THE 70 YEARS OF NATO:
CONTINUOUS WAR
INDEX
1. NATO is born from the Bomb
2. In the post-Cold War, NATO
is renewed
3. NATO demolishes the Yugoslav state
4. NATO expands eastward to Russia
5. US and NATO attack Afghanistan and
Iraq
6. NATO demolishes the Libyan state
7. The US/NATO war to demolish
Syria
8. Israel and the Emirates in NATO
9. The US/NATO
orchestration of the coup in Ukraine
10. US/NATO escalation in
Europe
11. Italy, the aircraft
carrier on the war front
12. US and NATO reject the UN treaty and
deploy new nuclear weapons in Europe
13. US and NATO sink the INF Treaty
14. The Western American Empire plays
the war card
15. The US/NATO planetary war system
16. Exiting the
war system of NATO
1. NATO is born from the Bomb
1, The events that gave birth to
NATO begin when the United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and
Nagasaki in August 1945, not to defeat Japan, now at the end, but to come
out of the Second World War with the greatest possible advantage,
especially over the Soviet Union. This was made possible by
the fact that, at that time, the United States was the
only country that possessed nuclear weapons.
2. Just a month after the bombing of
Hiroshima and Nagasaki, in September 1945, the Pentagon calculated that
it would take about 200 nuclear bombs to defeat an enemy the
size of the USSR. On March 5, 1946, Winston Churchill's speech about the
"Iron Curtain" officially started the Cold War. Soon after,
in July 1946, the USA carried out the first nuclear tests in the atoll of Bikini
(Marshall Islands, Pacific Ocean) to confirm nuclear bombs'
effectiveness on the disarmament of a group of ships and thousands of
guinea pigs. More than 40,000 US military and
civilians participated in the operation that included over
250 ships, 150 aircraft and 25,000 radiation detectors.
3. In 1949, the
US nuclear arsenal rose to about 170 nuclear bombs. At this
point the United States surely had enough bombs to attack the Soviet
Union within a short period of time. That same year,
however, the United States' plan to
preserve its monopoly on nuclear weapons failed. On
August 29, 1949, the Soviet Union carried out its first experimental nuclear
explosion. A few months earlier, on April 4, 1949, when Washington knew that
the Soviet Union was about to have the nuclear
bombs and was about to start the nuclear arms race, the United
States created NATO. During the Cold War, the Alliance under US
command included 16 countries: United States, Canada, Belgium,
Denmark, France, German Federal Republic, Great Britain, Greece, Iceland,
Italy, Luxembourg, Norway, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Turkey. Through
this alliance, the United States maintained its dominance over
European allies, using Europe as the front line against the Soviet Union.
4. Six years after the formation
of NATO, on May 14, 1955, the Warsaw Pact was born, which
included the Soviet Union, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Poland, the German
Democratic Republic, Romania, Hungary and Albania. (The Warsaw Pact
continued from 1955 to 1968.)
5. As the nuclear confrontation
between the US and the USSR began, Britain and France, both members of
NATO, moved to also equip themselves with nuclear weapons. The first
to succeed was Great Britain, which in 1952 carried out an experimental
explosion in Australia. NATO's advantage increased further when, on
November 1st of the same year, the US detonated its first H
(hydrogen) bomb. In February 1960, NATO countries with nuclear weapons
rose to three when France detonated its first nuclear bomb in the Sahara.
6. While the nuclear arms
race was in full swing, the missile crisis in
Cuba exploded in October 1962. After the armed invasion of
the island by CIA-backed exiles in April 1961 failed, the
USSR decided to provide Cuba with medium and intermediate range ballistic
missiles. The United States carried out the naval blockade of the
island and put their nuclear forces on alert. Over 130
intercontinental ballistic missiles were ready for launch,
and 54 bombers with onboard nuclear weapons were added
to the 12 bombers that the Strategic Air Command
always kept in flight 24 hours a day, ready for nuclear
attack. At the time, the United States had more than 25,500 nuclear weapons, to
which about 210 were added, while the USSR had about 3,350. The crisis,
which took the world to the threshold of nuclear
war, was defused by the Soviet decision not to install the missiles
in exchange for a US commitment to lift the blockade and respect
the independence of Cuba.
7.At the same time, China moves
towards the acquisition of nuclear weapons and, in October 1964, explodes its
first uranium bomb and, in less than three years, its first H-bomb.
8.Hand in hand with the growth of its arsenal, the
Pentagon developed detailed nuclear war operational plans against the
USSR and China. An 800-page dossier – made public in 2015 by the
US National Archives – contains a list (until then classified)
of thousands of targets in the USSR, Eastern Europe and China that the US was
preparing to destroy with nuclear weapons during the Cold War. In 1959,
the year to which the "target list" refers, the US had more
than 12,000 nuclear warheads and the British had 80, while the
USSR had about a thousand, and China had none up
to that point. Due to having superior transportation (bombers and
missiles), the Pentagon considered a nuclear attack to be feasible.
9.Paul Johnstone, a Pentagon nuclear war planner and
analyst for two decades (1949~1969), has revealed that at the time of the Cold
War, there was the conviction among US strategists that the
United States would suffer serious damage and have millions of deaths, but it
would continue to exist as an organized and viable nation, and it would
prevail, while the Soviet Union would not be able to do so.
10.Between the late 60s and early 70s, the
US had about 9,000 nuclear weapons deployed outside its territory:
about 7,000 in European NATO countries and 2,000 in Asian countries (South
Korea, Philippines, Japan). Besides these, they have 3,000 weapons aboard
submarines and other naval units, which can be launched at any time from
advanced positions against the Soviet Union and other countries. The USSR,
which has no advanced bases outside its territory near the United States (to
which it can approach, however, using nuclear submarines), tried to
prove that, if attacked, it could launch a devastating retaliation.
To confirm this fact, in a test conducted on October 20, 1961, the most
powerful hydrogen bomb ever experienced, the 58-megaton «Zar», equivalent to
almost 4,500 Hiroshima bombs, was detonated. At the same time, the
Soviet Union prepared a space weapon: a missile that, if put in orbit
around the Earth, could strike the United States at any moment with a nuclear
warhead.
11.At this point the United States, facing a difficult
position, proposed to the Soviet Union a treaty on the peaceful use
of space. Thus, in January 1967, the Treaty on outer space was signed, which
forbids the placing of nuclear weapons in the Earth's orbit, on the Moon or on
other celestial bodies, or, in any case, to place them in extra-atmospheric
space.
12.Immediately afterwards, in July 1968, the Nuclear
Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) was signed. The United States, Great Britain and
the Soviet Union promote it, worried by the fact that other countries want to
enter the circle of nuclear powers. Article 1 states: "Each of the
military nuclear States undertakes not to transfer nuclear weapons to
anyone". Article 2 states: "Each of the militarily non-nuclear
States, which is a Party to the Treaty, undertakes not to receive from anyone
nuclear weapons or other explosive nuclear devices, nor control over such
weapons and explosive devices, directly or indirectly". The nuclear
powers undertook to pursue negotiations on a Treaty establishing
general disarmament under international control (Article 6).
Italy signed the NPT in 1969 and ratified it in 1975.
13. While the United States, Great
Britain and the Soviet Union try to prevent other countries from entering the
nuclear club with the non-proliferation Treaty, of which five members belong in
1968, a sixth country infiltrates the circle of nuclear powers, succeeding not
only in enter it but, once inside, become officially invisible: the stone
guest is Israel. At the same time that the Non-Proliferation Treaty was opened
for signature in 1968, Israel is already secretly deploying its first nuclear
weapons. In the 1970s and 1980s, South Africa, India and Pakistan also began to
build nuclear weapons. In 1986 the world arsenal rose to its highest level:
around 65,000 nuclear weapons.
14. It is at this stage that Europe was being
turned into the front line of the nuclear confrontation between the
two superpowers. Between 1976 and 1980 the USSR deployed ballistic missiles of
intermediate range on its territory. Based on the fact that from the Soviet
territory they could hit Western Europe, starting in
1983, NATO decided to deploy US mid-range nuclear missiles in
Europe: 108 Pershing II ballistic missiles in Germany and 464 cruise missiles
that could be launched from the ground, distributed between Great Britain,
Italy, West Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands.
15. In less than 10 minutes from a launch, the
US Pershing 2 deployed in Germany could hit Soviet bases and cities,
including Moscow, with their nuclear warheads. At the same time, the US cruise
missiles deployed in Comiso and other European bases, flying at subsonic speeds
at a distance from the ground of a few tens of meters along the
contour of the terrain, could escape radar and hit the Soviet cities.
In turn, the SS-20 deployed in Soviet territory could hit the bases
and cities of Western Europe in less than 10 minutes from launch.
16. In Italy, in the mid-1980s, in addition to 112
nuclear warheads on cruise missiles deployed in Comiso,
there were other US nuclear weapons for a total estimated number
of about 700. They were made up mostly of atomic demolition
mines, nuclear projectiles artillery and short-range nuclear missiles, intended
for use in Italy. This indicates that Italy is considered by the Pentagon to be
a simple pawn to be sacrificed, a nuclear battlefield to be turned into a
radioactive desert.
17. During the Cold War, from 1945 to
1991, a nuclear arsenal accumulated in the world, which
in 1980s probably reached 15,000 megatons –
the equivalent of more than a
million atomic bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima. It is
as if every inhabitant of the planet were sitting upon 3 tons of TNT. The power
of the nuclear arsenal exceeds 5,000 times that of all the explosive devices
used in the Second World War. For the first time in history, a destructive
force was created that could erase from the face of the
Earth, not once but repeatedly, the human species and almost every other form
of life.
2. In the post-Cold War NATO is renewed
1. In the second half of the 1980s, the climate of
the Cold War began to change. The first sign of thawing was the
Treaty on Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF), signed in Washington on December
8, 1987, by Presidents Reagan and Gorbachev. According to the
INF, the United States and the Soviet Union were to undertake to
eliminate all missiles of this category, including the Pershing II and the
cruise missiles deployed by the US in European NATO countries and the SS-20
deployed by the USSR in their territory. By May 1991, a total of 2,692 missiles
in this category were removed.
2. This important result was essentially due to
the “disarmament offensive” launched by the Soviet
Union under Gorbachev. On January 15, 1986,
it proposed not only to eliminate Soviet and US intermediate
range missiles, but to implement an overall program to eliminate
nuclear weapons by 2000. In Washington, they knew that Gorbachev
really wanted the complete elimination of these weapons, but they
also knew that in the Warsaw Pact and in the Soviet Union itself a
process of disintegration was taking place, a process that the United
States and their allies favored by all possible means.
3.After the fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989, the
Warsaw Pact dissolved in July 1991. The six central and eastern
European countries that were part of it were no longer allies of the
USSR. In December 1991, the Soviet Union itself dissolved.
Fifteen states were formed in place of a single state. The
disappearance of the USSR and its block of alliances created an
entirely new geopolitical situation in the European and Central
Asian regions. At the same time, the disintegration of the USSR and the
deep political and economic crisis affecting the Russian
Federation marked the end of the only superpower able to rival that
of the United States.
4.The United States immediately took advantage of the
“détente” in Europe to concentrate their forces in the strategic area of the Persian Gulf, where, with a clever maneuver,
they prepared the conditions to unleash what the
Pentagon called “the first post-Cold War conflict, a determining
event in the global leadership of the United States”. On 17
January 1991, the US launched Operation Desert
Storm against the Iraqi Army – “the most intense bombing campaign in
history”. Over 43 days, the US and its allies (including
the Italy) used 2,800 aircraft to drop about 250,000 bombs, including
cluster bombs, which issued a total of over 10 million submunitions,
while flying gunships, helicopters and tanks shot over a million
depleted uranium projectiles. On 23rd February, the coalition troops,
comprising over half a million soldiers, launched a ground offensive, which,
after a hundred hours of carnage, ended on 28th February with a “temporary
ceasefire” proclaimed by President Bush.
5.NATO, while not participating as such in the Gulf War, provided the
backing of all its infrastructure to coalition forces. They took part
in the bombings, along with the US, British, French, Italian, Greek, Spanish,
Portuguese, Belgian, Dutch, Danish, Norwegian and Canadian air forces and naval
forces, while British and French forces joined US forces in the
land-based offensive.
6. A new strategy, published by the White House
in August 1991 called the “National Security Strategy of the United
States”, was officially announced six months after the end of the Gulf
War. The central concept was that "the United
States remains the only state with a force, a scale and influence in
every dimension – political, economic and military – truly global: there
is no substitute for American leadership. Our responsibility, even in the
new era, is of cardinal and inescapable importance ».
7. A Pentagon document, drawn up in February
1992, clarified that “our primary objective is to prevent the
re-emergence of a new rival, either on the territory of the former Soviet Union
or elsewhere, which poses a threat in the order of the one previously posed by
the Soviet Union. The new strategy requires that we work to prevent any hostile
power from dominating a region whose resources would be sufficient, if tightly
controlled, to generate global power. This strategy will be adopted in
all 'critical US security regions, which include Europe, East Asia, the
Middle East, South-West Asia and the territory of the former Soviet
Union.' We also have important interests in Latin America, Oceania and
Sub-Saharan Africa”.
8. “A key issue – the White House underlines in the National
Security Strategy 1991 – is how the role of America as the leader of
the Alliance, and indeed our own alliances, will be influenced, especially in
Europe, by the reduction of the Soviet threat. The differences between the
allies will probably become more evident as the traditional security concern
that brought them together at the beginning.” In other words, the European
allies could make divergent choices from those of the United States,
questioning the US leadership or even leaving NATO, now outdated by the new
geopolitical situation. It was, therefore, of the utmost urgency
for the United States to redefine not only the strategy but the role of NATO
itself.
9. On November 7, 1991, the heads of state and
governments of the 16 NATO countries, meeting in Rome in the
Atlantic Council, launched "The new strategic concept of the
Alliance". Although on the one hand "the monolithic, massive threat that
has been the main concern of the Alliance in its first forty years has
disappeared,” – the document states – “the risks that remain for the Alliance's
security are multifaceted and multidirectional in nature. The
military dimension of our Alliance therefore remains an essential factor, but
the new fact is that it will be more than ever at the service of a broad
concept of security ". In this way, the Atlantic
Alliance fundamentally redefined its role along the
lines drawn up by the USA.
3. NATO demolishes the Yugoslav state
1The "new strategic concept" of NATO was put
into practice in the Balkans, where the crisis of the Yugoslav Federation, due
to the contrasts between the power groups and the centrifugal thrusts of the
republics, had reached the breaking point.
2. In November 1990, the Congress of the United States
approved the direct funding of all the new "democratic" formations of
Yugoslavia, thus encouraging secessionist tendencies. In December, the
parliament of the Croatian Republic, controlled by the party of Franjo Tudjman,
issued a new constitution according to which Croatia is only "home of the
Croats" and is sovereign over its territory. Six months later, in June
1991, in addition to Croatia, Slovenia also proclaimed its independence.
Immediately afterwards, clashes between the federal army and the separatists
broke out. In October, in Croatia, the Tudjman government expeled over 25,000
Serbs while its militias occupied Vukovar. The federal army responded by taking
the city back. The civil war began to spread, but it could still be stopped.
3. The path that was taken was instead diametrically
opposite. Germany, committed to extending its economic and political influence
in the Balkan region, in December 1991, unilaterally recognized Croatia and
Slovenia as independent states. As a consequence, the day after, the Serbs of
Croatia proclaimed self-determination, thereby forming the Serbian Republic of
Krajna. In January 1992, first the Vatican and then the Europe of the Twelve
recognized Slovenia as well as Croatia. At this point, Bosnia and Herzegovina
were also set on fire, which, in a small way, represented the entire range of
ethnic and religious nodes of the Yugoslavian Federation.
4. The UN blue helmets, sent to Bosnia as a force of
interposition between the warring factions, was deliberately deployed in
insufficient numbers and without adequate means nor precise directives, ending
up becoming hostages in the middle of the fighting. Everything contributed to
demonstrating the "failure of the UN" and the need for NATO to take
matters into its own hands. In July 1992, NATO launched the first "crisis
response" operation and imposed an embargo on Yugoslavia.
5. In February 1994, NATO aircraft shot down a
Serbian-Bosnian aircraft flying over Bosnia. It was the first war action since
the foundation of the Alliance. With it, NATO violated Article 5 of
his own constituent charter, since the war action was not motivated by the
attack on an Alliance member and was carried out outside its geographical area.
6. When the fire in Bosnia was extinguished (where the
fire remained under the ashes of the division in ethnic states), NATO threw
petrol on the Kosovo outbreak, where a claim of independence by the Albanian
majority had been underway for years. Through underground channels largely
managed by the CIA, a river of arms and funding, between the end of 1998 and
the beginning of 1999, went to feed the KLA (Kosovo Liberation Army), an armed
wing of the Kosovo separatist movement. Albanian. CIA agents later reported
that they entered Kosovo in 1998 and 1999 as OSCE observers in charge of
verifying the ceasefire, providing US military training manuals and satellite
phones to the UCK so that the commanders of the guerrillas could stay in touch
with NATO and Washington. The KLA could thus launch an offensive against
Serbian federal troops and civilians, with hundreds of attacks and abductions.
7. While the clashes between the Yugoslav and the KLA
forces were provoking victims on both sides, a powerful political-media
campaign prepared international public opinion for the intervention of NATO,
presented as the only way to stop the "ethnic cleansing" of Serbians
in Kosovo. A priority target was the president of Yugoslavia, Slobodan
Milosevic, accused of "ethnic cleansing".
8. The war, called «Operation Allied Force», began March
24, 1999. The role of Italy was decisive. The D'Alema government put the
Italian territory, particularly the airports, at the disposal of the United
States armed forces and other countries to implement what the prime minister
called "the right of humanitarian interference". For 78 days, taking
off mainly from the Italian bases, 1,100 planes made 38,000 sorties, releasing
23,000 bombs and missiles. 75 percent of the aircraft and 90 percent of the
bombs and missiles were supplied by the United States. The US was also the
communication, command, control and intelligence network through which
operations were conducted. "Of the 2,000 targets hit by NATO aircraft in
Serbia – later documented by the Pentagon – 1,999 were chosen by US
intelligence and only one by Europeans.”
9. Systematically, the bombings dismantled the structures
and infrastructure of Serbia, causing victims especially among civilians. The
resulting damage to health and the environment was unquantifiable. Thousands of
tons of highly toxic chemicals (including dioxins and mercury) came out of the
Pancevo refinery alone. Other damage was caused by the massive use of depleted
uranium projectiles by NATO in Serbia and Kosovo. These projectiles had already
been used in the first Gulf War.
10. 54 Italian aircraft also took part in the bombings,
attacking the objectives indicated by the US command. “By number of aircraft,
we were second only to the USA. Italy is a great country, and we should not be
surprised at the commitment shown in this war,” stated the president of the
D'Alema council during a visit on 10 June 1999 at the base of Amendola,
stressing that, for the pilots who participated in it, it was "a great
human and professional experience".
11. On June 10, 1999, Yugoslavian troops began to
withdraw from Kosovo, and NATO put an end to the bombings. UN Security Council
Resolution 1244 provided that the international presence must have
"substantial NATO participation". "Today, NATO faces its new
mission: to govern", commented The Washington Post.
12. After the war, more than 60 FBI agents were sent to
Kosovo from the United States, but no traces of such excuses were found to
justify the accusation made of the Serbs of "ethnic cleansing".
Slobodan Milosevic, of the former Yugoslavia, was sentenced to 40 years
imprisonment by the International Criminal Court in The Hague.
He died after five years in prison. The same court exonerated him in
2016 from the accusation of "ethnic cleansing".
13. Kosovo, where the US installed a large military base
(Camp Bondsteel), became a sort of NATO protectorate. At the same time, under
the cover of the "Peace Force", the former UCK in power terrorized
and expelled over 250,000 Serbs, Roma, Jews and Albanians and branded them as
collaborators. In 2008, with the self-proclamation of Kosovo as an independent
state, the demolition of the Yugoslavian Federation was completed.
14. While the war against Yugoslavia was in progress, the
summit that formalized the transformation of NATO was convened in Washington on
April 23-25, 1999, by an alliance which, pursuant to Article 5 of the Treaty of
4 April 1949, commited member countries to assist the armed forces of a member
country which is attacked in the North-Atlantic area. It was transformed into
an alliance which, on the basis of the "new strategic concept" also
commited member countries to "conduct crisis response operations not
provided for by Article 5 outside the territory of the Alliance". In other
words, NATO was preparing to project its military force beyond its borders not
only in Europe but also in other regions of the world.
15. What did not change in the mutation of NATO was the
hierarchy within it. The President of the United States has always been able to
appoint the Supreme Allied Commander in Europe, who is still a US general,
while the Allies can merely ratifying the President's choice. The same is true
for the other key commands.
16. The document that commited member countries to
operate outside the Alliance, signed by European leaders on April 24, 1999 in
Washington, reaffirmed that NATO "fully supports the development of the
European defense identity within the Alliance". The concept is clear:
Western Europe can have its own "defense identity", but it must
remain within the Alliance, i.e. under US command.
17. The subordination of the European Union to NATO was
thus confirmed and consolidated. Subordination established by the Treaty of
Maastricht of 1992, which recognized the right of the EU States to be part of
NATO, was defined as the foundation of the defense of the European Union.
18 . By participating in the war against Yugoslavia, a
country that had not taken any aggressive action against either Italy or
against other NATO members, Italy confirmed that it had adopted a new military
policy and, at the same time, a new foreign policy. Since this involved using
military force as a tool, it violated the constitutional principle, affirmed by
Article 11, that "Italy repudiates war as an instrument of offense against
the freedom of other peoples and as a means of resolving international
disputes".
4. NATO expands eastward to Russia
1. In 1990, on the eve of the
dissolution of the Warsaw Pact, US Secretary of State James Baker assured USSR
President Mikhail Gorbachev that "NATO will not extend by a single inch to
the east". But in twenty years, after having demolished the Yugoslavian
Federation, NATO extended from 16 to 30 countries, expanding more and more
eastwards to Russia.
2. In 1999, it incorporated the first
three countries of the former Warsaw Pact: Poland, the Czech Republic and
Hungary. In 2004, it extended to other countries: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania
(formerly part of the USSR); Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia (formerly part of the
Warsaw Pact); Slovenia (formerly part of the Yugoslavian Federation). In 2009,
it incorporated Albania (formerly a member of the Warsaw Pact) and Croatia
(formerly part of the Yugoslavian Federation) and, in 2017, Montenegro; in
2019, it signed the protocol of accession of Northern Macedonia as the 30th
member. Three other countries – Bosnia and Herzegovina (formerly part of the
Yugoslavian Federation), Georgia and Ukraine (formerly part of the USSR) – are
currently candidates for entry into NATO.
3. So Washington ties these countries
not so much to the Alliance as directly to the US, strengthening its influence
within the European Union. Of the ten Central and Eastern European countries
entering NATO between 1999 and 2004, seven entered the European Union between
2004 and 2007. As the European Union expands to the East, the United States is
effectively extending its control over Europe through NATO. Clearly,
Washington's strategic plan is revealed: to use the expansion of NATO to the
East as a means of establishing relations of force even more favorable to the
United States and, thus, further isolate the “old Europe” that could one day
become autonomous.
4. Besides these, the expansion of NATO to the East
has other implications. Incorporating not only the countries of the former
Warsaw Pact but also the three Baltic republics that were once part of the
USSR, NATO has reached the borders of the Russian Federation. Despite
Washington's assurances of its peaceful intentions, this constitutes a threat,
even nuclear, to Russia.
5. US and NATO attack Afghanistan and
Iraq
1. The United States attacked and
invaded Afghanistan in 2001 with the official motivation being to hunt down
Osama bin Laden, who was targeted as the instigator of the terrorist attacks of
11 September 2001. (The official version of what took place on 9/11 does not
stand up to the technical-scientific investigations carried out by independent
experts.) Osama bin Laden was a well-known figure in Washington. He belonged to
a wealthy Saudi family and actively collaborated with the CIA from 1979 to 1989
when it trained and armed through the ISI (the Pakistani secret service) over
100,000 mujahidin for the war against the Soviet Union. The Soviet troops fell
into the “Afghan trap” (as Zbigniew Brzezinski later defined it, stating that
the training and arming of the mujahidin began in July 1979, five months before
the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan).
2. This opened a new phase in the
international situation. The President of the United States was authorized to
conduct a "Global War on Terrorism", in which there were no
geographical borders, conducted against an enemy who could be identified from
time to time not only in as a terrorist or a presumed terrorist, but in anyone
who opposed US policy and interests. President Bush described the perfect image
of an enemy, interchangeable and lasting. as "an obscure enemy, hiding in
the dark corners of the Earth".
3. The real purpose of US military intervention in
Afghanistan was the occupation of this area of primary strategic importance.
Afghanistan is at the crossroads of the Middle East, Central Asia, South and
East. In this area (in the Gulf and in the Caspian), there are large oil
reserves. There are three major powers – China, Russia and India – whose
strength is growing and influencing global assets. As the Pentagon had warned
in the report of 30 September 2001, "there is the possibility that a
military rival with a formidable resource base will emerge in Asia".
4. In the period before 11 September
2001, there were strong signs of a rapprochement between China and Russia in
Asia. Washington viewed this as a challenge to US interests at the critical
moment when the United States sought to fill the void that the disintegration
of the USSR had left in Central Asia. Afghanistan is in a key geostrategic position
for the control of this area.
5. The war began in October 2001 with
the bombing carried out by the US and British air forces. At this point, the UN
Security Council authorized the establishment of the ISAF (International
Security Assistance Force), whose command was entrusted in succession to Great
Britain, Turkey, Germany and the Netherlands. But suddenly, in August 2003,
NATO announced that it had "assumed the role of ISAF leadership force with
a UN mandate". It was a real coup. No resolution passed by the Security
Council authorizes NATO to assume the leadership or command of the ISAF. Only
in Resolution 1659 of February 2006 did the Security Council state that it
"recognizes NATO's continued engagement in directing the ISAF". The
ISAF mission was thus inserted into the Pentagon chain of command. The Italian
military assigned to the ISAF was included in the same chain of command.
6. After Afghanistan it is the turn of Iraq, subjected since 1991 to an extremely hard embargo which caused in ten years a million deaths approximately, of which about half a million children. In 2002, President Bush placed Iraq in the forefront of the "axis of evil".
6. After Afghanistan it is the turn of Iraq, subjected since 1991 to an extremely hard embargo which caused in ten years a million deaths approximately, of which about half a million children. In 2002, President Bush placed Iraq in the forefront of the "axis of evil".
7. After Afghanistan, Iraq is the
country that has been subjected to a strict embargo since 1991, which caused a
million and a half deaths in ten years, of which about half a million were
children. In 2002, President Bush listed Iraq in first place among the
countries that belong to the "axis of evil". Secretary of State Colin
Powell presented to the UN Security Council "evidence" gathered by
the CIA, which subsequently turned out to be false, on the alleged existence of
a large arsenal of chemical and biological weapons in possession of Iraq, and
on its alleged ability to build nuclear weapons in a short time. Because the
Security Council refused to authorize the war, the Bush administration simply
bypassed it.
8. The war began in March 2003 with
the aerial bombing of Baghdad and other centers by the US and British air
forces and with a land attack carried out by the Marines entering Iraq from
Kuwait. In April, US troops occupied Baghdad. The operation, called "Iraqi
Freedom", was presented as "a preventive war" and “an export of
democracy". The US and allied occupation forces – including the Italian forces
involved in the "Ancient Babylon" operation – encountered resistance
they did not expect to find. In order to cut it off, Iraq was put on fire by
over a million and a half soldiers that the Pentagon supplemented with hundreds
of thousands of military contractors, using every means from phosphorus bombs
to the people of Fallujah to torture in Abu Ghraib prison.
9. NATO actually participated in the war with its own
structures and forces. In 2004, the "NATO Training Mission" was
established in order to "help Iraq to create efficient armed forces".
In 2000, special courses were held in Alliance countries and thousands of Iraqi
soldiers and policemen were trained. At the same time, NATO sent instructors
and advisers, including Italians, to "help Iraq to create its own democratic
and durable security sector" and "establish a long-term NATO
partnership with Iraq".
6. NATO demolishes the Libyan state
1. Multiple factors make Libya
important in the eyes of the United States and the European powers. It has the
largest oil reserves in Africa, precious for its high quality and low cost of
extraction, and large reserves of natural gas. On these, the Libyan state
maintains strong control, leaving limited profit margins to US and European
companies. In addition to black gold, Libya has white gold: the immense reserve
of fossil water from the Nubian aquifer, which extends under Libya, Egypt,
Sudan and Chad. Relevant are the sovereign funds, the capital that the Libyan
state has invested abroad, in particular to provide Africa with its own financial
bodies and its own currency.
2. On the eve of the 2011 war, the United States and the
European powers "froze", or seized, the Libyan sovereign funds,
delivering a mortal blow to the entire project. The emails of Hillary Clinton
(Secretary of State of the Obama administration in 2011), which came to light
later, confirmed the real purpose of the war: to block Gaddafi's plan to use
Libyan sovereign funds to create autonomous financial bodies of the African
Union and an African currency as an alternative to the dollar and the CFA franc
(the currency that 14 African countries, ex-French colonies are forced to use).
It was Clinton - the New York Times would later document – who had President
Obama sign "a document authorizing a covert operation in Libya and the
supply of weapons to the rebels".
3. Tribal sectors hostile to the
government of Tripoli and Islamic groups that had until a few months before
been defined as terrorists were financed and armed. At the same time special
forces infiltrated Libya, including thousands of easily disguised Qatari
commandos. The entire operation was led by the United States, first through the
African Command, then through NATO under US command.
4. On 19 March 2011, Libya's air-sea bombing began. In
seven months, US/NATO air forces carried out 30,000 missions, of which 10,000
were attacks involving the use of over 40,000 bombs and missiles. Italy
participated in this war using its military bases and forces and tearing up the
Treaty of Friendship, Partnership and Cooperation between the two countries.
For the war on Libya, Italy made seven air bases (Trapani, Gioia del Colle,
Sigonella, Decimomannu, Aviano, Amendola and Pantelleria) available to the
US/NATO forces, providing technical assistance and supplies. The Italian Air
Force participated in the war by carrying out over a thousand missions, and the
Italian Navy engaged on several fronts.
5. With the US/NATO war of 2011, the
Libyan state was demolished and Gaddafi himself assassinated. That State was
demolished which, on the southern shore of the Mediterranean facing Italy,
maintained "high levels of economic growth" (as the World Bank itself
documented in 2010), recording "high indicators of human development"
including universal access to primary and secondary education with 46% of the
population at university level. Despite the disparities, the standard of living
of the Libyan population was considerably higher than that of other African
countries. This was evidenced by the fact that over two million immigrants,
mostly Africans, found work in Libya.
6. Sub-Saharan African immigrants were also
affected by the war, who, persecuted on charges of collaborating with Gaddafi,
were imprisoned or forced to flee. Many, driven by desperation, attempted the
crossing of the Mediterranean towards Europe. Those who lost their lives were
also victims of the war in which NATO demolished the Libyan state.
7. Also to be struck by the war are Immigrants
from sub-Saharan Africa who, persecuted on charges of collaborating with
Gaddafi, are imprisoned or forced to flee. Many, driven by desperation, try to
cross the Mediterranean towards Europe. Those who lose their lives are also
victims of the war by which NATO demolished the Libyan state.
7. The US/NATO war to demolish
Syria
1. After demolishing the Libyan state, the US/NATO
operation to demolish the Syrian state began in the same year. One reason was
the fact that in July 2011 Syria, Iran and Iraq signed an agreement for a gas
pipeline that would link the Iranian oilfield of South Pars, the largest in the
world, to Syria and then to the Mediterranean. Syria, where another large field
was discovered near Homs, could thus become a hub of alternative energy
corridors to those controlled by US and European companies that run
through Turkey and other routes.
2. The covert war began with a series
of terrorist attacks, carried out above all in Damascus and Aleppo.
Catastrophic were the images of the buildings devastated with powerful
explosives: not the work of simple rebels, but of infiltrated war
professionals. Hundreds of British elite SAS and SBS special forces - reported
the Daily Star - operate in Syria, along with US and French
units.
3. The rebel forces have been made up of an armed
gathering of Islamic groups (until recently branded by Washington as
terrorists) coming from Afghanistan, Bosnia, Chechnya, Libya and other countries.
In the group of Abu Omar al-Chechen - reported the reporter for The
Guardian in Aleppo - orders were given in Arabic, but have to be
translated into Chechen, Tajik, Turkish, a Saudi dialect, Urdu, French and
other languages. Equipped with fake passports (CIA specialties), the fighters
flowed into the Turkish provinces of Adana and Hatai, bordering Syria, where
the CIA opened military training centers. The weapons have arrived mainly via
Saudi Arabia and Qatar, which, like in Libya, also has provided special forces.
4. The command of operations has been
on board NATO ships in the port of Alessandretta. A propaganda center was
opened in Istanbul where Syrian dissidents, trained and financed by the US
State Department, have fabricated the news and videos that are broadcast via
satellite networks.
5. From special operational centers, CIA agents provide
for the purchase of weapons with large loans granted by Saudi Arabia, Qatar and
other Gulf monarchies. They organize the transport of weapons to Turkey and
Jordan through an air bridge that finally make it across the border to groups
in Syria who are already trained in special areas set up in Turkish and
Jordanian territories.
6. The strategy of Western forces was
disclosed in documents released in Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's emails.
In an email of 2012 (declassified as "case number F-2014-20439, Doc No.
C05794498"), Clinton wrote that, given the "strategic
relationship" of Iran and Syria, "the overthrow of Assad would
constitute an immense benefit for Israel, and it would also diminish the
understandable Israeli fear of losing their nuclear monopoly".
7. An official Pentagon document,
dated 12 August 2012 (declassified 18 May 2015 on the initiative of Judicial
Watch), states that "Western countries, the Gulf States and Turkey support
the opposition forces in Syria, which attempt to control the eastern areas
adjacent to the western Iraqi provinces, helping them “to create safe havens
under international protection". There is "the possibility of establishing
a Salafist principality in eastern Syria, and this is exactly what the powers
that support the opposition want to do: isolate the Syrian regime, the
strategic rear of the Shia expansion (Iraq and Iran)".
8. It is in this context that ISIS
(or DAESH) was formed in 2013, which calls itself "The State of the
Islamic Caliphate". In May 2013, a month after founding ISIS, Ibrahim
al-Badri - the "caliph" known on the battlefield as Abu Bakr
al-Baghdadi - met US Senator John McCain, leader of the Republican Party who
was commissioned by the President Obama (Democrat) to carry out secret
operations in Syria on behalf of the government. The meeting was
photographically documented.
9. ISIS has received funding, weapons
and transit routes from the closest allies of the United States: Saudi Arabia,
Qatar, Kuwait, Turkey and Jordan, based on a plan certainly coordinated by the
CIA. After having conquered a great part of the Syrian territory with its
militias, ISIS launched an offensive in Iraq, not surprisingly at a time when
the government, headed by the Shiite Nouri al-Maliki, was distancing itself
from Washington, getting closer and closer to China and Russia. The offensive,
which set Iraq on fire, was fueled by the Sunni-Shiite rivalry. ISIS militias
occupied Ramadi, Iraq's second largest city, and immediately afterwards,
Palmyra, in central Syria, killing thousands of civilians and forcing tens of
thousands to flee.
10. ISIS actually has played a
functional role in the US/NATO strategy of state demolitions. This does not
mean that the mass of its militants, coming from different countries, is aware
of it. It is very complex: there are Islamic fighters, formed in the drama of
war, who are ex-soldiers from Saddam Hussein's military who fought against
invaders, and many others whose stories are always linked to the tragic social
situations caused by the first Gulf War and the successive ones over more than
twenty years. It also includes foreign fighters from Europe and the United
States, behind whose masks there are certainly secret agents specially trained
for these operations.
11. Very suspicious is also the
unlimited access that ISIS has, in its period of maximum development, to the
world media networks that are dominated by US and European corporate giants,
through which it spreads its videos of beheadings that create horror and
manipulate public opinion in favor of the intervention in Iraq and Syria.
12. The military campaign
"Inherent Resolve", formally directed against ISIS, was launched in
Iraq and Syria in August 2014 by the USA and their allies: France, Great
Britain, Canada, Australia, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and
others. If the United States, France and Great Britain used their
fighter-bombers as they had against Libya in 2011, the forces of ISIS, moving
in open spaces, would be easy targets. They can instead advance undisturbed
with columns of armored cars loaded with men and explosives. If ISIS advances
in Syria and Iraq, it is because Washington wants just that. The strategic goal
of Washington is the demolition of Syria and the reoccupation of Iraq.
13. The Russian military intervention
in Syria in 2015, in support of government forces, reversed the fate of the
conflict. Russian fighter-bombers destroyed ISIS strongholds one after the
other, paving the way for Damascus forces. The United States, displaced, played
the card of the fragmentation of Syria, supporting Kurdish insurgents and
others.
14. After trying to demolish the Syrian state for five years, breaking it up with armed terrorist groups infiltrated from outside and causing over 250,000 deaths, when the operation started failing due to Russian military intervention in support of Syrian government forces, the political and media apparatuses of the entire West launched a colossal psyop (psychological operation) to make the government and all those Syrians who resisted aggression appear as aggressors. The spearhead of the psyop was the demonization of President Assad (as they had already done with Milosevic and Gaddafi), presented as a sadistic dictator who enjoyed bombing hospitals and exterminating children with the help of his friend Putin, painted as a neo-tsar of the reborn Russian empire. When the last strongholds of ISIS fell, the same political and media apparatuses spread the fake news that ISIS was defeated by the United States and the "Syrian Democratic Forces" (a militia of Kurds and Arabs armed and supported by the Pentagon).
14. After trying to demolish the Syrian state for five years, breaking it up with armed terrorist groups infiltrated from outside and causing over 250,000 deaths, when the operation started failing due to Russian military intervention in support of Syrian government forces, the political and media apparatuses of the entire West launched a colossal psyop (psychological operation) to make the government and all those Syrians who resisted aggression appear as aggressors. The spearhead of the psyop was the demonization of President Assad (as they had already done with Milosevic and Gaddafi), presented as a sadistic dictator who enjoyed bombing hospitals and exterminating children with the help of his friend Putin, painted as a neo-tsar of the reborn Russian empire. When the last strongholds of ISIS fell, the same political and media apparatuses spread the fake news that ISIS was defeated by the United States and the "Syrian Democratic Forces" (a militia of Kurds and Arabs armed and supported by the Pentagon).
8. Israel and the Emirates in NATO
1. The same day (4 May 2016)) in which NATO's new Supreme Allied Commander in Europe – the US general Curtis Scaparrotti, appointed as his 17 predecessors by the President of the United States – settled in NATO, the North Atlantic Council announced that an official Israeli Mission was established at NATO headquarters in Brussels, headed by Israel's ambassador to the EU.
2. Israel was, thus, integrated even more into NATO, to which it was already closely linked through the "Individual Cooperation Program", which was ratified by NATO on 2 December 2008, three weeks before the Israeli operation "Cast Lead" in Gaza. It included, among other things, the collaboration between intelligence services and the connection of Israeli forces, including nuclear ones, to the NATO electronic system.
3. Israel – the only nuclear power in the Middle East not adhering to the non-proliferation treaty, subscribed to instead by Iran that has no nuclear weapons – possesses (without admitting it) an estimated arsenal of 100-400 nuclear weapons, including new-generation mini-nukes and neutron bombs, and produces plutonium and tritium in quantities that will make hundreds more. Israeli nuclear warheads are ready to launch ballistic missiles and fighter-bombers from the US, to which are now added F-35s.
4. The main European NATO countries, which formally support the Iranian nuclear agreement signed in 2015 (from which the US left in 2018), are actually lined up with Israel. Germany provided Israel six Dolphin submarines, modified so that they could launch nuclear warhead cruise missiles, and approved the supply of three more. Germany, France, Italy, Greece and Poland participated, with the USA, in the largest international air war exercise in the history of Israel, the Blue Flag 2017. Italy, linked to Israel by a military cooperation agreement (Law n. 94, 2005), participated with Tornado hunting of the 6th Wing of Ghedi, assigned to transport US nuclear bombs.
5. According to the plan tested in the US-Israel exercise Juniper Cobra 2018, US and NATO forces would come from Europe (mainly from bases in Italy) to support Israel in a war against Iran. It could start with an Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, like the one carried out in 1981 in Osiraq in Iraq. In the event of Iranian retaliation, Israel could make use of a nuclear weapon by setting in motion a chain reaction with unpredictable results.
6. The official Israeli Mission to NATO is flanked by those of the kingdom of Jordan and the emirates of Qatar and Kuwait, "very active partners" who are even more integrated into NATO through acquired merits. Jordan hosts secret CIA bases that the New York Times and Der Spiegel have documented being used to train Islamic militants of Al Qaeda and ISIS to fight in Syria and Iraq. Qatar participated in the NATO war against Libya, infiltrating about 5,000 commandos in its territory in 2011 (as declared to The Guardian by the Chief of Staff of Qatar), and in the war against Syria. This was admitted to in an interview with the Financial Times by the former Qatari Prime Minister, Hamad bin Jassim Al Thani, who talked about Qatarian and Saudi operations of "interference" in Syria, coordinated by the United States.
7. Kuwait, through the "Transit Agreement", allowed NATO to have its first airport in the Gulf, not only for sending military forces and materials to Afghanistan, but also for "practical NATO cooperation with Kuwait and other partners, such as Saudi Arabia" – partners who have been supported by the US in the war in Yemen that has resulted in the massacre of numerous civilians. Kuwait also participates with about fifteen fighter-bombers, to which Italy has supplied 28 new-generation Eurofighter Typhoon fighters, after supplying Israel with 30 advanced M-346 fighters. The Eurofighter Typhoons, which Kuwait has used to commit massacres in Yemen and elsewhere, can also be armed with nuclear bombs. The Italian Air Force has provided training for the crews.
9. The
US/NATO orchestration of the coup in Ukraine
1. The operation conducted by the USA
and NATO in Ukraine began in 1991 after the Soviet Union collapsed and the
Warsaw Pact, which was a part of the Soviet Union, also disintegrated. The
United States and its European allies moved immediately to take full advantage
of the new geopolitical situation.
2. Ukraine – whose territory acts as a buffer between
NATO and Russia and is crossed by energy corridors between Russia and the EU –
did not enter NATO directly. However, within the framework of NATO, it joined
the “Partnership for Peace” contributing to “peacekeeping” operations in the
Balkans.
3. The "NATO-Ukraine Action
Plan" was adopted in 2002, and President Kuchma announced his intention to
join NATO. In 2005, in the wake of the "Orange Revolution"
(orchestrated and financed by the US and European powers), President Yushchenko
was invited to a NATO summit in Brussels. Immediately afterwards, an
"intensified dialogue on the aspiration of Ukraine to become a member of
NATO" was launched, and in 2008 the Bucharest summit gave a green light to
its entry.
4. That same year, the Georgian army, which had been
fighting South Ossetia that wanted to become independent from Georgia since
1991 (when the Soviet Union disintegrated), was trained and armed by the United
States and at the same time by Israel through "private" military
contractors. On the night of 8 August 2008, Georgia, backed by NATO, launched a
military offensive to regain control of the disputed region. A few hours later
Russia intervened militarily, rejecting the Georgian invasion, and South Ossetia
effectively became independent of Georgia. It was the first sign of the
offensive that NATO, under US command, was preparing on the eastern front to
force Russia to react.
5. In Ukraine, in 2009, Kiev signed
an agreement that allowed the transit from its territory of supplies for NATO
forces in Afghanistan. Membership now seemed certain but, in 2010, the newly
elected president Yanukovych announced that, while continuing cooperation, NATO
membership was not on his government's agenda. Meanwhile, however, since 1991,
NATO had woven a network of ties within the Ukrainian armed forces. Senior
officers had been attending courses at the NATO Defense College in Rome and in
Oberammergau (Germany) for years. Also contributing to the network of ties was
the establishment, at the Ukrainian Military Academy, of a new
"multinational faculty" with NATO professors. The scientific and
technical cooperation in the field of armaments had also been greatly developed
to facilitate the participation of Ukrainian armed forces in NATO-led
"joint peace operations".
6. Since there were other ties beyond what we could see,
it was clear that NATO was building a network of connections in military and
civilian environments much larger than it appeared. Through the CIA and other
secret services, neo-Nazi militants had been recruited, financed, trained and
armed for years. A photographic record showed young Ukrainian UN-UNSO neo-Nazi
militants being trained in Estonia in 2006 by NATO instructors, who taught them
urban combat techniques and the use of explosives for sabotage and attacks.
7. The same methods were used by NATO during the Cold War
to form the secret paramilitary structure "Gladio". It was also
active in Italy where, at Camp Darby and other bases, neo-fascist groups were
trained, preparing them for attacks and possible coup d'états.
8. The paramilitary structure of the Ukrainian neo-Nazi
groups came into action in 2014 in Maidan Square in Kiev. An anti-government
demonstration, which began with just claims against the rampant corruption and
the worsening of living conditions, was rapidly transformed into a real
battlefield. While armed groups attacked the government buildings, snipers
(purposely brought into Kiev from Georgia) used the same sniper rifles on both
demonstrators and policemen.
9. On 20 February 2014, the NATO
Secretary General addressed the Ukrainian armed forces with a commanding tone,
warning them to "remain neutral" on pain of "serious negative
consequences for our relations". Abandoned by the leaders of the armed forces
and much of the government apparatus, President Viktor Yanukovych was forced to
flee. Andriy Parubiy – co-founder of the National Social Party, established in
1991 on the model of the National Socialist Party of Adolf Hitler, and head of
the neo-Nazi paramilitary groups – was put in charge of the "National
Security and Defense Council".
10. The Maidan Square putsch was accompanied by a
persecutory campaign, directed in particular against the Communist Party and
the unions, similar to those that marked the advent of fascism in Italy and of
Nazism in Germany. Party headquarters were destroyed, leaders were
lynched and tortured, and journalists murdered; activists were burned alive in
the Odessa Chamber of Labor; unarmed inhabitants of eastern Ukraine of Russian
origin were massacred in Mariupol and bombarded with white phosphorus in
Slaviansk, Lugansk, Donetsk.
11. A real coup under US/NATO
direction was underway with the strategic aim of provoking a new cold war in
Europe to strike and isolate Russia and at the same time strengthen the
influence and military presence of the United States in Europe. Faced with the
coup d'état and the offensive against the Russians of Ukraine, the Supreme
Council of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea – Russian territory that was given
to Ukraine during the Soviet period in 1954 – voted to secede from Kiev and
requested to be re-connected to the Russian Federation, a decision that was
confirmed with 97% of the votes in favor by a popular referendum. On March 18,
2014, President Putin signed the treaty for the accession of Crimea to the
Russian Federation with the status of an autonomous republic. At this point
Russia was accused by NATO and the EU of illegally annexing Crimea and was
subjected to sanctions. Russia responded with counter-sanctions that mainly
affected the economies of the EU, including the Italian economy.
12. While in Donbass, the self-proclaimed Popular
Republics of Donetsk and Lugansk, supported by Russia, resisted the Kiev
offensive that caused thousands of civilian deaths. A roadmap for NATO-Ukraine
technical-military cooperation was signed in December 2015, which, in fact,
integrated the armed forces and the arms industry of Kiev into those of the
US-led Alliance.
13. In 2019, Ukraine took an unprecedented step: it
included in its constitution the commitment to officially enter NATO and, at
the same time, into the European Union. On February 7, at the suggestion of
President Petro Poroshenko – the oligarch enriched from the looting of state
property and who was returned to the presidency – the Kiev parliament approved
(with 334 votes against 35 and 16 absent) the amendments to the Constitution to
implement these steps. The Preamble states "the irreversible course of
Ukraine towards Euro-Atlantic integration": Articles 85 and 116 decree
that the fundamental task of parliament and the government is "to obtain
the full membership of Ukraine into NATO and the EU"; Article 102 states
that "the president of Ukraine is the guarantor of the strategic course of
the state to obtain full membership in NATO and the EU".
14. The inclusion in the Constitution of the
commitment to officially enter NATO involves very serious consequences.
Internally, it binds the future of Ukraine to this choice, excluding any
alternative, and effectively makes it illegal for any party or person to oppose
the choice. On the international level, it should be kept in mind that Ukraine
is already in fact in NATO, of which it is a partner country. For example, the
Azov battalion, whose Nazi imprint is represented by the emblem modeled on that
of the SS Das Reich, has been transformed into a special operations regiment,
equipped with armored vehicles and trained by US instructors of the 173th
Airborne Division, transferred from Vicenza to Ukraine and flanked by others
from NATO. Because Russia is accused of illegally annexing Crimea and carrying
out military actions against Ukraine, if Ukraine officially joined NATO, the
other 30 members of the Alliance, according to Art. 5, should "assist the
attacked party by taking action deemed necessary, including the use of armed
force". In other words, they should go to war against Russia. On these
dangerous implications of the modification of the Ukrainian Constitution –
behind which there are certainly the long hands of US/NATO strategists –
political and media silence has fallen over Europe.
10. US/NATO escalation in
Europe
1,The "new mission" of NATO
was made official by the September 2014 Summit in Wales, launching the
"Readiness Action Plan", the official purpose of which was "to
respond quickly and firmly to new security challenges" attributed to
"military aggression of Russia against Ukraine "and to the growth of
extremism and sectarian conflict in the Middle East and North Africa". The
Plan was defined by the Secretary General of NATO, Jens Stoltenberg, as
"the greatest reinforcement of our collective defense since the end of the
Cold War".
2. In just three months, NATO quadrupled the
fighter-bombers, with both conventional and nuclear capabilities, deployed in
the Baltic region (once part of the USSR), sent AWACS radar aircraft to Eastern
Europe and increased the number of warships in the Baltic, Black and
Mediterranean Seas, deployed US, British and German land forces in Poland,
Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, and intensified joint exercises in Poland and
the Baltic countries, bringing them to over 200 during the year.
3. From 2014, the US/NATO pressure on Russia grew in
geometric progression. In four years, from 2014 to 2018, the United States
spent US$10 billion on the "Europe Reassurance Initiative" (ERI), the
official aim of which was "to increase our ability to defend Europe
against aggression Russian”. Almost half of the expenditures were used to
strengthen the US "strategic prepositioning" in Europe. The armaments
that were placed in an advanced position allowed "the rapid deployment of
forces in the war theater". Another large segment of funds were destined
to “increase the presence on a rotating basis of US forces throughout Europe”.
The remaining funds served to develop the infrastructure of bases in Europe to
"increase the readiness of US actions", and to strengthen military
exercises and training in order to "increase the readiness and
interoperability of NATO forces".
4. The funds of the European Defense Initiative (EDI) –
formerly known as the European Reassurance Initiative of the United States –
were only a part of those targeted for the “Operation Atlantic Resolve that
demonstrated the USA's ability to respond to the threats against the allies”.
In the framework of this operation, the 3rd Armored Brigade, comprising 3,500
men, 87 tanks, 18 self-propelled howitzers and other means, was transferred to
Poland from the USA in January 2017. It was subsequently replaced by another
unit so that US armed forces could be permanently stationed on Polish
territory. From there, their departments were transferred, for training and
exercises, to other Eastern countries, especially Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania,
Bulgaria, Romania and also Ukraine. In other words, they were continuously
deployed close to Russia.
5. Also in the framework of this operation, the 10th
Combat Air Brigade was transferred to the Storck Barracks/Illesheim Kaserne
United States Army facility (Germany) along with 100 war helicopters. The Combat
Air Brigade's forces are sent to “advanced positions" in Poland,
Romania and Latvia. In the bases of Ämari (Estonia) and Graf Ignatievo
(Bulgaria), US and NATO fighter-bombers are deployed, including Italian
Eurofighters, for the Baltic air patrol. The operation also provides for
"a persistent presence in the Black Sea" along with the Mihail
Kogalniceanu Base (Romania) and the Novo Selo Training Area (Bulgaria).
6. General Curtis Scaparrotti, head of the European
Command of the United States and at the same time Supreme Allied Commander in
Europe, has assured Congress that "our forces are ready and positioned to
counter the Russian aggression". A US contingent is positioned in eastern
Poland, in the so-called "Suwalki Gap", a stretch of flat land about
a hundred kilometers long which, NATO warns, "would be a perfect gateway
for Russian tanks". The propaganda paraphernalia of the old cold war is
thus revived: that of the Russian tanks ready to invade Europe. Waving the
specter of a non-existent threat from the East, the US tanks arrived in Europe
instead.
7. The plan is clear. After provoking a new confrontation
with Russia in the Maidan Square protests, Washington (despite the change of
administration from President Obama to President Trump) has pursued the same
strategy: transforming Europe into the forefront of a new cold war to the
advantage of US interests and their balance of power with the major European
powers.
8. The European powers of NATO participate in the
deployment on the eastern flank – including armored forces, fighter-bombers,
warships and even nuclear missile units – as evidenced by the dispatch of
French troops and British tanks to Estonia. In this period, we talk about
"a European army, but in the meeting with the defense ministers of the EU,
in April 2017 in Malta, NATO general secretary Stoltenberg explained in what
terms." It was clearly agreed by the "The European Union that its
purpose is not to build a new European army or competitive structures in
competition with those of NATO, but something that is complementary to what
NATO does."
11. Italy, the aircraft
carrier on the war front
1. The U.S. Armed Forces
have in Italy (according to the official report of the Pentagon Base Structure
Report) more than 1,500 buildings, with a total surface area of over 1
million m², and they rent or have been granted permission to
use a further 800 buildings, with a surface of
approximately 900,000 m². In total, there are
over 2,300 buildings with an area of approximately 2
million m² scattered over fifty sites. But this is only part of
the U.S. military presence in Italy.
2. The U.S. military bases
are joined by the bases of NATO under U.S. command and the
Italian bases available to US/NATO forces. It is
estimated that, in total, there are over 100 bases. The entire network of
military bases in Italy is, directly or indirectly, under
the command of the Pentagon. It is part of the "area of
responsibility" of the United States European Command (EUCOM), the
European Command of the United States, headed by
a U.S. general, who at the same time holds the office of Supreme
Allied Commander in Europe. The "area of responsibility" of the
EUCOM, one of the six "unified combat commands" with which the US
covers the globe, includes the entire European region and all of Russia
(including the Asian side), plus some Western and Central Asian
countries: Turkey, Israel, Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan.
3. The 31st Fighter Wing is deployed
at the Aviano Air
Base (Pordenone). The US squadron maintains constant
attack readiness with about 50 B61 nuclear bombs (number
estimated by the FAS, the Federation of American Scientists, before 2020).
4. On the Ghedi Air
Base (Brescia), the 6th Italian Air Force is deployed, ready to
attack under U.S. command with about 20 B61 nuclear bombs (number
estimated by the FAS before 2020). That Italian pilots are trained in nuclear
attack – writes FAS – which is demonstrated by the presence in Ghedi
of one of the four units of the US Air Force deployed in European bases (along
with units in Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands)
"where US nuclear weapons are destined to be launched by
aircraft of the host country". The pilots of the four European countries,
along with Turkish pilots, are trained in the use of
nuclear bombs in NATO's annual nuclear war exercise. In 2013, it took
place in Aviano and in 2014 in Ghedi.
5. To the U.S. nuclear
weapons stationed on Italian territory, the actual
number of which is secret, are added those aboard units of the Sixth
Fleet, whose main base is in Gaeta in Lazio. The Sixth Fleet depends on the US
Naval Forces Command in Europe, whose headquarters is in Naples-Capodichino.
6. The 173rd Airborne Brigade of
the U.S. Army is based in Vicenza. It provides rapid
intervention forces to the European Command, African Command and Central
Command (whose "area of responsibility" includes the Middle East and
Central Asia). Forces of the 173rd Brigade, which were employed in
Iraq in 2003, are sent on a rotation basis to Afghanistan, the Ukraine and
other Eastern European countries.
7. In the Pisa/Livorno area, there is Camp
Darby, which has the largest US arsenal in the world outside
the US itself. It is the logistics
base for the U.S. Army that supplies U.S. and
allied land and air forces in Europe, the Middle East and Africa.
In its 125 bunkers are projected artillery shells, bombs for
airplanes and missiles in a number that can be estimated at over 1.5 million.
It cannot be excluded that there have been and may currently be nuclear
bombs among the aerial weapons stored at Camp Darby. Together with the
artillery ammunition, it is estimated that over 2,500 tanks and other military
vehicles are stored at the base along with over 11,000 military
materials of various types. The base holds the entire
equipment for two armored battalions and two battalions
of mechanized infantry, which can be quickly sent to the area of operations
through the airport of Pisa (a national military air hub) and the Port of Livorno
(to which they can also dock nuclear-powered units). Huge ships of private
companies that carry arms on behalf of the Pentagon make monthly stops here,
connecting U.S. ports to Mediterranean, Middle Eastern and Asian
ports.
8. In an area of Camp Darby initially intended for recreation activities, formally returned to Italy, was transferred in 2019 from the Gamerra Barracks in Pisa the command of the Special Forces of the Italian Army (COMFOSE), which brings together four regiments under a united command. This makes it possible to fully integrate the Italian special forces with the US, using them in secret operations under US command. All under the screed of military secrecy. Difficult then not to think about the history of the secret operations of Camp Darby: where it emerged from the investigations of Judges Casson and Mastelloni that Camp Darby played since the Sixties the basic function of the putschist network formed by the CIA and by Sifar under the secret plan Gladio.
9. The US / NATO bases - wrote Ferdinando Imposimato, Honorary President of the Supreme Court of Cassation - provided the explosives for the massacres of Piazza Fontana, Capaci and Via d'Amelio. In these bases "were meeting right-wing terrorists, NATO officers, Mafiosi, Italian politicians and Freemasons, on the eve of the attacks".
10. Camp
Darby was also involved in the tragedy of the Moby Prince
ferry, which collided with the Agip Abruzzo tanker on the evening of 10 April
1991 in the harbor of Livorno. 140 people died after waiting for
hours for help in vain. That evening in the Livorno harbor there was
intense traffic of United States military ships engaged in the
transfer of US weapons, part of which were secretly sent
to Somalia, Croatia and other areas. It included arms that were a par of
Operation Gladio. When the collision occured, the manager of the
operation – under the US command of Camp Darby –
immediately tried to get rid of any evidence.
11. The headquarters of the Allied
Joint Force (JFC Naples) is located in Lago Patria (Naples). Its new
headquarters, inaugurated in 2012 has a covered area of 85,000
m², surrounded by a large fenced area suitable for future
expansion. The staff, on the rise, is composed of over 2,500 military and
civilians. NATO's JFC Naples is under the command of an American admiral, who
at the same time commands the US Naval Forces in Europe (on which the Sixth
Fleet depends) and the US Naval Forces for Africa.
12. Every two years the JFC Naples assumes the
operational command of the "NATO Response Force" (NRF), a
"highly flexible and capable" joint force of 40,000 men, which has
the task of conducting military operations in the "area of responsibility
of the Supreme Allied Commander in Europe and beyond that area". The
spearhead of the NRF is its "Joint Task Force with very high operational
readiness", which is composed of 5,000 men who can
be deployed in two to three days in an intervention
area "before the crisis begins".
13. At the headquarters of Lago
Patria, since September 2017, the "NATO Strategic Direction Hub for the
South", an intelligence center primarily used for espionage, has been in
operation and has been "focused on the southern regions including the
Middle East, North Africa and Sahel Sub-Saharan Africa and adjacent areas
".
14. In Sicily, the Naval Air Station (NAS) Sigonella,
with a staff of about 7,000 military and civilians, constitutes the
largest US and NATO naval and air base in the Mediterranean region.
In addition to providing logistical support to the Sixth Fleet, it forms the
basis for launching military operations (mostly secret) mainly, but not
exclusively, in the Middle East and Africa. The NAS, the
official introduction reads, "hosts US and NATO
aircraft of all types", including Global Hawk spy drones, which from
Sigonella carry out reconnaissance missions on the Middle East, Africa, eastern
Ukraine, Black Sea and other areas. For targeted attacks (almost
always secret), Predator drones take off from Sigonella, armed with
laser and satellite-guided missiles and bombs.
15. The Naval Air Station Sigonella is supplemented by
the Italian base in Augusta, which supplies fuel and ammunition to
the US and NATO naval units, and the port of Catania, which can
accommodate up to nine warships. For fire drills, U.S. special forces
have the Pachino range (Syracuse) granted to them for their exclusive
use.
16. The other major US installation
in Sicily is the MUOS station in Niscemi (Caltanissetta). The MUOS (Mobile User
Objective System) is a very high-frequency military satellite
communications system, consisting of four satellites and four earth stations:
two in the U.S., in Virginia and in Hawaii, one in Australia and one
in Sicily, each with three large parabolic antennas of 18 meters in diameter.
This system allows the Pentagon to connect to a single network of
command and communications for submarines, warships,
fighter-bombers and drones, military vehicles and terrestrial departments while
they are in movement wherever in the world they are.
17. In Sardinia, there are the largest polygons for the
training of Italian and NATO military forces: in particular those of Salto di
Quirra, Capo Teulada, Capo Frasca and Capo San Lorenzo. Here, around 80% of the
bombs, missile warheads and bullets used in military maneuvers taking place in
Italy are used in fire drills, with serious consequences for the health of the
population.
12. US and NATO reject the UN treaty and
deploy new nuclear weapons in Europe
1. On 20 September 2017,
the same day that the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear
Weapons was opened for signature at the United Nations,
NATO was soundly rejecting it. The Treaty, approved by a
majority vote of 122 states of the General Assembly, commited the
signatory states not to produce or possess nuclear weapons, not to
use them or threaten to use them, not to transfer them or to receive them
directly or indirectly, with the aim of their total elimination.
2. In the statement of 20 September 2017, the North
Atlantic Council (made up of representatives of the 29 member
states) argued that "the Treaty will not be effective.
It will not increase international security or peace, but risks creating
the opposite by creating divisions and differences." It,
therefore, clearly clarified that "we will not accept any
argument contained in the Treaty".
3. The North Atlantic Council
thus foreclosed the national parliaments of the member countries,
depriving them of sovereignty to decide for themselves whether or not to join
the UN Treaty on the abolition of nuclear weapons. It
also announced that "we will call our partners and all countries
willing to support the Treaty to seriously reflect on its implications"
(read: “We will blackmail them so they do not sign it
or ratify it”). The North Atlantic Council reiterated that
"the fundamental purpose of NATO's nuclear capability is to preserve peace
and discourage aggression" and that "as long as nuclear weapons
exist, NATO will remain a nuclear alliance".
4. The North Atlantic Council,
however, ensured "NATO's strong commitment to the full
implementation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)". In
reality, it is actually violated by NATO. The United States,
in violation of Article 1 which prohibits militarily nuclear states from
transferring nuclear weapons to other countries, has deployed B61
nuclear bombs in five Alliance member countries: Italy, Germany, Belgium,
Holland and Turkey. These actions violate the NPT, which in
Article 2 prohibits militarily non-nuclear states from receiving nuclear weapons,
nor from having control over such weapons directly or indirectly.
5. A new US nuclear bomb, the B61-12, will
replace the B61, which is currently deployed in Italy and other European
countries. The B61-12 has a nuclear warhead with four selectable power options.
At the time of launch, the blast power is chosen depending on
the target. Unlike the B61, which is dropped vertically on
the target, the B61-12 is launched remotely and guided by a satellite
system. It also has the ability to penetrate deep into the Earth, even
through reinforced concrete, exploding at depths that
can destroy the bunkers of command centers and other underground
structures, so as to "decapitate" the enemy country in a nuclear
first strike.
6. The Pentagon program foresees the
construction of around 500 B61-12, with an estimated cost of around 10 billion
dollars (so each bomb will cost twice as much as it would cost if it were built
entirely in gold). The danger of this new weapon is highlighted even by General
James Cartwright, former head of the US Strategic Command, responsible for
nuclear weapons: "Nuclear weapons of less power and
more precision increase the temptation to use them, even to use them
first instead of in retaliation”.
7. Satellite photos show that
renovations have been carried out to increase the "security" of the
Aviano and Ghedi Torre bases in view of the installation of the B61-12.
Similar renovations were carried out at the German air base in
Buchel, in two other bases in Belgium and the Netherlands, and in the Turkish
base of Incirlic. The B61-12 can be dropped from F-16 and Tornado fighters,
but, to exploit the entire bomb capacity, we need U.S. aircraft
equipped with special digital systems: F-35A fighters, also supplied by the
Italian Air Force.
8. The fact that Polish pilots
also took part in the NATO nuclear war exercise in Ghedi for the
first time in 2014 indicated that the B61-12 will also be deployed in
Poland and other Eastern European countries. Dual-capacity conventional and nuclear
NATO fighters are already deployed in the Baltic republics near Russia.
9. At the same time,
the US and NATO are extending the "anti-missile shield"
over Europe. In May 2016, at the Deveselu Air Base in Romania, the
Aegis Ashore was inaugurated, the first terrestrial installation of
the United States Aegis missile system on European territory. NATO
Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg thanked the United States because
with this installation, "the first of its kind with a land-based
base", they greatly enhanced the ability to "defend
European allies against ballistic missiles from outside the Euro-Atlantic
area". He then announced the start of work to build another Aegis
Ashore in Poland by 2018, similar to the one that came into operation in
Romania. The two terrestrial installations are added to four warships equipped
with Aegis radars and SM-3 missiles, which, from a location of
the U.S. Navy in the Spanish base of Rota, cross into the
Mediterranean, the Black Sea and the Baltic Sea.
The U.S. Navy already has about 30 ships of this type.
10. Both Aegis ships and land-based installations are
equipped with Mark 41 Vertical Launchers from Lockheed
Martin, i.e. vertical pipes from which interceptor missiles are
launched. It is the so-called "shield" whose function is actually
offensive. If the U.S. could build a reliable system capable of
intercepting ballistic missiles, they could keep Russia under the threat of a
nuclear first strike, trusting the "shield" ability to neutralize the
effects of retaliation. The vertical "shield" launchers, in addition
to the interceptor missiles, can also launch other missiles. Lockheed Martin
herself points out that this system is capable of launching "missiles for
all missions", including "those for long-range attack", such as
"Tomahawk cruise missiles". These can be armed with a conventional
(non-nuclear) warhead or a nuclear warhead.
11. One cannot, therefore, know which missiles are
really in the vertical launchers of the bases in Romania and in Poland and in
those on board the ships that cross the limits of Russian territorial waters.
Unable to control, Moscow takes for granted that there are also nuclear attack
missiles. The location of Mark 41 Vertical Launchers near the Russian
territory, therefore, violates the Intermediate-Range Nuclear
Forces Treaty (INF) signed by the USA and USSR in 1987.
13. US and NATO sink the INF Treaty
1, The United States announced in
February 2019 the "suspension" of the INF Treaty with Russia and the
intention to leave it definitively within six months. They therefore feel free
to test and deploy weapons of the category prohibited by the Treaty:
short-range and intermediate range nuclear missiles (between 500 and 5500 km),
based on land. The Pershing 2 and the Cruise deployed in the 1980s by the USA
in European NATO countries and the SS-20 deployed by the USSR on their
territory were eliminated by the Treaty on Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF)
signed in 1987 by Presidents Gorbachev and Reagan.
2. The INF Treaty was challenged by
Washington when the United States saw their strategic advantage over Russia and
China diminish. In 2014, the Obama administration accused Russia, without
bringing any evidence, of having tested a cruise missile of the category
prohibited by the Treaty and, in 2015, announced that "faced with the
violation of the INF Treaty by Russia, the United States is considering the
deployment of ground-based missiles in Europe". The plan was carried out
by the Trump administration. In 2018, Congress authorized the financing of
"a research and development program for a cruise missile launched from the
ground by a road-based mobile platform". For its part, Moscow denied that
its cruise missile violated the treaty and, in turn, accused Washington of
having installed interceptor missile launchers (those of the
"shield") in Poland and Romania, which can be used to launch nuclear
warhead cruise missiles.
3. In this context, the geographical
factor must be kept in mind: while a US intermediate-range nuclear missile,
deployed in Europe, may hit Moscow, a similar missile deployed by Russia on its
territory may hit European capitals, but not Washington. Reversing the
scenario, it is as if Russia deployed its intermediate-range nuclear missiles
in Mexico.
4. The US plan to scuttle the INF Treaty was fully supported
by NATO's European allies. The North Atlantic Council declared in December 2018
that "the INF Treaty was in danger due to the actions of Russia",
which was accused of deploying "a destabilizing missile system". The
North Atlantic Council itself declared in February 2019 its "full support
for the United States' action to suspend its obligations with respect to the
INF Treaty" and urged Russia to "use the remaining six months to
return to full compliance with the Treaty".
5. The European Union also contributed
to the collapse of the INF Treaty. At the United Nations General Assembly in
December 2018, the EU voted against the resolution presented by Russia on the
"preservation and observance of the INF Treaty". It was rejected with
46 votes against 43 and 78 abstentions. The European Union – of which 21 of the
27 members are part of NATO (as is Great Britain even after leaving the EU) –
thus conforms totally to the position of NATO, which in turn conforms to that
of the United States. In essence, therefore, even the European Union has given
green light to the possible installation of new US nuclear missiles in Europe,
including Italy.
6. The warning issued by President Vladimir
Putin in February 2019 was once again ignored: "Russia will be forced to create
and deploy weapons systems that can be used not only against the territories
from which this direct threat originates, but also against those territories
where the decision-making centers are located from which the order to use these
weapons against us can come ”. In other words, if the US deploys
intermediate-range nuclear missiles aimed at Russia in Europe, Russia will
deploy nuclear missiles aimed at European territories where US missiles are
deployed and, at the same time, against US territories where the command and
control centers for these missiles are located.
14. The Western American Empire plays
the war card
1, A vast arc of growing tensions and
conflicts extends from East Asia to Central Asia, from the Middle East to
Europe, from Africa to Latin America. The "hot spots" along this
intercontinental arc - the Korean Peninsula, the South China Sea, Afghanistan,
Syria, Iraq, Iran, Ukraine, Libya, Venezuela and others - have different
histories and geopolitical characteristics, with specific internal
socio-economic factors, but they are at the same time linked to a single
factor: the strategy with which the United States of America seeks to maintain
their position as the dominant superpower.
2. The United States is still the
leading economic power in the world, above all thanks to the capital and the
mechanisms with which it dominates the global financial market, to the
multinationals with which they exploit human and material resources of every
continent, to the high technologies and to the relative patents in their
possession, to the pervasive role of their multimedia groups that influence the
opinions and tastes of billions of users on a planetary scale.
3. Their supremacy is however
jeopardized by the emergence of new state and social subjects. What is being
questioned by Russia, China and other countries is not only the exorbitant
power of the petrodollar (reserve currency from the sale of oil), but the
hegemony of the dollar itself. Its value is determined not by real US economic
capacity, but by the fact that it constitutes almost two-thirds of world
currency reserves and the currency with which the price of oil, gold and other
raw materials is established on global markets. in general of the goods.
4. This allows the Federal Reserve,
the Central Bank (which is a private bank), to print thousands of billions of
dollars with which the colossal US public debt is financed - about 23 trillion
dollars - through the purchase of bonds and other securities issued by the
Treasury. In this context, the decision taken by Venezuela in 2017 to release
the price of oil from the dollar and tie it to that of the Chinese yuan causes
a shock that causes the entire imperial palace founded on the dollar to shake.
If the example of Venezuela spread, if the dollar ceased to be the dominant
currency of international trade and foreign exchange reserves, an immense
amount of dollars would be placed on the market bringing down the value of the
US currency.
5. Washington looks with growing
concern above all at the Russian-Chinese partnership: the interchange between
the two countries is in strong growth; at the same time, Russian-Chinese
cooperation agreements on energy, agriculture, aeronautics, space and
infrastructure are on the rise. The supply of Russian gas to China through the
new Sila Sibiri gas pipeline, starting in 2019, opens the way to Russian energy
exports to the East while the US tries to block the way to the West towards
Europe.
6. In the Middle East, in addition to
the military intervention blocking the US / NATO plan to demolish the Syrian
state, Russia uses economic instruments, stipulating in 2017 agreements with
Iran for the construction of railway and energy infrastructure, including a
pipeline between Iran and India strongly opposed by the USA. Washington
responds with a move previously agreed with Israel: President Trump violently
attacks Iran, accusing him of violating "the spirit" of Tehran's 2015
nuclear deal with Group 5 + 1 (US, Britain, France, Germany , China and
Russia). Despite the fact that the International Atomic Energy Agency itself
guarantees that Iran is abiding by the agreement and is not attempting to
manufacture nuclear weapons, the issue is artificially reopened by initiating a
dangerous process with unpredictable results. The Washington attack is directed
not only against Iran, but against Russia which is reaffirming its presence in
the Middle East.
7. "Moscow - writes the New
York Times in October 2017 - tries, through the giant state oil
company Rosneft, to gain influence in places where the United States has
stumbled. The biggest bet is Venezuela. In three years Russia and Rosneft have
provided Caracas with financial assistance for 10 billion dollars, helping
Venezuela avoid default. Russia increasingly uses oil as a tool, spreads its
influence in the world and challenges the interests of the United States
".
8. A growing challenge to US
interests comes simultaneously from China. The world's leading exporter of
goods, it rose, as a gross national income, to second place in the world after
the United States and recorded economic growth rates higher than those in the
United States. The most ambitious project, launched by China in 2013 and shared
by Russia, is that of a new Silk Road: a road and rail network between China
and Europe through Central and Western Asia and through Russia, roughly along
the route of the ancient Silk Road. The project, already under construction,
foresees, together with the terrestrial one, a sea route through the Indian
Ocean, the Red Sea and the Mediterranean. For road and railway infrastructures,
which should cross and connect over 60 countries, investments of over 1,000
billion dollars are expected. The project, which does not include military
components, is not simply economic. If it were realized according to the
original idea, it would reshape the geopolitical architecture of the entire
Eurasia, creating on the basis of mutual convenience a new network of economic
and political relations between the states of the continent.
9. The drive to remodel the global
economic order does not only come from large state actors, such as China and
Russia, which want a world that is no longer unipolar but multipolar. It comes,
in multiple forms and degrees of awareness, from immense social subjects,
billions of human beings who, on every continent, suffer the consequences of
the current global economic order. An economic globalization centered on the
search for maximum profit which, while on the one hand cuts down borders so
that capital and production can circulate freely, on the other it sets up other
borders, invisible but no less concrete, which exclude the majority of the
world population from the benefits of that economic growth built with human and
material resources around the world. This system creates a growing polarization
between wealth and poverty in the world. Over 85% of global wealth (in terms of
money and property) is concentrated in the hands of 8% of the world's adult
population. The remaining 92% owns just 14% of global wealth. Over 3 and a half
billion people, representing almost three quarters of the global adult
population, have a total of less than 2.5% of global wealth.
10. Over 2 billion people in Africa,
Asia and Latin America, especially in rural areas, live in poverty or at least
in conditions of severe economic hardship. Among these, about one billion are
in extreme poverty, that is, in a social condition characterized by chronic
malnutrition, disastrous housing and hygiene situation, high incidence of
infectious and parasitic diseases, high mortality above all in children, short
average life span, illiteracy, lack of decision-making power, dependency,
marginalization, vulnerability and constant insecurity. From the villages of
sub-Saharan Africa to the Asian and Latin American slums, the poor experience
the same drama caused by the same underlying causes.
11. This is the global economic order
that the United States seeks by all means to preserve and control. The
strategic aim pursued by Washington is clear: to remove any state or political
/ social movement that could damage the fundamental political, economic and
military interests of the United States of America, endangering their
supremacy. In this strategy they are supported by the European powers of NATO
and others, such as Israel and Japan, which, despite having contrasts of
interest with the US, are under US leadership when it comes to defending the
economic and political order dominated by 'West. Not having the economic
strength to do so, the United States and its allies increasingly play the card
of war.
12. In addition to the wars properly called, Washington
increasingly leads "unconventional wars" through "covert
operations", that is to say secret. The Intelligence Community is formed
by 17 federal organizations. In addition to the CIA (Central Intelligence
Agency) there is the DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency), but every sector of the
Armed Forces - army, air force, navy, corps of marines - has its own secret
service. The State Department and the Homeland Security Department have it.
Among these services, in fierce competition with each other to grab political
support and federal funds, the NSA, the National Security Agency, specializing
in telephone and IT interceptions, through which they are not only spied upon,
plays a primary role. the enemies but also the friends of the United States, as
confirmed by the "datagate" aroused by the revelations of the former
contractor Edward Snowden.
13. The field actions are carried out
by the USSOCOM, the Special Forces Command, which has tens of thousands of
commandos from the four sectors of the armed forces. As emerges from a
Washington Post inquiry, special operations forces are deployed in 75
countries. The USSOCOM employs private military companies at the same time. In
the area of the US Central Command, which also includes Iraq and Afghanistan,
the Pentagon's contractors number over 150,000. Added to those assumed by other
departments and allied armies, the number of which is unknown, but certainly
high. All belong to the private shadow army, which joins the official one.
14. To this is added the "humanitarian
army" formed by all those "non-governmental organizations"
which, endowed with huge means, are used by the CIA and the State Department
for internal destabilization actions in the name of "defense of rights of
citizens ». In the same picture is the action of the Bilderberg group - which
the magistrate Ferdinando Imposimato denounced as "one of the leaders of
the strategy of tension and massacres" in Italy - and that of the Open
Society of the "investor and philanthropist George Soros", creator of
the «Color revolutions».
15. The United States - which since 1945 has caused
20-30 million deaths with their wars and coups (more than hundreds of millions
caused by the indirect effects of such actions) - are willing to do anything to
preserve military superiority on which they base their empire, which is
crumbling with the emergence of a multipolar world. Within the framework of
this strategy, political decisions are taken first of all in the "deep
state", an underground center of real power held by economic, financial
and military oligarchies.
15. The US/NATO planetary war system
1, In the "geography" of
the Pentagon, the world is divided into "areas of responsibility",
each entrusted to one of the United States Unified Combatant Command: the
Northern Command covers North America; the Southern Command, Central and South
America; the European Command, the region comprising Europe and the whole of
Russia; the African Command, the African continent (except Egypt which falls
within the Central Command area); the Central Command, the Middle East and
Central Asia; the Pacific Command, the Asia/Pacific region.
2. Each unified command is
composed of the commands of the different components of the US Armed Forces in
that area. For example, the US European Command consists of: US Army
in Europe, US Air Forces in Europe, US Naval Forces
in Europe, US Marine Forces in
Europe and US Special Operations Command in Europe. The
command of each force is in turn articulated in a series of sub-commands and
units. For example, the US Army in Europe has
22 sub-commands and units.
3. To the six geographical commands,
three are added on a global scale: the Strategic Command, responsible for the
terrestrial, air and naval nuclear forces, the military operations in space and
cyberspace, the global attack, electronic warfare and missile defense; the
Special Operations Command, with a specific command in each of the six areas
plus one in Korea, responsible for non-conventional warfare, counter-insurgency
operations, psychological operations and any other mission ordered by the
President or Secretary of Defense; the Transport Command, responsible for
the mobility of soldiers and armaments by land, air and sea worldwide.
4. The United States of America is
the only country to have a military presence on a global scale in every
continent and region of the world. The Pentagon is the direct owner of over
4,800 bases and other military installations, both domestically and
abroad, including over 560,000 buildings and structures (such as railways, oil
pipelines and airport runways). According to official Pentagon data, the United
States has around 800 bases and other military installations in over 70
countries, especially around Russia and China, plus many others in use
or classified. These bases are used for a continuous rotation of
forces, which rapidly increase together with those transferred
from the bases in the United States in certain war theaters. There are
more than 170 countries where US troops are deployed, including those where
the U.S. has no military bases. In terms of comparison,
Russia has only a dozen military bases abroad in the former Soviet
republics and in Syria; China has one in Djibouti, where its military and
civilian ships call.
5. In the wake of the United States'
moves, NATO, the alliance under US command, now has no more borders.
In Europe – after having extended into the area of the former Warsaw Pact, the
former USSR and the former Yugoslavia – it is actually incorporating
Ukraine. In Central Asia, NATO is incorporating Georgia, which already
integrated in its operations. It is a candidate to become a full member of
the Alliance. NATO also continues to "deepen cooperation" with
Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, to counter the
Eurasian Economic Union (which includes Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan,
Armenia and Kyrgyzstan). It also remains engaged in Afghanistan – a country of
great geostrategic importance to Russia and China.
6. In Western Asia, NATO continues
military operations against Syria and is preparing others (Iran
is still in the crosshairs). At the same time, it is
strengthening its partnership (tested in the war against Libya) with
four Gulf monarchies – Bahrain, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Qatar -
and military cooperation with Saudi Arabia that is killing Yemen with cluster
bombs provided by the US. In East Asia, NATO has concluded with
Japan a strategic agreement that "broadens and deepens the long
partnership", which is joined by a similar agreement with
Australia, with an anti-Chinese and anti-Russian
function. For the same purpose, the major NATO countries
(including Italy) participate every two years in the Pacific in what
the US Fleet command calls "the greatest maritime exercise in
the world".
7. In Africa, after destroying Libya, NATO
is enhancing military assistance to the African Union, which it also provides
"naval planning and transportation" in the strategic framework
of the United States Africa Command. In Latin America, NATO has signed a
"Security Agreement" with Colombia, which has already engaged in
Alliance military programs (including the formation of special forces) and has
become "NATO's first partner in Latin America". NATO, therefore,
now has its hands on a subversive plan against the Bolivarian Republic
of Venezuela.
16. Exiting the
war system of NATO
1, While the acceleration of ongoing
conflicts increases the risk of a great war that, with the use of nuclear
weapons and other weapons of mass destruction, would jeopardize the very
existence of humanity and planet Earth, It is vitally important to multiply
efforts to get out of the war system. This raises the question of Italy's
membership in NATO.
2, There are those who say that one
can stay in NATO while preserving his autonomy of choice, meaning having the
possibility to decide from time to time in the national parliament whether or
not to participate in a specific initiative of the Atlantic Alliance. It's an
illusion or worse. The North-Atlantic Council has established the NATO rules in
which "there is no vote or majority decision". "Decisions
are taken unanimously and by mutual agreement", meaning in agreement with
the United States of America, which they are entitled to by the right of
controlling the position of Supreme Allied Commander in Europe and other key
commands, including that of the Nuclear Planning Group.
3. In the great media spectacle of
politics, magicians and acrobats launch appeals for a world without nuclear
weapons, which is currently impossible, but they do nothing to achieve what
today would be possible: a decisive political battle to free Italy from nuclear
weapons, which do not serve our security but expose us to increasing risks.
Taking a real step forward towards the total elimination of nuclear weapons is
the only way in which Italy could really contribute to defusing the escalation
that leads to nuclear war.
4. To do this, we need to fight in
the open for Italy to stop violating the non-proliferation treaty it has
ratified, requiring the United States to immediately remove its nuclear weapons
from our national territory. By doing so, Italy would adhere to the United
Nations Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.
5, The principles of our Constitution
and our real national interests make indispensable the removal from our
national territory not only nuclear weapons, but U.S. and NATO bases under US
command. In other words, the Big Taboo that dominates the political and
institutional world must be broken, clearly indicating the goal to be achieved:
Italy's exit from NATO and NATO from Italy in order to contribute to the
dissolution of the Atlantic Alliance and any other military alliance.
It may be an objective considered crazy by those who see the Atlantic Alliance
as something sacred and untouchable and be considered dangerous by those who
know that by putting themselves against NATO, they put their political careers
at risk. It may also be considered impossible by those who think that a
sovereign and neutral Italy cannot exist.
6. The obstacles that stand in the way of achieving this
goal are enormous. The dominant power bases its strength not only on political,
economic and military instruments, but on the control of minds, made possible
by a pervasive media that, above all through television, leads us to believe
that only what is seen exists and what is not seen does not exist. The control
of minds through the dominant media apparatus allows politicans, on the one
hand, to reassure public opinion by hiding real threats, and on the other to
alarm it by making holograms of dangerous enemies appear, so as to justify
rearmament policies, military operations and wars, justifying at the same time
a military expenditure that in Italy amounts to about 70 million euros a day
and, according to the commitments made in NATO, will have to rise to around 100
million euros a day. And, again as a result of mind control, there is the
spectacle of those who have supported the wars that have demolished entire
states (the last one in Libya) and have caused dramatic mass exodus now in the
front row welcoming the victims of these same wars with open arms.
7. The vast majority, therefore, know
nothing or almost nothing about the mechanisms that determine the increasingly
rapid escalation of war, making the scenario of the third (and last) world war
ever more real: the thermonuclear one. It is spoken of in small circles of
"experts", in "gray rooms" (with reference to the color of
hair as a person ages) from which the young are largely absent. It's about
getting out of the closet, finding ways and languages to make people understand
that time is running out, that it is absolutely necessary to move while we have
time. What to do is in the hands of each of us.
8. In the face of
impending danger, we must show that there is still an Italy that remembers, not
only in words, its own Constitution; an Italy for which the word
"sovereignty" is not just a term for political change; an Italy that
refuses to remain caged in an alliance that under foreign command damages us
and brings us to the brink of catastrophe; an Italy capable of emerging from
the anti-historical vision of a West perched in defense of its supremacy; an
Italy capable of playing an active role in the construction of a multipolar world in which the
aspirations of peoples for freedom and social justice are based on the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
WORK GROUP:
Francesco Cappello, Giulietto Chiesa, Franco
Dinelli, Manlio Dinucci, Berenice Galli, Germana Leoni von Dohnanyi, Jeff
Hoffman, Giuseppe Padovano, Marie-Ange Patrizio, Jean Toschi M. Visconti, Luisa
Vasconcelos, Fernando Zolli
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAFIA
- The White House, Immediate Release, Statement by the President of the United States, 7 agosto 1945, Harry S. Truman Library
- Paul H. Johnston, Progetto Apocalisse / I piani del Pentagono per la guerra nucleare: memorie di un osservatore impotente / Prefazione e postfazione di Diana Johnston, Zambon Editore, 2017
- International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, L’ultimo aiuto / Le dimensioni mediche della guerra nucleare, Mazzotta, 1983.
- Herbert L. Abrams e AAVV, Le implicazioni mediche e sociali della guerra nucleare / Presentazione dei Premi Nobel Daniel Bovet e Carlo Rubbia, Edizioni GB, 1988
- The New York Times, 1950s U.S. Nuclear Target List Offers Chilling Insight, 22 dicembre 2015
- Secreatariat of The Antarctic Treaty, The Antarctic Treaty, 1959
- UNOOSA, Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, 1966
- United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), 1968
- FAS, Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, 1972
- The National Security Archives, Israeli Nuclear History, 2017
- The Sunday Times, Revealed: the secrets of Israel’s nuclear arsenal, 5 ottobre 1986.
- The New York Times, South Africa Says It Built 6 Atom Bombs, 25 marzo 1993
- Defence Forum India, India's Nuclear Weapons Program 1944-1999, 2001
- FAS, A Brief History of Pakistan's Nuclear Program, 2002
- Hans M. KristensenRobert S. Norris, Global nuclear weapons inventories, 1945-2013, op. cit.
- Peter Pringle and William Arkin, Single Integrated Operational Plan (SIOP) - The Secret US Plan for Nuclear War, 1983
· U.S. Department of State, Treaty Between The United States Of America And The Union Of Soviet Socialist Republics On The Elimination Of Their Intermediate-Range And Shorter-Range Missiles (INF Treaty), 1987
- The President of the United States, The National Security Strategy of the United States, the White House, 1991
- U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Planning Guidance for the Fiscal Years 1994-1999), The New York Times, 8 marzo 1992
- Manfred Wörner, L’Alleanza Atlantica nella nuova era, Notizie Nato, febbraio 1991
- NATO, The Alliance's New Strategic Concept, agreed by the Heads of State and Government participating in the Meeting of the North Atlantic Council, 7 novembre 1991
- NATO, ,Statement on Kosovo issued by the Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Washington, D.C, 23 aprile 1999.
- NATO, The Alliance's Strategic Concept approved by the Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Washington D.C., 24 aprile 1999
- Ministero della Difesa, Modello di Difesa / Lineamenti di sviluppo delle FF.AA. negli anni '90, Roma, ottobre 1991
- NATO, Enlargement, 2017
- U.S. Departmento of State, Treaty Between the United States of America and the Russian Federation On Strategic Offensive Reductions (The Moscow Treaty), 2002
- FAS, North Korea Nuclear Weapons Program, 2017
- Michel Chossudovsky, The 9/11 Reader: The September 11, 2001 Terror Attacks, Global Research, 11 settembre 2012
- Michel Chossudovsky, Finian Cunningham, The Iraq War Reader: A History of War Crimes and Genocide. The Unleashing of America’s New Global Militarism, Global Research, 27 maggio 2012
- NATO, Statement on Libya, following the working lunch of NATO Ministers of Foreign Affairs with non-NATO contributors to Operation Unified Protector, 14 aprile 2011
- Tim Anderson, The Dirty War on Syria, Global Research, 2016
- Eric Zuesse, What America’s Coup in Ukraine Did, Global Research, 24 marzo 2017
- Los Angeles Times, There's more than the CIA and FBI: The 17 agencies that make up the U.S. intelligence community, 17 gennaio 2017
- The Washington Post, Obama outlines plans to expand U.S. Special Operations forces in Syria, 28 aprile 2016
- Allied Joint Force Command, NATO “Hub" to address challenges from the south, 27 luglio 2017
· Luigi Grimaldi, Il Moby Prince e quelle navi di armi americane, Famiglia Cristiana, 4 novembre 2015
· Ferdinando Imposimato, La Repubblica delle stragi impunite, Newton Compton, 2012
· Nukewatch, B61-12 Bomb: Worth Its Weight In Gold- And Causing A Lot Of Trouble, settembre 2017
· Hans Kristensen, B61-12: The New Guided Standoff Nuclear Bomb, Third Preparatory Committee Meeting for the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty United Nations, New York, 2 maggio 2014
· Lockheed Martin, Mk-41 Vertical Launching System, 2017
- Hans M. Kristensen, Matthew McKinzie, Theodore A. Postol, How US nuclear force modernization is undermining strategic stability: The burst-height compensating super-fuze, Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, 1 marzo 2017
- Pravda, Russian defence industry ready to build 100-ton monster ICBM and ghost trains, 6 luglio 2017
- Jeff Halper, La guerra contro il popolo, edizioni epoké, 2017
- Russia Insider, Putin/Xi Plan to Bypass the Dollar Is a True Bombshell - A Report From the BRICS Summit, 8 settembre 2017
- Il Sole 24 Ore, La Cina prepara la sfida ai petrodollari, 7 settembre 2017
- The New York Times, Russia Uses Its Oil Giant, Rosneft, as a Foreign Policy Tool, 29 ottobre 2017
- The New York Times, Behind China’s $1 Trillion Plan to Shake Up the Economic Order, 13 maggio 2017
- Credit Suisse Research Institute, The Global Wealth Report, 2016
- The Fiscal Times, F-35 Total Costs Climb Past $1.5 Trillion — How High Will They Go?, 13 luglio 2017
- Ministero della Difesa, Libro Bianco per la sicurezza internazionale e la difesa, luglio 2015
- United Nations General Assembly, Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, 7 luglio 2017
- Michel Chossudodovsky, Towards a World War III Scenario, Global Research, 2012
- Jean Toschi Marazzani Visconti, Il Corridoio / Viaggio nella Jugoslavia in guerra, La Città del Sole, 2006 / La Porta d’ingresso dell’Islam / Bosnia Erzegovina:un paese ingovernabile, Zambon Editore, 2016
- Giulietto Chiesa
È arrivata la bufera, Piemme, 2015
Что, вместо катастрофа, Mosca 2016 Putinfobia, Piemme 2016Руссофобия 2.0. Eksmo, Moscow, 2017 Rusofobie 2.0. Editions du Cercle, ParisRusofobija, Albatros, Belgrado, 2016
Caos Globale, Revoluzione Ed., 2017Глобалний Каос, Moscow 2018
Caos Globale, Revoluzione Ed., 2017Глобалний Каос, Moscow 2018
- Manlio Dinucci
Coautore con Daniel Bovet e prefazione di Ernesto Balducci, Tempesta del deserto / Le armi del Nord, il dramma del Sud, Edizioni Cultura della Pace, 1991
Hyperwar, Edizioni Cultura della Pace, 1991
Coautore con U.Allegretti e D.Gallo, La strategia dell’impero / Dalle direttive del Pentagono al Nuovo Modello di Difesa, Edizioni Cultura della Pace, 1992
L’Arte della guerra / Annali della strategia USA/NATO (1990-2016), Zambon Editore, 2016
Diario di guerra, Asterios Editore, 2018
Guerra nucleare - Il giorno prima / Da Hiroshima a oggi: chi e come ci porta alla catastrofe, Zambon Editore, 2017
- Germana Leoni von Dohnanyi, Lo Stato Profondo, Imprimatur, 2017
- Francesco Cappello, Ricchezza fittizia povertà artificiosa, Edizioni ETS, 2018
/https://www.niagarafallsreview.ca/content/dam/thestar/news/canada/2021/09/25/huawei-executive-meng-wanzhou-receives-warm-welcome-upon-return-to-china/_1_meng_wanzhou_2.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.