23.01.2017
The
news media has been more interested in the histrionics of anti-Trump rioters
than the presidential inauguration. Consistent with history the liberals and
the Left are being manipulated by oligarchic interests. This manipulation can
occur because of the banality of Left-wing analyses, the fundamental common
world-view of the Left and global oligarchy, and the psychoses and neuroses
afflicting both the leadership and rank-and-file of the Left.
Oswald
Spengler observed that the Left has served the interests of money since
Tiberius Gracchus was backed by the equites. In his own time he
noted that there has not been a proletarian, not even a communist, movement
that has not served the interests of money. (Spengler, The Decline of The West,
London, 1971, vol. 2, p. 464, note 1; p. 402). During the French Revolution
funds were provided by the Duc d’Orleans. During Spengler’s time Jacob Schiff
of Kuhn Loeb & Co. was funding the Russian revolutionists via the Amercian
journalist George Kennan. Funds were provided by Olof Aschberg of Nye Banken,
Sweden, who became the first director of the USSR’s Ruskombank; William Boyce
Thompson, mining magnate and Federal Reserve Board director; Parvus-Helphand,
the Menshevik turned arms merchant, et al. (Bolton, Revolution from Above,
London, 2011, pp. 57-65). It seems that more often than not revolutions in the
name of ‘the people’ are a façade for the replacement of a traditional ruling
class by an oligarchic ruling class; in this we can include the Reformation of
Henry VIII, the Puritan Revolution of Cromwell, and the ‘Glorious Revolution’.
So when
today we talk of oligarchs behind ‘colour revolutions’ throughout the world,
the dismissive, smirking response from academic and journalistic pundits about
‘conspiracy theorists’ wears thin, particularly since the oligarchic interests
are open about their aims. Such is the confidence they have in their ability to
manipulate the mass mind with buzz-words such as ‘human rights’, and
‘equality’. How the Trump presidency will play out is extraordinarily difficult
to forecast, given the presence of oligarchs and Russophobes at cabinet level.
Regardless, Trump has unleashed a populist revolt which is deeply troubling for
the oligarchs.
George
Soros, the speculator, one would think would be anathema to the ‘social
justice’ street walkers of the Left. However, the extent of their moral and
intellectual bankruptcy is shown by their zeal in furthering the
Soros-globalist agenda.
One
might be puzzled as to the vehemence of the reaction by the Left, which is
supposedly anti-globalist, anti-TPP, and anti- interventionist, to a president
who is, at least at his word: anti-globalist, anti-TPP, and
anti-interventionist. However, to Soros an ‘open society’ means the global free
flow of labour (undertaken in the name of ‘humane immigration’), and ‘money’,
or whatever one wishes to call paper shuffling of the type that can bring a
state to bankruptcy overnight. To the Left, such globalisation of capitalism is
part of the dialectics of history, and the reason why Karl Marx supported the
revolutionary character of Free Trade, as opposed to ‘conservatism’ of
protectionism, as he commented in The Communist Manifesto. It is little wonder
that as a movement and as an ideology, the Left has been inherently worthless
in resisting capitalism. Of course one might doubt the word of Trump, or might
question how he is to achieve his agenda when he has certain elements in his
cabinet whom one might suspect. However, what at least can be said is that
Hillary Clinton was openly globalist, free trade, Russophobic and
war-mongering, yet large elements of the Left at all levels are hysterically
devoted to her. Again it shows a lack of reasoning ability among the Left, and
manipulation by those who will continue to hold power in key sectors of the USA
regardless, who could only be removed by a literal revolution, regardless of
who assumes the presidency.
Colour
Revolution comes to the USA
The
riots against Trump have the marks of a ‘colour revolution’ Soros-style. One
might ask what the anti-Trumpists aim for, given the legitimate election of the
president? The answer, one must assume, is to make the USA ungovernable: a
permanent state of anarchy. Soros has devoted a fortune to resisting ‘populism’
and subverting traditional values around the world: he is not going to rest
while his adopted nation (insofar as such a person can be identified with any
nation) undergoes an unexpected populist reaction. The oligarchic
revolutionists are attempting to unleash aggrieved minorities and sectional
interests. Feminists have long served the oligarchy, at least since Gloria
Steinem was sponsored by the CIA (Bolton, Revolution from above, op. cit., pp.
164-170), and Steinem is among the anti-Trumpists (Women’s March, honorary
co-chairs: https://www.womensmarch.com/honorary-cochairs/),
still ever-willing to serve the Establishment behind a façade of
anti-Establishment rhetoric. These disaffected sectional interests are being
cynically manipulated by Soros fronts through shameless fear-mongering. Soros
has prepared these disaffected sectional interests through the strategic
funding of their lobbies. There are also many Democrats involved in the
manufactured anarchy, including those who have been close to the Obama
Administration, such as those at the EMILYS List (below).
Among
of the most zealous of the anti-Trumpists is the Women’s March on Washington,
taking place as this is written. This has spearheaded a worldwide movement of
the zealously airheaded, which included marches in New Zealand on 21 January
for reasons that are strained at best. Among the sponsors of the Women Marchers
are Planned Parenthood; EMILY’s List, a political action committee of the
Democratic Party dedicated to getting ‘Pro-choice Democratic women’ elected to
office; NARAL Pro-Choice, a leading abortionist lobby; Human Rights Campaign,
and MoveOn.org. (Women’s March: https://www.womensmarch.com/sponsors)
The
Human Rights Campaign, heavily funded by corporates such as Goldman Sachs
(ironically, given the several appointees in the Trump cabinet), works with
Soros’ Open Society Foundation around the world. (http://www.hrc.org/blog/lgbt-advocates-talk-supporter-mobilization-as-hrc-global-summit-concludes).
Planned Parenthood receives Soros funding. In August 2016 leaked Soros
documents showed that the Open Society Foundation granted $1.5 million to
Planned Parenthood for a ‘fight back’ campaign, after beign exposed in
trafficking body parts of aborted foetuses. (Katie Yoder, ‘George Soros gave
Planned Parenthood $1.5 million to cover up sales of aborted baby parts’, Life
News, 25 August 2016: http://www.lifenews.com/2016/08/25/george-soros-gave-planned-parenthood-1-5-million-to-cover-up-sales-of-aborted-baby-parts/).
Soros is the third largest donor to ‘Planned Parenthood’. (‘Planned
Parenthood’s top 7 donors’, Life News, August 2015: https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/planned-parenthoods-biggest-donors-gave-374-million-in-four-years).
MoveOn.org was founded in1998 as a lobby to oppose the impeachment of Bill
Clinton. So much for their morality in politics. Initial funding came from
Soros. (Fatcheck. August 2010: http://www.factcheck.org/2010/08/moveonorg/).
MoveOn was among the first to call for mass demonstrations in Washington
against Trump. (‘MoveOn calls for protests over Trump victory’, Epoch Times,
210 November 2016: http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/2184374-moveon-calls-for-protests-over-trump-victory/).
Soros
$10 million Fund
On 22
November 2016 the Open Society Foundations announced the launch of a $10
million fund raiser to ‘confront hate’. This is unconcealed fear-mongering. The
Soros foundation aims to generate a feeling of insecurity among targeted
minorities to maintain a strategy of anarchy and make the USA ungovernable. It
is doing this by stating that disaffected interest groups stand in imminent
threat from the Trump administration. Soros has resorted to citing a report
from the Southern Poverty Law Center claiming over 700 ‘hate crimes’ since
Trump’s election in November. This figure was obtained largely through internet
complaint forms to the SPLC. (https://www.splcenter.org/20161129/ten-days-after-harassment-and-intimidation-aftermath-election). As
cynics who have observed such matters over the years might suspect, a great
many of the alleged ‘hate crimes’ are bogus, trivial, or unrelated to Trump.
(See: SPLC: https://www.splcenter.org/20161129/ten-days-after-harassment-and-intimidation-aftermath-election).
Already many of the examples have been exposed as fraudulent. (‘There is no
violent hate crime wave in Trump’s America’, Reason.com: http://reason.com/blog/2016/11/11/election-night-hijab-attack-false).
Additionally,
the report did not document the many more reported incidents of abuse of white
children, associated with the Trump election. Paul Sperry of the New York Post
reported:
‘At
least 2,000 educators around the country reported racist slurs and other
derogatory language leveled against white students in the first days after
Donald Trump was elected president. But the group that surveyed the teachers
didn’t publish the results in its report on Trump-related “hate crimes.” The
Southern Poverty Law Center partnered with the American Federation of Teachers,
which formally endorsed Hillary Clinton, to circulate the questionnaire among
its 1.6 million mostly Democratic members. The survey was sent out to K-12
teachers and administrators who subscribe to its “Teaching Tolerance”
newsletter’. (Paul Sperry, ‘Report buried Trump related hate crimes
against white kids’, New York Post, 5 December 2016: http://nypost.com/2016/12/05/report-buried-trump-related-hate-crimes-against-white-kids/).
The
Amercian Federation of Teachers, the co-sponsor of the SPLC report, is also a
sponsor of the Women’s March on Washington. On 19 January the AFT, as part of
the Alliance to Reclaim Our Schools, ‘spearheaded’ mass demonstrations against
Trump at more than 200 cities. (‘Thousands send message to Trump on eve of
inauguration’, http://www.aft.org/news/thousands-send-message-trump-inauguration-eve).
Using
this dubious SPLC/AFT report, a Soros press release on the fund raising states:
‘The
Open Society Foundations initiative is an effort to move swiftly to address
this urgent problem, providing support designed to encourage and empower
communities to resist the spread of hate and strengthen services and
protections for their most vulnerable neighbors’. (‘Open
Society Foundations announce $10 million fund to confront hate’, press release,
22 November 2016: https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/press-releases/foundations-announce-10-million-initiative-confront-hate).
The OSF
states that grants will be made to ‘grass roots community groups’ to protect
the vulnerable against hate crimes. (Ibid.). This is a euphemistic reference
for funding leftist street histrionics. The modus operendi has
been used dozens of times by Soros throughout the world in manufacturing
‘colour revolutions’ to overthrow regimes that resist some factor of the
globalist agenda. The funds are to launch what is being called a ‘Communities
Against Hate rapid-response initiative’, (‘Communities against hate’, https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/grants/communities-against-hate-20161122),
which I suggest is a euphemism for the type of mentally-challenged and
unbalanced antics of car- burning and store smashing that occurred on the day
of the presidential inauguration. It should be recalled that the ‘colour
revolutions’ are always portrayed as peaceful protests and spontaneous
indignation, not matter how violent and long-planned. OSF president Chris Stone
explains:
‘Trump’s
election calls for both a short-term and a longer-term response. In the days
and weeks ahead, we need to attend to the victims of these hate incidents,
prevent further attacks and intimidation, and join in solidarity with the
communities now living in fear. Many of these groups have suffered attacks like
these for centuries—hatred, racist bigotry, and sexist violence are not new—but
the frequency and scale of the attacks since November 8 are alarming. We need
to act now. At the Open Society Foundations, we will be supporting community
organizations across the United States ready to aid the victims of hate and
prevent these incidents from happening in the first place.’ (Stone, ‘hope on
the road ahead’, 18 November 2016: https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/voices/hope-road-ahead)
It is
not known, given most abuse apparently related to the Trump victory has been
directed towards white children, whether the KKK will be applying for a Soros
grant as a ‘grass roots community group’.
The
type of activity Stone at all have in mind is indicated by his endorsement for
the Women’s March on Washington. This seems to confirm that street action is
the intended strategy; not only peaceful litigation and education. Again, Stone
also confirms that this is part of a wider global agenda against any sign of
populist revolt:
‘The
rest of the world, too, needs a long-term program. The success of Trump’s
populist campaign links the United States to a global trend in which truth is
trashed, fear is exploited, and democracies are transformed into mafia states.
We need to build new and stronger institutions at local, national, and
international levels—transparent institutions with integrity, open to the
participation of all people. If nothing else, recent events have forged a
sudden solidarity among people with very different experiences, a degree of
solidarity that I have not seen for more than a decade’. (Stone,
ibid.).
Among
hypocritical jargon about peaceful and lawful protest by the frontman for an
organisation founded and chaired by an economic parasite who has brought mayhem
across the world to pursue ‘open societies’ in the interests of predatory
finance, Stone states: ‘On the global scale, we need to recognize the present
crisis as a powerful backlash against decades of progress in forging more open
societies’. (Ibid.). Never mind that the ‘backlash’ has been against the
oligarchic parasites who masquerade as champions of humanity. The anti-Trump
street mobs are too befuddle to understand, and too bigoted to listen. Perhaps
an apt response, given the hysteria of the rioters, and the kid-gloves of the
police, would be for the mobilisation of American workers and farmers with axe
handles to the ready?
/https://www.niagarafallsreview.ca/content/dam/thestar/news/canada/2021/09/25/huawei-executive-meng-wanzhou-receives-warm-welcome-upon-return-to-china/_1_meng_wanzhou_2.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.