Did
you know that the 911 events were perpetrated on the world’s people to cover up
high crimes and treason by Americans against their fellow citizens as well as
to all people on the planet?
Do
you think you know all the facts surrounding 911? If so, think again and take
time to read this important article that you will want to follow as We
the People get busy prosecuting these criminals against humanity. We
have no choice. Once you read this article, even if all you can do is scan the
headers, you will also see that we can no longer ignore evil in our midst or we
will all be exterminated or made into economic slaves.
We
ALL need to be fully aware of the depth and magnitude of the crimes that have
been committed and do something about it so that all people,
from all countries around the world, can be free of the nightmare we have been
living for the last one hundred years. The evidence is overwhelming, and it is
our patriotic duty as a citizens of the United States to know the
horrific DEEP backstory of 911 and to demand that these
criminals, no matter how illustrious their titles and positions, be put on
trial—for the whole world to see.
If
you are not a citizen of the U.S., you have also been violated by these
criminals and need to demand that crimes against humanity be prosecuted
in a world court.
911
INVESTIGATIONS ARE MODERN DAY KABUKI THEATRE TO KEEP YOU FROM KNOWING THE
REAL TRUTH
The
911 Commission Investigation was a complete farce run by Robert Mueller, the
same person who ran the investigation on the BCCI scandal, the Iran-Contra
criminal investigation, and the Noriega-CIA drug investigation.
The
Commissioners of the Investigation of 911 followed no leads, investigated no
banks or brokers, and the case was closed without looking at any evidence, with
28 pages of sealed testimony by Bush and Cheney remaining secret. In the wake
of the total destruction of five buildings in the World Trade Center complex by
the supposed collision of two airplanes, over 15 investigations into a variety
of economic terrorism came to a halt. The culprits of 911 have not been caught
and the real motives have been displaced on to patsy characters and
groups, to name a few, Al Qaeda, Osama Bin Linden, radical Islamic terrorism,
Iraq and Saddam Hussein.
If
you thought 911 was a false flag, then you should be aware of the
bigger false flag that preceded the collapse of the WTC.
By
now you have seen various puzzle pieces to this crime. You have seen how the
U.S. government can legally run false flags against its citizens, how the
military industrial complex is used by the warlord banksters to fund their
operations, how the markets (stocks, bonds, commodities) are rigged, how the U.
S. dollar is on the verge of collapse, and how the global shadow government
works through organizations like the Council on Foreign Relations, the
Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group, and others.
All
of these puzzle pieces are lying on the table in disarray, waiting for a master
“frame” so that all the dots can be connected and the picture of TRUTH can be
revealed. In this article, we are going to show you the FRAME of the picture so
that you will see how each puzzle piece fits together and shows us the horrific
picture of EVIL.
Before
you get started on this article, you may need a “catch up” on 911 and the new
world order agenda. We recommend the documentary Invisible
Empire. Two hours. Excellent and better than anything you will watch on MSM
tonight.
In
this article you will learn:
Who
were the real culprits behind the 911 attacks on the World Trade Center?
What
part did oil cartels, bank cartels, and the CIA play in this attack?
What
foreign intelligence agencies were involved?
Did
the Saudi’s play a major role in the attacks?
Why
was the Office of Naval Intelligence in the Pentagon destroyed by a missile?
When
was the WTC and Pentagon attacks devised and what were the major motives?
What
was the nature of the FBI investigation that was being conducted by the WTC
offices that were bombed?
What
are the names of the criminals responsible?
DETAILS
YOU MAY ALREADY KNOW
After
911, the FBI, ONI, SEC, and all other government agencies now grouped under
Homeland Security focused much of their efforts on “terrorism.” These
investigations included: the theft of national treasuries of Russia and the
Philippines; the use of heroin sales proceeds to fund covert intelligence
operations in in Azerbaijan, Chechnya, Georgia, Afghanistan, Kosovo, etc.;
illegal bribes to various Central Asian oligarchs from major corporate
financial contributors to the Bush campaigns, as well as directly from George
Bush Sr.; illegal gold and money laundering operations; and $280 Billion in
fraudulent Brady Bonds issued to Russian criminal oligarchs.
Conveniently
for the culprits being investigated, the two WTC airplane strikes were direct
hits on the largest traders of U.S. Securities, which were the only trades that
were made on the morning of 911. The FBI center holding the records of
the investigations exploded before the first plane struck. Rescue
teams had already reached the FBI offices before the first plane struck.
Towers 7, 4 and 6 all exploded, and the records in those towers were also
destroyed. The $2.3 trillion that Rumsfeld announced the day before can be
traced to some of these investigations. There was much to be lost by many bankers,
brokers, and CIA politicians and operatives in those investigations.
LET’S
GO DEEPER INTO THE BIGGEST CRIME IN HISTORY
After
years of studying 911, we finally came upon the most revealing, plausible, and
supportable theory so far. All of the evidence should have been
considered in the first 911 Commission but was kept well out of the way of the
public eye. The articles and papers were written by E. P. Heidner in 2008
and although they are eight years old today, the research is even more
compelling now than it was when published. Anyone seriously interested in
prosecuting 911 criminals in world court needs to review these important
documents, research that was compiled BEFORE 911 by the Office of Naval
Intelligence (ONI) in the exact Pentagon offices that were struck by a missile
on 911.
The
crimes entail a network far greater than the Saudis, as we are being led to
believe today. In light of the U.S. move to make it legal to sue foreign
governments for their participation in the terrorist attack on U.S. citizens,
let’s make sure we know exactly who the culprits are as they may be domestic as
well as international criminals.
CITIZENS
WERE MURDERED TO KEEP THIS INFORMATION FROM AMERICANS
What
follows is an abridgement of E. P. Heidner’s The September 11 Commission
Report, Final Report of the Investigation into the Murders of Nicholas Berg,
Eugene Armstrong and Jack Hensley, the Individuals Responsible for the Attack
of the World Trade Center, National Security Issues as the Root Cause for the
Attack on the World Trade Center. March 2008.
The
full document can be found at:
A
condensed version of the report by E. P. Heidner can be found at:
THE BUSH
CRIMINAL FAMILY USES 911 TO HIDE ITS CRIMES
The
Bush criminal family has been propelled into history by “dark ops” across the
globe, funded by the initial theft of the World War II Asian treasuries
recovered by Ferdinand Marcos and subsidized by criminal profits from weapons
for drugs for cash. The involvement of the Bush apparatus in facilitating this
trade between crime organizations, terrorist organizations, and mainstream
political parties is seen in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Chechnya, Albania, Columbia,
Nicaragua, to mention the obvious examples. Using these funds, they have
destabilized these same areas for the sake of controlling oil, while their
Russian/Israeli mafia partners reap the gold and diamond mineral wealth.
There
is however another layer of militancy, where organizations are fronts
for illegal intelligence operations, free of Congressional or Parliamentary
oversight. These are organizations where public leaders can deploy stolen
public treasuries for the purposes of advancing their personal business
interests. They come under such innocuous names as:
International
Republican Institute (not affiliated with the Republican Party)
World
Vision
Wings
of Democracy
US-Azerbaijani
Chamber of Commerce
Office
of Special Plans
Internationale
Weiterbildung und Entwicklung
Azerbaijan
International Operating Company
American
Commonwealth University
These
organization and corporations are only a few of the fronts deployed by this
movement’s members.
In
their proclaimed battle of good versus evil, neoconservatives claim – as did
Hitler and Stalin –that they stand for democracy and patriotism. What they
leave behind in the Philippines, Albania, Chechnya, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan,
Angola, Nicaragua, Afghanistan, Iraq and other places is a new tyranny, the
only difference is that the new tyrannies pay tribute to the “new world
order”: the friends and corporations aligned with the neoconservative movement
and Bush family. What they leave behind in the U.S. is equally tragic,
the subtle theft of untold hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars via:
- Treasury
backed loans from The World Bank, the IMF, and the Inter-American
Development Bank, which end up in Swiss and other off-shore accounts;
- A
fee on all cash transactions of the U.S. Treasury. In their outsourcing of
the various federal functions, every dollar going into and out of the
Treasury flowed through the Riggs Bank, in Washington D.C., of
which Jonathon Bush is a Director, and former Vice Chairman and Director
J. Carter Beese became a founder of the Carlyle Group and an SEC
Commissioner. When attention was focused on the bank for its unwillingness
to clamp down on illegal money laundering, the bank changed its name;
- Secret,
uncompetitive bid contracts for hundreds of billions of dollars that
produce no substantial value, and where even the results of government
audits which report fraud are disregarded.;
It
appears that contrary to what the U.S. Government (under the guidance of George
W. Bush, Jr.) has convinced the public, Muslim terrorists did attack
the World Trade Center, but not for the purpose of jihad. These
Muslim terrorists most likely were contract operatives working under the
guidance of the Mossad and rogue U.S. intelligence operatives. Their
objective was to bring to an end numerous U.S. investigations into secret Swiss
bank accounts and Deutsche Bank transactions which would
have exposed numerous criminal activities by the Russian mafia
and the George HW Bush Sr. intelligence operations going back as far as
1991.
Those
investigations would have exposed:
- illegal
theft of national treasuries of Russia and the Philippines;
- the
use of heroin sales proceeds to fund covert intelligence operations in
Central Asia (mostly in Azerbaijan, Chechnya, Georgia, Afghanistan,
Kosovo, etc.);
- illegal
bribes to various Central Asian oligarchs from major corporate financial
contributors to the Bush campaigns, as well as directly from George Bush
Sr.;
- illegal
gold and money laundering operations; and
- fraudulent Brady Bonds issued
to Russian criminal oligarchs.
Like
the Iran Contra scandal of the 1980’s, George Bush Sr. used a wide
array of illegal activities to fund intelligence operations for a foreign
policy he deemed appropriate, and decided to pursue, without
Congressional confirmation, and in violation of the law. His
administration’s foreign policies were nothing more than illegal activities
developed to take over the Central Asian and Russian oil and gas fields of the
former Soviet Union through use of privately funded armies and financial fraud
– just as he had illegally funded covert activities to promote foreign policy
in Iran and Nicaragua. Illegal activities also included Bush’s payoffs to
Russian oligarchs with ten-year Brady Bonds to ensure the collapse of the
former Soviet Union.
KEY
POINT: However much one may agree with those ‘foreign policy’
objectives, the activities undertaken at Bush’s order were illegal, and
ultimately needed to be covered-up by the destruction of the World Trade
Center, and the senseless murder of thousands of innocent people in the world
since 911.
BUSH
ADMINISTRATION THREATENED WITH EXPOSURE
All
of these illegal activities were threatened with exposure by various
investigations of Swiss accounts by U.S. federal agencies, and possibly the New
York State Tax department. The accounts that were attracting the most
investigative evidence were the Khashoggi accounts,
which were used to hide proceeds from the transfer of the Philippine treasury
stolen by Ferdinand Marcos, with the assistance of George Bush Sr.
Khashoggi’s accounts were linked, through his Azerbaijani banks, to illegal
funding of mercenaries in Central Asia, and probably the Afghan heroin trade,
as well his connections of arranging terrorist events for the Russians.
However, the Russian accounts were rapidly drawing attention as well.
There
were other investigations that threatened to expose a network of illegal
funding, as well as illegal profiteering. These included investigations into
- The
DeutscheBbank and Barrick gold trades investigated by the FBI in
conjunction with the GATA lawsuit (This investigation would have exposed
the gold laundering operations used by the German bank cartel to launder
Russian mafia and Philippine gold);
- The
Swiss accounts of Kazakhstan President Nazarbayev, which led to the
GiffenWilliams-Mobil Oil money laundering scandal (There is evidence that
the Russian mafia associates of Nazarbayev threatened to bring an end to
the investigation);
- The
Swiss accounts of various Russian oligarchs related to the Bank of New
York/Riggs-valmet /Russian mafia money laundering scandal and the illegal
Brady Bonds of September 12, 1991;
- The
export-import loans to Halliburton that probably funded illegal activities
in Angola, Georgia, and Kazakhstan; and
- The
Swiss accounts which held World War II holocaust gold, which would have
been audited as a result of the GATA investigation.
A
potentially bigger time-bomb than any of these investigations would be the
exposure of the September 11, 1991 Brady Bonds. Although a decision to
destroy the World Trade Center was made in late 1998, the execution of the
attack had to be delayed until September 11, 2001 because the cover-up of the
ten year Brady Bond fraud could only be done in conjunction with these bonds
being refinanced on maturity.
KEY
POINT: By declaring a national emergency with the attack on
the World Trade Center, Alan Greenspan – one of the co-initiators of the bonds
with George Bush Sr. and Oliver North – allowed for the refinancing of the
fraudulent Brady Bonds during the activities that followed September 11.
To
ensure the destruction of the FBI and other investigative agency offices in the
various buildings of the World Trade Center, rogue Mossad agents planted
explosivesthroughout Buildings 1, 2, 4, 6 and 7, during the blackout
weekend prior to the attack. This cover-up also required manipulating Muslim
fanatics into creating a diversion which would cover-up the explosions. To
accomplish this, the rogue, Russian-based Mossad used the traditional Mossad to
create and manipulate a false flag operation. Nick Bergwas part of this
operation. The FBI was hot on his trail, and he needed to be silenced.
With
the involvement of Israelis, Russian mafia and German and Swiss bank
executives, it was easy for the intelligence agencies of these countries to
discover the plot, and send warnings to the U.S. government. Top leaders in the
Bush administration were already aware.
Prior
knowledge of this attack was leveraged by a group of bureaucrats and military
professionals, and possibly the president himself (but more likely his father
Bush Sr.), who had pre-inauguration plans to launch attacks on Afghanistan and
Iraq, using the attack as a “Pearl Harbor” justification. Their plan
was to use the incident to further their personal agendas in American foreign
policy: the enrichment of U.S oil interests, and the security of Israel through
the destruction of its enemies in Palestine, Iraq, Iran, and Syria.
BANK
CARTEL OR OIL SYNDICATE – WHO ATTACKED THE WTC?
In
Heidner’s investigation, a bank cartel is outed as attempting to control gold
prices and an oil syndicate allegedly attempting to limit competition in the
Central Asian region. Both of these cartels seem to have motive for disrupting
the money laundering investigations initiated in the late 1990s, continuing
into the present. Both of these cartels had extensive contacts in the murky
underworld of the Russian/Israeli mafia and U.S. Intelligence. They work
together, and use each other’s services. The over-riding question
appears to be: which cartel bears responsibility for the attack on the WTC?
When
the details of Central Asian covert oil operations are explored one finds the
same criminals involved as in the Harken Energy, Iran Contra and BCCI scandals,
the Barrick operation, and the pillage of the Soviet and Philippine treasuries.
The Oil Cartel money laundering paths clumsily and inadvertently intersect at
several places: Deutsch Bank and Union Bank of Switzerland (UBS), Bank of New
York and an interesting parallel involvement by Barrick.
KEY
POINT: These banks continuously “appear” and have active roles in
billion dollar deals which over time are shown to involve fraud, theft,
expropriations, illegal drugs and weapons, or other illegal activities that
leave national treasuries poorer for their involvement and hundreds of millions
of dollars unaccounted for.
By
facilitating and negotiating these deals, these bankers are
co-conspirators. These companies have facilitated the theft of
treasuries from the Soviet Union, France, Czechoslovakia, Kazakhstan, the
Philippines, Angola, and possibly the U.S. These banking organizations – joined
with Enron
Online – have the infrastructure for both rapid global distribution
and high volume capacity required to mask the flow of illegal funds, and
convert them into physical assets (bearer bonds, commodity futures and gold
certificates) which cannot be traced. Time and again, these same financial
institutions are identified as conduits for illegal activity and actively
engage known criminals as business partners, thereby becoming criminals
themselves. Because of their widespread criminal activity, they have been the object
of numerous investigations by agencies across the world.
Equally
important, this information reinforces the theory that the 911 attack was an
attempt to cover up massive money and gold laundering activity by destroying
multiple investigations in the World Trade Center.
We now know that additional investigations were being conducted by the ONI
which was housed in the section of the Pentagon hit by Flight 77. It is now
clear that the actual gold used to kick-off the Durham/Brady Bond scam came
from Swiss accounts managed by the individual responsible for the 1991
Brady Bonds – George HW Bush.
In
that sense, an investigation of those accounts for any reason would have
brought global visibility to a $240 billion “scam” in which the Russian mafia
and George HW Bush, with support from major American financial houses,
attempted to take over major segments of Russian industry during the
privatization of the collapsing Soviet economy, a collapse largely facilitated
by a Bush managed currency destabilization program. It sheds new
light on the growing relations between the Russian mafia and the Bush family
personal investments.
NEOCONS
AND THE PROJECT FOR THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY
The
PNAC is referred to under several names – neo-conservatives, neocons, neokons,
PNAC, and Hillary Clinton’s unidentified “right wing conspiracy.”
“In
1997 a group of neo-conservatives founded the Project for the New
American Century(PNAC) – A year later PNAC called for the removal of Saddam
Hussein’s regime in Iraq – In 2000 they predicted that the shift in US
foreign policy towards that aim would come about slowly, unless there were
“some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor”. That
event happened on September 11th 2001 – Ten people in the Bush administration
were members of PNAC. They include Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul
Wolfowitz, Richard Armitage, John Bolton, Zalmay Khalilzad and member of the
advisory Defense Science Board, Richard Perle” [The Dossier, ukonline.co.uk]
The
publicly acknowledged intent of the PNAC group is the ‘furtherance of
democracy,’ in a manner that was inconceivable under prior U.S.
administrations. Essentially, the PNAC model for U.S. foreign policy is one of
unilateral aggression, putting the U.S. foreign policy in the company of many
historical imperialist powers.
THE
SEPTEMBER 11 COMMISSION REPORT PAGE 108
“Bill
Kristol, (is) one of the most sought-after political commentators in the US,
editor of The Weekly Standard, and President of The Project for a
New American Century. In his talk, entitled U.S. Foreign Policy after
9-11: The Bush Doctrine, Kristol declared that “for the U.S., the
world really changed on September 11. We are no longer prepared to rely mainly
on negotiations, trade pressures, arms control regimes and international
institutions in order to solve critical world problems. The Israeli operation
against the Iraqi nuclear reactor in Osirak is our new paradigm. Time is not on
our side. We need to act soon, act preemptively, and act alone if necessary.
Osirak is now the model of how foreign policy has to be conducted,” said
Kristol. “Indeed, today the U.S. is committed to forcing regime change in Iran,
Iraq, and North Korea,” continued Kristol. “We will be much more aggressive in
pursuing this goal; no longer are we content to wait for history to work things
through. Unfortunately, Europe does not yet seem to understand our new world.
They wish to return to pre-September 2001 rules.” [Begin –Sadat Center For
Strategic Studies, May 2002 No. 14 ]
The
background of many of these key policy players, however, suggests they are far
more interested in the security of Israel than that of the U.S.
Two of the key architects of this group – Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz-
have a well-documented (both Congressional and FBI investigations) past of
being alleged agents for the Israeli government, and have been directly
responsible for the employment by U.S. Policy making groups (Office of Special
Plans- OSP) of at least four other similarly documented and alleged agents of
Israel: Douglas
J. Feith (Undersecretary of Defense for Policy), Lawrence
Franklin (under investigation by the FBI as being a potential
Israeli spy), Michael
Ledeen, and Dr.
Stephen Bryen. Lawrence Franklin works in an office overseen by Douglas J.
Feith, the Defense Undersecretary for Policy. Feith was an influential aide to
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Also included in this list is Dr. Rabbi Dov Zakheim, who at
the time was acting as chief-financial officer for the Department of Defense. A
signer of the “Pearl Harbor” statement and an original member of the PNAC.
[www.shaalvim.org]
From
all available evidence it was these “unofficial” political advisers organized
by Wolfowitz, Feith, and Rumsfeld in the U.S. Office of Special Planning (OSP)
who were the sources of the fabricated evidence, which was used to “justify”
the invasion and occupation of Iraq. These fabrications which took America to
war with Iraq were based on a long standing Likud
policy paper authored by Perle and Feith in 1996.
“The
OSP and the other members of the networks that operated throughout key U.S. agencies
shared a right-wing, pro-militarist ideology and are fanatically pro-Israel.
Feith and Perle authored an infamous policy paper in 1996 for the Likud Party
extremist, Benjamin Netanyahu, entitled A Clean Break: A New Strategy
for Securing the Realm. This strategy called for the destruction of Saddam
Hussein and his replacement by a Hashemite monarch. Syria, Lebanon, Saudi
Arabia and Iran would then have to be overthrown or destabilized for Israel to
be secure in a kind of ‘Greater U.S.-Israel Co-Prosperity Sphere.’ The OSP was
an arm of the Wolfowitz-Feith policy of furthering the policies of the most
extremist groups of the Sharon regime, forging close ties with a parallel ad
hoc intelligence operation in the Israeli regime according to a report from the
British newspaper, The Guardian.” [Who Fabricated the Iraq War
Threat: An Inside View, James Petras, Centre for Research on Globalisation,
August 22, 2003]
KEY
POINT: To that end, the invasion of Iraq was as much a foregone conclusion as
was the invasion of Afghanistan. It was a decision made by this group years
before the ‘weapons of mass destruction’ excuse was presented to the public as
the rationale for invasion, and years before the attack on the World Trade
Center.
Both
so called “conspiracy” interpretations (one in which oil interests are
responsible, another in which pro-Israeli Neocons are responsible) provide
compelling insights, and may explain the Bush administration’s behavior after
the WTC tragedy, but do little to explain events leading up to the attack. The
hard truth is, this tragedy was beginning to unfold long before Bush won the
election, and before he won the Republican National convention. President Bush
initially declined the recommendations of the PNAC, preferring to invade Afghanistan
before paying attention to Iraq.
BUSH
CRIMINAL VEHICLES – DILIGENCE, NEW BRIDGE, FARWEST
The
Bush family criminal cartel used numerous private intelligence agencies to
carry out black ops activities in America and throughout the world. Here
are some of the key players in two of those intelligence agencies named
Diligence and New Bridge. Both of these companies had ongoing business
involvement with the Bush family as well as Shiek Kamal Adham and Adnan
Khashoggi.
- Joe
Allbaugh, the deputy chairman of Diligence, resigned his post as head of
FEMA on March 1, 2003, a post granted to him after serving as National
Campaign Manager for the Bush-Cheney 2000 election and chief of staff to
then-Gov. Bush of Texas.
- Neil
Bush has been paid a $60,000 annual consulting fee. Neil’s role is to
“help companies secure contracts in Iraq,” according to the Financial
Times reports.
- Lord
Powell of Bayswater (also on the Board of Barrick, with Adham and
Khashoggi), representative of the Rothschild family investment firms.
- Richard
Burt: chairman of Diligence, was a Director of Deutsche Bank-Alex Brown
fund, former U.S. Ambassador to Germany.
- Ed
Rogers and Lanny Griffith, former George H.W. Bush aids. Ed Rogers has
been a lobbyist for Shiek Kamal Adham and Adnan Khoshoggi, as well as the
Russian Alpha Group/Alpha Bank owned by Mikhail Friedman.
- President
of the company, John Howland, and principal Jamal Daniel were business
partners of first brother Neil Bush
- Whitley
Bruner, formerly head of the CIA Baghdad station, then director of the
Iraq branch of Diligence.
Farwest
is primarily a drug operation, there are some very well placed members of the
Bush apparatus dealing with them. It might be easy to conclude that this
Russian mafia Farwest-Diligence network is irrelevant and proves nothing
regarding 9/11. With some reflection however, the implications are very
significant:
- It
demonstrates that Adnan Khashoggi, a key participant in multiple aspects
of the 9/11 motive and planning, clearly has no hesitation to facilitate
operations which result in political terror and mass murder, and a
documented track record of doing just that.
- It
demonstrates that the Bush family financial apparatus, including Dick
Cheney, conducts on-going business with an organization (Farwest) that
arranges contract political terror using Muslim terrorists with the same
background as Al Qaeda, and is a major drug conduit.
- It
demonstrates that the Russian/Israeli Mafia family (the Yeltsin Family in
particular) that has reaped billions of dollars from Bush largesse since
1991 uses the same political terrorist professionals as the Bush Family.
- It
demonstrates that the Bush Family had other channels besides Armitage and
Secord to hire Al Qaeda trained mercenaries.
- It
demonstrates that Sibel Edmonds could easily have translated conversations
which demonstrated major U.S. political connections to drug deals and
money laundering in Central Asia. The Chechnyan crime operation is linked
to the Yeltsin Family, Farwest, and Diligence, and hence in many ways to
the Bush political and family network.
THE
IRAN-CONTRA/AZERBAIJAN CRIMINAL SYNDICATE
Adnan
Khashoggi – UBS Union Bank of Switzerland – George Bush, Sr. & Jr. –
Deutsche Bank – Richard Secord – Credit Suisse – Richard L Armitage –
BCCI (later Indosuez) – Farhad Azima – Bank of New York – Richard Cheney
– Potomac Capital Inc. – Porter Goss – Khalid bin Mafhouz
All
reports seem to suggest the group above represents the core of an organized,
criminal syndicate operating over a twenty-year span, across the globe. As
a syndicate, they had a great deal to hide, and much to gain by the destruction
of evidence in the various investigative offices of the World Trade Center.
However, they had no more – and maybe even less – incentive than the Russian
mafia, the Italian mafia, or the Columbian drug cartel. What all these
syndicates had in common, besides criminal activity, is their use of these
banks. Deutsche Bank represented a global pipeline for money, and UBS
was the primary holding tank. Other, smaller Swiss banks were under intense
investigation that involved transactions from New York and Deutsche Bank, and
accounts that had secreted away the treasuries of many nations; these can be
best described as the criminal nouveau riche skimming a small piece- table
scraps from the German cartel take.
Prior
to 1998, the Swiss banks had never had to give up the criminal proceeds of its
many customers. If it hadn’t been for a negotiated ‘deal’ by Edgar
Bronfman on the Marcos and Nazi gold, independent investigators would have
continued to drill down into those accounts and their audit trails. This
Bronfman deal, however, was not enough to shut down other investigations: the
GATA lawsuit and FBI investigation, Kazakhstan-gate, Angolagate, Pakistani/CIA
heroin trafficking and more. The attack on the WTC diverted the
attention the entirety of the world’s largest investigative bodies, and
destroyed whatever working papers they may have had. Given the evidence
known today, planning for the attack started in 1998. The cover
story offered by the leadership of a probable criminal syndicate is that Al
Qaeda orchestrated this attack, when the truth is more likely that the attack
was orchestrated by a bigger, more powerful cartel that could easily blackmail
the U.S. government into support and a cover-up if it needed to do that.
With
the success of Harken
pump and dump behind him, and towards the end of his presidency, the
record will show that Bush Sr. sent trusted operatives (Secord, Armitage and
Giffen) into Central Asia. They made significant inroads into bringing
investment capital to the region, and building trusting relationships with the
corrupt dictators that ran those countries. Key members of the Iran-Contra
group controlled major information resources for this area were the Azerbaijan
American Chamber of Commerce and the Kazakhstan Oil Advisory Council.
They pumped the opportunity to justify loans of billions of U.S. taxpayer
dollars in the region from the Overseas Private Investment Corporation and the
U.S. Export-Import Bank. This opportunity was significantly overstated by 93%
to 96% according to more recent, third party estimates. With the price of oil
being pumped to all-time highs in 2005, properties in Central Asia are now
being sold-off to Russian and Chinese investors. Central Asia became the
world’s largest pump and dump scam.
BUSH’S
ILLEGAL, COVERT SUPPORT OF AZERBAJAN
In
Azerbaijan, one finds a large cast of participants all linked through
supporting roles in the Iran-Contra Scandal and its cover-up. These individuals
are:
- Adnan
Khashoggi, whose Azerbaijan banks played a big part in the formation of
terrorist camps and in the opening of laboratories for developing chemical
and bacteriological weapons in Nagornyy Karabakh.
- Richard
Secord, a former U.S. Air Force major general who been helping to recruit
and train the Azerbaijani army as well as regional secret services;
- Richard
Armitage, acting as a consultant to Halliburton and Unocal at the time,
and President of the US-Azerbaijani Chamber of Commerce;
- Farhad
Azima, arms merchant with Iranian background, member of
US-Azerbaijani Chamber of Commerce, assisted Richard Secord in recruiting
and training mujahedin mercenaries, owns the Azerbaijan Airlines, and has
a twenty-year relationship with the Bush family enterprise;
- Khalid
bin Mahfouz, owner, with the bin Laden family and members of the Saudi
royal family of the Saudi companies Delta Oil and Nimir Oil. Both are
partners with Unocal in Azerbaijan.
- Dick
Cheney, as CEO of Halliburton, lobbyist for the Azerbaijan International
Operating Company, on US-Azerbaijani Chamber of Commerce;
- David
Kimche, Israeli Mossad agent who brought Israeli agents into Azerbaijan at
the request of Secord, and worked with Secord and the regional secret
service organizations.
The
essence of the Azerbaijan operation was an effort by former Iran-Contra
conspirators to illegally support (support was made illegal by the U.S.
Congress) the despotic government of Azerbaijan in its war against Russian backed
Armenia. In doing so, they supposedly sought to protect U.S. and Saudi oil
interests in western access to the Caspian Oil basin, the four largest oil
fields in the region. They did so by illegally recruiting Afghan mujahedin
mercenaries to fight for Azerbaijan (against Russian backed Armenians), using
Mega Oil as the financial cover. This approach appears to be part of the CIA
handbook. This same approach of using an oil company as cover for covert
operations was used in the 1970s, with right wing CIA trained death squads in
South America masquerading as Bridas employees. This is the same Bridas that
competed for the Afghan pipeline rights.
It
is of small historic note that of the mercenaries procured by Secord, one of
them was actually Osama Bin laden. Secord also brought the Mossad into
Azerbaijan, which confirms reports that Israelis fought side-by-side with
mujahedin. In the news report of David Kimche’s
involvement, is an important observation that not only are the Mossad in
Azerbaijan, but that the secret service organizations of Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan
and Uzbekistan were all working in unison with the Mossad and Richard Secord.
When
trying to understand why such a high powered team as the Iran-Contra/October
Surprise team – is reconstructed in a little country like Azerbaijan, it
becomes clear that Azerbaijan is merely a base of operations for the
broader Central Asian operation initiated by Bush in 1991. Secord’s
employer in this operation – President Heydar Aliyev– was no
novice in the realm of covert operations, being a former top KGB official. The
operations were covert because American support was illegal according to Section 907 of the Freedom
Support Act.
The
fact that Congress had outlawed support to Azerbaijan would not have mattered
to Secord. At the heart of the Iran-Contra controversy was a Congressional ban
on aid to the Contras strikingly similar to Section 907, and Secord’s primary
role in that first scandal was as the head of a private corporation which
worked at the behest of Oliver North for covert and illegal weapons procurement
for the Nicaraguan Contras. Secord appears to have been violating
congressional intent in Azerbaijan exactly as he had for the Contras. It
should not be assumed that he was just once again demonstrating patriotic
fervor. Many forget that Secord’s involvement in the Iran-Contra Affair was
motivated to a large degree by personal profit. Secord was reportedly
investigated by the U.S. Department of Justice for his involvement in
Azerbaijan, but there has been no mention of this report in the U.S. press, and
the investigation appears to have been buried.
The
collapse of the Azerbaijan regime was prevented by this tactic long enough so
that when 911 occurred, the Bush administration was able to remove the
law that prevented the U.S. from giving aid to despotic governments.
“The
USACC Advisory Board consisted of “only” these seven men: Dr. Henry Kissinger,
James A Baker III, Lloyd Bentsen, Zibigniew Brzezinski, Dick Cheney, Brent
Scowcroft, John Sununu. It is noted here that the current Vice President’s
daughter, Elizabeth Cheney-Perry, has been named Assistant Secretary of State
for Near East Affairs for regional economic issues; she left Armitage
Associates for the job. The USACC Vice-Chairman of the Board is James A. Baker
IV (Baker Botts, L.L.P.); Chairman Emeritus is T. Don Stacy (VP, Amoco); with
Richard Armitage as Board President, until he resigned to become Colin Powell’s
Deputy, which rounds out the US elite running the USACC. The remaining Board of
Directors are a who’s who of the oil and gas multinational corporate interests
of the west and specifically the United States. On the Board of Trustees or
USACC the latter interests hold sway again with three primary exceptions:
Senator Sam Brownback (`R-KS`) and Joseph R. Pitts (`R-PA`) (whose efforts
formed the 1996 legislative backbone of the House/Senate Silk Road Strategy for
Afghanistan, [Unocal, Texaco] et al) and Richard Perle (US Defense Policy
Board). The Legal Counsel for USACC is Ted Jones of the Texas Law firm Baker Botts
L.L.P. (James A Baker III & IV’s law firm.); Treasurer is Karl Mattison
(VP, Riggs Bank, NA). It was the James A. Baker III Institute of Rice
University which outlined the Cheney Strategic Energy Initiative which later
became the Administration’s Strategic Energy National Security Policy. (Clearly
Dick Cheney wouldn’t be interested in giving Congress the names of who he
consulted on the Energy Initiative as they would amount to the remainder of the
Board of Directors and Board of Trustees of USACC.)” [U.S. political
objectives in the Middle East Will Fail, Creating a New Cold War with China and
Russia; Target is Iran not Iraq., by Craig B Hulet]
WARS
FOR PIPELINES AND HEROIN DIVERSION FOR MONEY LAUNDERING
A
large segment of the Bush administration’s national security and defense
planning structure came from the energy industry, and set national defense
policy lends some suspicion to the objectivity of that policy. Any and
all arguments might easily lead one to conclude that the invasions of Iraq and
Afghanistan sparked by the attack on the World Trade Center were conducted more
for the benefit of the American oil industry that for the sake of world
security against “terrorists.” Although conspiracy theorists could
make an argument that the invasion of Afghanistan was meant to control the
world heroin trade, with Afghanistan producing 80% to 90% of the world’s
heroin. The world narcotics industry is larger than the gas and oil industry
combined, and more profitable.
The
WTC did not have to be destroyed for the Central Asian pipeline deals in
Afghanistan and Azerbaijan to be successful. However, the bribes and money
laundering behind these pipeline deals were illegal, and the
investigative evidence pointing to the money laundering was the target of the
attack on the WTC. While the actual illegal trading and bribing activity
leaves very little physical evidence, money always leaves an audit
trail, and that trail was being tracked and documented in Building Seven, the
North Tower and Buildings Four and Six– hence the need to destroy the entire
World Trade Center. In a manner highly reminiscent of the investigation of
the BCCI bank fraud, once the bank’s criminal activities were exposed, bank
records in England were destroyed in multiple warehouses by no less than seven
separate fires, and sixteen material witnesses were murdered.
“The
Manhattan D.A. who closed the American branch (of the BCCI) announced that 16
witnesses had died in the course of investigating the bank’s entanglements in
covert operations of the CIA, arms smuggling to Iraq, money laundering and
child prostitution.” [The False Memory Alex Constantine, Copyright © January,
1996]
The
individuals involved in the destruction of the warehouses of BCCI evidence and
the destruction of the WTC are same the individuals linked to the Central Asian
money laundering crimes as well as the theft of Russian and Philippine gold
treasuries. Understanding that the invasion of Afghanistan was not a necessary
condition for the securing of the pipelines allows the analysis to entertain
other theories as to why these individuals felt the need to murder thousands of
people in the WTC attacks.
A
PATTERN EMERGES AS TIME UNFOLDS TRUTH
Events
in Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Afghanistan, and related activities in Angola are
generally viewed as independent senarios, but should not be. When approached
from the perspective of four separate, but linked operations, there is a
consistent pattern that is not obvious when analyzing these events one at a
time.
- Each
operation involves brutal warlords or dictators controlling access to oil.
- Each
operation includes reports of U.S. agents trying to legally control access
to that oil by aiding and abetting these dictators and warlords with
bribes and IMF loans.
- Each
operation involves the provision of weapons, mercenaries, and bribes in
exchange for mineral, oil, or pipeline rights.
- Each
operation involves complex money laundering schemes, involving billions of
U.S. taxpayer dollars provided by the U.S. Export-Import Bank and the IMF.
- Each
operation involves Halliburton, Saudi oil, and American oil companies.
- Each
operation involves money flowing through the Deutsche Bank and/or the
Union Bank of Switzerland (UBS.)
KEY
POINT: The same people are found to be conducting these
activities: Russian/Israeli mafia provides the weapons; the German/Swiss
Banking Cartel moves and hides the money (for very significant profit), and the
western oil companies claim the oil revenues. There are generally a number of
smaller banks and other financial intermediaries involved, but the final
resting place of the stolen treasuries generally appears to be a solid bank
with vaults deep in the Swiss Alps.
The
provision of illegal weapons around the globe is heavily dominated by the
Israeli/Russian mafia, who source their weapons from former Soviet regimes as
well as Israeli firms. Even when the U.S. intelligence agencies wanted weapons
for the Contra rebels, they turned to Russian/Israeli traders (Russians seeking
protection from international law in Israel, with a good participation by
indigenous Israelis.) With the arms merchants, comes the same banking network,
the same German banking cartel, generally fronted by Deutsche Bank. However,
and all too often, news reporters and investigators lose track of most of the
money. That is because the real profiteers are the bankers, with the
old bloodlines of Europe.
These
oil and gas operations, however, help expose a larger criminal pattern. In
this pattern, the leaders of these countries allow their national treasuries to
be siphoned-off in an array of financial maneuvers abetted by large
corporations and international scam artists, and hide this money with the
expertise of the German/Swiss Banking Cartel. This pattern is exposed
in Germany, the Soviet Union, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Afghanistan, Angola, and
Philippines and with all probability, the US.
Here
is the larger story: the theft of these treasuries is what the destruction of
the WTC was meant to cover-up. Investigations into these
lesser operations in Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Afghanistan and Angola would have
stumbled on Swiss and Deutsche Bank accounts and transfers that, if
investigated, would expose a grander scheme.
Not
widely reported: The U.S. government somehow “misplaced” $ 3.3 trillion during
the late 1990s. Donald Rumsfeld announced to the press on September 10, 2001
that $ 2.2 trillion was missing from the DOD accounts – but
the world was too preoccupied the next day to worry about the world’s
largest heist.
The
interesting point made by Catherine Fitts (Former Assistant Secretary of
Housing, First Bush Administration) is that the same people involved in the
BCCI fraud, (hence the theft of the Russian and Philippine treasuries) are now
associated with what some call the world’s largest money-laundering scheme –
Enron – about the same time as the $ 3.3 trillion goes missing from the U.S.
Treasury.
The
money of the various oil operations involved in Central Asia (including
Halliburton and Enron, both key players in Afghanistan) starts to cross paths
at the Deutsche Bank and UBS. Here is where one finds the ‘old men of
Europe’ – secretive names that rarely show up in the press, and old family
names changed to hide the lineage. Here is where the money stops.
When all the investigations spawned by the money-laundering of the late 1990s
began to narrow the search to these banks, it was these old men and families of
Europe who had to be protected. These are the families that “own” the
banks through holding companies based in offshore countries, where the laws are
controlled so that the owners’ names do not need to be divulged. The
physical assets however, are in Swiss vaults, as the offshore banks can never
offer the types of security guarantees offered by a Swiss bank. Here, they can
be ‘frozen’ under a new set of anti-money laundering laws that went into effect
in 1998, thus magnifying the risk the U.S. investigations posed.
CLUES
THAT POINT TO MONEY LAUNDERING
To
fully understand the Afghani events, which many 911 writers and truthers focus
on, one must understand a coordinated set of covert activities being undertaken
in Central Asia at that time. Prior to the attack on the World Trade Center,
there were a number of seemingly independent, U.S. covert operations occurring
in many Central Asian countries, but primarily: Afghanistan, Kazakhstan,
Azerbaijan, and Uzbekistan. This suggests the Kazakhstan operation is also
linked to covert activities in Angola. The central figures in these
‘theatres of operations’ are Richard Cheney, Richard Secord, Richard Armitage
and George Bush Sr. Research demonstrates that covert activities in
these regions were supported by additional participants from the Iran-Contra
and October Surprise Scandals of the 1980s. These participants include David
Kimche (Mossad), Adnan Khashoggi (Saudi), and Farhad Azima (arms merchant and
airline owner). The central institutions in these operations are Halliburton,
Unocal, Delta Oil, Enron, Union Bank of Switzerland (UBS), Credit Suisse, the
Bank of New York, and the Deutsche Bank. In the background of these operations
one finds the Russian/Israeli mafia and arms merchants. Their base of
operations was Azerbaijan.
This
is an extremely high-powered group of individuals which had been thoroughly
tested on more than one occasion in its ability to execute large scale covert
operations and maintain silence in the face of being ‘caught in the act.’ They
were the “A” team.
KEY
QUESTION: Their reunion in Azerbaijan demands an answer to the
question: “Why was this high powered team working together in a small,
impoverished corner of the world?”
This
group – more so than Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda – had the wherewithal to
direct the events of 911. More importantly, it will be shown that Osama Bin
Laden (and his mujahedin) was a contractor to this group, and that even up to
2001, the press was reporting that Osama Bin Laden was a figurehead for Al
Qaeda, with the real leadership being unknown. Kimche, as an integral member of
this A-team, had developed a loyal following with ex-KGB agents he had helped
escape to Israel, and had access to both the Mossad and the Russian/Israeli
mafia. Together, this A-Team had access to all the right
resources, had connections to the same banks and had a vested interest in
helping bring to an end the investigations into their gold and
money-laundering, illegal bribes and securities fraud.
There
are three primary clues in the volumes of 9/11 data that point to the
conclusion that the attack on the WTC was an attempt to stop investigations
into money-laundering. Each clue reinforces the legitimacy of the other clues.
The
accusation of Sibel
Edmonds, an FBI translator who was silenced with a constraining order from
public comment by Attorney General Ashcroft. After the attack on the WTC,
the FBI hired extra translators to help with a backlog of taped phone
transmissions. One of these translators was Sibel Edmonds who has gone on
public record accusing the Bush administration of covering up its knowledge of
events which would help explain 9/11. Sibel Edmonds – after reading and
interpreting raw intelligence data – contends that the 9/11 perpetrators were
protected by Dick Cheney’s “intelligence block” which prevented the
investigation into terrorists. Since making her accusations, she has been
silenced by a restraining order from U.S. Attorney General Ashcroft, in the
name of national security. She was translating intercepts of Azerbaijani
businessmen or politicians that were involved in laundering large quantities of
cash raised by Afghan heroin smuggling. She has also made clear that the drug
dealers and the arms dealers are mixed up together and that the divisions
become blurred between these organizations.
So,
what kind of people have experience in money laundering, arms smuggling, and
drug smuggling, but who also are known to have been involved in Azerbaijan? The
most famous Americans with such experience are the veterans of the Laos war
during Vietnam. Many of them were later implicated in the Iran-Contra affair,
which, of course, involved money laundering, arms, and drug smuggling. Among
these crafty spooks are such veterans as Richard Secord, Heinie Aderholt,
Farhad Azima and Richard Armitage. Sibel personally identified ten
well-known Americans who are politicians and heads of federal agencies linked
to drug-money laundering in the federal banking system which was used for
political campaigns–but also linked to financing the World Trade
Center/Pentagon 9-11 attacks. She has yet to divulge the names. [Missile
& remote control systems added to small jets before 9-11; same parts found
at Pentagon, Tom Flocco, TomFlocco.com, 5/26/2005]
The
co-location in the North Tower of the WTC of the FBI investigation into two
seemingly independent crimes: illegal gold trades and Kazakhstangate – the
illegal payment of bribes to Kazakhstan officials by Mobil Oil representatives
Giffen and Williams. Co-location suggests the two investigations
were related, but there is other reason to believe that to be the case.
Additional evidence suggests the money laundering involved in both cases
crosses paths through the Deutsche Bank and Credit Suisse. Evidence is later
presented in the report which indicates that the secret services of Kazakhstan
and Azerbaijan were working together, in unison with Richard Secord and David
Kimche (Mossad), so any investigation into Kazakhstan bank accounts probably
would have carried over into Azerbaijani bank activity.
FBI
counter-terrorism chief John O’Neill’s made the accusation that Vice President
Dick Cheney officially blocked investigation into Afghan terrorist activities
by the FBI so to protect oil industry interests. O’Neill’s accusations,
however, are broader than just Dick Cheney’s “intelligence block.” As early as
1996, the Department of State had been blocking his investigations in the
Middle East – Yemen and Saudi Arabia specifically.
These
clues (1. the accusations of Sibel Edmonds, 2. the FBI investigations into
Kazakhstan, and 3. the accusations of John O’Neill) point to five distinctly
separate, but inherently related sets of events, occurring in the same time
period – starting in the early 1990s through 2001. Together, these seemingly
unrelated events demonstrate a larger pattern of investigation into the
German banking cartel by U.S. investigators.
- The
James Giffen Credit Suisse scandal involving Mobil Oil, Phillips Oil,
Chevron and Halliburton in Kazakhstan, which while reported as isolated to
UBS, seems to avoid reporting involvement of Marc Rich (Russian
mafia/Israeli) and his use of the Bank of New York/Cayman Islands/Deutsche
Bank chain for his money laundering and oil swap operations;
- The
Mega Oil operations in Azerbaijan, involving the former Iran-Contra guns
for drugs operatives and their UBS accounts;
- Enron
and Unocal operations in Afghanistan and Pakistan, using Deutsche Bank
channels to funnel money through the Pakistanis to the Afghanis;
- The
Kevin Ingram scandal in which this Deutsche Bank executive was convicted
of laundering money for weapons purchases for Muslim terrorists through
Pakistani agents; and
- The
Bank of New York Russian money laundering scandal, in which Russian funds
were being sent back to Russia via the Cayman Islands, where they were
being picked up by the Deutsche Bank and Banker’s Trust.
These
were the five incidents brought to light as part of a broader investigation by
the agencies housed in the WTC. Together they suggest that consecutive
U.S. administrations had sought to further the interests of the U.S. and Saudi
Oil companies in Central Asia and Russia, and had undertaken covert operations
to do so. In and by itself, while these activities to some may be
reprehensible, they are not all illegal. There is, however, a common thread
buried in the detail which is illegal: money laundering used for
heroin, weapons and bribes, as well as at least three assassinations.
Finally,
lest not anyone forget, there were probably up to several trillion
dollars of stolen national treasuries open to discovery and disclosure in these
accounts. With the same players being involved in so many of these
activities, their German/Swiss bank accounts represents a house of cards, and
any one investigation into any one of the aforementioned crimes could lead to a
major exposure of the world’s greatest criminals – and their criminal bankers!
RIGGS
BANK AND RUSSIA
In
summarizing the role of Riggs
Valmet, what the timeline of world events shows is that George Bush steered
the re-financing of third world debt under the astute guidance of the
soon-to-become Enron Vice President Robert Hermann. During this refinance
process (according to ONI released documents), an undisclosed amount of
financial collateral “disappeared” into the U.S. banking system, thus delaying
the re-settlement of the third world debt. In the meantime, George Bush’s
brother Jonathon, who was in charge of investments for Riggs Financial
Management, took controlling interest in a company called Valmet, and opened a
Swiss subsidiary, which became the financial consultants to the KGB and future
criminal oligarchs of Russia and other criminal groups.
The
Riggs Valmet “consultants” helped the KGB and oligarchs create Bank Menatep,
which later became a business partner with Riggs, in owning an undisputed
money-laundering, tax evasion vehicle for its Russian and U.S. customers. It is
speculated that the third world debt collateral was withheld long enough that
the Soviet economy collapsed due to lack of capitalization, the goal of the
destabilization program. The collateral funds – or part of the $300 billion
plus that could have been generated in interest by the missing third world debt
collateral – were then restored to Yelstin by George Bush Sr. Yeltsin then
moved the collateral funds into Bank Menatep, that proceeded to use the funding
with the Yeltsin oligarchs to “buy-up” Russian industry for pennies on the
dollar.
Through
an array of financial actions, that wealth was then transferred through Nordex,
Marc Rich, the Bank of New York, Riggs Valmet (and its shell companies) and
several other banks identified collectively by Ambassador Leo Wanta and the
Office of Naval Intelligence, to Swiss and German banks, while nominally ‘held’
in off-shore banks.
In
creating the “cash” that was to fund the oligarchs’ takeover of Russian
industry in 1991, a $240 billion jump in the M3 measure of money would have to
occur if regular Federal Reserve or large bank channels were used, and there
was no such jump.Having the bonds backed by “private” collateral –
such as the Durham Trust or Swiss gold – the generation of the money supply did
not need to settle through any bank linked to the Federal Reserve, especially
if they were shopped overseas, which is what happened. They were funded via
Israel and supposedly backed by gold from Switzerland, according to the
released documents.
KEY
POINT: The Marcos gold confiscated by George Bush, Sr. (and
acknowledged to exist in records from Congressional hearings as a source of funding
for Iran-Contra operations) or the Russian treasury gold (theft of which was
facilitated by Leo Wanta), probably served as collateral for these loans.
The interesting thing to keep in mind is that if Brady type bond payments are
defaulted, the maturity value is guaranteed by U.S. Treasury Bonds, thereby
explaining the need for the Federal Reserve intervention of 2001.
The
German /Suisse banks referenced in the investigation include those very banks
reported to be at the heart of the need to cover up investigations at the World
Trade Center: Credit Suisse, Union Bank of Switzerland, Deutsch Bank, Dresdner
Bank, and now, including Westdeutsche Landesbank.
YELTSIN
FAMILY AND THE INVESTIGATIONS IN THE WORLD TRADE CENTER
There
were at least seven active investigations into the Yeltsin family when
the World Trade Center – home of the U.S. major financial investigative
organizations – went down. In all probability, there might have
been up to fifteen or twenty investigations opened, and most of them would never
see the light of day. All of these investigations are tied to
accounts that would ultimately link back to the Bush family financing.
- In
1998, Loutchansky, Marc Rich and Berezovsky (Berezovskii) – all associates
of the Yeltsin family – were being investigated in conjunction with the
Bank of New York money-laundering scandal that the Bush administration,
(through Ashcroft) first tried to bury as insignificant – only to have it
put back on the front page of the press by Swiss investigators, and then
Russian investigators. This investigation opened inroads into accounts at
Menatep Bank, Runicom, Inkombank, EuropeanUnion bank, Riggs Valmet, Bank
Rossisky-Kredit, Alpha Bank, many of which were linked to Bush operatives
and the Yeltsin Family counterparts going as far back as 1991.
- Nazarbayev
and his Swiss accounts were being investigated by the Swiss for illegal
activities, linked to Bush Sr. and Richard Cheney in the Griffen scandal.
- Later
Mikhail Khodorkovsky would be implicated in the Bank of New York money
laundering scandal because of his control of Menatep Bank, but would be
more closely tied to use of the Riggs Valmet money-laundering conduit. His
imprisonment for tax evasion would be portrayed in the U.S. press as
“political” repression by the Putin regime, and hardly a mention of the
Riggs Bank connection would be published. The Bush family remained loyal
to Khodorkovsky after his arrest, with George Bush Jr. acting on his
behalf.
“Upon
his arrest, Khodorkovsky’s secretive business arrangement with the Rothschild
family was exposed, as Jacob Rothschild took over Khodorkovsky’s 26% control of
Yukos. Khodorkovsky’s seat on the board of directors for Yukos went to former
Halliburton executive Edgar Ortiz, a former Halliburton vice president during
US Vice President Dick Cheney’s time as Halliburton CEO, and as President and
CEO of Halliburton, took over the relationship with the State Oil Company of
Azerbaijan Republic (SOCAR).” (See Halliburton Man to Sub for
Khodorkovsky, Simon Ostrovsky, Moscow Times, April 30, 2004.)
Yeltsin’s
accounts in UBS were being investigated by the Swiss at the same time as the
1998 decision to attack the World Trade Center was made.
Loutchansky,
as shown earlier, was being investigated by the Swiss as well.
The
missing Russian treasury gold was probably under scrutiny by the FBI
investigation of gold-price fixing, an investigation that would have
encompassed accounts from Barrick Gold and Deutsche Bank.
The
Westdeutsche Landesbank related money-laundering of Boris Berezovsky and Roman
Abramovich.
All
of the investigations targeted individuals who were at some point financed by
Bush Sr. and his business associates, and used government funds to fraudulently
enrich various business partners and themselves. All the investigations
were housed in the World Trade Center. All of these Russian/Israeli mafia
frauds were being investigated by agencies in the WTC and had their
investigative resources refocused on “Al Qaeda.” It should not be
forgotten that Al Qaeda has been a documented CIA front established under
George Bush Sr. when he was CIA Director, then continuing as he became Vice
President and officially the chief of National Security under Reagan, and as
President.
KEY
POINT: As the senior U.S. Intelligence czar for 20 years, if anyone ever
‘owned’ Al Qaeda, it was George HW Bush.
GERMAN
AND SWISS GOLD HOLDINGS OF THE NAZI, MARCOS, AND OTHERS
There
are a number of Swiss banks that regularly are mentioned in reports of
money-laundering and protection of stolen national assets. Amongst them,
one stands out: UBS, but often mentioned as well is the Credit Suisse
Bank. UBS, formerly Banque Federale or Federal Bank of
Switzerland, is the long time banker to the Marcos family, Adnan Khashoggi and
the Saudi Royal family, and assorted international criminals.This Swiss
bank is one of several strongly attached to the German industrial and banking
cartels, with a history traceable back to the Third Reich.
UBS
operated with the Deutsche Bank to funnel laundered Third Reich funds into many
of the subsidiaries created by German industrialists at the end of the war,
especially I.G. Farben and Thysssen A.G. This was done to protect
assets from confiscation by the Allies. In 1978, these two banks would create
UBS-DB Corporation, an American firm. It would later become Atlantic Capital
Corporation (wholly owned by the Deutsche Bank), and continue to help UBS
customers place investments in the U.S.
UBS
was one of the few banks used by the Germans during WWII to launder and hold
“holocaust victim gold” as well as the stolen treasuries of Europe, including
gold reserves from France and Czechoslovakia. At the time the Nazis stole the
French treasury, the gold holdings of France were reported to be greater than
the combined holdings of Fort Knox and the Bank of England.
After
the war, the Swiss banks took elaborate measures to hide Nazi gold and prevent
confiscation by the Allies. Although the Allies were able to seize some, the
actual amount deposited by the Nazi government and German industrialists could
not be ascertained. Shortly after the war, the Swiss passed laws to ensure that
they would be able to hold on to whatever the Allies did not confiscate.
WHAT
HAPPENED TO THE MARCOS GOLD?
The
next great gold bonanza to get channeled to the Swiss banks was the Marcos
gold. In both instances of the holocaust victim and Philippine gold, the Swiss
banks adamantly resisted years of effort by the governments of Israel and the
Philippines to have the gold returned to its rightful owners.
The
reason the Swiss banks relinquished in this, after more than fifty years of
denial, was not so much a result of newly defined morality, but rather the
result of pressure from U.S. investigators and lawmakers on three separate
fronts, and by Swiss lawmakers on a fourth front:
Front
#1: There were claims by the Philippine government that the Marcos family had
secreted away $13.4 billion of the Philippine treasury. In 1991, at the end of
the Marcos presidency in the Philippines, there were a number of reports that
Marcos had secreted away in UBS large quantities of the Philippine national
treasury. There are reports that these funds came from multiple
sources: the looted Japanese treasury, Nazi gold money-laundering, and
embezzlement of U.S. aid. The point that has not been disputed is that
regardless of the source, there was “a lot” of illegal gold and money moved to
Switzerland by Marcos, with the assistance of Adnan Khashoggi.
George
Bush Sr., as CIA director, would also be involved in helping Marcos move
bullion out of the Philippines. Investigators from the Philippines started
making claims on these funds, providing proof the funds were secreted away at
UBS, but because of the banking laws of Switzerland, the bank would never
confirm to the Philippine government of President Aquino that it had the
missing Philippine funds.
Front
#2: The U.S. Department of Justice, representing eight U.S. nationals that had
won a lawsuit against the Marcos estate for torture and deprivation of rights,
was pressing for an investigation into the Swiss accounts. A number of human
rights groups took on the Marcos family in U.S. courts for violation of human
rights, and won a major, billion-dollar settlement against the Marcos family.
Ferdinand Marcos had died in 1989, but the judgment was levied on his estate.
After losing the suit, the Marcos family claimed it did not have the resources
to settle the claim. That is when the Department of Justice was brought in to
investigate the accounts identified in the Swiss banks as Marcos accounts. When
the possibility of the estate being hidden in UBS was exposed by the efforts of
the Philippine government, the Department of Justice began an investigation.
Front
#3: The search for holocaust gold was re-activated in 1996 when newly
declassified documents of the Swiss government inadvertently suggested the
banks were still holding on to financial assets that belonged to holocaust
victims and their families. The search erupted into a scandal in 1997, when
a janitor at UBS discovered and retrieved documents being shredded that
supported the claims of the holocaust victims and their families.
Front
#4: The final front was new anti-money laundering regulations which took hold
in Switzerland in late 1998. This new legislation put criminal penalties on
bankers who knowingly supported money-laundering activities.
Eventually
the Bronfman investigation convinced the Swiss bankers to hand over roughly $8
billion ($1.25 billion to the holocaust victims, $4.6 to the Philippine
government, and another $2 billion to the 8 U.S. victims of the torture suit)
compared to less than the $1 billion they were originally planning on paying.
There
was another complicating factor in bringing closure to the “bullion” issues.
The Swiss and Deutsche Bank knew that resolving the holocaust and Marcos gold disputes
was not the end of the pressure on the banks. There were three more
open investigations:
In
1998, Russian investigators traced a $300,000 ransom payment from the Bank of
New York, which opened up the Bank of New York/Russian mafia bank scandal. This
scandal would later be shown to be connected to the Swiss banks and the
Deutsche Bank. It is of significant note that two primary owner-investors in
two of the key banks involved in the Russian money laundering scandal
were Bruce
Rappaport, a Swiss Israeli banker who was involved with Khashoggi and
George Bush Sr. in the IranContra, October Surprise, and BCCI scandals,
and Dr.
Alfred Hartmann. Another key player already linked to the Bank of New
York/Russian mafia money laundering scandal was Jonathan Bush and
his involvement with Valmet SA.
A
thorough investigation into these Swiss accounts probably would have uncovered
links involving Richard Cheney and Marc Rich, among others, to the Nigerian and
Angolan oil scandals, in which dollars flowed from the U.S. to Russia.
Additional
investigations that might have exposed this network of accounts included:
- In
2000, Reginald Howe introduced his GATA lawsuit, naming the Deutsche Bank
as a key party to the gold price-fixing lawsuit, prompting an
investigation by the FBI into Swiss and Deutsche Bank gold trading
accounts. The FBI records for this investigation were co-located with records
to the Giffen/Mobil Oil investigation, which may or may not be meaningful.
- In
the Fall of 1997, The UK courts began inquiries into claims about the
Kazakhstan breach of contract claim made by Farhat Tabbah against James
Giffen, which opened a Pandora’s box on illegal bribes. Shortly
thereafter, the investigation spilled over to Switzerland (1999), and then
to the U.S. courts (2000).
THE
BARRICK-BANK CARTEL CONNECTION
The
relationship between U.S. intelligence and UBS goes back for 60 years. Since
WWII, UBS, notably stands out as part of a mix of Swiss banks heavily involved
with the U.S. Intelligence community, far removed from Congressional oversight:
The
interplay of Barrick and the bank and oil cartels crisscross in a manner that
strongly suggests ongoing partnership rather than coincidence. There are three
pieces of evidence that identify a linkage between the management/ownership of
Barrick, the oil cartel, and the German bank cartel. This report finds
the individuals involved in planning, executing, and covering the WTC attack to
be the same as those involved in Barrick and covert oil operations in Central
Asia.
- The
Houston office building that housed both Enron and Halliburton corporate
headquarters was owned by Trizec
Hahn. As earlier discussed, Trizec Hahn was a merger of Peter Munk’s
(Barrick Gold) and the Canadian Bronfman family. The CEO’s of both
companies, Kenneth Lay and Dick Cheney, are close associates of the Bush
family, whose relationship to the founder of Barrick– Adnan Khashoggi –
are extensive and stretched over at least two decades.
- Barrick
is also directly linked to UBS and the German bank cartel, through use of
its subsidiary gold refinery: Argor-Heraeus S.A. Owership of this refinery
was transferred from UBS to Commerzbank, also part of the German bank
cartel in 1999.
- Barrick
is linked closely to the banking cartel through, one of the most
longstanding members of the Advisory Board – Karl Otto Pohl, former
President of the German central bank (Bundesbank) and chief officer of the
International Bank of Settlements and IMF. Also on the Barrick Board was
former Canadian Deutsche Bank executive Tye W. Burt – the former Chairman
of Deutsche Bank Canada and Deutsche
Bank Alex Brown Securities Canada, and Managing Director and Head
of Deutsche Bank’s Global Metals and Mining Group. Burt was involved when
the Canadian Deutsche Bank backed Khashoggi in the MJK Securities fraud.
Burt left the bank shortly after the fraud was discovered. Note also, two
of the initial big investors in Barrick – Khashoggi and Bronfman – used
the same personal financial advisor: Mayo Shattuck of the Deutsche Bank
Alex Brown. Mayo Shattuck was the chief assistant to Buzzy Krongard when
he worked at Deutsche Bank Alex Brown. Both, through their executive roles
at Deutsche Bank Alex Brown were in a position to be familiar with the
Khashoggi/Marcos gold deposits at that Bank. Remember that Krongard
managed the merger between Bankers Trust and Deutsche Bank Alex Brown, and
that Banker’s Trust is the bank that received significant amounts of the
Marcos gold with the assistance of Khashoggi.
- The
Deutsche Bank was identified as a major gold trading partner with Barrick
in both the Blanchard and Howe law suits.
- Enron
– an energy trading company – had created a gold bullion and gold
derivatives trading operation. When Enron went bankrupt, Enron Online was
bought by UBS. A competitive market for trading energy and gold bullion
was set-up by former Deutsche Bank executive Mayo Shattuck as new CEO at
Constellation Energy, using former Enron employees.
These
five points suggest that if it doesn’t exist already, there exists the
potential for a cozy relationship between the U.S. oil cartel, the German
banking cartel and Barrick.
LINK
BETWEEN THE WTC, ILLEGAL GOLD, AND MONEY LAUNDERING
The
key matter for consideration and inquiry is that, according to John O’Neal, and
Sibel Edmonds, the FBI (whose files were in the WTC North Tower)
was denied information by the CIA and Secret Service. The CIA’s files would
have been kept in Building Seven. One has to presume that any files relating to
financial investigations of money laundering related to “intelligence”
operations and the Russian/Israeli mafia around Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and
Afghanistan were kept in Building Seven or Tower 1.
The
WTC offices also held investigative information for the Bank of New money
laundering scandal, which will later be shown to be intricately linked to
covert oil operations in the aforementioned countries. From another
perspective, three of the agencies involved in the Enron investigation were
housed in the WTC: SEC, the Justice Department, and the FBI. With a great
deal of certainty this report concludes that Enron was a major
money-laundering vehicle for the financial rape of Russia, buying and selling
petrochemical contracts from the U.S. subsidiaries of the Russian
oligarchs. Both DoD and HUD had contracts with Enron, and those
agencies were reported by Rumsfeld (on September 10, 2001) to be unable to
account for some $3.3 trillion in funding. The IRS, in Building 7 was looking
at Barrick’s offshore hedge book.
“The
contention that the destruction of the WTC was used to destroy evidence
contained on the 23rd and 24th floors of the North Tower is now
incontrovertible. …Here is evidence supplied by the Head of Security of the
World Trade Center on network television indicating that the floors used by the
FBI (22nd, 23rd and 24th floors) of the North Tower — 70 floors below the
crash-bombing impact — had been devastated and reduced to debris. This same
Head of Security himself dug through the debris to save persons who were
trapped there. It was on these floors that the evidence and
investigation briefs on two highly important cases were being stored:
1) The case against Mobil Oil and James Giffen on illegal oil swaps between
Iran and Kazakhstan (at that time before a New York grand jury as described in
great detail by Seymour Hersh in the July 9 New Yorker magazine); 2) The
evidence in the investigation of Gold Price Fixing which stemmed from charges
brought against Alan Greenspan, Morgan & Company and Goldman Sachs. At noon
E.P. Heidner received a phone call from New England from friend who was
reviewing recorded footage of coverage of the destruction of the WTC on NBC’s
program “48 Hours.” Steve has reviewed the footage many times and taken
detailed notes. I took notes at my computer as he spoke. After the south tower
collapsed, men went up to the 22nd floor of the WTC and “dug” someone out of the
“rubble” he found there. It is known that these floors contained the
New York FBI offices. Peter Jennings actually did a two-day network news
story on the effects of the destroyed evidence and files on American financial
crime investigations around the world. The 48 Hours anchor was interviewing the
Head of Security of the WTC about the evacuation. He had received a call, after
the South Tower was down, from the Port Authority’s Command Center on the 22nd
floor asking for rescue. The Head of Security himself traveled to that floor in
the company of a NY Fireman where they found the offices devastated to the
point that they had to “tunnel through debris” to “dig out” the two or three
Port Authority workers who were trapped there. All of this happened 73 floors
below crashbombing impact.” [WTC Attack Destroyed Criminal Evidence
, Dick Eastman, http://www.conspiracyplanet.com,
10/26/2001]
Eastman’s
report is substantiated by other reports from CBS News and an individual
chronicler of events. These reports suggest that while one drama unfolded
throughout the WTC complex, another drama was unfolding on the 22nd Floor of
the North Tower.
The
result of the loss of this building was a major loss of investigative documentation
by U.S. agencies. Agencies known to have lost evidence include the
Export-Import Bank (source of loans to Afghanistan and Angola), CIA, SEC, IRS
and Secret Service.
Investigative
and Evidentiary Agencies in the WTC Building 7
Export-Import
Bank of the US – Floor 6
U.S.
Secret Service – Floors 9 & 10
Securities
and Exchange Commission – Floors 11,12 &13
Internal
Revenue Service – Floors 24 & 25
CIA
– Floor 25
Department
of Defense – Floor 25
In
the key emergency control center of New York in Building 7 (free-fall
building), someone gave the order to evacuate the building and the control
center. No one knows who gave that order. In the buildings that were supposedly
hit by planes, personnel were not given that order, and remained in the control
centers until the end. Investigators of financial crimes throughout the U.S.
lost evidence in thousands of cases, including original SEC filings falsely
reporting the Deutsche Bank’s lack of involvement in the Cayman shell companies
of Enron.
Talk
about destroying evidence. Clinton’s missing emails is nothing compared to the
destruction of evidence in the WTC and Pentagon.
THE
UNMENTIONED LOSS OF WTC 6
A
key hypothesis of this report is that the attack on the World Trade Center was
intended to stop investigations into various forms of money laundering by
officials of the U.S. and the Russian/Israeli Mafia. It would not be
appropriate to discuss Building 6, which housed U.S. Customs – one of the key
U.S. Agencies with responsibility for investigating money laundering. The
fate of Building 6 is ignored in virtually every report available, but the
couple of references found are totally aligned with the hypothesis that these
agencies were targeted.
GOLD
TRADING AND MONEY LAUNDERING INVESTIGATIONS CANCELLED BY DESTRUCTION OF THE
WTC
The
23rd floor of the North Tower of the WTC held FBI records pertinent to
investigations of international gold movements and violations of the U.S.
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The stimulus for the FBI investigation was a
lawsuit initiated by GATA against a number a major bullion international banks
and the former US Secretary of the Treasury. The lawsuit alleged that
these banks conspired to manipulate and artificially depress the price of gold.
The evidence presented by GATA was quite compelling, and suggested that 1)
these parties had used national gold reserves to illegally regulate the price
of gold, 2) these banks had created a significant risk that threatened the
liquidity of all of the key players, and 3) that the national gold reserves had
been illegally depleted as a result.
KEY
POINT: The basis for this suit was analysis of gold market
prices and trades that suggested approximately 14,000 tons of paper gold had
been artificially created to keep gold prices depressed. This report speculates
that gold prices were not being manipulated, but rather 14,000 tons of
stolen gold was being illegally laundered.
The
logic of what GATA called a scam “on the American citizens and individual gold
buyers” was this. Bullion banks “loan” gold to each other at 1% or 2% interest.
When they borrow gold to cover needs, they buy a gold future and assign it the
lender. Thus the lender always has the “same” amount of gold, except some is
‘paper gold.’ According to GATA, these banks would loan gold to each other, and
then sell the real gold, using the proceeds to invest in equities, which paid a
higher return. This is a good deal when the investment’s return on the equity
is greater than the costs of the increased price of gold. The GATA claim is
that this process had been going on secretly for a number of years, with U.S.
private banks making hefty profits using U.S. treasury gold. This process is
not illegal – fixing-prices is.
At
some point in the process, these banks had loaned out more gold than could be
produced by all the gold mines in the world in the next two and a half years. Because
the world started viewing the dollar as overvalued, there was a move towards
gold, which stood to drive the price of gold up – dangerously so. These banks
then had to borrow and sell even more U.S. gold, and then (it is contended)
brought in the London banks to support them, to keep the price of gold
artificially down. The prices had to be kept artificially low because
if there was an actual call on the gold loans by one bank, it would bring them
all down like a house of cards. There was not enough physical gold available to
make good all the futures being held by the banks.
It
has been speculated that it was these banks – with a focus on the American
banks -that somehow brought about an attack on the FBI office, using the cover
of the airliner assault to destroy the evidence against them. According to this
theory, the attack needed to happen before October 9, 2001, when this
lawsuit opened in court. It may be fair to speculate that U.S. bank
executives were not worried about being convicted for violation of dubious and
ambiguous laws. However – win or lose, this report speculates there was at
least one group of bank executives that had plenty of reason to worry if this
lawsuit saw the open courtroom, and that is the group that set out to destroy
the World Trade Center. These are the executives who were worried that an
investigation and trial would expose their gold laundering activity.
KEY
POINT: This report speculates that gold being sold on the market was
not ‘artificially created,’ but rather illegal, stolen gold that needed to be
laundered.
HOW
IS GOLD BEING LAUNDERED?
The
argument that the attack on the WTC was an attempt to silence an investigation
into gold transactions and money laundering has never seriously been
considered. In a world that has recently seen reports of the disappearance of
4,000 to 60,000 tons of illegal gold stolen from various national treasuries,
no one seems to have asked: How is this gold being laundered? The selling
behavior demonstrated by the bullion banks could also be interpreted as selling
off huge, illegal gold hoards at a previously agreed upon price point. The
hypothesis that a large portion of this may be laundered by the
Deutsche Bank becomes more compelling when one focuses on the Deutsche Bank,
and its possible reasons for wanting this investigation quashed – which no one,
except maybe the FBI, has focused on. The Deutsche Bank (along with Dresdner,
and U.S. banks) had been conducting gold sales for years, and, indeed, it was
speculated in the GATA suit that the European banks in general had
illegally dumped large amounts of their reserve gold to buoy up bank
profitability.
The
question needs to be asked: What if the German banks, primarily the Deutsche
Bank – and possibly some American banks, were not selling their gold reserves,
but rather laundering gold for its clients? Until this report,
there has been no mention of this possibility. Not too long ago, several
previous board members of the Deutsche Bank were indicted for helping high
profile clients avoid taxes by laundering money into Switzerland. The bank
certainly also had a reputation for the less dignified money laundering
activity associated with organized crime and the Chairman of the Deutsche Bank
Board admitted the bank “possibly” had been “misused” by these same Russian
mafia types, previously linked to the Mossad by this report.
Any
serious investigation into illegal gold laundering by the FBI probably would
have exposed transactions no one wanted to make public. Any
FBI evidence would have to be destroyed, and the investigation stopped. One of
the more convenient aspects of the attack on the WTC is that while destroying
relevant FBI investigation materials, it also destroyed all U.S. Deutsche Bank
records.
The
original GATA lawsuit was dismissed, and the FBI investigation was ended.
A reorganization of the FBI in 2002 refocused agency attention on terrorism,
leaving bank crime to “other agencies.”
WHAT
TO DO WITH TONS OF ILLEGAL GOLD
What
the GATA and the subsequent suit never considered was that while “large,
inexplicable” amounts of gold (estimated at 6,000 to 14,000 tons) were being
released on the market by the bullion banks, possibly this was a gold
laundering operation. Certainly enough stolen gold had poured into Germany
and Switzerland from various sources to explain a majority of the German trades
(and possibly trades by U.S. banks as well), and these flows were documented in
Heidner’s report:
- 3,000
tons of gold stolen from Russia by the KGB, a theft
made public in September 1991 by Grigory Yavlinski;
- 40
tons of Czech gold;
- an
undisclosed amount of Third Reich (Nazi) gold stolen from
the holocaust victims and their survivors as well as undisclosed treasury
gold removed from the banks of conquered countries;
- at
least 1,000 tons of Philippines gold from the Marcos
family, which had previously been the wealth of the Japanese
Imperial family hidden during World War II.
While
the early reports of this Philippine treasure were generally regarded by the
media as rumor, the story was subsequently well substantiated by the reporting of
David Guyatt and others. A major source for this documentation was a death bed
statement by Brigadier-General Erle Cocke, in April 2000. Cocke was a banker
before he became a black operative. He had worked as a “fixer” for “every
President since Truman.” Additionally, he was an Alternate Executive Director
of the World Bank for four years, a member of the US delegation to the UN for
two years.
As
part of this illegal gold movement, it is extremely important to
notice where at least 50 tons of it went, because it starts a chain of
events involving the banks of Bankers Trust, JP Morgan and the Deutsche
Bank Alex Brown. It is also important to note that the gold started
to be moved into the market place in the early 1980’s by Marcos himself and in
the late 1980’s by his wife. It was during this time that George Bush Sr. got
involved.
“The
Bush family off-shore money tranches originated with gold bars and jewels
spirited out of the Philippines upon the overthrow of Ferdinand Marcos in 1986.
The Marcos fortune was the price exacted by Vice President Bush for his being
granted asylum in Hawaii. The gold bars were transported from the Philippines
to the International Diamond Exchange Vaults near Rockefeller Center. A CIA
proprietary firm called Oceaneering International of Houston procured barges to
move some of the gold from secured warehouses to a specially-configured Boeing
747 which then flew the cargo to New York. Oceaneering sealifted the remaining
gold to Oregon. After George W. Bush’s victory in 2000, the last of the gold
and jewels stored in New York was moved to UBS Bank in Zurich. Marcos and Saudi
billionaire Adnan Khashoggi set about to create Five Star Trust in 1983 as a
means to create a vehicle to use the Philippine wealth to create and funnel
fungible assets abroad. In 1989, Five Star Trust was officially established in
the Isle of Man by a Houston-based attorney who was a close friend of the Bush
family.” [http://www.waynemadsenreport.com]
Is
should be of historic note that it was three of George Bush’s key aids who
played primary roles in convincing President Ronal Reagan to withdraw his
support for Marcos, thus forcing Marcos to seek asylum and deal with George
Bush Sr.
In
answering the question as to “why?” the records point to the conclusion
that George HW Bush set up a private funding mechanism for his own personal
dark-ops foreign policy.
KEY
POINT: This was a fund protected from Congressional oversight and a
fund that would allow Bush to authorize and fund operations that violated
United States law.
This
fund would subsequently be used to wage war against the former Soviet Union by
financing Muslim terrorists and Russian mafia oligarchs in his continued
efforts to destabilize the Soviet Union. It would be used illegally to fight
“Communists” in South America. Some of the Marcos/Bush gold was even considered
for use in the Iran-Contra dealings: “In 1985, [Oliver North] attempted to sell
44 tons of Marcos bullion, worth $465 million, on the black market. He blithely
suggested skimming $5 million to finance the Nicaraguan contra war, but the
deal fell through when North, true to form, stiffed the Israeli middlemen on
the Marcos payroll. Tapes and documents implicating American officials in the
gold transfers were withheld from the Iran-contra committee by Major General
Colin Powell, Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger and William Odom, director of
the NSA. “It wasn’t so much the mention of gold that concerned them,” say
Thompson and Kanigher. “It was Marcos talking (on tape) about contributions to
U.S. presidential campaigns and the use of the gold proceeds to fund illegal
arms deals.” [Iran-Contra Connections to the Oklahoma Bombing, by Alex
Constantine © 2000 Alex Constantine. All rights reserved]
This
Marcos gold would be a fund the use of which had to be protected from ever
being exposed to the world. It would be a fund that investigators
housed in the World Trade Center were on the path to uncover. It would provide
the basis for the “National Security” rationale for all the cover-up associated
with the government investigation of the destruction of the WTC.
Bankers
Trust, where Marcos placed his gold in 1982, becomes an important name in this
report in that the merger of Bankers Trust (formed by JP Morgan in 1903) and
Deutsche Bank Alex Brown was conducted by “Buzz” Krongard, with the assistance
of his primary staff assistant, Mayo Shattuck. What it suggests is that
Krongard, Shattuck, executives of JP Morgan, and executives of the Deutsche
Bank were in a position to be knowledgeable about the illicit gold movements
that ultimately were covered up by the destruction of the World Trade Towers.
Krongard has been implicated as a potential “person of interest” in the alleged
cover-up by the U.S. Government of what really happened on September 11 because
of his association to the bank to which many illegal stock trades were traced,
and the unexplained ‘shutdown’ of that investigation.
“By
profession, Krongard is a banker and formerly was the Chairman and CEO of
investment bank Alex. Brown, Inc. In September 1997, Krongard engineered the
merger of Alex. Brown with Bankers Trust and became the Vice Chairman of the
board of directors of Bankers Trust. A few months later, in January 1998, he
was recruited as a “counselor” to CIA boss George Tenet. In March 2001, he was
promoted to Executive Director, making him the No. 2 man of the spy
agency.” [Project Hammer Reloaded, Part 1 of 2, Nexus Magazine,
Volume 10, Number 6 (October-November 2003), David G. Guyatt]
What
is not recognized by many is that Krongard’s main assistant at Alex Brown was
Mayo Shattuck. Mayo – who was also the personal financial advisor to Edgar
Bronfman and Adnan Khashoggi – resigned as CEO of Deutsche Bank, America on
September 12, 2001, and went on become CEO of the company that would replace
the bankrupted Enron as the primary energy market maker. Mayo’s
Deutsche Bank operation in the WTC was buried on September 11.
Also
rarely mentioned is the fact the Senator Carl Levin’s Senate Hearings into U.S.
money-laundering identified AB Brown – where Krongard, Shattuck and Beese were
the top three executives – as one of the top twenty U.S. banks involved in
money-laundering. Finally, one should note that Krongard was mentor to another
placement from the CIA training facilities of the U.S. War College and John
Hopkins. That protégé was named J. Carter Beese, who was one of George Bush
appointees to the board of directors of the Overseas Private Investment
Corporation in 1992, and later would become Chairman of Riggs Bank, as well as
an SEC Commissioner (appointed by Bush.) J. Carter Beese Jr. was Chairman at Alex
from 1994 to 1997, and would move from there to also be vice-chairman of
Bankers Trust. Beese went from Banker’s Trust to become President of Riggs
Capital Partners, which will later be demonstrated to play a major role in
George’s Bush’s 1991 ten-year bond fraud, one of the major drivers behind the
September 11 tragedy. Beese was the son of an FBI agent. Beese,
like many CIA trainees, would have his life ended in April 2007 with a reported
suicide, at the age of 50.
It
also suggests that the management of the JP Morgan syndicate of financial
institutions was in a position to be aware of these illegal gold transactions,
as were other American financial institutions such as Citibank and Drexel.
Another
potential source of illegal gold in the market was uncovered in the 1990’s by
the WJC. (World Jewish Congress). Recent disclosures from World War II
documents released in the 1990’s demonstrated that the Swiss banks had
understated the amount of gold received from Nazi Germany during the war.
This gold appears to have originated with holocaust victims and the national
treasuries of conquered nations. Technically, this gold was to have been
returned to those nations and families it was confiscated from.
Swiss
banks denied the existence of this and the Marcos gold, despite historical
evidence to the contrary. It was only when a janitor for one of the banks
discovered and saved records of this gold in the process of being destroyed by
the banks, and handed over these records to the press, did the whole Swiss denial
begin to crumble. At that point, the World Jewish Congress began to apply
more pressure on the Swiss banks, and on the U.S. Congress to penalize the
Swiss banks. At about the same time, the Philippine government was pressuring
the banks for a return of the Marcos gold, and the American legal system was
seeking billions from the Marcos accounts on behalf of victims of Marcos
torture that had won a lawsuit against the Marcos estate in Hawaiian courts. On
top of these legal probes into the illegal gold holdings of the Swiss banks
came the GATA lawsuit and its associated FBI investigation.
The
amounts of illegal gold from all of these various sources may have been
adequate to explain the “inexplicable” gold volume being sold in the gold
market, as suggested by GATA statistics. This illegal gold is also
of interest because one of the key individuals heading the international law
suit against the Swiss banks was the President of the WJC – Edgar Bronfman. The
Bronfman family, along with executives of JP Morgan, were key investors in a
Canadian company called Barrick – named as a defendant in the second gold
price-fixing suit, and the largest producer of “paper” gold in the world. This
report speculates that Barrick was operating as a ‘front’ for moving
stolen gold into the market.
Winning
or losing this lawsuit would be quite immaterial to a large number of people
unless the banks had to reveal the sources of their gold, which generally had
been funneled into Swiss accounts by German banks and its global network of
banks. It is hypothesized that the exposure of this gold laundering
activity was the ‘issue’ that allowed German banking executives and Russian
KGB/mafia lords to sit at the same table and discuss a mutual interest in
destroying the World Trade Center. It created the incentive to
leverage Russian/Israeli mafia relationships within the Israeli Mossad, and
initiate the attack on the WTC.
Interestingly,
it was also this same type of interest in ‘preventing public disclosure, or
exposure’ that may have encouraged Bush to divert attention away from this
economic motive for a crime.
The
argument made by Flocco and Ruppert, while valid, misses the real cover-up. An
investigation into the Deutsche Bank connection to the terrorists would have
demonstrated that at the heart of the connection was a need to cover-up
probable illegal gold movements. Moreover, the names of two banks (JP
Morgan and Deutsche Bank) and three individuals (George Bush Sr., Adnan
Khashoggi and Edgar Bronfman) reported to be involved in these probable illegal
gold movements are linked to a single gold company: Barrick. These names are
not linked as a group to any other gold company. These individuals, along with
Shiek Kamal Adham, (the former head of the Saudi intelligence agency and a regular
business partner of Khashoggi) have been widely reported as involved (but not
convicted) in money laundering schemes and illegal gold movements:
- George
HW Bush: the Iran-Contra scandal, the Marcos gold;
- Adnan
Khashoggi: the BCCI-Vatican Bank money laundering scandal, Iran-Contra,
MJK securities fraud, and the US savings and loans bankruptcies, the Sand
casino bankruptcy, and the Marcos gold;
- Shiek
Kamal Adham: the BCCI-Vatican Bank scandal, Iran-Contra; and
- Edgar
Bronfman: Harris Bank and Household Bank money laundering, the Nazi gold
hoards, as well as the family history in Canada of bootleg alcohol
smuggling.
If
four suspected money-launderers, at least two of which are involved in prior
movements of this gold, are all financially involved in a company responsible
for the generation of billions of dollars of paper gold, and producing bullion
from mining deposits with a history of dubious value, then should not those
facts warrant suspicion of that company’s intent?
In
fact, the Barrick gold operation is a phenomenon that could not have occurred
without the assistance of President George Bush Sr. In his last days as
President, Bush pardoned his former political colleagues convicted in the
Iran-Contra Scandal, including Adnan Khashoggi. The Iran-Contra conspirators
executed their crime with the heavy involvement of three individuals who
continue to appear throughout this report:
- Adnan
Khashoggi;
- Khalid
bin Mahfouz, owner of 20% of BCCI; and
- Shiek
Kamal Adham, who belonged to a group that owned approximately 55% of BCCI,
and was on the board of directors with Mahfouz.
At
the same time that Bush pardoned the convicted Iran-Contra conspirators, he
authorized a procedural change which allowed Barrick (a company started with
funding from Khashoggi and Shiek Kamal Adham as an original investors) to claim
$10 billion in unmined reserves in Nevada, for the meager cost of $10,000. It
is speculated this process needed to be expedited because it was anticipated
the Clinton administration would not approve transaction without sizeable
royalty requirements. This report speculates that Bush expedited the approval
so that laundering of gold could happen much sooner – that having the reserves
on the books was a necessary step to begin laundering the stolen treasuries.
Not often reported, Barrick claims it paid $63 million for the company that
owned those rights, although the details of that investment are not known. Even
at that rate, $63 million for $10 billion in assets seems like a suspicious
arrangement.
About
the same time Khashoggi and Adham were investing in Barrick, a partner of their
BCCI partner (Khalid bin Mahfouz) was becoming a 12% investor in Harken, which
would later be identified with George Bush Jr.’s insider trader.
The
current Bush administration has dropped all investigations of potential
financial crimes associated with the destruction of the WTC. It has
forced the FBI to drop the GATA/gold price-fixing investigation so as to focus
on ‘terrorism.’ The Bush administration dropped the investigation of illegal
stock trades once they were traced back to Israel. The 9/11 Commission report
does not mention them, and there is no SEC nor FBI report on the
investigation. Any formal announcement of the findings disappeared a long
time ago, and an only inadvertent leak let the world know what really happened.
An investigation into the destruction of the WTC as a classic criminal act
rather than an act of political terror would most likely result in exposure
bringing disrepute to the Bush family, and some of the most powerful banking
executives in the world. Criminal charges would also be possible. It
would also start in motion actions required to return billions of dollars of
illegal gold to their rightful national treasuries. It would probably bring about
the collapse of a number of major financial institutions. Therein lays
the heart of real the National Security issue.
GOLD
LAUNDERING – THE PROCESS
Before
attempting to unravel the mechanism by which the laundering of illegal gold may
have been perpetrated, one needs to understand the magnitude and difficulty of
this crime. Gold, because of its scarcity and value, is a closely
monitored commodity. Gold traders across the world monitor supply and
demand, and report regularly on web sites. They watch it so closely, that when
unexplained amounts of gold on the market in the 1990s started to depress
prices, they traced it to bullion bank sales of reserves.
The
annual mining and production of physical gold contributes only about 2,500 tons
per year. The price of gold has remained relatively stable from 1992 to
2003. Had there been a significant ‘dump’ of illegal gold in the magnitude of
2,000 to 3,000 tons or more in a short span of time, the transaction would have
been easily identified by the market watchers as laundering activity.
KEY
POINT: Hence, illegal gold from Russia, Switzerland or the
Philippines would have had to been moved into the market slowly, with a
credible paper trail.
The
strategy for laundering gold without depressing prices would have been a rate
of laundering in the range of 10% of market supply and demand, possibly 200 to
300 tons per year. Anyone sitting on stolen gold could not dump it immediately,
but would require institutional help in laundering 5% to 10% of the hoard per
year, over ten to fifteen years – unless they got greedy, and wanted a faster
payout.
GOLD-BACKED
BONDS, CANTOR FITZGERALD, AND THE OFFICE OF NAVAL INTELLIGENCE
A
small and unseemly clue opened the door to an investigation which suggests
that Cantor Fitzgerald, at the top of the North Tower of the World
Trade Center, and the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), in the Pentagon, were
specific and related targets of the 9/11 attacks. This theory is
corroborated by a wide range of information, which taken together suggests that
while the attacks on the WTC may have been initiated to bring to an end to
their investigations into money and gold laundering, the actual timing of
September 11 was set by George Bush Sr. to cover his tracks left by a
ten-year-old securities fraud in which he partnered with the Russian
oligarchs and rogue KGB that overthrew the Soviet government.
This
fraud is linked to the banks and accounts which were a part of the Bank of New
York money laundering scandal and the Marcos gold theft, which served as the
collateral for the securities. When one begins to ponder why investigations
into what may be the world’s largest money-laundering scandal – the Bank of New
York/Russian mafia scandal – was completely sidestepped by the U.S. judicial
system, or why the Enron losses were never fully tracked down, the answer is
found in the revelation that these were extensions of a Bush family foreign
policy to decimate the Soviet Union. Had the tragic events of 911 not
happened on September 11, 2001, exposure of an illegal foreign policy and
crimes that have enriched the Bush family, their political and business network
and, of course, the German-Swiss bankers, and their U.S. counterparts would
have been discovered.
Just
as the FBI offices on the 23rd floor of the North Tower seem to have been
targeted with explosives, both Cantor Fitzgerald (North Tower) and the Office
of Naval Intelligence (Pentagon) seem to have been targeted for assured
destruction by near-direct hits from alleged hijacked airliners. A new target
needs to be added to this list: Eurobrokers who were housed in the South Tower.
There
were only three companies in the WTC that serviced government securities and
“repos.” (A repurchase agreement -“repo” or “RP”- is a sale of securities
coupled with an agreement to repurchase the securities at a higher price on a
later date):
- Cantor
Fitzgerald lost 661 of its employees when the alleged high-jacked airline
hit, i.e. explosions were detonated, in the tower immediately below its
offices in the North Tower.
- Garbon
Inter-Capital (now ICAP PLC, on the 25th and 26th floor of the North
Tower) sitting right over the destroyed FBI offices, and
- Euro
Brokers, a much smaller broker, lost 60 employees in the South Tower.
Had
the towers not collapsed, it is fair to surmise that the three government bond
operations would have been effectively compromised. Of the three bond
traders, Cantor Fitzgerald was by far the largest, being the largest
government securities trader in the world and moving up to a half of the U.S.
securities.
Co-incidentally,
in August of 2001, Deutsche Bank, the bank of origin for numerous illegal stock
trades or “put options” made in the days preceding the attack, had just signed
an agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald to install Cantor Fitzgerald’s eSpeed
trading system.
An
overview of this situation is worth providing:
–
Illegal trades were reported on September 11, which had to be government
securities trades, as the stock markets had not yet opened.
–
Computers at Cantor Fitzgerald are known to have hosted programs that simulate
attacks on U.S. securities.
–
These programs should have been operational on September 11 as part of a
broader synchronization of Department of Defense War Games.
–
The terrorist attack on the financial center of the US failed to bring down any
core trading system or Cantor Fitzgerald’s eSpeed trading system.
–
The only trading system that reported problems was the securities clearing and
settlement system, which publicly attributed its problems to communication
failures with the Bank of New York.
–
Federal Reserve and the Elimination of Regulatory Control, the Clearing process
was hung up for weeks on an inability to “match,” although the matching data is
reported to have been whole. This issue has never been publicly addressed in
any article or speech by the Federal Reserve, and can only be identified by the
‘orders’ issued by the Federal Reserve in the aftermath of September 11. This
‘matching’ had nothing to do with the Bank of New York’s telecommunications
problems, and had everything to do with missing seller data and certificates.
Cantor
Fitzgerald has been reported as the “holder” of $240 billion of ten-year old
Durham/Brady Bonds that were due on or around September 11th. (There
are no officially named “Brady Bonds” from the “Brady Plan” for the Russian
debt; but because of the similar purpose of these $240 billion in bonds, they
are continually referred to in the press as such. These bonds were
reported to have been put into the market by Alan Greenspan, Oliver North, and
George Bush Sr. in 1991, backed by gold securities and Swiss gold bullion,
backed (in full or part) by the “Durham Trust”.
KEY
POINT: The interesting aspect of these accusations is that the Chairman
of the Federal Reserve– a privately held, commercial group of banks – and the
President of the United States are reported to have illegally created these
securities, and the ONI – destroyed in the attack on the Pentagon – was hot on
the trail of these securities.
The
exposure of these bonds and the testimony that their settlement date coincided
with 9/11 support a theory that Cantor Fitzgerald was a specific target
of the attack. It would certainly provide a compelling argument of motive
for administration complicity in the attack. Having $240 billion in bonds fail
in public might cause a crisis, such as that predicted by the Russian
Intelligence and the Dresdner Bank. The Russians and Germans were forecasting a
financial catastrophe for late August of 1991. Their ability to do so is
consistent with the documentation that the bonds were made payable in
Deutschmarks and Yen, and were used by George Bush Sr. to buoy (or buy) the
Russian economy in early September 1991, a few days after the collapse of the
Soviet Union. The Russian and German ability to foresee this matter is also consistent
with the not-widely-reported ‘fake advice notices’ used to steal $220 billion
from the Soviet Treasury. Both the Russians, who received the funding, and the
Germans (via Deutsch Bank), who were also involved in the transaction, were in
a position to understand the magnitude of the financial crisis created
by the inability to settle these bonds.
Once
the illegal trades were in the system, they would have to be settled with the
Federal Reserve. It might be a little difficult to sweep $240 billion in
illegal transactions under the carpet. Coincidentally, the attack on
the WTC has been the only occasion in which the emergency powers of the
Securities and Exchange Act have been enacted, which allow the Chairman of the
Federal Reserve to not only over-ride the formal settlement process, but
virtually every control on reporting and ownership as well. If the
transactions had to be swept under the carpet, September 11 was the only time
in US history that it could be done.
FEDERAL
RESERVE AND THE ELIMINATION OF REGULATORY CONTROL
A
review of actions taken by the Federal Reserve in the days and weeks following
the attack on the WTC reinforces the theory that the attack was used to
cover up illegal trades with the support of the Federal Reserve. Hence,
the SEC activities following the attack on the WTC could only have happened
with the approval of those who owned the Federal Reserve Banks.
The
Bank of New York would continue to be at the center of virtually every money
laundering scandal coming out of Russia, including Alexander
Konanykhine’s European Union Bank (of Antigua) and Mikhail Khodorkovsky’s Bank
Menatep, and Nordex. Now, it would be identified as the bond clearing house to
be at the center of failed communications as $240 billion in fraudulent
bonds were settled under suspicious circumstances in the aftermath of September
11. The Federal Reserve would be reported by records unofficially released
from the Office of Naval Investigation as having been involved in a number of
secretive transactions in 1990 and 1991 that ranged between $60 and $100
billion dollars. In these transactions, the money moved through the Hong Kong
Shanghai Bank (London), Chase Manhattan Bank, Key Bank (Ogden) and the
MidAtlantic National Bank.
The
Bank of New York has been able to fend off any serious investigation from
Federal agencies regarding these various money-laundering schemes, but only
with a tremendous amount of political support, and lack of outcry from the
American public. As far as the public was concerned, this was Russian money –
and, therefore, had little effect on their lives. The exposure of the
Brady/Durham bond fraud would have been too impactful for the American public
to ignore. The regulations of the SEC would have resulted in an immediate
exposure of this crime during settlement. Hence, the only option
available to the people that pulled this fraud together was to create a
national emergency which would allow the Federal Reserve board to suspend the
SEC regulations, and the clearing agencies (Bank of New York and GSCC) to mask
their operations.
KEY
POINT: This national emergency was the attack on the World Trade
Center.
As
a result of having had a dry run at this situation only the year before during
the naval war games, the management of the Federal Reserve had a precise
strategy of how to deal with this situation. Within hours of the attack on the
WTC:
“…the
Commission for the first time invoked its emergency powers under Securities
Exchange Act Section 12(k) and, on Friday September 14, issued several orders
and an interpretive release to ease certain regulatory restrictions temporarily.
Last Friday, September 21, we extended this relief for an additional five
business days.” [Testimony Concerning The State of the Nation’s
Financial Markets in the Wake of Recent Terrorist Attacks, Harvey L. Pitt,
Chairman, U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission Before the Committee on
Financial Services United States House of Representatives, September 26,
2001]
Recall,
however, that this national emergency was declared even though the entire
system remained whole, and as documented earlier, none of the trading data was
lost.
If
the Federal Reserve had to cover-up the elimination of $240 billion in bogus
securities, they could not let the volume of capital shrink by that much in the
time of a monetary crisis. They would have had to push excess
liquidity into the market, and then phase it out for a soft landing, which is
exactly what appears to have happened. In about two months, the money supply
was back to where it was prior to 9/11.
The
need for an extra $300 billion in liquidity at the time of the “crisis” seems
to be a bit of a mystery, and there has not been a significant effort to
explain it. The immediate demand for cash (ATM machines, checking accounts
etc.) never exceeded $2 billion. The U.S. banks had already agreed amongst
themselves not to force balance settlements, so the Federal Reserve ‘loans’
which were supposedly necessary to save the banking system never needed to
happen. The SEC had indicated the financial companies could continue financial
reporting as if any transactions from that day had never occurred. Most
importantly, all the transactions pumped into the WTC financial centers were
replicated in their Disaster Recovery sites, which were up and running in two
days.
WHY
THE BANKING SYSTEM REALLY NEEDED A $300 BILLION INFUSION
With
the regulatory changes that followed in the immediate aftermath of the attack
on the WTC, it was not the banking system that required a $300 billion monetary
infusion. The $300 billion was required for something else. This report
hypothesizes that the delays in structuring settlements of “fails” were caused
by an absence of matching buy/sell records, because the trade data was actually
provided by a program run from a war game simulation server from within the WTC
and connected to the trading system. The fraudulent bonds were put up for a
settlement that was not forthcoming, and in the settlement process at the Fed,
were replaced with new Federal Reserve securities.
KEY
POINT: The bogus bonds were replaced with legitimate U.S. debt,
and the $240 Billion in bogus bonds were written off the books as the Fed’s
reduction in the temporary boost in M3 required to “prevent a crisis.”
The
only conclusion one could reach is that if there were $240 billion in illegal
securities in circulation, all due at once, one could not imagine a more
opportune moment to make those securities disappear than the suspension
of all regulations and the perceived justification to increase the monetary
supply by at least twice that amount. The coincidence of these two
situations happening at the same time, by accident, can only be described as
highly improbable.
911
WAS DEVISED TO COVER UP MANY CRIMES
This
report hypothesizes that once it was determined to support the destruction of
the WTC to derail investigations into Swiss and German gold accounts, the
actual attack was postponed and timed to coincide with the need to resolve the
fraudulent bond deal. Given that the same international banking cartel was
involved in all the crimes mentioned, and that the Bush covert operations of
1991 stood as the source of all of them, it probably matters little if one or
more of these crimes provided the key motivation.
THE
NAVAL INTELLIGENCE THREAT
There
are a number of public sources of information that suggest that the Office of
Naval Intelligence (ONI) represented a threat to the Bush administration, and
the alleged Greenspan/Bush $240 Billion security fraud. The threat manifested
itself in a number of different manners, through a number of individuals –
suggesting that the friction between the Bush organization and the Office of
Naval Intelligence was more than personal, it was institutional. At an
organizational level, it is reported that the ONI was at odds with Bush and his
primary enforcement agencies- the CIA and NSA.
HUFFMAN
FLIGHT SCHOOL
The
Huffman Flight School garners the most media attention, for at least four
reasons. First, it was the primary training school for Mohammed Atta and four
of his reported ‘cell member’ colleagues from Hamburg. Second, it is also known
that recruiting for the school was actively conducted by Yeslam Bin Laden,
brother of Osama Bin Laden. Third, the school was responsible for training of
the bin Laden family pilots for SICO, it’s Swiss investment arm, run by two
former BCCI agents. Fourth, the school has an intriguing story behind its
ownership. Actual financial ownership of the school has not been thoroughly
documented, but the consensus appears to be that it was under the ownership of
Oryx Investments, an investment holding company formed in Dubai by Adnan Khashoggi,
Sheik Kamal Adham, director of Saudi intelligence (1963-79), Prince Nawaf bin
Abdul Aziz (a major investor in Barrick) and Wallace J. Hilliard.
Wally
Hilliard is a semi-retired insurance entrepreneur/multi-millionaire, and many
observers – including the FBI – view him as an innocent victim in his
connections to the terrorists. Unfortunately, while Wally Hilliard
continues to claim he was duped, many of his business partners have well
documented links to the intelligence and criminal underworlds. He also appears
to have political friends that might ensure his protection from any
prosecution. Wally made his first fortune by selling an insurance company –
Employers Health -that he had co-founded in Green Bay. That company was sought
for purchase by the Fireman’s Fund Insurance, whose Chairman was Myron Du Bain.
Myron, it seems, was a close associate of John McCone (former CIA Director),
and they held simultaneous seats on the boards of several major financial
institutions, including the United California Bank. It is fair to speculate
that Myron is responsible for introducing Wally to the fast paced world of
weapons merchants and drug smugglers. Significantly, he and his investment
partner in Oryx, Adnan Khashoggi, have spent several years attempting to establish
businesses in Cuba.
THE
SAUDI CULPRITS AND THE FLYING TERRORISTS
Adnan
Khashoggi – is first and foremost one of the world’s elite arms merchants.
Referred to as a “notable member of this elite group,” he was described in the
Small Arms Survey of 2004 with the following words:
“Some
brokers with powerful political clout, like Khashoggi, are virtually
‘untouchable’ insofar as their relationships and dealings involving government
officials at the highest echelons go. Any persecution of these brokers, or
denunciation of their activities as illicit, could result in the incrimination
of states, or the exposure of embarrassing covert activities by the governments
themselves.” [Small Arms Survey, Graduate Institute of International Studies in
Geneva, Switzerland, 2004]
Khashoggi
has his fingerprints on so many aspects of 9/11 that he may well be “the” key
conspirator. Gaining notoriety by being at the heart of
the Iran-Contra ‘guns for drugs scandal’ during the Reagan administration,
Khashoggi has since leveraged his notoriety to the point where he is a familiar
face with film and rock stars, presidents, sultans, sheiks, kings and queens,
investment bankers and of course, war lords. While most famous for his
connections with the Arab banking community, he is also well
established with the Deutsche Bank, most recently continuing his notoriety
in the U.S. press by being sued, with Deutsche Bank Securities of Canada, for
fraudulent manipulation of security prices. In the case of MJK Clearing vs
Deutsche Bank Securities, Adnan Khashoggi et al., filed in December 2002, the
facts presented suggest that in addition to misrepresentation by the
defendants, an ‘unanticipated drop in stock prices’ on September 11, 2001
enhanced their ability to increase the payout of the purported
fraud. (Business Week, May 2003.)
As
part of the ever increasingly tangled web of relationships, Khashoggi also had
ties not only to the Deutsche Bank, but the Bronfman family as well (additional
key investors in Barrick) by way of another Deutsche Bank executive- Mayo
Shattuck.
His
ties to the Bronfmans went well beyond Shattuck, as Khashoggi and Bronfman
would become investment partners in Barrick, through Trizec Hahn. Khashoggi was
also identified as an early participant in the October Surprise meetings and
subsequent Iran-Contra deals. Khashoggi would later create Oryx, which
funded Hoffman Aviation –the training school where many of the hijackers
validated their “education” visas.
After
the invasion of Iraq, Adnan Khashoggi (Genesis Aviation) became a business
partner with retired General William Lyon (on the Board of Kellstrom
Industries, Inc., an Israeli owned company) in a venture called Wings of
Democracy, an attempt to penetrate the commercial Iraq air business. Lyon is
the founder of several university diploma-mill operations in California
(American Commonwealth University, aka William Lyon University). These
operations are directly associated with the entry to the U.S. by two of the
9/11 hijackers in the early 1990s. Lyon is a major Republican fund raiser in
Orange County, associate of Karl Rove, major financial backer of the Swift Boat
Veterans, and keynote speaker at the Republican national convention.
Khashoggi
is also of interest due to his relationship with Yaslem Bin Laden, a known
business partner of his in limited number of investments. In this case, Yaslem
admits to have recruited young Arabs from across the world for Huffman
Aviation, a school owned by his former and ongoing business partner, Adnan
Khashoggi. Similary, Khashoggi has banks in Azerbaijan, where he easily could
have coordinated the recruitment of hijackers with the assistance of his other
business associates Richard Secord and David Kimche (Mossad).
Sheik
Kamal Adham is the last and least mentioned investor in Oryx was Sheik Kamal
Adham, director of Saudi intelligence (1963-79), brother-in-law of King Faisal
and the CIA’s key liaison in the Arab world, a relationship established with
George HW Bush when he was Director of the CIA.”In the 1980s, the Sheik Kamal
Adham and Abdul Khalil (Adham’s successor as Saudi intelligence director), became
officers of BCCI, and were implicated in a hostile bid for FIB, and became
embroiled in the BCCI bank scandal. In a related venture, Majority shares in
Capcom, a BCCI subsidiary, were held by Adham and Khalil. Capcom activities
included money laundering and drug trafficking. Adham was eventually prosecuted
for fraud in the BCCI case and paid a $100 million fine.” [Saudi Entrepeneur
Adnan Khashoggi Linked to 9/11 Terrorists, Alex Constantine]
Also
of interest is the report that two of the 19 reported hijackers were actually
from Saudi Intelligence:
“Two
of the hijackers—part of the team that flew a plane into the Pentagon—had very
visible connections to Saudi intelligence and the CIA. Nawaf al-Hazmi and
Khalid al-Mihdhar were well known to the CIA and FBI. The claim that an FBI
informant in San Diego who knew the men and assisted them but never mentioned
any of this to his FBI handlers has another, darker explanation. A former CIA
officer who worked in Saudi Arabia described what he says happened: “We had been
unable to penetrate Al Qaeda. The Saudi’s claimed that they had done it
successfully. Both al-Hazimi and al-Mihdhar were Saudi agents. We thought they
had been screened. It turned out the man responsible for recruiting them had
been loyal to Osama bin Laden. The truth is bin Laden himself was a Saudi agent
at one time. He successfully penetrated Saudi intelligence and created his own
operation inside. The CIA relied on the Saudis vetting their own agents. It was
a huge mistake. The reason the FBI was not given any information about either
man is because they were Saudi assets operating with CIA knowledge in the
United States.” [The Real Intelligence CoverUp: America’s Unholy Alliance, Joe
Trento’s Column, 8/6/2003 ]
It
is possible that like the Israelis, the Saudis’ with interest in global gold
movements, decided to place two of their own team with the hijackers to ensure
success of the mission.
Author
note: Of course as we reflect upon Heidner’s
report in 2016, we know that there were no planes used in the WTC attack; these
were all controlled demolitions or nuclear events. And the Pentagon attack was
more than likely a missile. But when Heidner’s report was put together in 2008,
hijackers and planes were still the leading “causes” of the destruction.
Another
interesting point is that Prince Nawaf bin Abdul Aziz was an initial investor
in Barrick, and had remained primarily an investor through the 1980s and 1990s.
However, two weeks before September 11, 2001, he was appointed as the new head
of Saudi Intelligence.
Needless
to say, if one had to find the type of criminals necessary to provide the
Arabic hijackers which would create the appearance of an Arabic
terrorist operation, these latter three men were the right men to bring to
the job. Finding willing terrorists, however, was probably the easier part of
this operation. After all, there are reported to be thousands of these
‘terrorists’ just looking for the opportunity to strike at America. The more
difficult part of this operation would be to manage and steer these terrorists,
which would be the task of Mohammed Atta and his friends from northern Europe.
Here is where the proclivity for being two-sided was required of a perennial
middle-man. Adnan
Khashoggi
was that middle-man with a reputation of dealing with anyone and everyone, and
being able to misrepresent the total picture. Khashoggi’s relationship
with Richard Perle is well documented in the press. Adnan would have
no difficulty on one hand, encouraging his friend and partner Yeslam Bin Laden,
to find recruits for this mission. On the other hand, he was probably required
to work into the management team of this attack three probable sayanim: Pascal
Schreier, Rudy Dekkers, Arne Kruithof, and one deep cover Mossad agent –
Mohammed Atta– who would have been provided to him by the Mossad.
KEY
POINT: This report, with the evidence provided, will conclude that Mohammed
Atta was actually a deep Mossad agent rather than an Al Qaeda operative.
THE
IRAN-CONTRA RE-UNION CULMINATES IN 911 EVENT
Throughout
this report, there have been names of individuals previously associated with
treason, bank fraud, money-laundering, gun-running which all seem to find a
common background in the events referred to as Iran-Contra, the October
Surprise, the BCCI bank scandal, the Lincoln Savings and Loan scandal. This
group appears to have moved its base of operations to Azerbaijan, a small
country whose dictator is widely recognized to be a criminal in his own
right. This group includes:
- Adnan
Khashoggi, whose Azerbaijan banks “played a big part
in the formation of terrorist camps and in the opening of laboratories for
developing chemical and bacteriological weapons in Nagornyy Karabakh”;
major mover of illegal gold; major investor and founder in Barrick; major
investor in Oryx – financial backer of Huffman Aviation; business partner
with General William Lyon – founder of diploma mills which provided access
for two hijackers.
- Richard
Secord, a former U.S. Air Force major general who
helped to recruit and train the Azerbaijani army as well as regional
secret services in conjunction with David Kimche;
- Richard
Armitage, managed illegal gold funds for George
HW Bush during IranContra period; acting as a consultant to
Halliburton and Unocal at the time, and President of the US-Azerbaijani
Chamber of Commerce; demonstrated history of visits to Pakistan and the
rest of Central Asia;
- Farhad
Azima, arms merchant with Iranian background, member of
US-Azerbaijani Chamber of Commerce, assisted Richard Secord in recruiting
and training mujahadin mercenaries, owned the Azerbaijani Airlines, and
has a twenty year relationship with the Bush family enterprise;
significant co-investor with Wally Hilliard of Huffman Aviation in
Spatialight. Inc.
- Khalid
bin Mahfouz, owner, with the bin Laden family and
members of the Saudi royal family of the Saudi companies Delta Oil and
Nimir Oil. Both are partners with Unocal in Azerbaijan; partner in
multiple Bush family enterprises; participant in Barrick and Trizec Hahn;
- Brent
Scowcroft, Director in the Azerbaijan International
Operating Company; participant in congressional hearings that let
Iran-Contra participants off-the-hook.
- Dick
Cheney, as CEO of Halliburton, lobbyist for the
Azerbaijan International Operating Company on US-Azerbaijani Chamber of
Commerce; participant in Congressional hearings that let Iran-Contra
participants off-the-hook.
- David
Kimche, Israeli Mossad agent who brought Israeli
agents into Azerbaijan at the request of Secord, and worked Secord and the
regional secret service organizations; participant in the October Surprise
and Iran-Contra scandal;
KEY
POINT: This report hypothesizes that this group conspired to provision
and execute a plan to destroy the World Trade Center on behalf of the
German/Swiss banking cartel.
The
idea for the attack most likely came from the Israelis, as did the original
thinking for the October Surprise and Iran-Contra. The proposal probably came
from Kimche, through Bronfman to the cartel, as the quid pro quo required to
successfully negotiate a solution to the U.S. gold related investigations
plaguing the Swiss banks in 1998.
In
exchange for a lucrative payout on the gold issue, Bronfman promised the banks
protection against further investigations by various U.S. agencies housed in
the WTC, which were drilling deep into accounts that might expose larger bank
vulnerabilities. Bronfman’s connections with the Clinton administration brought
“Buzzy’ Krongard into the CIA in 1998 to coordinate the cover. However, this
would not be enough. Khashoggi was a person all parties could work with, and
had demonstrated his ability to arrange financing for covert activities which
could be well hidden. Khashoggi, with Bronfman, was able to arrange for
additional U.S. support by engaging his former Iran-Contra colleagues. Once
Khashoggi had coordinated the involvement of the Iran-ContraAzerbaijan team,
Secord probably arranged recruitment and Armitage probably managed diplomatic
cover (e.g., Pakistani involvement, German involvement, Syrian involvement…)
Kimche probably managed “insurance,” making sure the back-up plans for
destruction of the buildings held up and the designated hijackers did what they
were recruited to do.
At
the end of the day, this attack was going to happen whether the Bush enterprise
wanted it or not, whether Bush was president or not. Bush knew that, and
capitalized on it rather than prevent it. Bush knew that if the actual planners
were identified by U.S. investigators, they would take him down with them.
KEY
POINT: Thus, Bush put in motion an elaborate cover-up which involved a
“controlled” patsy – Osama Bin Laden.
GETTING
MORE BANG FOR A BUCK: CAPITALIZING THE 911 EVENT
Once
the primary plan was in motion, other plans were set in motion to capitalize on
the event. The Bush administration had its plans–
essentially to move its Central Asian oil agenda further, faster. The Israelis
had their plans, which was to use the event to further its own security
interest in the Middle East. Khashoggi made a few million on his MJK scandal.
The Bush enterprise was able to legalize investments and aid in Azerbaijan,
thus enabling them to continue their standard pump and dump practice of oil
stocks. Equally important, it allowed the Bush enterprise to push billions of
U.S. taxpayer dollars from Aid for International Development, the Overseas
Private Investment Corp. and the Export Import Bank through the Riggs Bank,
where they were taking their percentage whether the investments paid off or
not.
It
seems as though the Bush family had been setting up its own international
banking pipeline to compete with the Deutsche Bank. This would prove to be the
Riggs Bank, with its small set of global offices providing banking services to
nearly every foreign embassy in the US.
ROBERT
MUELLER – SLANTED INVESTIGATIONS
When
it was time for the investigations, Robert S. Mueller (U.S. Attorney and FBI
Director) was named, and, not surprising, he was had also been in charge of
major investigations of crimes linked to the Bush group. Mueller had been the
chief investigator and prosecutor over the BCCI scandal, the Iran-Contra
criminal investigation, the Noriega-CIA drug connections, and finally, the 9/11
investigation. His protégé, Leslie Caldwell, was responsible for the Arthur
Anderson investigation, and later the Enron investigation.
“In
the case of Noriega and Gotti, they were silenced through the capable tools of
the American justice system. And overseeing the prosecutions – Noriega, Gotti,
and BCCI – happened to be a man who would, years later, be entrusted with
overseeing the investigation into the causes of 9/11 – Robert Mueller III. ” [Backdrop
– Detecting The Puppet Masters, Part 6 of Truth, Lies, and The Legend of 9/11:
Truth Lies Legend]
Other
items warranting mention concerning George Bush are:
- four
probable violations of SEC regulations by George Bush Jr. while with
Harken which have been overlooked,
- closing
down of criminal investigations into Jeb Bush’s partners Camilo Padreda
and Miguel Recarey,
- Bush
Sr’s destruction of SEC records of Zapata Oil,
- Interference
with bank regulators during the Riggs money-laundering investigation,
where Jonathan Bush is a director.
The
Bush family has three generations of experience in circumventing investigation
into their financial conduct. They have appointed six of the Supreme Court
Justices, and given major federal appointments to two of the Justice’s
children, after having been given the presidential office by Supreme Court dictate.
COMPLICIT
CULPRITS
Bill
Casey- CIA Director Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission
David
Doherty- General Counsel of the Central Intelligence Agency, Vice President of
the New York Stock Exchange
A.B.
“Buzzy” Krongard, Executive Director of the Central Intelligence Agency,
Chairman of the investment bank A.B. Brown and former Vice Chairman of Banker’s
Trust.
John
A McCone- CIA Director, Director of United California Bank, Western
Bankcorporation; Pacific Mutual Life Insurance
John
Deutch, CIA Director, the board at Citigroup
Nora
Slatkin, CIA Executive Director, sits on Citibank’s board
Robert
“Bud” McFarlane- CIA Director Board of Directors of American Equity Investors
(AEI)
William
Colby- CIA Director, General Counsel of the Nugan Hand Bank, unlisted counsel
to Household Bank
Mitch
Rogovin- CIA Legal Counsel, Board of Directors of American Equity Investors
(AEI)
George
Clairmont and Howard Hebert- CIA officials, Board of Directors of American
Equity Investors (AEI)
Bobby
Inman- CIA Director, and ONI Board of Directors, Federal Reserve, Dallas
Maurice
“Hank” Greenburg- floated as a possible CIA Director in 1995, CEO of AIG
insurance, manager of the third largest capital investment pool in the world
CONCLUSION
Patriots,
if you made it through this article, congratulations. Heidner’s report is much
longer and filled with the data we need to begin cleaning out house. If you are
not a U.S. citizen, we ask you for your assistance in helping us rid the United
States of these thugs and murderers. None of us are safe, now and in the
future, until we call this out for what it is and put the Bad Guys away:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.