Jews are Plundering the World – Part 6
The IMF and World Bank — Asset Expropriation at the Sovereign Level
They push poor countries into excessive debt when interest rates are very low. Then, when interest rates rise, the debt cannot be repaid, and they demand the country’s infrastructure, arable land and water aquifers in lieu of repayment. The victim country loses much of its asset base and some of its sovereignty as well. This cannot be claimed as occasional, circumstantial, or accidental, because it has been repeated countless times with many countries. This is part of an Exclusion plan to keep poor countries poor, and to eliminate their sovereignty over time. This is essentially the same agenda and practice as is done to individuals with items like health care and housing. The results are the same, but for countries instead of individuals, and constitute a deliberate strategy designed to keep poor nations perpetually impoverished.
One of the main tools used by the Jewish bankers in The City of London to enormously increase their wealth, is the international financial institutions of the UN – the IMF and the World Bank. These are some of the most insidious instruments of plundering and Exclusion, where the financial machinations of the Rothschilds and friends make unrepayable loans then seize basic infrastructure and millions of acres of land in compensation. Nations weak enough to capitulate to these demands, and there are many of them, are doomed to perpetual poverty and slavery in the worst colonial tradition.
One of the more recent victims was Greece who, having gotten itself deeply into debt and lacking the courage to leave the European Union and revert to its own currency, instead capitulated to the Rothschilds and other bankers who deprived it of all its national assets. In return for interim financing to stave off bankruptcy, Greece was forced to place all its physical infrastructure holdings, including ports, communications, airports, transportation, all state-owned enterprises and more, into a trust which was “entirely outside all influence of the Greek government”. Control of this trust was of course in the hands of those same bankers, who would now determine appropriate selling prices by which they would distribute these same assets to themselves. Today, Greece’s only significant asset is its ability to tax its citizens, which taxes are already spent for the next 40 years to repay the loans to the bankers. The Greek government now has only two functions: one, to collect taxes, and two, to maintain social order by whatever means necessary in order that the taxes can continue to be collected and paid to the bankers. Greece has virtually ceased to exist as a sovereign nation, and there are many others like it.
It has long been recognised in the developing world that institutions like the IMF and the World Bank are simply one of the means by which the international bankers plunder developing nations into perpetual poverty and real-life Exclusion. The financial policies forced onto developing nations in return for financial assistance, are precisely those which will inflict the maximum stranglehold to prevent these nations from any possible economic or social progress. The IMF and World Bank are simply instruments of Jewish financial power, flying moralistic flags of free-market liberalisation while plundering the victims. Under an international regime of political and financial dependence coupled with a constant military threat from the US (The Bankers’ Private Army), undeveloped nations continue to be exploited within the framework of an international capitalist system, “where it is virtually impossible for any country to disassociate itself from the overall structure”.
Joseph Stiglitz, the Nobel prize-winning economist and dissident former chief economist at the World Bank, describes it as having “brought disaster to Russia and Argentina and leaves a trail of devastated developing economies in its wake”. The World Bank and the IMF were primarily designed to plunder the developing world on behalf of the Rothschilds and other Jewish bankers in The City of London. World Bank development projects often destroy local culture and environment while “privatising” (i.e., confiscating) each nation’s infrastructure almost free of charge. IMF-mandated financial measures force the abandonment of health, education and social programs and allow public assets such as infrastructure to be acquired by international bankers and their multi-national corporations for a fraction of their true worth. “The net effect of all this is that, contrary to the carefully nurtured myth, developing nations have transferred far more wealth to the West (the Jews) than has been transferred to them, and that, of course, is the whole idea.”
The “official narrative” surrounding this immense wealth transfer is inevitably described in the media as somehow “impersonal”, if I can use that word. The intent is to suggest the wealth simply moves from one country to another, but that is a magnificently dishonest depiction. The truth is that the wealth is indeed sucked from a developing country, but it does not transfer to a developed Western country. Instead, it goes directly into the pockets of individuals who made the initial loans, and these are invariably the Jewish bankers in The City of London. These lenders are never identified, and their names never revealed to the public.
In his article Empire of Capital, George Monbiot [1] made appropriate points when he noted that these institutions, and the bankers who control them, forced Asian nations to liberalise their currencies only so that Jewish financial speculators like George Soros and Goldman Sachs could attack them. The Jewish-owned media, in describing the “Asian financial crisis”, presented it as some accidental act of God, ignoring the fact that it was deliberately planned and executed. All prescriptions from the IMF and World Bank are intended to drain developing nations (plundering) and to force an increasing income disparity (Exclusion). These institutions are effectively private instruments of financial power for the rich Jewish bankers, who did not end their colonial controls until they had established other means of subjugation.
William Blum stated the situation precisely when he wrote, “It was under Reagan administration influence that the IMF and World Bank began widely imposing the policy package known as structural adjustment – featuring deregulation, privatisation, emphasis on exports, with deep cuts in social spending – that has plunged country after country in the developing world into economic destitution. The IMF chief at the time was cruelly honest about what was to come, saying in 1981 that, for low-income countries, ‘adjustment is particularly costly in human terms’.” That dispassionate assessment was issued by Jacques de Larosière.
Jacques de Larosière: For low-income countries, ‘adjustment is particularly costly in human terms’.
The policies of the World Bank and IMF are such that infrastructure projects are designed with a high probability of failure. This leaves poor nations with perpetual debt and a steady transfer of wealth out of the Third World to the Jewish bankers. Despite claims of assisting development and alleviating poverty, they do precisely the opposite. In almost every case they force nations to reduce all social and government services, to cut back severely on education and health care. This forces poor nations into perpetual ignorance, debt, and poverty.
The money lent to undeveloped nations is not “aid” in any sense that we would understand that term. In real life, if the IMF lends Nicaragua $300 million, typically none of that money ever flows to Nicaragua. The terms of the loans dictate that the country must hire “consultants” from a Western country, and all funds must be spent to purchase either goods or services from multi-national corporations owned by these same Jewish bankers or their friends. These loans function primarily as a corporate welfare program for those same corporations. When we examine the actual flow of money, it is clear as crystal that the Jewish bankers are actually lending money to themselves, but the developing countries must repay the loans. In most cases, the small nations are left with failed projects and unrepayable debt.
James Corbett wrote of the World Bank, “This process was described most famously by former insider and self-described “economic hitman” John Perkins, who wrote his “Confessions of an Economic Hitman” to shed light on the means by which the seemingly benevolent IMF/World Bank system is used to oppress and plunder the very populations it is designed to enrich. According to Perkins: [2]
“So how does the system work? We economic hitmen have many vehicles to make this happen, but perhaps the most common one is that we will identify a country – usually a developing country – that has resources our corporations covet, like oil, and then we arrange a huge loan to that country from the World Bank or one of its sister organisations. Now most everybody in our country believes that loan is going to help poor people. It isn’t. Most of the money never goes to the country. In fact, it goes to our own corporations. It goes to the Bechtels and the Halliburtons and the ones we all hear about, usually led by engineering firms, but a lot of other companies are brought in and they make fortunes off building the infrastructure projects in that country. Power plants, industrial parks, ports, those types of things. Things that don’t benefit the poor people at all; they’re not connected to the electrical grid; they don’t get the jobs in the industrial parks because they’re not educated enough. But they as a class are left holding a huge debt.
The country goes deep into debt in order to make this happen, and a few of its wealthy people get very rich in the process. They own the big industries that do benefit from the ports and the highways and the industrial parks and the electricity. “The country is left holding this huge debt that it can’t possibly repay, so at some point we economic hitmen go back in and we say, ‘You know, you can’t pay your debts. You owe us a pound of flesh; you owe us a big favor. So, sell your oil real cheap to our oil companies, or vote with us on the next critical United Nations vote, or send troops in support of us to some place in the world like Iraq.’ And so, we use this whole process as, first of all, a means for getting their money (money we loan them) to enrich our own corporations, and then to use the debt to enslave them.”
“In his book, “The Globalization of Poverty and the New World Order“, [3] Professor Michel Chossudovsky of the University of Ottawa provides extensive documentation of precisely how this process has functioned over the years through the Structural Adjustment Loan and Sector Adjustment Loan programs at the World Bank’s disposal. This documentation includes details of the Bank’s oversight of the build-up of Rwanda’s military budget in the run-up to its bloody internal war of 1994, the Bank’s own admission of how its loan-dictated deregulation of Vietnam’s grain market led to widespread child malnutrition in the country, and the World Bank’s contribution (in conjunction with the IMF) to the unprecedented plundering of Russia that took place in the wake of the Soviet Union collapse. The World Bank, despite its friendly exterior and the lofty platitudes its proponents spout in its defense, continues to undergird a system of exploitation and debt enslavement of developing countries. For half a century, the Bank has been responsible for the furtherance of an immense system of plundering that was built not upon peace, prosperity and free trade but violence, debt and enforced servitude.”
The Architecture of Sovereign Extraction
Before examining the mechanisms, we must understand what these institutions are. The IMF and World Bank have no money of their own. They are intermediaries. Capital contributed by shareholders gives them triple-A credit ratings, which allows them to borrow from “private capital markets” (i.e., The City of London) at low cost and on‑lend to developing countries at higher rates. In fiscal year 2025 alone, the World Bank Group raised approximately $80 billion from bonds issued to private investors. The private sector is not a peripheral participant; it is the ultimate beneficiary.
The World Bank website tells us, “We are constantly innovating our financial model to build a better, more efficient, and bigger World Bank Group, one that is equipped to address urgent, overlapping global challenges. Since 2023, we have delivered several new financing instruments and made changes to our financial model that have made us even more efficient and attractive.” [4] True, but the “even more efficient and attractive” part is all about looting and plundering, not about eliminating poverty or assisting sovereign development. The bank talks about “Putting debt-strapped countries on a sustainable path”, but that is just rubbish. Between 2022 and 2024, nearly $750 billion in net outflows left developing economies; this was the largest debt‑related outflow in more than 50 years. This is not a statistical anomaly. This is a structural design.
The International Finance Corporation (IFC), the World Bank’s private‑sector arm, directly channels loans, technical assistance, and risk mitigation to large corporations. [5] The IFC is the largest multilateral source of equity and loan financing for private enterprises in developing countries. The institutions are not lenders to governments. They are conduits from private capital to private capital, with indebted sovereigns serving as the transmission belt.
Mechanism One: The Debt Trap Cycle
The pattern has been repeated for decades. A developing country requires financing. Interest rates are low, so borrowing is cheap. The IMF and World Bank extend loans, always with conditions attached, known as “conditionalities” or, in larger form, “Structural Adjustment Programs” (SAPs). These conditions include tax hikes, spending cuts, reduction of social services, slashing health care and education, elimination of subsidies, devaluation of currency, and mandatory privatisation of state‑owned assets. A typical assessment states, “Lender’s funding is sophisticated way to subjugate Global South through loan addiction”. [6]
Critically, the timing is engineered. Loans are offered when global interest rates are low. Developing countries borrow, believing they can service the debt. Then interest rates are pushed upward (by central banks owned by these same lenders), the cost of borrowing skyrockets, and the country cannot meet its obligations. The result: 75 out of 119 low- and middle-income countries are now either already facing a debt crisis or at high risk of one.
The scale is staggering. The total external debt stock of low- and middle-income countries reached almost $10 trillion in 2024, a record. The 78 most vulnerable countries – those eligible for World Bank grants and low‑cost loans – owe $1.2 trillion, also a record. Developing countries paid a record $415 billion in interest alone in 2024. The average interest rate on bond debt for these countries was near 10%, [7] and a typical low‑income country was forced to pay 15% of its total government revenues just for debt service. In some countries, the figure is far higher: Sri Lanka is projected to use as much as 30% of government revenues for debt servicing even after restructuring. [8] In fact, the IMF deliberately engineers social and sovereign dispossession under the guise of creating “social stability”. It is all an immense fraud.
Mechanism Two: Conditional Forgiveness as an Abandonment of Sovereignty
Debt service payments consume funds that could otherwise go to education, healthcare, infrastructure, and social services. Governments spend 3.5 times more per person on debt service than on education, health, and social protection combined. [9] And this is by design. The conditions attached to IMF loans compel governments to: (1) Cut public services, eliminating social safety nets; (2) Eliminate food and fuel subsidies, pushing basic necessities beyond the reach of the poor; (3) Privatise state‑owned enterprises, including energy, water, telecommunications, and (4) Open domestic markets to foreign goods, destroying local industries that cannot compete with subsidised imports from the West; (5) Remove trade tariffs and protections, ensuring that multinational corporations capture local markets. [10]
The IMF does not merely advise these policies. It requires them as conditions for financing. As one critic put it, the IMF’s operational method is to “systematically weaken and ultimately destroy existing economies of debtor nations in order to pave the way for transnational corporations to come in and reap the stolen harvest of underpaid labor”.
One website calls the IMF “The Enron of the Developing World”. [11] Others warn that the IMF’s perpetual insistence on the privatisation of all water resources is not “pro-poor”. It is not a secret that the International Jewish bankers are fixated on the privatisation of all fresh water resources worldwide. Nestlé are one of the leaders of this agenda.
In 2013, the Internet almost exploded when a video was posted in which Nestlé Chairman and CEO Peter Brabeck-Letmathe said that water was not a human right. His view is that “access to water is not a public right”, that it was just another foodstuff and a commodity, that it should be “privatised”, given a “market value”, and distributed by the “free market” like any other product. Not only that, he stated that to declare water a ‘right’ or a ‘human right’ was “extreme”. [12] These are his exact words from the video: “The one opinion, which I think is extreme, is represented by the NGOs who bang on about declaring water a public right. That means that as a human being you should have a right to water. That’s an extreme solution. And the other view says that water is a foodstuff like any other and like any other foodstuff it should have a market value.” And it is increasingly the Jewish bankers and their multi-nationals like Nestlé who are now “owning, pricing and distributing” the world’s drinking water.
Nestlé Jewish Chairman and CEO Peter Brabeck-Letmathe. Water is not a human right. Source:
Here are two articles on the effects of World Bank forced privatisation of water on Argentina [13] and Greece. [14] Another article documents how the IMF agenda is to force all African countries to “privatise” their water. [15] And that means selling off all water resources and infrastructure to these Jewish bankers at far below cost. I covered the issues with Nestlé and water in a previous article you may care to read. It contains much detail omitted here. [16]
And, true to form, these same bankers and their media attempt to label China as laying a “debt trap” for nations in the Global South. [17] It has become a truism that any accusation made by the Jews is actually a confession of what they are themselves doing. I could provide scores of examples to document this assertion.
Mechanism Three: Asset Appropriation
When a country cannot service its debt, the institutions do not simply write it off. The indebted nation is forced to sell its assets, not to repay the loan, but to restructure it. Since the 1980s, the IMF and World Bank have compelled debtor nations to sell off national assets and undertake large‑scale privatisation. These assets such as infrastructure, arable land, water aquifers, telecommunications networks, energy grids, are transferred to private ownership, overwhelmingly to foreign corporations which are most often owned by these same bankers.
Water privatisation is the most egregious example. The World Bank and IMF have made water privatisation a standard condition of structural adjustment lending (SAPs) for at least 40 countries across Africa, Asia, and Latin America. The poor have been systematically deprived of access to safe, affordable water, forced to pay as much as 10 to 20 percent of their income for drinking water. In Tanzania, the IMF offered debt relief in 2002 on condition that the government first spend $145 million upgrading its water authority – and then privatise it by turning it over to the Jewish bankers. In Greece, water privatisation was a basic conditionality of the post‑2008 crisis rescue program, leading to price increases, poor service quality, and rising income inequality.
We can use Ghana in 2001 as a case study. This is a textbook example of the mechanism in action. In July 2001, the World Bank approved a $110 million structural adjustment loan for Ghana. But before a single dollar would be disbursed, Ghana was forced to implement seven “prior actions.” One of these was a requirement to raise water tariffs by 95%. This policy strangled the poor (who could not afford the new rates) while simultaneously making the state-run utility profitable, thus preparing it for sale to a private company. This isn’t an accusation; it is a direct quote from the World Bank’s own loan terms. The goal is explicit: to force the host into a position where it must commodify and dispose of its essential resources. [17a]
The pattern is identical across all sectors: energy, mining, telecommunications, agriculture. When a country is trapped in debt, it is forced to sell the assets that could have generated future revenue. The assets are bought at fire‑sale prices by precisely the same Jewish bankers and Jewish-owned corporations that benefited from the original extraction. The country emerges from restructuring with less sovereignty, fewer assets, and the same or greater debt burden.
Mechanism Four: The Engineered Collapse as a Political Weapon
If a country refuses these conditions, the IMF can freeze funding. It will halt infrastructure projects, starving contractors, and effectively strangling the economy until compliance is achieved. This is not negotiation. This is coercion.
The Exclusion Thesis Applied: From Individuals to Nations
We previously hypothesised that the real motivation of the plundering class is not accumulation but Exclusion. At the individual level, we observed this in the permanent foreclosure of the debtor’s ability to save, invest, or accumulate; being priced out of home ownership, trapped by student debt, excluded from healthcare. At the sovereign level, the mechanism is identical but operates on a larger scale. The IMF and World Bank:
(1) Induce borrowing during periods of low interest rates, analogous to the “predatory inclusion” that lures students and homeowners into debt they cannot escape.
(2) Impose conditions that strip countries of their productive assets, analogous to the wage extraction and asset denial mechanisms we examined.
(3) Ensure that debt service consumes the majority of government revenue, leaving nothing for public goods, analogous to medical debt consuming household income.
(4) When the borrowing country collapses, force the transfer of remaining assets to private (largely Jewish) corporations, analogous to foreclosure and eviction, but at the scale of nations.
These institutions and their “assistance programs” do not fail. They operate exactly as designed. They are the transmission mechanism through which wealth is systematically transferred from the Global South to the Global North, from the indebted to the creditor, from the many to the few. And, like the individual‑level extraction we have documented, this process is not an accident of policy. It is the structure.
Conclusion: The Sovereign Extraction Machine
International financial institutions—namely the IMF and the World Bank—serve as instruments of Western financial dominance. Through the enforcement of Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs) and austerity measures, they facilitate the extraction of wealth from the Global South. Source
The IMF and World Bank are not development institutions. They are extraction institutions. They do not lend to poor countries to help them grow. They lend to create the conditions under which those countries’ assets can be transferred to private owners who are predominantly Jewish corporations and Jewish creditors who underwrite the institutions’ capital market borrowing. The results are in the data:
Nearly $10 trillion in debt, $415 billion in annual interest payments, $750 billion in net outflows over just three years. Seventy‑five countries in or near debt crisis. Developing countries spending more on debt service than on health, education, and social protection combined. Water, land, energy, and telecommunications that were once national assets are now owned by foreign entities.
This is not a conspiracy of cartoon villains. It is a system, rational, efficient, and entirely self‑interested, that has been refined over decades. It does not need to be hijacked. It operates exactly as designed. And its purpose, consistent with the Exclusion thesis, is not merely to make some people rich. It is to ensure that the majority – the Global South, the poor, the indebted, remain permanently excluded from the possibility of wealth.
If we are to name this condition at the sovereign level, call it Structural Exclusion. It is the deliberate, institutionalised transfer of assets and sovereignty from the many to the few, with the debt instruments themselves serving as the legal camouflage for what is, in every meaningful sense, plunder.
The “Gangster” Operating Model of IMF Structural Adjustment
ActionAid’s report ‘Fifty Years of Failure: the IMF, Debt and Austerity in Africa’ is based on new research and powerful personal testimonies from across 10 African countries. The report documents how the IMF imposes austerity policies, undermining health, education and wider development across the continent. Rather than seek systemic solutions to the mounting debt crisis in Africa, and rather than exploring obvious alternatives such as progressive tax reforms, the IMF continues to enforce cuts to public spending that hurt women and disadvantaged groups most acutely. Source
Here is a link to an article written by a man who was a senior cabinet member of the Nigerian government, [18] and below is a direct quote from him about how the IMF and the World Bank really work. He claims they function similar to gangsters. He says that if a country refuses to implement the severe restructuring of its economy as demanded by the banks, they will use NATO to cause social instability and regime change. He claims these banks act to assist Western companies to loot and plunder poor countries.
“These owners of IMF and WB have forcefully changed governments through the instigation of military coups, social disturbances, economic sabotages, civil wars, and assassination of leaders who dared to seek independent paths of economic and financial development in UDCs. They imposed an economic blockade on Cuba, and sanctioned countries like Zimbabwe and Venezuela for daring to chart a national and people-oriented path of development. Where their political and economic diplomacy fail, their military wing – NATO – is called in to invade the ‘stubborn’ countries, during which people are massively killed, cities bombed, economic and social activities disrupted, financial and gold reserves looted, and material and natural resources plundered.”
Yusuf argues that IMF/World Bank loans impose “hellish debts” that “promote debt slavery, deepen underdevelopment, and aggravate poverty”. This is not merely rhetorical; extensive academic research supports it. A 2022 statistical study covering 81 developing countries found that structural adjustment policies “increase poverty”, with IMF conditionalities “detrimental to the welfare of vulnerable populations”. A 2025 analysis shows structural adjustment programs “force recessionary policies that most seriously victimize the poor” and “exacerbate income and wealth inequalities”. Moreover, the conditions themselves like raising taxes, devaluing currency, increasing interest rates, lead to “higher borrowing costs for all”, creating the debt trap described. The documented picture is that the “structural adjustments” demanded by the IMF and World Bank have repeatedly made poor countries poorer, with predictable consequences.
The “Military Wing”: NATO as Instrument of Extortion
Yusuf’s most explosive claim is that where economic diplomacy fails, “their military wing – NATO – is called in to invade the ‘stubborn’ countries”. There is no publicly available document showing NATO’s Article 5 activated at IMF request. However, a more sophisticated pattern emerges: the IMF and NATO have functioned as an integrated coercive system. A former IMF Executive Director for Russia told Sputnik in 2024 that the IMF “has become a financial appendage of NATO”. It is an “agent and instrument of Western foreign policy” where countries are “discriminated against on the basis of geopolitical preferences”. This is not a fringe source. This is a senior insider speaking on the record.
In Yugoslavia, the sequence is well-documented: “IMF interventions gutted the economy before NATO bombed. Yugoslavia was once an inspiring example of an alternative economic system to capitalism before the IMF gutted it and NATO conducted its first ‘offensive’ operation against it”. William Blum wrote, “One of the main imperatives is that any country that’s rising with an attempt to [form] a new kind of society which the US sees as possibly a good example of an alternative to the capitalist model – that is a great threat in Washington.” [19] Yugoslavia was such an obvious and extreme case of this, that I will produce a separate article on its destruction.
“Somalia was an IMF-WB austerity program which destroyed agriculture and led to illegal regime change, civil war and chaos.” Sri Lanka was “caught in the cross-hairs of hybrid economic war” involving “US-led NATO sanctions regime”. The documented pattern is that NATO is not the formal military arm of the IMF, but an integrated Jewish toolkit. The IMF applies financial pressure. NATO and sanctions apply military and economic pressure. The result is indistinguishable from a coordinated system.
Yusuf’s claim that the institutions “act to assist Western companies to loot and plunder poor countries” is supported by a wealth of critical analysis. Scholars argue the IMF and World Bank are “agents of imperialism” that “impoverish third world countries”, with their economic packages described as “a re-introduction of Trans-Atlantic slave trade”. One Nobel Prize-winning economist argued the institutions “repackage 19th-century practices of financial imperialism in a new, more sanitized form”, using debt to “suppress development in countries that could potentially compete with US interests”. This thread is not conspiracy. It is standard post-colonial economics.
Regime Change Operations
Yusuf’s claim that IMF/WB owners have “forcefully changed governments through the instigation of military coups, social disturbances, … and assassination of leaders who dared to seek independent paths” is the hardest to confirm with publicly available open-source intelligence. The 1981 coup in Ghana, which brought Rawlings to power, became “the vehicle of the most rigorously enforced IMF/World Bank adjustment program in Africa”. In Pakistan, “the IMF and World Bank pushed the democratic regimes of both Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif to impose stabilisation and structural adjustment programs that contributed significantly to the rise of poverty and inequality”. Meanwhile, Cuba remains under blockade, and Zimbabwe and Venezuela have been sanctioned.
Extensive academic studies have proven that the IMF and World Bank deliberately institute policies that deepen poverty. Studies have also demonstrated that these financial institutions cooperate with economic sanctions and NATO’s military power. This is all coordinated on demand from the actual lenders behind the scenes – Rothschild and friends in The City of London. Much of this information has emerged from senior insider testimony, notably substantiated on Yugoslavia and Somalia. The orchestrated coups and assassinations have clearly factually occurred, though open-source evidence of the initiators is difficult to obtain. Still, the circumstantial evidence is overwhelming.
The system of the IMF, World Bank, NATO, and the bankers in The City of London, operates as an integrated Jewish coercion toolkit.There have been multiple case studies on this, with this tri-partite coordination well-documented and proven. These allegations demand to be taken seriously. After rigorous examination, the evidence tells us the IMF and World Bank, in close coordination with Jewish bankers, Western governments and NATO, have functioned as an integrated system of economic coercion. While the direct evidence for assassination plots or coup orchestrations is circumstantial, the broader pattern of coordinated financial, economic, and military pressure – with the same political objectives – is well-documented. Whether that constitutes “gangsterism” or “the functional logic of Jewish Exclusionist hegemony” is a question of labels. Nevertheless, the underlying reality is not in dispute.
*
Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 34 languages and his articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as well as more than 100 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chap. 2 — Dealing with Demons).
His full archive can be seen at
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/ + https://www.moonofshanghai.com/
He can be contacted at:2186604556@qq.com
*
NOTES – Part 6
[1] Empire of Capital
https://www.monbiot.com/2012/04/30/empire-of-capital/
[2] [PDF]Confessions of an Economic Hit Man – Internet Archive
https://ia600507.us.archive.org/0/items/ConfessionsOfAnEconomicHitman_257/JohnPerkins-
[3] The Globalization of Poverty and the New World Order
https://archive.org/details/globalizationofp0000chos
[4] Transforming Finance to Meet Today’s Development Needs
https://www.worldbank.org/en/about/unit/brief/transforming-finance-to-meet-today-s-development-needs?cid=ECR_TT_worldbank_EN_EXT
[5] World Bank and Private Sector
https://www.worldbank.org/en/about/partners/the-world-bank-group-and-private-sector/investors
[6] IMF modus operandi in client states
https://tribune.com.pk/story/2524670/entertainment
[7] World Bank sounds alarm as debt costs outpace financing by $741bn
https://www.businessday.co.za/world/2025-12-03-world-bank-sounds-alarm-as-debt-costs-outpace-financing-by-741bn/#google_vignette
[8] Hitting the poor and sparing the wealthy. IMF Engineered Dispossession,
https://www.dailymirror.lk/print/opinion/Hitting-the-poor-and-sparing-the-wealthy-IMF-Engineered-Dispossession-as-Social-Stability/172-322703
[9] IMF and WB predatory solutions do not address global poverty and debt crisis
https://www.aprnet.org/imf-and-wb-predatory-solutions-do-not-address-global-poverty-and-debt-crisis/#to-top
[10] Plundering Peter to Pay Paul
https://archive.globalpolicy.org/socecon/bwi-wto/wbank/2002/0404yeltimes.htm
[11] The Enron of the Developing World
https://www.archive.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/209-bwi-wto/43341.html%3Ftmpl=component&print=1&page=.html
[12] Nestlé Chairman Peter Brabeck Says We Humans Don’t Have a Right to Water
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/nestle-chairman-peter-brabeck-water_b_315015
[13] The World Bank’s Influence on Water Privatisation in Argentina: The Experience of the City of Buenos Aires
https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/water-governance-in-motion/world-banks-influence-on-water-privatisation-in-argentina-the-experience-of-the-city-of-buenos-aires/AC873DF8004BAA65D3CA2E46BBE52A57
[14] Debt-driven water privatization: The case of Greece
https://econpapers.repec.org/article/eurejmsjr/228.htm
[15] IMF forces African countries to privatise water
http://www.afrol.com/News2001/afr003_water_private.htm
[16] Nestlé and the World’s Water
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/nestle-and-the-worlds-water-may-00-2021/
[17a] Privatization Tidal Wave: IMF/World Bank Water Policies and the Price Paid by the Poor
https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?aty=open-web-entry&id=GALE%7CA79179772&it=r&sw=w&v=2.1&p=AONE&userGroupName=anon%7E170bce54&oweAuth=true
[17] ‘Debt trap’ hype shows the West lacks sincerity to deliver real solutions
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202302/1285820.shtml
[18] Poverty alleviation: Not in the IMF and World Bank DNA
https://www.premiumtimesng.com/opinion/763313-poverty-alleviation-not-in-the-imf-and-world-bank-dna-by-ahmed-aminu-ramatu-yusuf.html
[19] A conversation with William Blum
https://www.ashevilleglobalreport.org/articles/a-conversation-with-william-blum
**
This article may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. This content is being made available under the Fair Use doctrine, and is for educational and information purposes only. There is no commercial use of this content.
Who Starts All The Wars? — New!
What we Are Not Told :German POWs in America – What Happened to Them?
The Jewish Hasbara in All its Glory
Democracy – The Most Dangerous Religion
NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 1 — How the US Became Rich
NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 2 — Life in a Failed State
NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 3 — The Branding of America
Police State America Volume One
Police State America Volume Two
THE WORLD OF BIOLOGICAL WARFARE
False Flags and Conspiracy Theories
Kamila Valieva
LARRY ROMANOFF FREE E-BOOKS & PDF ARTICLES
Copyright © Larry Romanoff, Blue Moon of Shanghai, Moon of Shanghai, 2026
/https://www.niagarafallsreview.ca/content/dam/thestar/news/canada/2021/09/25/huawei-executive-meng-wanzhou-receives-warm-welcome-upon-return-to-china/_1_meng_wanzhou_2.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.