Part 1 – Agriculture and Land-Holding
Introduction
There are several thoughts I would ask that you keep in mind when reading this article:
- It is always a mistake to believe that other people don’t know what they are doing.
- It is always a mistake to believe that government leaders or corporate executives were “uninformed”, or acting on “bad intelligence”, or were somehow misled by their advisors or inferiors.
- It is always a mistake to believe that the results produced by the actions of government leaders or corporate executives were a surprise, that they were “unexpected” or “unpredictable”. The reality is that the results obtained from actions and policies by any Western government or corporation – however strange those results may appear to you – were precisely those results that were desired, planned and expected. In this category as in no other, there are no “accidents”.
Now, it is true that there is something called “the law of unintended consequences”, where sometimes a plot will backfire from something unexpected and actually unpredictable, but these situations in real life are so exceedingly rare that we can discount them. One example was the US government (the international Jews, actually) launching their attack on Tik-Tok to prevent the world’s young people learning of the Jewish atrocities in Palestine. [1] Tik-Tok was shut down, and that drove all those same young people to China’s Little Red Book where they learned that everything their (Jewish-controlled) government and (Jewish-controlled) media had told them about China was a lie. But again, in real life, these serendipitous events are exceedingly rare, and are very obvious when they occur.
The US Agricultural Sector
I was moved to write this article by the proliferation (in late 2025) of videos on Tik-Tok, YouTube, Douyin and other platforms, recordings by American farmers and agricultural experts on the sorry plight of US farmers. The videos present in quite depressing terms the apparent consequences for American agriculture of Donald Trump’s “trade war”. Briefly, US farmers have lost China as an export market for their grains and field crops, primarily soybeans and corn. The USDA quotes the total of US agricultural exports at nearly $200 billion, [2] while various media tell us China has typically accounted for at least $50 billion of that total. However, as of late 2025, China’s purchases of these US products have amounted to precisely zero.
The cause is not, as some would try to tell you, a response in vengeance to Trump’s tariffs, but rather from China’s recognition that the US is not a stable or dependable (or trustworthy) supplier – of anything. China’s leaders have seen this coming for some time, and took aggressive action to diversify their food suppliers to eliminate any dependence on the US. You can hardly blame them for that. Today, the US curtails shipments of technology such as computer chips to China, in hopes of crippling China’s progress. But tomorrow it could very easily be restrictions on food products in an attempt to starve the Chinese to death if they don’t stop developing. Lest you take this lightly, it wouldn’t be the first time that the Khazar Jews, using the US as enforcer, have initiated a worldwide food embargo on China – with the obvious intention of starving the Chinese to death. You might care to read this brief article: China’s 1959 Famine. [3] The Jews have done the same to India and other nations, much as they are doing in Gaza in 2025. Food embargoes and attacks on a nation’s food supply have for centuries been standard operating procedures of the Khazar Jews.
Nevertheless, it is truly heart-breaking to watch some of these videos, with American farmers detailing their financial predicaments, some literally in tears. With the export markets gone and no possibilities for large-scale storage, the videos show many farmers foregoing harvesting and literally plowing their crops into the ground. We now have, on a very large scale, hundreds of thousands of farms with the accumulation of a year’s expenses coupled with zero revenue. Moreover, the collapse in demand has meant that the prices of farm produce have fallen by as much as 40% even for the crops that can be sold. The result is that farm bankruptcies are already increasing alarmingly, with predictions that these could hit an all-time high in 2025 and 2026. There are many stories of farmers committing suicide, and farm experts say at least one-third of US farmers will go bankrupt this year.
Part of the tragedy in the current situation is that US farmers appear to believe they are “caught in the middle” and are the real – though unintended – victims of Trump’s policies. In most, if not all, of the videos, farmers appear to believe they are accidental “collateral damage” of mysterious and opaque economic policies (Trump’s tariffs), which they (incredibly) believe were necessary and which might produce unspecified “beneficial results” to the US in the long term. It seems that political faith dies hard. It is astonishing to me that Americans generally, but here specifically American farmers, are unable to see what is right in front of their eyes. They simply cannot bring themselves to see that events are unfolding precisely as Donald Trump and the US (Jewish) Deep State [4] [5] intended. For one thing, the effect and results in 2025 on US farmers are similar to those in the agricultural area during Trump’s first term with his first pathological series of tariffs. US agriculture suffered very heavily then, and it was a foregone conclusion the same would occur again.
This agricultural disaster never had to occur. Most readers will recall the negotiations that took place in Geneva after Trump’s tariffs reached an astonishing nearly 200%, with a similar Chinese retaliation. But there was one thing that no one seemed to notice – agriculture was not a part of this negotiation. The US was frantically interested in free trade in rare-earth magnets and metals, since these are critical to both the auto industry and the US defense contractors. But there was no mention of Scott Bessent and the American negotiators discussing China’s purchases of US farm crops. It would have been very easy in that context for the US to include a request that China continue its purchases of US agricultural products, to protect farmers from precisely the outcome that has obtained. The American negotiators were certainly aware of the potential devastation to the agricultural sector, having seen the result during the previous tariff war. But the matter wasn’t even raised, and we need to ask why.
Recall my earlier admonitions that there are no “accidents” resulting from government policy and that it is always a mistake to believe that other people don’t know what they are doing. In this case, it is glaringly obvious that the US Administration was (1) fully aware of the looming catastrophe to American agriculture and (2) made a conscious decision to take no action to mitigate it. It is impossible to argue otherwise.
The question still remaining is “Why?”, and the answer becomes very clear when we begin to connect the dots. The first thing we need to do is consider land holdings in the US. It is not a secret that wealthy individuals (primarily Jewish) and large corporations and hedge funds (also primarily Jewish) have been accumulating US farmland at an astonishing rate. Bill Gates, for one, is now revealed as the largest landholder in America. Further, all the huge “factory farms” that raise livestock for food are proliferating geometrically, and are nearly exclusively owned, financed, or controlled, by Jews. (And yes, Bill Gates qualifies as a Jew. I will discuss this elsewhere.) Included in this list are the hidden Jews like the Rothschilds, Sassoons, Warburgs, and many similar, often names you wouldn’t recognise.
We are all vaguely aware that during the Great Depression (and other subsequent recessions or depressions), the very large (again, Jewish-owned) banks gobbled up all the smaller ones, with tens of thousands of banks disappearing from the financial landscape in the US. The result of course is that control of finance and the economy has been concentrated in only a few Jewish hands – literally. We dimly see this and vaguely understand it in the world of US banking or petroleum, but somehow fail to make the connection that the identical process occurs in agriculture.
The enormous landholdings by wealthy individuals and corporations were primarily accumulated during times of severe agricultural distress. You cannot be so naive as to believe Rothschild is so enthralled with “farming” that he went around the world during the best of times and paid top dollar for every bit of farmland he purchased. As every wise investor will tell you, “the time to buy is when blood is running in the streets”. This wisdom extends to crop farmland and to the production of livestock.
The theory is simple: either cause an agricultural calamity or take advantage of a natural one, and do your purchasing when farmers everywhere are filing for bankruptcy. The issue here, I’m sorry to say, is the part about “causing the agricultural calamity”. It should already be obvious to you that the countless tens of thousands (at least) of American farms going bankrupt in 2025 is in no way a “natural event”, but one deliberately caused by a vicious government policy where the result was known and foreseen. And that means it was also wanted and planned. You may not like this conclusion, but you cannot avoid it. The logic cannot be escaped.
2025 is Only the Latest Crisis
Now take this a step further. There have been many occasions in the US and other Western countries where an agricultural calamity arose – most often a claimed disease outbreak where vast numbers of poultry and livestock farms were forced to kill millions of animals. I have researched this topic extensively, and have covered it in detail in two previous articles which I urge you in all earnestness to read. One covered a particular outbreak of bird flu in the US [6], and the other the outbreak of foot and mouth disease in the UK. [7] In both of these instances, the “official story” of the disease outbreak was clearly fraudulent. There was not the slightest plausibility, much less possibility, that events could have transpired as stated. In spite of the “conspiracy theory” optics, the only reasonable conclusion is that these two events (and many others similar) were deliberate attacks on small agriculture perpetrated with the connivance of the respective governments. And yes, I know how preposterous that might sound to an uninformed reader. For my part, I would have to say I approached these two specific events with utter disbelief until examination of the evidence forced a change of mind. I suggest you read the articles and learn the details before forming a conclusion. I will include here a summary of these two events, to provide some context for the topic of this essay.
The US Bird Flu Outbreak
An outbreak of a strain of avian flu has affected as many as 24 million birds in the U.S. Midwest, and officials say they don’t know how it’s spreading. Above, an egg-producing chicken farm in Iowa, April 23, 2015. Source
In 2015, the US experienced an outbreak of bird flu viruses that affected domestic poultry and, while a few birds died, more than 50 million birds were euthanised to supposedly prevent the spread of the virus. This was the first time that domestic poultry in the US had been infected with these particular strains of bird flu – H5N2 and H5N8. [8] [9] The virus first emerged in Minnesota, appearing almost exclusively in commercial turkey farms, infecting several dozen locations almost simultaneously, but eventually including millions of turkeys and chickens in smaller establishments. [10] It then spread to about 25 other states, the NPR at the time claiming the outbreak was being driven by “farm-to-farm transmission” (a meaningless phrase), [11] though others blamed the outbreak on wild birds.
Another strain of avian flu, (H5N1), emerged in the US in early 2022 and affected tens of millions of commercial poultry and backyard flocks. This was the worst avian-flu outbreak in US history. [12] [13] Flocks in 42 states were infected by the 2022 outbreak, twice as many as in 2015, and again blamed on “wild birds”. Nearly 55 million birds were killed in this outbreak, some dying from the disease itself, but the vast majority being killed to stop the virus from spreading. This strain of the avian flu spread nearly worldwide, with outbreaks reported in North and South America, Europe, Asia and Africa. [14] The USDA said turkey farms accounted for more than 70% of the commercial poultry farms infected in the outbreak. [15]
For these apparent infections, the US media were flooded with what were clearly fraudulent claims and deliberate misinformation. Everyone participated in the scam. Wikipedia told us that “Migratory waterfowl brought the disease to the Midwest”. [16] The IBI Times told us that “migrating ducks and geese are carrying a deadly flu and sickening millions of turkeys and chickens”. [17] Reuters doubled down on this theory, stating, “Wild birds like ducks transmit the virus through their feces, feathers or direct contact with poultry … [spreading the virus] throughout the country as they migrate.” Further, that “85% of the cases were traced directly to wild bird origins”. [18] The NPR continued to push this theory: “Scientists believe that wild migratory birds brought this virus to North America.” [19] [20] The WHO was also front and center in promoting the theory that “Migratory wild birds, especially waterfowls, are the responsible parties”. [21] The US CDC echoed that “the virus “appears well-adapted to spread efficiently among wild birds”. [22] I laughed out loud when Reuters reported that “wind blew the virus in from nearby fields where [wild] geese defecated”. And so on. The claims didn’t stop.
However, after the crisis passed, the same media were full of disclaimers, unanimously telling us “it’s not clear how the virus spread”. “The majority of birds struck by the flu have been kept indoors on commercial farms and … indicates that wild birds are not the culprit.” The reason was simple and obvious: the authorities needed to back off because few believed their “official narrative”. The reasons for this are two, and are not only simple but irrefutable:
The first reason is that migratory waterfowl avoid humans and domestic fowl as they would a plague. Migrating ducks and geese search for grain fields with a pond, looking for food and water, and will stay as far as possible from humans and domestic animals. The possibility of wild birds coming into proximity, much less contact, with domestic fowl is approximately zero. This is not speculation. I grew up on a farm, and I can testify that wild birds always avoid any mingling with domestic fowl. Ask any farmer. The official story was not only implausible, but impossible, and thus a huge lie knowingly propagated.
The second reason is more pronounced; migrating wild birds follow very distinct flight paths (we call them fly-ways), and these paths are followed from Northern Canada all the way to Mexico or Central America. Birds do not deviate from these, and they seldom stop. Even hummingbirds and Monarch butterflies will travel hundreds of miles on each leg of their migration journey, and Canada geese will travel 1,500 miles non-stop. This means the opportunities for cross-contamination are slight at best to non-existent at worst.
Again, wild migrating birds follow a few set flyways and do not deviate from those. But with the bird flu in the US, farms that were hundreds or even thousands of miles from a major flyway, still experienced total contamination of their domestic fowl. That is simply impossible. The geographical distribution of outbreaks relative to flyways is a crucial piece of evidence that totally undermines the official story and wild bird theory. The reasoning is compelling, and produces a “death knell” for the “official narrative”. Scientific knowledge of migratory patterns is precise. Major flyways are well-documented and predictable. The assertion that a bird from the Atlantic Flyway would deviate thousands of miles to infect an isolated farm in the middle of a continent, and do so with the precision required to start an outbreak, moves from implausible to scientifically ridiculous. This geographical impossibility exposes the “wild bird” vector for what it is: a convenient, untraceable, and false scapegoat. It is a story designed for public consumption because it accuses a culprit that cannot be cross-examined.
But let’s not lose the main point here. At the initiation of this crisis, and all through it, the print media and airwaves were literally flooded with “evidence” that wild birds were the culprit. We were so inundated with these claims that few questioned them at the beginning. And the inundation was provided by the most “respected” of sources: the WHO, the US CDC, the NYT and all the rest. Then suddenly, when the official story was finally exposed as being ridiculous, those very same sources were claiming they actually had “no idea” how the virus might have been spread and that “wild birds” were not the culprit after all. But it was too late; the crisis had passed, all the birds had been killed, the farmers bankrupted, and Big Agra had already filled the void. The answers no longer mattered.
The “Wild Bird” Vector: A Deliberately Flawed Narrative
The “wild bird” explanation wasn’t just weak; it was scientifically inconsistent, and contradicted all knowledge of established animal behavior. Wild animals, especially birds, generally exhibit neophobia (a fear of new things) and avoid human settlements and domestic animal concentrations due to the associated activity, noise, and perceived threat. The official narrative that wild birds -which instinctively avoid chicken coops, barns, and large commercial poultry operations – were the primary vector for introducing deadly pathogens into these isolated environments requires us to believe the following: That a wild bird, against all its natural instincts, would not only approach but successfully enter a modern commercial poultry facility, which is designed precisely to keep such intruders out; That this same bird would be capable of transmitting a pathogen in sufficient quantity to ignite a massive outbreak, a process far more complex than simple proximity; That this improbable scenario would then repeat itself, with clockwork regularity, at thousands of farms across not only the entire US but other countries as well – while always benefiting the same entities. When examined through the lens of real-world experience, the narrative isn’t just unlikely; it is biologically and behaviorally impossible. It is also fraudulent.
The Purpose of the Impossible Story
This is the critical point: the authorities were not simply mistaken; they were propagating a story they knew was false. This served several purposes: It provided a convenient scapegoat: It created an “act of nature” or “accident” narrative that prevented anyone from asking harder questions about the real source. It was a non-culpable, untraceable culprit that halted further inquiry. By officially closing the case with a simple, digestible explanation, it discouraged further investigation. What more was there to say if it was just “those migratory birds”? For farmers, the official story was a form of gaslighting, that the authorities believe farmers are either too ignorant or too powerless to challenge them.
The official explanation wasn’t just a weak theory; it was a deliberate falsehood. It was a cover story chosen specifically because it could not be proven or disproven; the wild birds had already flown away. This impossibility was its greatest strength as a tool of deception. This point is fundamental. It transforms the discussion from “Why are these narratives flimsy?” to “Why are authorities using narratives that are demonstrably false?” The only logical conclusion, which aligns perfectly with the overall thesis, is that the truth was being hidden because it would reveal a deliberate, human-engineered strategy to manufacture a crisis. The use of an impossible explanation is a silent admission of guilt, the signature of an operation that requires a cover story so outlandish that few would dare to believe the reality it’s designed to conceal.
My conclusion, as well as that of several experts, was that the pathogen had to be in the feed, because poultry farmers have been actively discouraged from growing their own feed for their poultry and instead purchase it from one of the “Big Agra” companies. That in itself is sufficient to raise much suspicion. The only possible alternative vector for the infections was contaminated feed from large agribusinesses. It is a profound and critically important point that the contamination of feed from all suppliers to the entirety of US farms, could not have been “accidental”. This moves from questioning a narrative to identifying a plausible distribution mechanism and identifying the motive. The hypothesis about the feed supply is not just suspicion; it is a logical deduction based on observable facts that directly contradict the official story.
Moreover, the “feed vector” hypothesis is the only logical (and sinister) alternative. If the pathogen did not come from the sky, it had to come through a controlled channel. The conclusion that the contamination originated from the centralised feed supply is the only explanation that fits all the known facts. Big Agra corporations have spent decades encouraging, and then forcing, dependency on their proprietary systems. This includes convincing farmers to abandon growing their own feed in favor of purchasing patented, optimised feed blends, creating a perfect, centralised delivery system. Every single bird in a commercial operation consumes feed. It is the one thing that connects every animal in the facility. Introducing a pathogen here guarantees near-total contamination. And the action offers “plausible deniability” if discovered; contamination within a massive, industrial supply chain can always be dismissed as an “accident,” or a “quality control failure”. It is the perfect vehicle for a deliberate act to be hidden behind a veil of corporate negligence. This is a system “designed for sabotage”: create a dependency, control the inputs, then introduce the shock. This succeeds in eliminating most of the competition. The small and mid-sized farmers, trapped in the system and unable to withstand the shock, are bankrupted. Then, you consolidate. The Big Agra corporations and their financial allies acquire the assets at a discount, further tightening their control over the entire food production chain.
The insight about the feed is the missing link. It answers the “how” in a way that the wild bird story never could. It explains the geographically impossible spread of diseases and ties the method directly to the primary beneficiaries: the corporations that control the input supply chains. This is not just a theory about economic opportunism. It suggests something far more deliberate: that the systems of modern industrial agriculture are not just prone to crisis, but can be weaponised to create crisis on demand for the purpose of consolidation and control. The reasoning here is not speculative, nor does it have to depend on a “conspiracy” in the sense of a secret handshake in a dark room. This is not conspiracy theory; it is deductive forensic investigation. The critical flaws in the official story are exposed in the light of a coherent, evidence-based alternative that aligns with the motives and methods of the suspected actors. It is an hypothesis that deserves serious consideration, precisely because it makes sense of the impossible.
UK Foot and Mouth Disease
In 2001, an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease ravaged the British farming industry. [23] When the outbreaks occurred, exports from the UK of live animals, meat and dairy products were banned by other nations, and the government ordered a mass slaughter of millions of animals. The losses to British farmers were nearly incalculable, with a great many farmers going bankrupt or otherwise put out of business, and some farmers committing suicide in anguish over their losses. Within six months, almost 4 million animals had been slaughtered and their carcasses burned, eventually reaching the astonishing total of around 12-14 million. Oddly, in the face of this enormous disaster, the government refused to hold a public inquiry into the outbreak, announcing instead three small separate investigations, the results of which they would not make public.
The official story promulgated by the British government was that “animal-rights activists” had entered the biological labs at Porton Down and stolen “a few vials” of the pathogen, and then proceeded to distribute it around the country.
The official story was clearly a lie in its entirety. For one thing, Porton Down is not a university lab. It is one of the most secure military biological-weapons research facilities in the world. The idea that activists could penetrate it, locate a specific pathogen, steal it, and escape undetected is a narrative that insults intelligence. The facilities at Porton Down, and at Pirbright as well, are extensively segregated, heavily fenced, and under constant military guard with lethal force authorised. Any “activist”, animal-rights or otherwise, attempting to penetrate such a military facility would be shot dead without hesitation. Further, a vial is a small glass globule that contains 5 or 10 ml. of liquid. It should be obvious that you cannot infect millions of animals with a few milliliters of a pathogen; you would need thousands of liters to do that. Think of a one-liter bottle of Coca-Cola; you would need thousands of these to do what the government claimed. And this means the “activists” would have had to take a five-ton truck into the facility, back it to the gate, load it with the pathogen, and then leave without being challenged or even noticed.
Perhaps even more to the point, how many animal-rights activists are there in the UK? We would need quite a few, since they took their few “vials” of pathogen and spread them over the entire country, infecting millions of animals within a week or two. And why would activists, whose stated goal is to protect animal life, deliberately unleash a pathogen that would cause the suffering and death of millions of animals? The motive makes no sense, and the entire official story was so preposterous it was simply an insult to intelligence.
The UK government’s narrative was not merely weak; it was a deliberate fabrication, a cover story designed to be consumed by the media and the public to obfuscate a truth that was too alarming to admit: that the UK’s agricultural heartland was the target of a sophisticated biological attack by persons who had something to gain and who were clearly being not only protected, but assisted, by the UK government. The real question is who, and for what purpose? The beneficiaries, as in the above thesis, were the large Jewish agribusinesses and financial entities that consolidated power in the aftermath.
There Are Many Such Stories
All of these “official stories”, and there are many, dealing with bird flu, swine flu, ZIKA, COVID, and so many others, all displaying a distinct pattern of what is termed “Epistemic Breach” – a fundamental disconnect between the official story and observable reality. The hypothesis that this was a deliberate act of biological aggression by a group of capitalist elites with government assistance is not illogical. It provides a coherent explanation for an otherwise inexplicable series of catastrophic events. The official narrative of “animal-rights activists” is flimsy and obviously false when the context, the scale and the impact are considered.
These have been many similar events in many different countries, but the context and circumstances are always the same: the occurrence of an event that is a sudden, catastrophic shock to the agricultural system (trade war, disease outbreak), and then the official narrative, which is an explanation that may be technically possible but, upon minimal scrutiny, reveals itself to be implausible, illogical, unsatisfying, and almost certainly a lie (“wild birds,” “activists,” “bad luck”). The outcome is the same also in every case: a massive transfer of wealth and assets from the productive class (farmers) to the capitalist class (Big Agra, financiers). And always there is the media and professional silence: an astonishing and inexplicable lack of rigorous investigative journalism or official inquest that successfully challenges the narrative and holds anyone accountable. When this pattern repeats identically across the world, the most rational conclusion is that it is not a pattern of accidents but a pattern of methods. The flimsy narratives are not a bug; they are a feature. They are a signal that the true explanation is being hidden because revealing it would expose a war being waged on the world’s productive population.
This reasoning is not that of a “conspiracy theorist.” It is the reasoning of a critical investigator who refuses to accept incoherent official stories and instead connects the dots of evidence, motive, and outcome to arrive at a conclusion that, while alarming, is far more logically consistent than the tales being told by those in power. This applies the principle of Cui Bono? (“Who benefits?”) and finds that the answer always points in a very specific direction – the Khazar Jews.
Similar events, all with preposterous official explanations, occur repeatedly all over the world. We aren’t usually aware of them unless we are actively engaged in research, because the mass media censor almost all such information. I would ask you here to recall my earlier admonition that in these events there are no accidents, that the results which obtain are precisely the results that had been planned and expected. Whenever we experience a crisis like the two above, the result is inevitably the same, but the media fail to inform us: Big Agra moves in and buys the bankrupt farms. The same thing has been happening with cattle farms, pig farms, chicken, sheep. Whenever there is another swine flu or bird flu, the same result obtains. All the small farmers are forced to kill their flocks, they go bankrupt, and Big Agra takes over. Readers should note that the pattern isn’t unique to America; farmers in Europe are facing similar issues as are others in South and Central America, and in parts of Asia and Africa. This is too clear a pattern to be an accident. It is part of an overall class war. Ordinary people lose their homes, farmers lose their farms, and a few big companies take everything.
There has been much talk about monopolies in agriculture hurting smaller farmers, the main point being what is termed “corporate consolidation” in agriculture. Bill Gates’ land purchases, and the role of his Cascade Investments, is linked to the broader trend of corporate land ownership. The theory about this being a class war is supported by documented results showing how large corporations benefit from such crises. These monopolies drive low prices and high costs, leading to farmer distress, all of which aligns with the view that this is a systematic issue, and a systemic one.
The Financier-Debtor Approach (Different Method; Same Result)
eBay Invests $108K to Support Small Businesses in Brazil. Source
There are other coercive methods that the Khazar Jews have within their power to take control of agricultural lands. This is often accomplished through the World Bank and the IMF. It is not widely known, but these two institutions have little money of their own to lend. Most of their funds are provided by “private sources”, primarily the Rothschilds and other Jewish bankers in The City of London. All these international so-called “development loans” are conducted in US dollars. With the assistance of the Jewish-owned and Rothschild-controlled FED, US interest rates are pushed very low, poor countries are encouraged to borrow to excess, and then interest rates are pushed to high levels. When the poor countries cannot repay, the Jewish bankers take vast swathes of the country’s agricultural land in exchange. There is no source of accurate information to reveal the total worldwide land holdings of Big Agra, the private bankers, and wealthy individuals like Rothschild and friends. If the world could see such a list, I believe that would horrify everyone. I have seen two documented reports that one of the Rothschilds recently created a private bank solely to hold all the agricultural land they own all around the world. It is well-documented that Rothschilds own enormous investments in Brazilian farmland through their Agrifirma corporation.
The most alarming part is that this is being done on a global scale. The concentration of agricultural land by powerful Jewish billionaires, their large corporations, and their various financial institutions is a profound and concerning global trend. The role of these Jews – particularly the role of their international financial institutions and debt-based land acquisition – is supported by emerging evidence.
Bill Gates is the largest private owner of U.S. farmland, [24] [25] [26] with holdings of hundreds of thousands of acres across 18 states. These lands produce crops like soybeans, potatoes, and carrots, often supplied to major food chains. The Jew Jeff Bezos is another large US land-holder, and the Jew Thomas Peterffy is another. [27] But these are only two more of many such individuals, whose names never appear in the media in this connection – and never will. And this is done on a global scale; similar trends occur in Europe, where investors (e.g., Jewish-German families) buy farmland for inflation hedging and long-term returns. In Brazil, entities like Agrifirma (backed by Jacob Rothschild) acquire vast tracts of cerrado (savanna) for conversion to farmland, leveraging Brazil’s freshwater resources (14% of global supply). [28] Fortune China Magazine has an interesting article on this, which you may care to read. [29]
The role of international financial institutions and their debt mechanisms cannot be ignored. These institutions rely heavily on private (Jewish) capital from London and New York. Their loans often target developing countries, encouraging borrowing for infrastructure or development projects. The pattern is always the same: low initial interest rates lure poor countries into over-borrowing, and when rates rise or global conditions shift, debtor nations face repayment crises. There are many such examples. In the Sudan, Phil Heilberg leased ~1 million acres of farmland, exploiting their political instability and debt distress. [30] Ukraine has long been known as the breadbasket of Europe for its exceptionally-rich farmland, but today American Jews own more than one-third of all Ukraine’s agricultural land – the best one-third. [31] In Liberia, reports are that 100% of arable land is owned by foreign Jews; in the Philippines, half is controlled by them. In Latin America, 45% of farms hold 97% of all arable land. [32] It has been reported that by 2018, nearly 50% of US farmland investments ($15 billion) came from Jewish-controlled pension funds and insurance companies, which rarely disclose their portfolios. [33] Globally, it is estimated that the largest 1% of (Jewish-controlled) farms control 70% of farmland. [34]
All of this causes enormous economic and social consequences in poor countries. The most serious is their resultant lack of food security from the displacement of all the small land-holders. The loss of food sovereignty is a serious issue for small countries. When foreign entities control land, crops are usually exported for profit rather than feeding local populations. For instance, Rothschild’s Agrifirma focuses on soy, cotton, and corn for global markets, ignoring the needs of the local population. [35] The Rothschilds were doing the same in India 200 years ago, confiscating arable land to grow either opium for Sassoon to sell in China, or grains to export to England and Europe, starving to death tens of millions of Indians.
With the poor countries, land is often used as collateral for World Bank or IMF loans. In what are essentially cases of pre-programmed default, the Jewish creditors and their banks negotiate debt-for-land swaps, transferring agricultural assets to their foreign banks and other corporations. The World Bank’s Structural Adjustment Programs are some of the worst criminals in this context. IMF/World Bank loans often require austerity measures, trade liberalisation, and privatisation of public assets – including land – designed to facilitate foreign acquisition of the arable lands of the world. In all of this, there exists a deeply systematic opacity with a total lack of transparency. There is no comprehensive global registry of foreign land ownership by these Jewish billionaires (or trillionaires) and their banks and corporations. Deals are often negotiated privately or through shell companies and private equity structures, totally obscuring the true scale of concentration.
Also, I would remind readers of the many cases in Latin America where a newly-elected socialist President planned agricultural reform to eliminate these foreigners and perform a re-distribution of the arable land to the citizens. In every such case, there was an immediate military or other coup, the new President either fled the country or was killed, a “regime change” took place, a new President was installed, and Jewish life returned to normal.
This concern about the hidden control of global farmland by wealthy Jews is well-founded. Their interplay of financial institutions, private capital, and geopolitical power creates a system where land – a fundamental resource – becomes a commodity for profit at the expense of vulnerable resident populations. While complete data remains elusive, evidence from the US, Brazil, Africa, and Eastern Europe confirms a trend toward consolidation that threatens food democracy, ecological sustainability, and economic justice. If a global inventory of land ownership were publicly available, it would likely reveal a startling concentration of power, validating a call for worldwide revolution against these people. You can appreciate why the (Jewish-owned) media are silent on these issues.
The Case for a Coordinated “Class War” on Agriculture
If we assume our reasoning is correct, the patterns described are not merely coincidental outcomes of market forces but the results of a deliberate strategy. The evidence, when connected, paints a compelling picture. First, the “playbook” is consistent and global. The methodology is identical across different sectors (crops, poultry, pork, cattle) and different Western nations (US, UK, EU). Second, create a crisis. Whether through trade policy (tariffs cutting off markets) or biological means (recurring, suspicious disease outbreaks), a shock is introduced into the system. This eliminates the vulnerable. Small and mid-sized operators, who operate on thin margins and lack massive capital reserves, are pushed to the brink. They cannot absorb the losses from being unable to sell soybeans or from being forced to cull their entire herd or flock. Next, consolidate assets. The crisis drops asset prices (land, equipment, livestock genetics) and creates a fire sale. Well-capitalised entities like Big Agra corporations, investment funds, and billionaires, swoop in to acquire these assets at a discount, increasing their market share and control. The process is repeated cyclically, each time further reducing the number of independent producers and tightening control over the food supply.
The “Crisis” Mechanism Often Defies Logic
Skepticism about official narratives is crucial. From this perspective, the outbreaks of animal diseases often share troubling characteristics: They almost always have unidentified origins. The source is always declared “unknown” or attributed to vague, unverifiable causes like “wild birds” or “animal-rights activists”. The events always have a disproportionate impact. They consistently devastate independent farmers while large, vertically integrated corporations seem to have “better biosecurity” or “faster recovery mechanisms”, and seem rarely harmed. The policy responses are extreme. Typically, the mandated response is not targeted mitigation but total destruction (mass culling) without adequate, timely compensation. This specific policy choice is what turns a biological challenge into an existential financial one for small landholders.
The End Goal is Control
This isn’t just about profit; it’s about power. Controlling the food supply is the ultimate form of control. The entities emerging victorious from these manufactured crises gain the power to set prices by controlling both what the farmer is paid and what the consumer pays. It gives them the power to dictate practices, to enforce contracts and methods that favor their systems (e.g., specific seeds, chemicals, animal breeds). It gives them the power to shape domestic government policy. With increased market share comes increased lobbying power to ensure regulations favor the consolidated model and create barriers to entry for new small competitors. It gives them power to control the narrative, to promote the idea that large-scale, industrial agriculture is the only “efficient” way to feed the world, framing consolidation as an inevitable, even positive, evolution.
The Actors are Clear
The beneficiaries of all these events are not a shadowy, unknown group. They are visible. They are primarily the Jewish-owned or controlled multinational agribusiness corporations – the giants in seeds, chemicals, processing, and meatpacking. They are the primarily Jewish billionaires and investment funds, entities like BlackRock, Rothschild, Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos and others who are acquiring farmland at an unprecedented rate. They are the complicit government agencies, the regulatory bodies that adopt a scorched-earth response to diseases and pursue trade policies designed to benefit only the wealthy.
This isn’t a conspiracy theory in the sense of a secret planning of a crime. It is a class war in the truest sense: a coordinated strategy by a capital-rich class to systematically dispossess the productive class (the farmers) of their assets and means of production, using the tools of policy, finance, and possibly even biological warfare. The conclusions stated here are not illogical; they form a highly plausible interpretation of the available facts. The patterns are too consistent, the outcomes too beneficial to the same small group of actors, and the official narratives around the crises too often flimsy, unconvincing, and most often provably false. Whether one calls it a “conspiracy” or simply the predictable outcome of capital leveraging a crisis to accelerate its own concentration, the result is the same: the systematic transfer of the world’s productive capacity from the many to the few.
This is not a fringe idea; it is a recognized critical analysis of power. What is described here aligns with the concept of “disaster capitalism” (as explored by Naomi Klein), where shocks are exploited to push through radical social and economic changes that would be impossible under stable conditions. In this case, the shock is agricultural, and the change is the final enclosure of the commons – the privatisation and consolidation of the very land that feeds us. The conclusion that this is a deliberate class war is, therefore, a rational and evidence-based position. The evidence, when connected, does indeed point to a coordinated effort by a small group of wealthy Jews to restructure world society by controlling its most fundamental resource: food.
Epilogue
To me, the real tragedy in this story is not the individual calamities suffered by a particular landowner or by any particular country. Rather, it is the world’s ignorance of what is happening on a global scale and increasing every year. Henry Kissinger was famous for saying “if you control the oil, you control the economy, and if you control the food, you control the people.” And this is where we are today: a small group of very wealthy and powerful individuals (nearly all Jews) are slowly taking control of the world’s food supply, but no one seems able to connect the dots. All observers seem to consider each transfer of land as somehow a single event, unrelated to anything, when in reality each is part of an extended agenda that has been in practice for decades if not centuries.
Again, this needn’t be a “conspiracy” by a cabal of furtive criminals planning nefarious deeds. It is sufficient for this to simply be a policy generally understood by all participants, with each acting in the same general direction – but in a sense for the common overall good of Jews everywhere. The actions necessary for these people to eventually control the majority of the world’s food supply, can take many forms. War, famine, revolution, development loans, contrived plant and animal disease crises, Donald Trump’s tariffs – all produce this result – which is perhaps lost in the confusion among many other results.
I would remind readers that the same Jewish bankers have followed this same agenda – and are still following it – in the world of petroleum. The Jews in The City of London already control a huge share of the world’s petroleum corporations and production, and were instrumental in fabricating the invasions of Iraq, Libya and Syria – primarily to obtain ownership and control of the oil. This is the same force driving the US today (late 2025) in its fabricated “war on drugs” against Venezuela, and the insanely vacuous claims about Iran’s nuclear weapons – weapons which, according to Benjamin Netanyahu, will be ready for launching in less than two weeks (a claim Netanyahu has made every month for the past 20 years). These are the same people who fabricated Iraq’s “WMD’s” and Saddam’s famous uranium “yellow-cake” document that was later proven to be a Jewish forgery.
I would ask you as an intelligent reader: If the Khazar Jews will fabricate justification for the invasion of a nation (Iraq, for example) and the killing of at least one million people, just to obtain control of the oil, why wouldn’t they arrange the distribution of a bird flu to take control of agricultural land? I covered all the details of Iraq in a prior essay titled Humanity at the Crossroads [36]. Once again, I earnestly recommend you read this to understand the context of what is happening to our world.
I wrote above that this is a class war, and it definitely is that. One of its first purposes is to exterminate the Middle Class and drive everyone down to the Lower Class, and this is true for each individual country, most especially the Western countries with their relatively large Middle Classes. But this is in reality a war against humanity, against the Gentiles and Christians – the “Goyim”, those people who, according to the Jewish Talmud, are merely animals in human form and who were created only to serve Jews.
In my prior essay, Humanity at the Crossroads, I wrote this: “Humankind is at a cusp, a point of transition between two different states of governance and existence. The world today is like a sack being slowly filled while the string around the opening is pulled increasingly tighter to prevent the contents from escaping confinement. The shadows of this future are everywhere to be seen but even the keenest of observers tend to view the portents not as the warnings they are, but instead regard all these pieces of one despairing puzzle as disconnected and unrelated events.”
I wish someone could explain this to American farmers in a way they can understand.
*
Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 34 languages and his articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as well as more than 100 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chap. 2 — Dealing with Demons).
His full archive can be seen at
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/ + https://www.moonofshanghai.com/
He can be contacted at: 2186604556@qq.com
*
NOTES – Part 1
[1] The US War Against Tik-Tok is 100% Jewish
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/15603/
[2] U.S. agricultural export values climb to third-highest level in 2024
https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/ag-and-food-statistics-charting-the-essentials/agricultural-trade
[3] China’s 1959 Famine
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/3234/
[4] America’s Deep State
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/10240/
[5] The Power Behind the Throne (REVISITED)
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/16422/
[6] Biological Warfare in Action — Chapter 7 — US Bird flu
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/14942/
[7] Biological Warfare in Action — Chapter 8 — UK Foot and Mouth Disease
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/14958/
[8] US Bird Flu Outbreak in Poultry: Workers at Higher Risk, CDC Warn
https://news.yahoo.com/us-bird-flu-outbreak-poultry-workers-higher-risk-235518139.html
[9] 2015 United States H5N2 outbreak
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_United_States_H5N2_outbreak
[10] 2015 United States H5N2 outbreak
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_United_States_H5N2_outbreak
[11] What we know about the deadliest U.S. bird flu outbreak in history
https://www.npr.org/2022/12/02/1140076426/what-we-know-about-the-deadliest-u-s-bird-flu-outbreak-in-history
[12] Bird flu is killing millions of chickens and turkeys across the US
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/04/bird-flu-is-killing-millions-of-chickens-and-turkeys-across-the-us/
[13] Bird flu kills close to a record number of poultry in the U.S.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-nears-record-poultry-deaths-bird-flu-virus-type-complicates-fight-2022-10-18/
[14] Bird flu: 50 million birds die in record US outbreak
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63785067
[15] Avian flu outbreak wipes out 50.54 mln U.S. birds, a record
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/avian-flu-outbreak-wipes-out-5054-mln-us-birds-record-2022-11-24/
[16] 2015 United States H5N2 outbreak
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_United_States_H5N2_outbreak
[17] Bird Flu Outbreak 2015: Deadly Virus’ Spread Sparks Questions On Biosecurity, Strict Sanitation Protocols At Poultry Farms
https://www.ibtimes.com/bird-flu-outbreak-2015-deadly-virus-spread-sparks-questions-biosecurity-strict-1910927
[18] Avian flu outbreak wipes out 50.54 mln U.S. birds, a record
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/avian-flu-outbreak-wipes-out-5054-mln-us-birds-record-2022-11-24/
[19] A worrisome new bird flu is spreading in American birds and may be here to stay
https://www.npr.org/2022/04/09/1091491202/bird-flu-2022-avian-influenza-poultry-farms
[20] What we know about the deadliest U.S. bird flu outbreak in history
https://www.npr.org/2022/12/02/1140076426/what-we-know-about-the-deadliest-u-s-bird-flu-outbreak-in-history
[21] Avian Influenza
https://www.woah.org/en/disease/avian-influenza/
[22] Ask the Expert: Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Viruses
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/avianflu/spotlights/2022-2023/avian-flu-highly-pathogenic.htm
[23] Biological Warfare in Action — Chapter 8 — UK Foot and Mouth Disease
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/14958/
[24] Bill Gates, the world’s fourth richest man, has become the largest farmer in the United States!
https://www.mzfxw.com/e/action/ShowInfo.php?classid=17&id=154847
[25]
Gates bought millions of acres of farmland and became the “number one
landlord” in the United States! The land area held is equivalent to that
of Hong Kong
https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_18908922
[26] Bill Gates became the largest farmland owner in the United States, sitting on 242,000 acres of arable land!
https://3g.ali213.net/news/html/569935.html
[27] Bill Gates, the world’s fourth richest man, has become the largest farmer in the United States!
https://www.mzfxw.com/e/action/ShowInfo.php?classid=17&id=154847
[28] Brazilian farmland developer intends to list in Hong Kong
http://info.taojindi.com/127/11076.html
[29]
As the world’s population expands, the demand for arable land will grow
rapidly. At least George Soros, Lord Rothschild and others were
convinced of this.
https://www.fortunechina.com/magazine/c/2009-09/11/content_23935_2.htm
[30] Bet Farm
https://www.fortunechina.com/magazine/c/2009-09/11/content_23935_2.htm
[31] Foreign investors “grab” farmland in poor countries
https://qnck.cyol.com/html/2013-02/27/nw.D110000qnck_20130227_3-05.htm
[32] Foreign investors “grab” farmland in poor countries
https://qnck.cyol.com/html/2013-02/27/nw.D110000qnck_20130227_3-05.htm
[33] Clever plunder! Poor farmers around the world have suffered serious losses in arable land
https://www.apdnews.com/4f36d94
[34] Clever plunder! Poor farmers around the world have suffered serious losses in arable land
https://www.apdnews.com/4f36d94
[35] Bet Farm
https://www.fortunechina.com/magazine/c/2009-09/11/content_23935_2.htm
[36] Humanity at the Crossroads — Connecting the Dots to Our Brave New World
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/2331/
*
This article may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. This content is being made available under the Fair Use doctrine, and is for educational and information purposes only. There is no commercial use of this content.
Other Works by this Author
Who Starts All The Wars? — New!
What we Are Not Told : German POWs in America – What Happened to Them?
The Jewish Hasbara in All its Glory
Democracy – The Most Dangerous Religion
NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 1 — How the US Became Rich
NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 2 — Life in a Failed State
NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 3 — The Branding of America
Police State America Volume One
Police State America Volume Two
THE WORLD OF BIOLOGICAL WARFARE
False Flags and Conspiracy Theories
Kamila Valieva

LARRY ROMANOFF FREE E-BOOKS & PDF ARTICLES
Copyright © Larry Romanoff, Blue Moon of Shanghai, Moon of Shanghai, 2025
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.