But aren’t you —
Donald Trump: Yes, go ahead.
Question: Real news, Mr. President. Real news.
Donald Trump: And you’re not related to our new —
Question: I am not related, sir, no. (Laughter.) I do like the sound of Secretary Acosta, I must say.
Donald Trump: I looked — you know, I looked at that name. I said, wait a minute, is there any relation there? Alex Acosta.
Question: I’m sure you checked that out, sir.
Donald Trump: No, I checked it. I said — they said, no, sir. I said, do me a favor, go back and check the family tree.
Question: But aren’t you concerned, sir, that you are undermining the people’s faith in the First Amendment freedom of the press, the press in this country when you call stories you don’t like “fake news”? Why not just say it’s a story I don’t like?
Donald Trump: I do that.
Question: When you call it fake news, you’re undermining confidence —
Donald Trump: No, I do that. No, no, I do that.
Question: — in our news media.
Donald Trump: Here’s the thing.
Question: Isn’t that important?
Donald Trump: Okay, I understand — and you’re right about that except this. See, I know when I should get good and when I should get bad. And sometimes I’ll say, wow, that’s going to be a great story, and I’ll get killed. I know what’s good and bad. I’d be a pretty good reporter — not as good as you. But I know what’s good. I know what’s bad.
And when they change it and make it really bad — something that should be positive. Sometimes something that should be very positive, they’ll make okay. They’ll even make it negative. So I understand it because I’m there. I know what was said. I know who is saying it. I’m there. So it’s very important to me.
Look, I want to see an honest press. When I started off today by saying that it’s so important to the public to get an honest press. The press — the public doesn’t believe you people anymore. Now, maybe I had something to do with that, I don’t know. But they don’t believe you.
If you were straight and really told it like it is, as Howard Cosell used to say, right? Of course, he had some questions also. But if you were straight, I would be your biggest booster, I would be your biggest fan in the world — including bad stories about me. But if you go — as an example, you’re CNN — I mean, it’s story after story after story is bad. I won. I won. And the other thing: Chaos. There’s zero chaos. We are running — this is a fine-tuned machine. And Reince happens to be doing a good job. But half of his job is putting out lies by the press.
I said to him yesterday, this whole Russia scam that you guys are building so that you don’t talk about the real subject, which is illegal leaks. But I watched him yesterday working so hard to try and get that story proper. And I’m saying, here’s my Chief of Staff, a really good guy, did a phenomenal job at RNC. I mean, we won the election, right? We won the presidency. We got some senators. We got some — all over the country, you take a look, he’s done a great job.
And I said to myself, you know — and I said to somebody that was in the room — I said, you take a look at Reince, he’s working so hard just putting out fires that are fake fires. They’re fake. They’re not true. And isn’t that a shame, because he’d rather be working on health care. He’d rather be working on tax reform, Jim. I mean that. I would be your biggest fan in the world if you treated me right. I sort of understand there’s a certain bias, maybe by Jeff or somebody — for whatever reason. And I understand that. But you’ve got to be at least a little bit fair. And that’s why the public sees it — they see it. They see it’s not fair. You take a look at some of your shows and you see the bias and the hatred. And the public is smart. They understand it.
Okay, yeah, go ahead.
Question: We have no doubt that your latest story is (inaudible). But for those who believe that there is something to it, is there anything that you have learned over these last few weeks that you might be able to reveal that might ease their concerns that this isn’t fake news? And secondly —
Donald Trump: I think they don’t believe it. I don’t think the public would. That’s why the Rasmussen poll just has me through the roof. I don’t think they believe it. Well, I guess one of the reasons I’m here today is to tell you the whole Russian thing — that’s a ruse. That’s a ruse. And, by the way, it would be great if we could get along with Russia, just so you understand that. Now, tomorrow you’ll say, Donald Trump wants to get along with Russia, this is terrible. It’s not terrible — it’s good.
We had Hillary Clinton try and do a reset. We had Hillary Clinton give Russia 20 percent of the uranium in our country. You know what uranium is, right? It’s this thing called nuclear weapons and other things. Like, lots of things are done with uranium, including some bad things. Nobody talks about that. I didn’t do anything for Russia. I’ve done nothing for Russia. Hillary Clinton gave them 20 percent of our uranium. Hillary Clinton did a reset, remember, with the stupid plastic button that made us all look like a bunch of jerks? Here, take a look. He looked at her like, what the hell is she doing with that cheap plastic button? Hillary Clinton — that was a reset. Remember? It said "reset."
Now, if I do that, oh, I’m a bad guy. If we could get along with Russia, that’s a positive thing. We have a very talented man, Rex Tillerson, who is going to be meeting with them shortly. And I told him, I said, I know politically it’s probably not good for me. Hey, the greatest thing I could do is shoot that ship that’s 30 miles offshore right out of the water. Everyone in this country is going to say, oh, it’s so great. That’s not great. That’s not great. I would love to be able to get along with Russia.
Now, you’ve had a lot of Presidents that haven’t taken that tact. Look where we are now. Look where we are now. So, if I can — now, I love to negotiate things. I do it really well and all that stuff, but it’s possible I won’t be able to get along with Putin. Maybe it is. But I want to just tell you, the false reporting by the media, by you people — the false, horrible, fake reporting makes it much harder to make a deal with Russia. And probably Putin said, you know — he’s sitting behind his desk and he’s saying, you know, I see what’s going on in the United States, I follow it closely; it’s got to be impossible for President Trump to ever get along with Russia because of all the pressure he’s got with this fake story. Okay? And that’s a shame. Because if we could get along with Russia — and, by the way, China and Japan and everyone — if we could get along, it would be a positive thing, not a negative thing.
Question: Tax reform —
Question: Mr. President, since you —
Donald Trump: Tax reform is going to happen fairly quickly. We’re doing Obamacare — we’re in final stages. We should be submitting the initial plan in March, early March, I would say. And we have to, as you know, statutorily and for reasons of budget, we have to go first. It’s not like — frankly, the tax would be easier, in my opinion, but for statutory reasons and for budgetary reasons, we have to submit the health care sooner. So we’ll be submitting health care sometime in early March, mid-March. And after that, we’re going to come up — and we’re doing very well on tax reform.
Yes.
Question: Mr. President, you mentioned Russia. Let’s talk about some serious issues that have come up in the last week that you have had to deal with as President of the United States.
Donald Trump: Okay.
Question: You mentioned the vessel, the spy vessel, off the coast of the United States.
Donald Trump: Not good.
Question: There was a ballistic missile test that many interpreted as a violation —
Donald Trump: Not good.
Question: — of the agreement between the two countries. And a Russian plane buzzed a U.S. destroyer.
Donald Trump: Not good.
Question: I listened to you during the campaign —
Donald Trump: Excuse me, excuse me, when did it happen? It happened when — if you were Putin right now, you would say, hey, we’re back to the old games with the United States. There’s no way Trump can ever do a deal with us because the — you have to understand, if I was just brutal on Russia right now, just brutal, people would say, you would say, oh, isn’t that wonderful. But I know you well enough. Then you would say, oh, he was too tough, he shouldn’t have done that. Look, of all —
Question: I’m just trying to find out your orientation to those —
Donald Trump: Wait a minute. Wait, wait. Excuse me just one second.
Question: I’m just trying to find out what you’re doing to do about them, Mr. President.
Donald Trump: All of those things that you mentioned are very recent, because probably Putin assumes that he’s not going to be able to make a deal with me because it’s politically not popular for me to make a deal. So Hillary Clinton tries to reset, it failed. They all tried. But I’m different than those people.
Go ahead.
Question: How are you interpreting those moves? And what do you intend to do about them?
Donald Trump: Just the way I said it.
Question: Have you given Rex Tillerson any advice or counsel on how to deal?
Donald Trump: I have. I have. And I’m so beautifully represented. I’m so honored that the Senate approved him. He’s going to be fantastic.
Yes, I think that I’ve already —
Question: Is Putin testing you, do you believe, sir?
Donald Trump: No, I don’t think so. I think Putin probably assumes that he can’t make a deal with me anymore because politically it would be unpopular for a politician to make a deal. I can’t believe I’m saying I’m a politician, but I guess that’s what I am now. Because, look, it would be much easier for me to be tough on Russia, but then we’re not going to make a deal.
Now, I don’t know that we’re going to make a deal. I don’t know. We might, we might not. But it would be much easier for me to be so tough — the tougher I am on Russia, the better. But you know what, I want to do the right thing for the American people. And to be honest, secondarily, I want to do the right thing for the world.
If Russia and the United States actually got together and got along — and don’t forget, we’re a very powerful nuclear country and so are they. There’s no upside. We’re a very powerful nuclear country and so are they. I’ve been briefed. And I can tell you, one thing about a briefing that we’re allowed to say because anybody that ever read the most basic book can say it: Nuclear holocaust would be like no other. They’re a very powerful nuclear country and so are we.
If we have a good relationship with Russia, believe me, that’s a good thing, not a bad thing.
Question: So when you say they’re not good, do you mean that they are —
Donald Trump: Who did I say is not good?
Question: No, when I read off the three things that have recently happened and each one of them you said they’re not good.
Donald Trump: No, it’s not good, but they happened.
Question: But do they damage the relationship? Do they undermine this country’s ability to work with Russia?
Donald Trump: They all happened recently, and I understand what they’re doing, because they’re doing the same thing. Now, again, maybe I’m not going to be able to do a deal with Russia, but at least I will have tried. And if I don’t, does anybody really think that Hillary Clinton would be tougher on Russia than Donald Trump? Does anybody in this room really believe that? Okay.
But I tell you one thing: She tried to make a deal. She had the reset. She gave all the valuable uranium away. She did other things. You know, they say I’m close to Russia. Hillary Clinton gave away 20 percent of the uranium in the United States. She’s close to Russia. I gave — you know what I gave to Russia? You know what I gave? Nothing.
Question: Can we conclude there will be no response to these particular provocations?
Donald Trump: I’m not going to tell you anything about what response I do. I don’t talk about military response. I don’t say I’m going into Mosul in four months. "We are going to attack Mosul in four months." Then three months later: "We are going to attack Mosul in one month." "Next week, we are going to attack Mosul." In the meantime, Mosul is very, very difficult. Do you know why? Because I don’t talk about military, and I don’t talk about certain other things. You’re going to be surprised to hear that. And, by the way, my whole campaign, I’d say that. So I don’t have to tell you —
Question: There will be a response?
Donald Trump: I don’t want to be one of these guys that say, “Yes, here’s what we’re going to do.” I don’t have to do that.
Question: There will be a — in other words, there will be a response, Mr. President?
Donald Trump: I don’t have to tell you what I’m going to do in North Korea. Wait a minute. I don’t have to tell you what I’m going to do in North Korea. And I don’t have to tell you what I’m going to do with Iran. You know why? Because they shouldn’t know. And eventually you guys are going to get tired of asking that question. So when you ask me, what am I going to do with the ship — the Russian ship, as an example — I’m not going to tell you. But hopefully, I won’t have to do anything. But I’m not going to tell you. Okay.
Question: Thanks.
Question: Can I just ask you — thank you very much, Mr. President — the Trump —
Donald Trump: Where are you from?
Question: BBC.
Donald Trump: Okay. Here’s another beauty.
Question: That’s a good line. Impartial, free, and fair.
Donald Trump: Yeah, sure.
Question: Mr. President —
Donald Trump: Just like CNN, right?
Question: Mr. President, on the travel ban — we could banter back and forth. On the travel ban, would you accept that that was a good example of the smooth running of government, that fine-tuned —
Donald Trump: Yeah, I do. I do. And let me tell you about the travel —
Question: Were there any mistakes in that?
Donald Trump: Wait, wait, wait. I know who you are. Just wait. Let me tell you about the travel ban. We had a very smooth rollout of the travel ban, but we had a bad court. We got a bad decision. We had a court that’s been overturned — again, maybe wrong, but I think it’s 80 percent of the time. A lot. We had a bad decision. We’re going to keep going with that decision. We’re going to put in a new executive order next week sometime. But we had a bad decision. That’s the only thing that was wrong with the travel ban.
You had Delta with a massive problem with their computer system at the airports. You had some people that were put out there, brought by very nice buses, and they were put out at various locations. Despite that, the only problem that we had is we had a bad court. We had a court that gave us what I consider to be, with great respect, a very bad decision. Very bad for the safety and security of our country. The rollout was perfect.
Now, what I wanted to do was do the exact same executive order but said one thing — and I said this to my people: Give them a one-month period of time. But General Kelly, now Secretary Kelly, said, if you do that, all these people will come in, in the month — the bad ones. You do agree, there are bad people out there, right? They’re not everybody that’s like you. You have some bad people out there.
So Kelly said, you can’t do that. And he was right. As soon as he said it, I said, wow, never thought of it. I said, how about one week? He said, no good. You got to do it immediately, because if you do it immediately, they don’t have time to come in. Now, nobody ever reports that, but that’s why we did it quickly.
Now, if would have done it a month, everything would have been perfect. The problems is we would have wasted a lot of time, and maybe a lot of lives, because a lot of bad people would have come into our country.
Now, in the meantime, we’ve vetting very, very strongly. Very, very strongly. But we need help, and we need help by getting that executive order passed.
Question: Just a brief follow-up. And if it’s so urgent, why not introduce —
Donald Trump: Yes, go ahead.
Question: Thank you. I just was hoping that we could get a yes- or-no answer on one of these questions involving Russia. Can you say whether you are aware that anyone who advised your campaign had contacts with Russia during the course of the election?
Donald Trump: Well, I told you, General Flynn obviously was dealing. So that’s one person. But he was dealing — as he should have been —
Question: During the election?
Donald Trump: No, no, nobody that I know of.
Question: So you’re not aware of any contacts during the course of the election?
Donald Trump: Look, look, how many times do I have to answer this question?
Question: Can you just say yes or no on it?
Donald Trump: Russia is a ruse. Yeah, I know you have to get up and ask a question, so important. Russia is a ruse. I have nothing to do with Russia, haven’t made a phone call to Russia in years. Don’t speak to people from Russia. Not that I wouldn’t, I just have nobody to speak to. I spoke to Putin twice. He called me on the election — I told you this — and he called me on the inauguration, and a few days ago. We had a very good talk, especially the second one — lasted for a pretty long period of time. I’m sure you probably get it because it was classified, so I’m sure everybody in this room perhaps has it. But we had a very, very good talk. I have nothing to do with Russia. To the best of my knowledge, no person that I deal with does.
Now, Manafort has totally denied it. He denied it. Now, people knew that he was a consultant over in that part of the world for a while, but not for Russia. I think he represented Ukraine or people having to do with Ukraine, or people that — whoever. But people knew that. Everybody knew that.
Question: But in his capacity as your campaign manager, was he in touch with Russian officials during the election?
Donald Trump: I have — you know what, he said no. I can only tell you what he — now, he was replaced long before the election. You know that, right? He was replaced long before the election. When all of this stuff started coming out, it came out during the election. But Paul Manafort, who’s a good man also, by the way — Paul Manafort was replaced long before the election took place. He was only there for a short period of time.
How much longer should we stay here, folks? Five more minutes, is that okay? Five?
Question: Mr. President, on national security —
Donald Trump: Wait, let’s see, who’s — I want to find a friendly reporter. Are you a friendly reporter? Watch how friendly he is. Wait, wait — watch how friendly he is. Go ahead. Go ahead.
Question: So, first of all, my name is (inaudible) from (inaudible) Magazine. And (inaudible). I haven’t seen anybody in my community accuse either yourself or any of the — anyone on your staff of being anti-Semitic. We have an understanding of (inaudible).
Donald Trump: Thank you.
Question: However, what we are concerned about, and what we haven’t really heard be addressed is an uptick in anti-Semitism and how the government is planning to take care of it. There have been reports out that 48 bomb threats have been made against Jewish centers all across the country in the last couple of weeks. There are people who are committing anti-Semitic acts or threatening to —
Donald Trump: You see, he said he was going to ask a very simple, easy question. And it’s not. It’s not. Not a simple question, not a fair question. Okay, sit down. I understand the rest of your question.
So here’s the story, folks. Number one, I am the least anti-Semitic person that you’ve ever seen in your entire life. Number two, racism — the least racist person. In fact, we did very well relative to other people running as a Republican.
Question: (Inaudible.)
Donald Trump: Quiet, quiet, quiet. See, he lied about — he was going to get up and ask a very straight, simple question. So you know, welcome to the world of the media. But let me just tell you something — that I hate the charge. I find it repulsive. I hate even the question because people that know me — and you heard the Prime Minister, you heard Netanyahu yesterday — did you hear him, Bibi? He said, I’ve known Donald Trump for a long time, and then he said, forget it.
So you should take that, instead of having to get up and ask a very insulting question like that.
Yeah, go ahead. Go ahead.
Question: Thank you. I’m Lisa from the PBS —
Donald Trump: See, it just shows you about the press, but that’s the way the press is.
Question: Thank you, Mr. President. Lisa Desjardins from the PBS Newshour.
Donald Trump: Good.
Question: On national security and immigration, can you give us more details on the executive order you planned for next week, even its broad outlines? Will it be focused on specific countries?
Donald Trump: It’s a very fair question.
Question: And in addition, on the DACA program for immigration, what is your plan? Do you plan to continue that program or to end it?
Donald Trump: We’re going to show great heart. DACA is a very, very difficult subject for me, I will tell you. To me, it’s one of the most difficult subjects I have, because you have these incredible kids, in many cases — not in all cases. In some of the cases they’re having DACA and they’re gang members and they’re drug dealers too. But you have some absolutely incredible kids — I would say mostly — they were brought here in such a way — it’s a very, very tough subject.
We are going to deal with DACA with heart. I have to deal with a lot of politicians, don’t forget, and I have to convince them that what I’m saying is right. And I appreciate your understanding on that.
But the DACA situation is a very, very — it’s a very difficult thing for me. Because, you know, I love these kids. I love kids. I have kids and grandkids. And I find it very, very hard doing what the law says exactly to do. And you know, the law is rough. I’m not talking about new laws. I’m talking the existing law is very rough. It’s very, very rough.
As far as the new order, the new order is going to be very much tailored to what I consider to be a very bad decision, but we can tailor the order to that decision and get just about everything, in some ways more. But we’re tailoring it now to the decision. We have some of the best lawyers in the country working on it. And the new executive order is being tailored to the decision we got down from the court. Okay?
Question: Mr. President, Melania Trump announced the reopening of the White House Visitors Office.
Donald Trump: Yes.
Question: And she does a lot of great work for the country as well. Can you tell us a little bit about what First Lady Melania Trump does for the country? And there is a unique level of interest in your administration, so by opening the White House Visitors Office, what does that mean to you?
Donald Trump: Now, that’s what I call a nice question. That is very nice. Who are you with?
Question: (Inaudible.)
Donald Trump: Good. I’m going to start watching. Thank you very much.
Melania is terrific. She was here last night. We had dinner with Senator Rubio and his wife, who is, by the way, lovely. And we had a really good discussion about Cuba because we have very similar views on Cuba. And Cuba was very good to me in the Florida election as you know, the Cuban people, Americans. And I think that Melania is going to be outstanding. That’s right, she just opened up the Visitors Center — in other words, touring of the White House.
She, like others that she’s working with, feels very, very strongly about women’s issues, women’s difficulties, very, very strongly. And she’s a very, very strong advocate. I think she’s a great representative for this country. And a funny thing happens because she gets so unfairly maligned. The things they say — I’ve known her for a long time. She was a very successful person. She was a very successful model. She did really well. She would go home at night and didn’t even want to go out with people. She was a very private person. She was always the highest quality that you’ll ever find. And the things they say — and I’ve known her for a long time — the things they say are so unfair. And actually, she’s been apologized to, as you know, by various media because they said things that were lies.
I’d just tell you this: I think she’s going to be a fantastic First Lady. She’s going to be a tremendous representative of women and of the people. And helping her and working with her will be Ivanka, who is a fabulous person and a fabulous, fabulous woman. And they’re not doing this for money. They’re not doing this for pay. They’re doing this because they feel it, both of them. And Melania goes back and forth, and after Barron finishes school — because it’s hard to take a child out of school with a few months left — she and Barron will be moving over to the White House. Thank you. That’s a very nice question.
Go ahead.
Question: Mr. President.
Donald Trump: Yes. Oh, this is going to be a bad question but that’s okay.
Question: No, it’s not going to be a bad question.
Donald Trump: Good, because I enjoy watching you on television.
Question: Well, thank you so much. Mr. President, I need to find out from you — you said something as it relates to inner cities. That was one of your platforms during your campaign.
Donald Trump: Fix the inner cities, yes.
Question: Fixing the inner cities. What will be that fix and your urban agenda, as well as your HBCU executive order that’s coming out this afternoon? See, it wasn’t bad, was it?
Donald Trump: That was very professional and very good.
Question: I’m very professional.
Donald Trump: We’ll be announcing the order in a little while, and I’d rather let the order speak for itself. But it will be something I think that will be very good for everybody concerned. But we’ll talk to you about that after we do the announcement.
As far as the inner cities, as you know, I was very strong on the inner cities during the campaign. I think it’s probably what got me a much higher percentage of the African American vote than a lot of people thought I was going to get. We did much higher than people thought I was going to get and I was honored by that, including the Hispanic vote, which was also much higher. And, by the way, if I might add, including the women’s vote, which was much higher than people thought I was going to get.
So we are going to be working very hard on the inner cities having to do with education, having to do with crime. We’re going to try and fix as quickly as possible — you know it takes a long time. It’s taken 100 years or more for some of these places to evolve, and they evolved many of them very badly.
But we’re going to be working very hard on health and health care; very, very hard on education. And also, we’re going to working in a stringent way, and a very good way, on crime. You go to some of these inner city places, and it’s so sad when you look at the crime. You have people — and I’ve seen this, and I’ve sort of witnessed it. In fact, in two cases, I have actually witnessed it. They lock themselves into apartments, petrified to even leave, in the middle of the day. They’re living in hell. We can’t let that happen. So we’re going to be very, very strong.
It’s a great question, and it’s a very difficult situation, because it’s been many, many years. It’s been festering for many, many years. But we have places in this country that we have to fix. We have to help African American people that, for the most part are stuck there — Hispanic American people. We have Hispanic American people that are in the inner cities, and they’re living in hell.
I mean, you look at the numbers in Chicago. There are two Chicagos, as you know. There’s one Chicago that’s incredible, luxurious and all, and safe. There’s another Chicago that’s worse than almost any of the places in the Middle East that we talk about, and that you talk about every night on the newscasts. So we’re going to do a lot of work on the inner cities. I have great people lined up to help with the inner cities.
Question: Well, when you say — when you say the inner cities, are you going to include the CBC, Mr. President, in your conversations with your urban agenda, your inner city agenda, as well as your —
Donald Trump: Am I going include who?
Question: Are you going to include the Congressional Black Caucus and the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, as well as —
Donald Trump: Well, I would. I tell you what, do you want to set up the meeting? Do you want to set up the meeting?
Question: No, no, no.
Donald Trump: Are they friends of yours?
Question: I’m just a reporter.
Donald Trump: No, go ahead, set up the meeting.
Question: I know some of them, but I’m sure they’re watching right now.
Donald Trump: Let’s go set up a meeting. I would love to meet with the Black Caucus. I think it’s great — the Congressional Black Caucus. I think it’s great. I actually thought I had a meeting with Congressman Cummings, and he was all excited, and then he said, oh, I can’t move, it might be bad for me politically, I can’t have that meeting. I was all set to have the meeting. You know, we called him and called him, and he was all set. I spoke to him on the phone. Very nice guy.
Question: I hear he wanted that meeting with you as well.
Donald Trump: He wanted it. But we called, called, called, called — they can’t make a meeting with him. Every day, I walked in, I said, I would like to meet with him. Because I do want to solve the problem. But he probably was told by Schumer or somebody like that — some other lightweight — he was probably told — he was probably told, don’t meet with Trump, it’s bad politics. And that’s part of the problem of this country.
Okay, one more. Go ahead.
Question: Yes, Mr. President, two questions —
Donald Trump: No, no. One question. Two, we can’t handle. This room can’t handle two. Go ahead, give me the better of your two.
Question: (Inaudible) it’s not about your personality or your beliefs. We’re talking about (inaudible) around the country, some of it by supporters in your name. What do you —
Donald Trump: And some of it — and can I be honest with you? And this has to do with racism and horrible things that are put up. Some of it written by our opponents. You do know that. Do you understand that? You don’t think anybody would do a thing like that. Some of the signs you’ll see are not put up by the people that love or like Donald Trump, they’re put up by the other side, and you think it’s like playing it straight. No. But you have some of those signs, and some of that anger is caused by the other side. They’ll do signs and they’ll do drawings that are inappropriate. It won’t be my people. It will be the people on the other side to anger people like you. Okay.
Go ahead.
Question: You are the President now. What are you going to do about it?
Donald Trump: Who is that? Where is that? Oh, stand up. You can —
Question: What are you going to do about the tensions that have been discussed?
Donald Trump: Oh, I’m working on it. No, I’m working on it very hard.
Question: Are you going to give a speech?
Donald Trump: No, no, look. Hey, just so you understand, we had a totally divided country for eight years, and long before that, in all fairness to President Obama. Long before President Obama, we have had a very divided. I didn’t come along and divide this country. This country was seriously divided before I got here.
We’re going to work on it very hard. One of the questions that was asked — I thought it was a very good question — was about the inner cities. I mean, that’s part of it. But we’re going to work on education. We’re going to work on lack — you know, we’re going to stop — we’re going to try and stop the crime. We have great law enforcement officials. We’re going to try and stop crime. We’re not going to try and stop, we’re going to stop crime.
But it’s very important to me. But this isn’t Donald Trump that divided a nation. We went eight years with President Obama, and we went many years before President Obama. We lived in a divided nation. And I am going to try — I will do everything within my power to fix that.
I want to thank everybody very much. It’s a great honor to be with you. Thank you. Thank you very much. (Applause.)
Article licensed under Creative Commons
The articles on Voltaire Network may be freely reproduced provided the source is cited, their integrity is respected and they are not used for commercial purposes (license CC BY-NC-ND).

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

ROMANOFF INTERVIEW

ARRIVING IN CHINA

Ver a imagem de origem


APPEAL TO THE LEADERS OF THE NINE NUCLEAR WEAPONS’ STATES

(China, France, India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States)

中文 DEUTSCH ENGLISH FRANÇAIS ITALIAN PORTUGUESE RUSSIAN SPANISH ROMÂNA

LARRY ROMANOFF on CORONAVIRUS

Read more at Moon of Shanghai

World Intellectual Property Day (or Happy Birthday WIPO) - Spruson ...


Moon of Shanghai

MOON OF SHANGHAI

MOON OF SHANGHAI
Click image

Larry Romanoff,

contributing author

to Cynthia McKinney's new COVID-19 anthology

'When China Sneezes’

When China Sneezes: From the Coronavirus Lockdown to the Global Politico-Economic Crisis

MANLIO

President of Russia Vladimir Putin:

Address to the Nation

Address to the Nation.


J. Bacque

coronavirus in Russia


Imagem

PT -- VLADIMIR PUTIN na Sessão plenária do Fórum Económico Oriental

Excertos da transcrição da sessão plenária do Fórum Económico Oriental


Joint news conference following a Normandy format summit

https://tributetoapresident.blogspot.com/2019/12/joint-news-conference-following.html

Joint news conference following the Normandy format summit.

ÍNDICE


“Copyright Zambon Editore”

PORTUGUÊS

GUERRA NUCLEAR: O DIA ANTERIOR

De Hiroshima até hoje: Quem e como nos conduzem à catástrofe

ÍNDICE

THE PUTIN INTERVIEWS


The Putin Interviews
by Oliver Stone (
FULL VIDEOS) EN/RU/SP/FR/IT/CH


http://tributetoapresident.blogspot.com/2018/07/the-putin-interviews-by-oliver-stone.html


FOX NEWS

TRIBUTE TO A PRESIDENT


NA PRMEIRA PESSOA

Um auto retrato surpreendentemente sincero do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin

CONTEÚDO

Prefácio

Personagens Principais em 'Na Primeira Pessoa'

Parte Um: O Filho

Parte Dois: O Estudante

Parte Três: O Estudante Universitário

Parte Quatro: O Jovem especialista

Parte Cinco: O Espia

Parte Seis: O Democrata

Parte Sete: O Burocrata

Parte Oito: O Homem de Família

Parte Nove: O Político

Apêndice: A Rússia na Viragem do Milénio


MANLIO DINUCCI -- NO WAR NO NATO

putin

Açores


Subtitled in EN/PT

Click upon the small wheel at the right side of the video and choose your language.


URGENT IMPORTANT -- FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE NEEDED FOR A YOUNG BOY 14 Y OLD WITH BRAIN CANCER

Dear Friends,

I have never asked any money/donations for myself in my blogs (400) but this is an exceptional emergency. Please help the best you can to assist Isabelle, our French Coordinator, to alleviate as much as possible her step son's health condition.



You can donate through Kees De Graaff

Type your recurring amount here:


PayPal


The email address connected with Kees Paypal account is keesdegraaff@gmail.com

Many thanks from the heart to all of you.



PUTIN FRENCH



2017 FSB Meeting - RO from Roberto Petitpas on Vimeo.

BOTH VIDEOS AVAILABLE IN ENGLISH,FRENCH, ROMANIAN, PORTUGUESE

PRESIDENT





Labels

: ARTICLES 'Epica della guerra di liberazione' "Flying Syringes" “Full Spectrum Dominance” "L'INSPIEGABILE COVID-19" "O plano dos judeus khazarianos para um Governo Mundial Único" “PROPAGANDA "Restabelecer factos distorcidos" "Restoring distorted facts" “The Khazar Jews’ Plan for a One-World Government” “可萨犹太人的计划一个世界政府” « Rétablir des faits distordus » «DICHIARAZIONE DI FIRENZE» 1961 1961 SPEECH 20 years in the EU - the losses are greater than the benefits 21st Century Wire 2AFRICA 4 Novembre 5G 5G Technology 6ª coluna 6th Column 7 APRIL 70 GODINA NATO-a: KONTINUIRANI RAT 9/11 911 A “Leap” toward Humanity’s Destruction A Arte da Guerra A BRAMERTON A FLEETING REFLECTION A GRANDEZA DE UMA NAÇÃO A GUERRA NUCLEAR A Hasbara Judaica em Toda a sua Glória.Mentiras por Todo o Lado A História das Invenções Chinesas A Litany of Pharma Crimes A Message from Larry Romanoff A new kind of Tiranny A SAMPLE OF THE E-BOOK A. Orlov A.C. Abayomi Azikiwe ABIZAID ABOGADOS ABOGADOS PROGRESISTAS DE ESPAÑA ABOUT TRUMP Abu Bakr al Baghdadi ABU GHRAIB Acción secreta Açores activism Adam GArrie ADL ADN CHINÊS Afeganistão Afeghanistan Afghanistan Africa AIDS Ajamu Baraka Al Jazeera AL-ASSAD AL-HUSAINI Alberto Bradanini Aleksandar PAVIC Alemanha ALENA Alessandropoli alex gorka Alex Lantier Alex Rubinstein Alexander Azadgan ALEXANDER COCKBURN ALEXANDER DUGIN ALEXANDER KUZNETSOV Alexandra Bruce Alexandre Artamonov Alexandre Cazes ALEXIS Alfred McCoy ALLARME PER LA CRESCENTE TENSIONE INTERNAZIONALE Allied Spirit Allies Ambasciatore della Lettonia AMBASSADRICE DE LETONNIE Ambrose Evans-Pritchard AMÉRICA America - The World's Bully America's Bio-Weapons Status America’s Deep State Revisited AMERICA'S WHITE SLAVERY AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM AMERICAN HEALTHCARE American Infiltration AMLO an Greenhalgh Ana de Sousa Dias ANA SOUSA DIAS ANASTASOV Anatol Lieven Andre Vltchek ANDREI AKULOV Andrew Griffin Andrew Korybko Andrew P. Napolitano Andrey Afanasyev Anglozionists animals Ann Diener Ann Wright Anna Hunt ANNA KURBATOVA Anna Von Reitz Anne Speckhard Ph. D. Anne Speckhard PH. D ANONYMOUS PATRIOTS Anti-Media News Desk ANTI-MONOPOLY POLICIES Anticipated Civil Unrest António Guterres Antony C. Black ap APEC APEL CONDUCATORILOR CELOR NOUA STATE DETINATOARE DE ARME NUCLEARE APELA A LOS LÍDERES DE LOS NUEVE ESTADOS CON ARMAS NUCLEARES APELO AOS DIRIGENTES DOS NOVE ESTADOS DETENTORES DE ARMAS NUCLEARES APPEAL TO THE LEADERS APPEL AUX DIRIGEANTS APPELLO AI LEADER DEI NOVE STATI APRIL 7 Arab NATO aRABIC Arabische NAVO ARAM MIRZAEI Argentina Ariel Noyola Rodríguez ARJUN WALIA Armas Nucleares ARMENIAN ARMES NUCLÉAIRES armi atomiche ARMI NUCLEARI arrested ARROZ DORADO ARTICLES Asaf Durakovic Asia Asma Assad ASMOLOV ASSANGE assassination At the helm: 20 years ago Atomic bomb Atomic Bombs AUDIO INTERVIEW AUKUS Australia Automóveis Eléctricos AUTOPSY Avelino Rodrigues Aviano AVNERY B61 B61-12 B61-12 Bomb Background BAKER balfour BAN ALL NUCLEAR WEAPONS bankers BANQUEROS EUROPEUS JUDÍOS BAOFU barcelona Barrett Brown Bash China Bashar al-Assad Basi americane Baxter Dmitry BECKER Before it's News BEGLEY Bell & Edison Belmarsh Prison Belshmare BEM NACIONAL BENJAMIN H. FREEDMAN BERGER Berlin Conference Bernays and Democracy Control BERNAYS AND PROPAGANDA BERUTE BILDERBERG 2019 BILL GATES BILL SARDI Binoy Kampmark BIO WAR BIO WARFARE Bio-chemical Warfare biological and chemical weapons BIOLOGICAL WARFARE Biological Warfare in Action Biological Weapon BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS Biotechnology and GMO Bioweapons Birth of America Bloqueios de Informação Body Systems BOER WARS BOGDANOV bolsa Bombing of North Korea Bonnie Faulkner books about war Boris Johnson Brazilian BRENNAN Brexit BRIAN CLOUGHLEY BRICS briefing Bruce Cagnon Bruce Gagnon BULGARIAN Bulletin of The Atomic Scientists Bush family BUTLER By Jack Heart & Orage By Prof Michel Chossudovsky CABRAS Caitlin Johnstone CAMP DARBY CAMPOS DE CONCENTRAÇAO Canada’s Tainted Blood Canadian Red Cross cancer CAPITALISM capitalismo CAPÍTULO 10 CAPÍTULO 11 CAPÍTULO 8 CAPÍTULO 9 CAPÍTULO SETE Captagon CAPTAIN AMERICA Carey Wedler Carla Stea CAROL ADL CARTA ABERTA CARTALUCCI Casques Blancs CASTELLANO CATALUNHA Catherine Austin Fitts CATHY O'BRIEN cats cavaquismo CDC CEI 70 DE ANI AI NATO: DIN RAZBOI ÎN RAZBOI CFO of Huawei Change of Venue CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 10 CHAPTER 11 CHAPTER 12 CHAPTER 13 CHAPTER 14 CHAPTER 15 CHAPTER 16 CHAPTER 17 Chapter 2 CHAPTER 3 CHAPTER 4 CHAPTER 5 CHAPTER 6 CHAPTER 7 Chapter 8 CHAPTER 9 CHAPTER TEN Chelsea Manning CHEMICAL WEAPONS CHEMICHAL WEAPONS Chi sono gli incendiari di petroliere CHIESA CHINA China is Not the West China reseeded China's 1959 Famine China's Democracy Experiments China's Hongersnood 1959 China's Summer Palace Chine Chineese feel home better CHINESE CHINESE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM Chinese Embassy Chinese Embassy in France CHINESE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM Choice and Truth Choosing Government Leaders Chossudovsky Chris Cole CHRIS HEDGES Christchurch Christian Far Right Christopher Black CIA CIA Project MK-ULTRA CIDADES MAIS SEGURAS DO MUNDO CIMEIRA DE VARSÓVIA CINA CITIBANK civilian repression Claire Bernish Clima CLIMATE CHANGE clinton CNN COCA COLA Coca-Cola COINTELPRO Collective Evolution colonialismo coloured revolutions. elections meddling COMBOIOS DE ALTA VELOCIDADE Comitato No Guerra No Nato COMMENTS Como os EUA se Tornaram Ricos COMUNICATO/APPELLO Comunidad Saker Latinoamérica Condolences from the President of the Russian Federation CONVEGNO INTERNAZIONALE CONVEGNO INTERNAZIONALE PER IL 70° DELLA NATO CONVENÇÃO INTERNACIONAL DO 70º ANIVERSÁRIO DA NATO CONVENȚIA INTERNAȚIONALĂ PENTRU A 70-A ANIVERSARE A NATO-ULUI CONVERSATIONS WITH PUTIN COOK Cooper Union University coordinamento COPPA DEL MONDO coranavirus COREIA DO NORTE Corey Feldman corona virus coronavirus coronavírus corporações corsa nucleare cost of war COUNTER PUNCH COUNTER-ACTIONS AGAINST USA counterpunch Covert Action COVID Vaccinations COVID Vaccinations and Oxitec’s “Flying Syringes” Covid-19 COVID-19: Survival Guide COVID-20 COVID-US Craig McKee Craig Murray CRANDANGOLO Crimes against Humanity Criminal Enterprise crise dos refugiados CROATIAN Cult CUNNINGHAM CURENT CONCERNS CURRENT CONCERNS CZECH DAMAS Damasco Daniel Ellsberg Daniel Lazare Daniel McCARTHY Daniele Ganser DANISH DANSK Darius Shahtahmasebi DARK JOURNALIST DARK JOURNALISTt DARPA DAVE WEBB DAVID HOROVITZ DAVID IGNATIUS DAVID IRVING David Krieger David Krieger. Martin Luther King David Lemire David STERN David Swanson DAVIDSWANSON Deal of Century DEAN Dean Henderson DECLARAÇÃO BALFOUR Declaração de Florença Declaration of Florence Deena Stryker Deep State Defender Europe 20 Defender Europe 2020 Defense Pact Delta coronavirus Democracia Multi-Partidos DEMOCRACY Democracy - The Most Dangerous Religion Democracy and Universal Values DEMOCRACY CONTROL Democracy to Fascism demonização do Islã xiita Denali dependência depopulation Der Krieg gegen Jugoslawien DESENVOLVIMENTO desigualdades Desinformação Mediática Destruction and desperation Deutsch Devin Nunes Diário do Povo Online Dichiarazione di Firenze DICK CHENEY Die Kunst des Krieges Die Präsidenten DIMONA DINNUCI DINUCCI DIPLOMACY Directiva Guerini DISCOURS À l'ASSEMBLÉE FÉDÉRALE discurso de Walid Al-Moualem Distanziamento sociale DISTORTIONS Dmisa Malaroat DMITRIY SEDOV Dmitry Minin DMITRY ORLOV DOCUMENTARY AND DRAMATIC FILMS ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS Dollar Domenico Losurdo DOMÍNIO DA UNIVERSALIDADE Donald Trump Donbass doni DONINEWS Doomesday Clock Dr. Kevin Barrett Dr. Strangelove Dresden drone assassination Drone strikes Drones NATO Dublin DUFF DUGIN E-BOOK e-commerce EBOLA economia ECONOMIA. POLÍTICA economic costs Economic Theory ECONOMICS ECONOMY Ed Dames EDITOR'S CHOICE Eduard Bernays Education EDWARD BERNAYS EDWARD SNOWDEN EINLADUNG ZUR INTERNATIONALEN KONFERENZ ZUM 70-JÄHRIGEN JUBILÄUM DER NATO Einstein El Ejército Privado de los Banqueros El Excepcionalismo Americano El Periodico ELDERLY MAN ON FIRE ELECTION ELEIÇÕES USA: OS MECANISMOS DA FRAUDE Eliason ELIJAH J. MAGNIER ELISABETE LUIS FIALHO Eliseo Bertolasi Elite’s Malthusian Agenda Embaixada da China em França Embaixatiz da Leónia Embajadora de Letonia EMBASSY OF ECUADOR EMMONS empréstimos EN -- INVITATION TO THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE 70TH ANNIVERSARY OF NATO EN — LARRY ROMANOFF — Democracy END FACTORY FARMING endgahl energia solar ENGDAHL English entrevista epidemias EPILOGUE Erdogan Eric S. Margolis Eric Zuesse ERKLÄRUNG VON FLORENZ ESCOBAR ESPANÕL Español estado estado-nação Ethnicity EU EUA Europa EUROPE EUROPEAN KHAZARIAN JEWS European Union EUTM Eva Bartlett EVAGGELOS VALLIANATOS Evan at Fight for the Future EVENT 201 Evgeny Baranov EVs ewish Corporate Heroes EXÉRCITO DOS BANQUEIROS JUDEUS Expulsion of Russian Diplomats Over Skripal Case F-35 F. William Engdahl facebook Faco fake news Fake News Awards Fallujah FALTA DE IMPARCIALIDADE FANG Farage farewell address FARSI Fattima Mahdi FBI Federal District Judge Miles Lord FEDERICO PIERACCINI Felicity Arbuthnot FEMA FERDINANDO IMPOSIMATO FERRIS Festival des Droits Humains Field McConnell finança finance Finian Cunningham Finnian Cunningham FINNISH FIRENZE First International Conference Against US/NATO Foreign Military bases FIRST PERSON FLÁVIO GONÇALVES FLUORIDATION FMI Follhas For Your Information FORBIDDEN KNOWLEDGE TV forbidden nowledge FÓRUM ECONÓMICO ORIENTAL Foster Gamble four horsemen FR -- LES 70 ANS DE L'OTAN: DE GUERRE EN GUERRE Fr. Andrew Phillips FRANÇA FRANÇAIS France FRANCESCA CHAMBERS FRANCESCO CAPPELLO Francesco Colafemmina Francis Lee Frankreichs FRAUDE EXTRANJERO FREE AHED TAMINI FREE E-BOOK FREE ENTERPRISE FREE Julian Assange FREE PAGES FREE PDF Freeman FRENCH FRISK From Gaza AI War Criminal FUKUSHIMA FULFORD FULL SPECTRUM DOMINANCE Fuller G-20 G20 G20 SUMMIT Galima Galiullina Galima Galiullina GALLAGHER Gareth Porter GARY NORTH Gás natural Gaza Gaza strip Gemplus General Flynn Genetic Manipulation genocide geopolítica George Gallanis George Szamuely GERMAN German. Manlio Dinucci GERMANOS germany Ghedi GHOUTA Ghouta Oriental Gilad Atzmon Gilbert Doctorow Giulietto Chiesa Giuseppe Conte Giuseppe Padovano GIVING NAMES Gladio Glen Greenwald Glenn Greenwald Global Economy GLOBAL MELTDOWN GLOBAL RESEARCH GLOBAL RESEARCH NEWS HOUR Global Times global warming Globalism globalização GMO GMO's REVEALED GMOS Gold GOLD ROBBERY google GORBACIOV AL CONVEGNO DI FIRENZE SULLA NATO GORDON GORDON DUFF GOUTHA Graham E. Fuller Graham Vanbergen GRANDANGOLO GRAZIA TANTA GREAT RESET Greece GREEK GREENHALGH GREENWALD Greg Hunter Gregory Copley GRETA THUNBERG GRETE MAUTNER GRUPO BILDERBERG Guerra alla Jugoslavia GUERRA BIOLÓGICA Guerra Civil guerra comeercial GUERRA NUCLEAR GUERRA NUCLEARE Guest Contributions GUEST CONTRIBUTORS GUNNAR Guns & Butter GUTERRES Gypsies Gypsies Expulsions Gypsies Origins HAARP HAGOPIAN Hakan Karakurt HAMBRUNA DE CHINA health HEGEMONIA USA HELLENIC Henry Kissinger HEPATITE C Hepatitis C Herbert McMaster HERMAN HERNÂNI CARVALHO HEZ HIBRYD WARS hill HILLARY CLINTON HIROSHIMA Hiroshima & Nagasaki História History History of Mossad assassinations and false flag attacks HIV hollywood HONG KONG HONG KONG PROTESTERS Honk if You Love Jesus http://www.independent.co.uk/ http://www.northcrane.com/ http://www.salem-news.com/ http://yournewswire.com/ HUAWEI HUDON HUDSON HUMANITY AT THE CROSSROADS HURRICANE HYBRID WARS Ian Greenhalgh Ian Shilling ICAN ideeCondividi Igor Nikulin Il futuro dell’America impeachment INAUGURATION INBJUDAN TILL EN INTERNATIONELL KONFERENS INFÖR NATO´S 70-ÅRSDAG INCÊNDIOS Incirlik INDEPENDÊNCIA India Índia Indiens INF TREATY Inform Clear House INFORMATION BLOCKADES INICIATIVA PRIVADA INSANIDADE AMERICANA Intelligence INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE IN FLORENCE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE IN FLORENCE Italy INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE 70TH ANNIVERSARY OF NATO INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE 70TH ANNIVERSARY OF NATO INTERNATIONALE KONGRES FOR 70 ÅRS DAGEN FOR NATO’S OPRETTELSE INTERNATIONATIONAL CONFERENCE Internet INTERVIEW Interview with Larry Romanoff Intimidating the Media & Subverting the Press INTRODUCTION INVITACIÓN PARA LA CONVENCIÓN INTERNACIONAL DEL 70º ANIVERSARIO DE LA NATO INVITATION À LA CONVENTION INTERNATIONALE POUR LE 70ème ANNIVERSAIRE DE L'OTAN/NATO INVITO INVITO AL CONVEGNO DEL 25 APRILE IODINE ION COJA IRAN Irão IRAQ Iraq war Iraque IRRAN Isaac Davis ISIS Ismail Bashmori Israel Israeli mass murder Israels IT -- Manlio Dinucci -- L'arte della guerra -- Le 70 candeline (esplosive) della Nato IT – Manlio Dinucci – L’arte della guerra -- Hong Kong Itália ITALIAN ITALIANO Italy Italy's Olive Trees ITULAIN Ivan Blot JACQUES CHIRAC Jacques Sapir Jacy Reese JALIFE-RAHME JAMES James A. Lucas James Angleton James Comey JAMES CORBETT JAMES GEORGE JATRAS James ONeil JAMES PETRAS JAMES RISEN Jane Grey Japan JAPANESE Japão Jay Greenberg Jean Perier Jean Périer Jean Toschi M. Visconti Jean-Claude Paye Jean-Luc Melenchon JEFF SESSIONS JEFFREY EPSTEIN Jeffrey Epstein's suicide JEFFREY SMITH JEFFREY ST. CLAIR JEFFREY ST. CLAIR - ALEXANDER COCKBURN JEWISH BETRAYAL Jewish Corporate Heroes Jews Jews' control over US domestic and foreign policy JEZEBEL JFK JILL STEIN Jim W. Dean Jimmy Carter Joachim Hagopian Joan Roelofs Joe Biden Joe Biden apprendista stregone nucleare Johan McCain John Bolton John Helmer John LaForge john McCain JOHN PILGER John Podesta John W. Whitehead JONAS E. ALEXIS Jonas E. Alexis. VETERANS TODAY Jonathan Marshall JONES Jordânia JOSÉ GOULÃO Joseph Thomas journalism jubilados Jugoslávia JULIAN ASSANGE JULIAN ROSE Justice Horace Krever Justice in Focus Symposium Justice Mary Lou Benotto Justin Raimondo KADI Kadir A. Mohmand KADOORIE Kadyrov kalee brown kamila Valieva Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Bechet-Golovko KATEHON KATHEON Katherine Frisk Ken O’Keefe Kenneth P. VOGEL Kerch Strait kerry KERRY BOLTON Kerry Cassidy Kerry Picket Kevin Barret. VT Khashoggi Kim Petersen KIMBERLEY KINZER KIRYANOV KOENIG Konstantin Asmolov KORYBKO KORZUN KREMLIN LIST Krum Velkov KURDS L’agonie de la politique étrangère française l'arte de la guerra L'arte della guerra L’arte della guerra L’incendie de la cathédrale Notre-Dame L’Italia nella Coalizione «antiterrorismo» L’URLO DEGLI SCHIAVI SOFFOCATO DALLE ONG AL FESTIVAL DEI DIRITTI UMANI La corsa al dominio dello Spazio LA COUPE DU MONDE La course à la domination de l’Espace Labor Lajes USA base Larry Chin LARRY ROMANOF Larry Romanoff LARRY ROMANOFF Global Economy LARRY ROMANOFF ON CORONAVIRUS Latvian Ambassador Lauréat du Club de Periodistas de México Laurent Gerra lavr LAVROV LAW AND JUSTICE Le Monde LE PARISIEN Le Saker Francophone LENDMAN Leonardo LESIN Líbano LIBERIAMOCI DAL VIRUS DELLA GUERRA LIBIA Líbia LIBRI CONTRO LA GUERRA LIBRO APERTO LIBYA LIDAR COM DEMÓNIOS LIES Lies Everywhere Lionel Shriver LISBOA LITHIUM lítio Lituania Livorno Livro 1 lletin of The Atomic Scientists LOFGREN LONDON Lorenzo Guerini LUSITANIA LUTA ANIT-COMUNISTA LVOV LYBIA MACMILLAN macron Maduro Maidan Makia Freeman MANAGEMENT MANLIO Manlio Dinucci Manlio Dinucci - Manual de prevenção e controle da Covid-19 Manuel Ochsenreiter MAO TZE DONG MAO ZEDONG Mar del Plata Mar do Sul da China Marc Lassus Marco Cassiano MARCUS WEISGERBER MAREJADAS MARGARET KIMBERLEY Margarita Simonyan Margherita Furlan MARIA BUTINA MARIA BUTINA FUND MARIA ZAKHAROVA Mario Draghi Mark Citadel Mark Esper Mark Taliano Markus Frohnmaier Martin Berger Martin Hurkes Martin Luther King MARUSEK MARY BETH SULLIVAN Matt Agorist Matt Peppe MATTEO rRENZI MATTHEW COLE MATTHEW JAMISON MAX PARRY May McCain McCloy-Zorin Accords MCLAUGHLIN MEDIA AND CONSPIRACY IN ACTION Media Disinformation MEDIA E CONSPIRAÇÃO EM ACÇÃO” MEDIA E COSPIRAZIONE IN ATTO MEDIA I SPISEK W AKCJI MEDIA ȘI CONSPIRAȚIE ÎN ACȚIUNE” MEDICINE Meetings of NATO Ministers of Defence MEGYN KELLY MÉLENCHON MELKULANGARA BHADRAKUMAR meloni memo Memorial day Meng Wanzhou Meningitis mercado «repo» mercados MERCOURIS MERITOCRACY MERS-US MES Metas de desenvolvimento nacional da Rússia até 2030 MEU COMENTÁRIO MEXICO MEYSSAN MIC - MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX MICHAEL AVERKO Michael Brenner Michael Hudson MICHAEL JABARA CARLEY Michael S. Rozeff Michael T. Klare Michał Kalecki MICHEL CHOSSUDOVSKY Michel Raimbaud Middle East MIG video mike harris Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Whitney Militarização e Armas de Destruição em Massa Militarization and WMD militarized budget MILITARY INTELLIGENCE MINA Mint Press News MintPressNews MIRANDA miscalculation Misión Verdad MISSEIS NUCLEARES NA EUROPA missiles nucleaires en Europe missioni cloniale MKULTRA Mobile Phone Systems Mohamed Mokhtar Qandiel MOHMAND Montenegro MOON OF ALABAMA moonofalabama MORENA Mossad MOST DAMAGING WIKILEAKS Mouna Alno-Nakhal MOVIMENTO PORTUGUÊS CONTRA A CIMEIRA DA NATO EM LONDRES Mudança de Local MYTH OF SUPREMACY Myths of Democracy NA PRIMEIRA PESSOA nacionalismo Nações Construídas sobre Mentiras NAFTA Nagasaki NÃO À GUERRA NÃO À NATO NAPALM national archives National Covid-19 Testing Action Plan NATIONAL GOOD NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE National Security Strategy NATO NATO & NUKES NATO Araba NATO Counter-Summit NATO EXIT NATO GENNEM 70 ÅR: VEDVARENDE KRIG NATO nello Spazio NATO Summit in London NATO Trident Juncture 2018 NATOME Nazim Hikmet Nazis Nazism nazismo Nazismus NED NEDERLANDS NEIL KEENAN NEO neoliberalismo new high-speed maglev train NEW INTERNATIONAL ORDER new silk road NEW VIDEO New World Order New York Times NEWS DESK Nicholas Nicholaides Nick Turse Nigeria NIKANDROV nikki haley Nile Bowie NISSANI NO WAR NO NATO Noam Chomsky NOR Nordkoreas NORMAN SOLOMON NORSK NORTH KOREA North Stream 2 NORWEGIAN NOVOROSSIA novorussia NSA NSA BUILDINGS nuclear nuclear Armageddon Nuclear arsenal NUCLEAR MISSILES AGAINST USA NUCLEAR MISSILES IN EUROPE NUCLEAR WAR NUCLEAR WEAPONS NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN SPACE NUKES Nuovo Comando USA Nuremberg NWO NYTIMES O “Acordo do Século” O FUTURO DA AMÉRICA O SANGUE ADULTERADO DO CANADÁ obama obamas Objectively Observatório da Guerra e do Militarismo Obstruction of Justice OCCUPY WALL STREET Oil OLAS Oliver Stone Olivier Renault OMS ONDAS One-World Government ONU OPEN LETTER Operation Paperclip ORIGEM ORLOV Os Acordos McCloy-Zorin Os Judeus de Staline Os judeus estavam ocupados na década de 1930 Osama bin Laden OSCAR FORTIN Osservatorio sulla presenza USA in Italia ouro Outer Space OWoN Team Oxitec Pacto PAKISTAN Pakistans Palestina PALESTINE Palestinians pandemia pandemias PANDORA TV PANGEA Pangea Grandangolo (Byoblu) Pangea Notizie Papa Francisco PARRY Part 10 PARTE 1 PARTE 2 PARTE 3 Parte I Patrick Iber Patrick J. Buchanan Patrick Martin PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS Paul Fitzgerald Paul Martin Paul R. PILLAR Paul Street PAYE Paz PCR peace Pedro Bustamante Pedro Caetano pedrógão grande PENTAGON PEPE ESCOBAR PEPE ESOBAR PERSIAN Peter Dale Scot Peter Dale Scott Peter Koenig PETER KORZUN Peter Thiel Petition PETRAS Petrodollar Pfizer's Perfectly-Timed Epidemic Ph.D Phil Butler PICCARD Pierre Farge PILGER Pirbright Institute Pisa Book Festival PISKORSKI PLAZA DE TIANANMEN Plenary session of the Eastern Economic Forum PODESTA POISONING CITIZENS POISONS IN THE WORLD CUP Police State & Civil Rights Police State America POLISH Política Political Economy Políticas anti-Covid-19 POLITICS POLSKI Pompeo Pompeo threatens Putin Pope Bergoglio Pope Francis Porte-parole du Comitato No Guerra No Nato PORTO Portugal PORTUGUES PORTUGUÊS PORTUGUESE Portuguguese PORTUGUSES Poutine POW POZVÁNKA NA MEDZINÁRODNÚ KONFERENCIU K PRÍLEŽITOSTI 70. VÝROČIA NATO PRAÇA TIANANMEN PRAVDA prc Premierminister und Gesetzgeber Chinas premIo dal Club de Periodistas de México Prémio Internacional de Análise Geoestratégica Premio Internacional de Análisis Geostratégico Premiul Internațional de Analiză Geostrategică preservação ambiental President Vladimir Putin Interview to Tucker Carlson Presidential Address to Federal Assembly Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly PRESTON JAMES PRINCE CHARLES PRINCE PHILIP PRIVATISATION Privatization Prof Michel Chossudovsky Prof Rodrigue Tremblay Project Veritas PROJECTO MK-ULTRA projecto Secasol PROPAGANDA PROPAGANDĂ PROPAGANDA E MEIOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO SOCIAL psychological warfare Psycological Warfare PSYOP Psywar Público PUERTO RICO PUTIN Putin in Italia Putin’s State of the Union PUTIN/TRUMP Putin/Trump meeting PYOTR ISKENDEROV Qingdao Queen Elizabeth QUEEN VICTORIA racism Rajan Menon RAND CORPORATION Raphael Johnson Raphaël Meyssan rebecca gordon Recent Bio-Weapons Attacks Recovery Fund Rede des Präsidenten vor der Bundesversammlung Redmayne-Titley Reiner Fuellmich Relatório do 2º Trimestre RELAX remote viewing Rep. Ron Paul Replant American Dream réseau Réseau International Réseau Voltaire Réseau Voltaire: Resources Warfare Rete Civica Livornese Contro la Nuova Normalità della Guerra Revisited Revue Défense Nationale Ricardo Vaz RICHARD DOLAN Richard Galustian Richard Labévière Richard Spencer Rick Sterling RIPPLES AND SURGES RM Rob Slane Rob Urie Robert Bridge Robert F. Kennedy Jr Robert J. Burrowes Robert J. O’Dowd Robert Maginnis Robert Mueller Robert O’Dowd ROBERT PARRY robert steele ROBERTS ROCKEFELLER rof. Mohssen Massarrat ROLAND Roland San Juan blog ROMÂNA ROMANIA PROTESTS ROMANIAN ROMÎNA Ron Aledo RON PAUL Ron Paul Institute Ron Unz rothschild roubo da prata RT Rubber-Stamp Parliaments Rudolph Giuliani RUDY GIULIANI RUSSIA RÚSSIA Russia feed RUSSIA TODAY russiafeed russiagate RUSSIAN Russian & Chinesese leaders Russian Insider RUSSIAN OLIGHARCHS Russian/Ukrianian conflit Russie politics Russka Russlands RUSSOPHILE Ryan Dawson Ryan Gallagher s: ARTICLES s:ARTICLES Sahra Wagenknecht SALÁRIO Salman Rafi Sheikh sana SANÇÕES sanctions sanders SANTOS SILVA Sarah Abed SARS SARS-US sARTICLES Sassoon Saudi Arabia SCAHILL Science SCOTT Scott Humor Sea of Azov Sean Adl-Tabatabai sécurité alimentaire syrienne Seeds of Destruction semences de blé contaminé September 25 SERBIAN SERGEY LAVROV serviços secretos servizi segreti Sessão Plenária do Fórum Económico Internacional de São Petersburgo sessions Seth Ferris SETH RICH SHAKDAM Shandong Province Shane Quinn Sharon Tennison Shawn Hamilton SHEIKH sic sic notícias SIDA Sigonella SIMON PARKES SIPRI Síria Skripal poisoning SLOVAK SLOVENIAN SLOVENSKÝ Smith & Wesson SNOWDEN SNYDER soberania SOCIALISM SOCIALISMO SOCIETY SOCIOLOGY Soleimani assassination Sophie & Co Søren Korsgaard Soros SOUS NOS YEUX SOUTH FRONT South Korea SOUTHFRONT Sovranità SP -- Manlio Dinucci -- «EL ARTE DE LA GUERRA»‎ La estrategia del caos dirigido Space Daily SPACE WARFARE Spain SPANISH speech GERMAN MP Speech at UN Assembly SPEECH TO FEDERAL ASSEMBLY Speer-Williams Sputinik sPUTNICK SPUTNIK SPY SPYING STACHNIO Stalin Stanislav Petrov State of the Nation stealth B-2 Spirit STEPHEN KARGANOVIC Stephen Kinzer Stephen Lendman Steve Pieczenik STEVE PIECZENIK: Steve Robertson Steven MacMillan STONE STORM CLOUDS GATHERING StormCloudsGathering.com STRAGE DI PIAZZA FONTANA PROVENIVA DALLE BASI NATO» Strategic Culture Strategic Maneuvers STRATTON STRYKER submarino ARA San Juan Submarinos nucleares SUMMIT Sunagawa SUOMI support his Health condition support his work Suspicious US Outbreaks SVENSKA Sweden SWEDISH SYLVAIN LAFOREST Syria t T.J. COLES T.V. SOONG TAIPINGS Taiwan TAKEHON TALIANO TASS Tavolo della Pace Val di Cecina Tecnologia 5G TED RALL TEREHOV Terrorismo the The American Insider The Anti-Media The British Royal Family The Chimera of Democracy The City of London the coming storm The deeper state The Duran The Economic Boycott of 1933 The FBI The Financial Times The Financial Times's Interview with President Putin THE HAMMER AND THE DANCE THE INFINITE WAR THE INTERCEPT The Jewish Declaration of War on Germany The Jewish Hasbara The Jewish Hasbara in All its Glory The Jewish Origin The Khazar Jews’ Plan THE MEASURE OF A NATION The Most Dangerous Religion The Next American Revolution? The Next American Revolution? Anticipated Civil Unrest The Non-Imperial Empire The Pathology of American Competition The Power Behind the Throne The Right-Wing Brain The Rise of the Police State The Rockefeller Foundation The Rockeffeler Foundation The Rockfeller Foundation THE SAKER THE SCREAM OF THE SLAVES SILENCED By NGOs AT THE HUMAN RIGHTS FESTIVAL The Theology of Elections The Theology of Politics the true activist The US in Korea THE US IN VIETNAM The WHO – Depopulation is Reality The World of Biological Warfare The World’s Safest Cities THERAPEOFJUSTICE Thierry Meyssan Thierry Meyssan. Syria Third Presidential Debate TIANANMEN SQUARE REVISITED TIBET PROVINCE Tik-Tok Tik-Tok and WeChat Tillerson TNP Treaty To White House Puppet Master tom dispatch TOM ELEY Tom Engelhardt Tom Feeley TOM JOAD Tomas Pueyo Tomasz Čukernik TomDispatch TOMGRAM Tony Blair Tony Cartalucci torna il Trattato di Nanchino torture Trabalho e Roubo Salarial TRADE WAR TRUCE TRAIÇÃO DOS JUDEUS TRATADO DE VERSALHES Tratado ONU Tratatto ONU Trattato Open Skies TRE LIBRI CONTRO LA GUERRA trees TROVAN True Activist TrueActivist.com trump TRUMP ENTRE A GUERRA E A PAZ Trump Tra Guerra e Pace Trump's impeachment TRUTH TSUKANOVA TTIP Tucker Carlson Tukish Tulsi Gabbard TUR TURCHIA TURKEY Turkish TURQUIA Turquish Twitter TYLER DURDEN UCRANIA Ucrânia Udo Ulfkotte UE UITNODIGING VOOR HET INTERNATIONALE CONGRES VANWEGE HET 70e JUBILEUM VAN DE NAVO UK Ukraine Ukraine Biden Ukraine provocation Ukrainian and Russian View on the Kursk Invasion Ukrainian Deserter Ukrainian Provocatian Un cambio de lugar de encuentro Un Messaggio di Larry Romannoff Un Mondo senza guerre UNDERSTANDING UNIÃO EUROPEIA Union of Concerned Scientists UNITED BASES OF AMERICA UNITED KINGDOM UNITED STATES Universal Public Surveillance UNIVERSIDADE DE HARVARD UNRISTRECTED WARFARE Update April 2024 US bases in Greece US Bird Flu US CORPORATE AND INSTITUTIONAL EXECUTIVES CRIMINALLY INSANE US Domestic Projects and Experiments US Economic Statistics: “Unreliable Numbers” US ELECTIONS US Foreign Deployment US HEALTH CARE US HEGEMO US HEGEMONY US imperialism US JOURNALISTS KILLED BY USA US MARINES US Military US NAO WAR AGENDA US NATO AGENDA US NATO War US NATO War Agenda US NGOs USA USA bases in Greece USA Criminally Insane USA ELECTION USA ELECTIONS USA Hegemony USA sanctions USA USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS USA/NATO Bases uso militar uso militare vaccin vacina vacinas VALDAI VALDAI DISCUSSION CLUB MEETING Valentin Vasilescu VALORES CULTURAIS Van AUKEN VANDERBILT VASILESCU Vault 7 Venezuela Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity VETERANS VETERANS TODAY VETERNAS TODAY Victory Day video video interview VIDEO. videos VIETNAM VETERANS Viktor Mikhin VITALY CHURKIN VITOR LIMA VÍTOR LIMA Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Chizhov Vladimir Danilov VLADIMIR KOZIN VLADIMIR PUTIN Vladimir Safronkov Vladimir Terehov VLTCHEK VOA VOICE OF AMERICA Volume 1 Volume One Votos de Feliz 2020 VT Waking Times WALTER LIPPMAN WANTA war Warsaw Washingtons blog WAVES WAYNE MADSEN Weapons of Mass Destruction WENDY WOLFSON – KEN LEVY West Bank WESTBERG Westmoreland What do you think about China wheel of misfortune WHITEHEAD WHITNEY WEB Whitney Webb WHO IS A JEW WIKILEAKS Wikispooks William Barr William Blum WILPF Wladimir Putin WOODS world beyond war world cup 2018 WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION WORLD MAP OF PRIVATISATION Wright Brothers Wuhan WWII WWIII XI JIMPING Xi Jinping XINGIANG Xinjiang XUE FENG Yameen Khan Yanis Varoufakis YEMEN YOUNG HERO Youssef A. Khaddour Yuan Yugoslavia ZAKHAROVA ZÉ GERALDO Zelensky ZEROHEDGE Zhang Wenhong ZIKA ZIONISM -- THE HIDDEN TIRANNY ZUESSE Волны ОБРАЩЕНИЕ К ПРЕЗИДЕНТАМ ПРИГЛАШЕНИЕ НА МЕЖДУНАРОДНУЮ КОНВЕНЦИЮ ПОСВЯЩЕННУЮ 70й ГОДОВЩИНЕ ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ НАТО РУССКИЙ рябь и всплески СРПСКИ 中国1959年的饥荒 关于新冠病毒未解释的事情 国际会议邀请 北约成立70周年纪念日 宣传、媒体和行动中的阴谋 拉里•罗曼诺夫访谈录 波浪,涟漪和波涛 王位背后的权力 简体中文 美国-世界上的恶霸 美国例外论