EN — LARRY ROMANOFF: Debunking Elon Musk – Part 17 — Emasculation of National Sovereignty

  

Debunking Elon Musk – Part 17

Emasculation of National Sovereignty

By Larry Romanoff

 

This is one of the most important documents you will ever read. Its content is of extreme importance to each and every one of us.

 

 

 

 

Introduction

World Government

Supranational Sovereignty

Nationalism

ISDS

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)

A Second Look at DOGE

A Professional Litigant

Judge-Shopping

Intimidation Through Litigation

The Example of Canada

Advertisers

NGOs

Connecting Some Dots

Jewish Privilege

Apple’s Rotten Core

The Sackler Family

AMEX

Nestlé – Murdering With Milk

Nestlé and The World’s Water

Pfizer’s Perfectly-Timed Epidemic

Epilogue

 

 

Introduction

 

 

This article continues from the previous Part 16 where I wrote that Elon Musk’s genius was never technical—it was as a human smokescreen for the largest sovereignty transfer in history. For your easy reference, I will repeat here three brief paragraphs from the end of Part 16.

 

The scale and coordination behind Elon Musk’s persona operation unquestionably required an infrastructure with global influence. Based on financial trails, geopolitical patterns and media mechanics, the evidence points to a London-based financial syndicate as the architect; Rothschild and the Jewish bankers in The City of London. This massive, decades-long enterprise clearly had a centralised command, but one that transcended conventional profit-seeking or market manipulation. The evidence points to a more profound objective: dismantling national sovereignty, with Musk’s persona serving as the Trojan horse for an irreversible power shift. Musk’s genius was never technical—it was as a human smokescreen for the largest sovereignty transfer in history.

 

The strategic purpose was to neutralise governments, privatise governance, and financialise national sovereignty. Musk’s early “cute/retarded/harmless” image was the glossy wrapper that made financial, technical, and digital, predation palatable. Musk’s later “rebel genius” branding served as camouflage for the mechanisms to bypass all national sovereignty. Elon Musk’s cute sideways-eyes puppy face was the “user-friendly” interface masking complex and very hostile foreign intent. It made the digital enclosure of society feel like progress rather than corporate enslavement.

 

This is simple to understand if you can grasp one thing: Elon Musk’s “persona” was not the product; it was the packaging. This was never about Elon Musk; it was about building a human API for Jewish capital to rule nations across borders, as if those borders didn’t exist. The London Jewish syndicates bet that a “techno-messiah” could legitimise their seizure of digital and physical infrastructure. The endgame is to replace nation-states with a kind of “algorithmic feudalism” where Musk’s persona legitimises London’s control.

 

This essay continues with the sovereignty transfer effected by Elon Musk, by his outrageous persona magnification, and by his DOGE and related activities. But, to help you fully understand the dynamics of all this, and the potential effects, we need some background. Bear with me, because this background is important.

 

In an earlier essay titled “Humanity at the Crossroads“, [1] I began with the following statement:

 

Humankind is at a cusp, a point of transition between two different states of governance and existence. The world today is like a sack being slowly filled while the string around the opening is pulled increasingly tighter to prevent the contents from escaping confinement. The shadows of this future are everywhere to be seen but even the keenest of observers tend to view the portents not as the warnings they are, but instead regard all these pieces of one despairing puzzle as disconnected and unrelated events.

 

For, dark and despairing, my sight I may seal, but man cannot hide what God would reveal. ‘Tis the sunset of life gives me mystical lore, and coming events cast their shadow before. [2]

 

Those words are becoming increasingly important to each and every one of us. In this essay, we will take a look at where our world is going, how it is going there, and why it is going there.

 

World Government

 

 

This is not a fantasy, and it most definitely is not a “conspiracy theory”. The thoughts and plans for a one-world government have been in execution by the Khazar Jewish bankers in The City of London for at least the past 200 years. The signs are everywhere. We need only look and connect the dots.

 

On February 17, 1950, the Jewish banker James Paul Warburg made this statement in testimony to the US Senate: “We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” [3] Warburg was the son of Paul Moritz Warburg, and a nephew of Felix Warburg and of Jacob Schiff, both Jewish bankers at Kuhn, Loeb & Co.

 

Some readers will remember the old stories about the Bilderberg Group, the existence of which was hotly denied for decades, with so many astute observers derided as “conspiracy theorists” until the truth was finally revealed: This was David Rockefeller, speaking at the June, 1991 Bilderberger meeting in Baden, Germany: “We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” [4] Rockefeller confessed further in his memoirs, “If accused of conspiring to build a supranational structure overriding national sovereignty, I am guilty and proud.”

 

There are two things of which you should take note in the above quotations. First, the statement by Paul Warburg. Think what must have already been in motion, and for how long, for Warburg to have made such a definitive and bold statement – in public – to the US Senate. This was a presumptuous and patronising statement, dismissive, essentially a declaration to the Senators that “their days were numbered”, that they were heading for a future of irrelevancy – and that they didn’t have to like it. Warburg was not speaking for himself; he was speaking for Rothschild and the cabal of Jewish bankers in The City of London where these plans and their execution originated. To make such a public declaration, Warburg was essentially telling the US Senate that the plans for a one-world government were already so far along that they could not be prevented.

 

Now think of the statement by David Rockefeller. There is no way to misunderstand the man’s words. He is openly admitting to a conspiracy among all the major US media (all Jewish-owned) and the bankers behind the Bilderberg Group. It was a conspiracy of silence that lasted nearly 40 years, where the media possessed full knowledge of the existence of this group and of their plans for a world government, but hid the truth and severely damaged the reputations of anyone who attempted to expose it. He not only says it would have been impossible to develop those plans had they been revealed prematurely, but that a “supranational sovereignty” of Jewish bankers is “surely preferable” to nations determining their own paths.

 

There was more. Montagu Norman, who was a Rothschild agent and the Governor of the Rothschild-owned Central Bank of England, said in a speech to the United States Bankers’ Association in 1924:

 

“Capital must protect itself in every possible way, both by combination and legislation. Debts must be collected, mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When, through the process of law, the common people lose their homes, they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of government applied by a central power of wealth under leading financiers. These truths are well known among our principal men who are now engaged in forming an imperialism to govern the world. By dividing the voter through the political party system, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting for questions of no importance. It is thus by discreet action we can secure for ourselves that which has been so well planned and so successfully accomplished.” [5] The quote contains several distinct ideas, all of which should seem truly ominous for people in almost every country.

 

(1) Debt enslavement

(2) people losing their homes; becoming renters or homeless

(3) government of central power by bankers

(4) bankers are now engaged in forming an imperialism to govern the world

(5) “democracy” is a sham to divide and conquer the population; people waste their time on “questions of no importance”.

(6) “we can secure for ourselves that which has been so well planned”. If this isn’t a “conspiracy”, then what would be?

 

I would add a note on debt enslavement. The US is a classic case. In addition to all other debt, we now have tens of millions of graduate university students owing hundreds of thousands of dollars each in student loans – at interest rates as high as 17%, and these loans cannot be forgiven by bankruptcy. They will be perpetual. Another note would be firms like Blackstone exploiting housing shortages by purchasing countless tens of thousands of homes, with monthly ownership costs now exceeding renting by $1,000 in Western markets. This is true in most Western countries and in some Eastern European nations as well, where home ownership is now literally just a dream. This “home shortage” is not an accident; it is part of the agenda. No such event could occur “by accident” in 25 or 30 countries simultaneously. Montagu Norman meant what he said about people being docile when they have no home, or at least no home that they own.

 

Supranational Sovereignty

 

The Rhodes “scholarships” were intended to conscript the best and brightest of young Western elites and send them to study in Oxford, where they would be indoctrinated with world government ideology.

 

Back to James Paul Warburg and David Rockefeller. It is the “supranational sovereignty” that is of interest to us, because this is not about “government”, but about governance. It is about sovereignty; about power over government. In this Jewish-banker-world-to-come, national governments will still exist, but they will have no power. They will still enforce traffic regulations, the garbage will still be collected, but not much else. Most everything will have been “privatised”. The bankers and industrialists will have taken ownership of everything that has a flow of money: the central banks, trade, banking, commerce, IP, education, health care, transportation, highways, ports, airports, communications, the production of goods, will be taken over and controlled by these bankers. All the infrastructure and primary natural resources of a nation will be in private hands, no longer under the control of any national government. And the remaining “government”, such as it will be, will have only two primary functions. One will be the collection of taxes to forward to the bankers, and the other will be population suppression of the citizens who resent living in that world and cannot bear that way of life. It is the difference between government and governance.

 

National sovereignty will actually no longer exist, if this dream comes to pass. All the power over the world would be in the hands of a very small number of Jewish bankers and industrialists who would own and control almost everything – including land and all fresh water. They would be subject to no laws except their own, as with the ISDS, and they will have all the wealth. The populations of each nation will be poor animals, no better than cattle. Klaus Schwab said nation-states are obsolete, and that unelected tech-banking elites would control global governance. Many who have tried to oppose this system have been killed. The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) was part of this, as was Elon Musk’s DOGE charade in the US.

 

These bankers claim that the idea of national sovereignty is outdated, an anachronism, no longer appropriate. The solution they propose is a “one-world government” to replace national sovereignty, a governance controlled by Jewish bankers that would rank higher than any national government. Justin Trudeau, Canada’s former Prime Minister, claimed his success in Canada being the world’s first “post-national state”. [6] He neglected to point out that the goal of his alternative is to override the rules, customs and sovereignty of individual nations. [7] No Canadians of understanding, approved of that description.

 

This is truly a dystopian future where foreign bankers and industrialists control all the essentials of life in a nation. The people, the future cattle-to-be, should have a visceral fear of nothingness and dehumanisation. This is not a secret. Men have been warning about this for centuries, but it seems few understand the looming peril. This is a kind of “silent coup” over national governments, with Jewish financial control replacing national sovereignty. In 1802, Thomas Jefferson said, “If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency … the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless.” And yet this is precisely what has happened.

 

There are also many Anglo-American power networks that exist to further the cause. These can be apparently-innocent think tanks, but there are many others we might not recognise in their clothing. One such is the Rhodes Trust which was established in the late 1800s, a brainchild of Cornelius Rhodes and one of the Rothschilds. These men laid out the plans for a Jewish-controlled world government back then. The Rhodes “scholarships” were intended to conscript the best and brightest of young Western elites and send them to study in Oxford, where they would be indoctrinated with world government ideology.

 

There have been some astonishing efforts to convert the US into an instant Jewish-controlled fascist dictatorship, which so far have failed. One such was an abortive attempt in 1934 at a military coup of the US, funded in the background by European Jews. [8] This was very real, and nearly succeeded. Its history has been so deeply buried, almost no one alive knows of it.

 

Again, in 1949, there was something called the “Atlantic Union Resolution“, secretly funded by Rockefeller interests (the “secret” part is that Rockefeller was a Rothschild agent), which proposed abolishing the US Declaration of Independence to create an Anglo-American super-state. But it is important to note that both the “Anglo” and the “American” portions of this super-state would have been comprised almost entirely of Jews.

 

Nationalism

 

As Napoleon expanded and his armies occupied many other European countries, those other countries all agreed national self-determination was the way to go. Uniting against the French regime created a sense of common destiny—a sense of nationalism. Source

 

Nationalism is usually thought of as love for one’s country or concern for one’s country. But the bankers who want to establish a world government, claim that nationalism is bad. The reason it is bad (for them) is that people who are “nationalist”, i.e., who love their country, will not want to cede sovereignty or ownership of resources or infrastructure to these foreign bankers.

 

In an earlier E-book on “How the US Became Rich” [9], I wrote the following:

 

At a conference in Mexico in 1945, the US demanded an ‘Economic Charter of the Americas’ [10] [11] designed to eliminate what it called “the scourge of economic nationalism”, determined to crush “the philosophy of the New Nationalism which embraces policies designed to bring about a broader distribution of wealth and to raise the standard of living of the masses”. A State Department official explained that this meant a US objection to Latin Americans who “were convinced that the first beneficiaries of the development of a country’s resources should be the people of that country”. In keeping with this attitude, the US agreed to recognize Mexico’s government only on condition that Article 27 of the Mexican Constitution would not apply to American oil companies. Article 27 stated that Mexican oil was the property of Mexico. (The State Department officials and the others involved in these negotiations were primarily Jews and Jewish bankers). You can see where that leads. “Nationalism” says “What’s mine is mine.” The bankers’ “supranational sovereignty” says “What’s yours is mine.”

 

European bankers have made many statements condemning nationalism as a curse.

 

Christine Lagarde (ECB President, Former IMF Head), said at the 2017 IMF Annual Meeting, “Economic nationalism is a sure-fire way to turn [a] recovery into a downturn.”

Mario Draghi (Former ECB President), in a 2012 speech at Harvard University, said, “National sovereignty is incompatible with the euro … It must be exercised jointly.” He was advocating the transfer of all fiscal powers from EU states to Brussels technocrats.

Klaus Schwab (WEF Founder), in the 2018 WEF Summit, said, “Nation-states must surrender sovereignty to global governance networks … The Fourth Industrial Revolution demands it.” He was pushing a kind of “stakeholder capitalism” where corporations and banks co-write the laws for all subject nations.

George Soros (Criminal Financier), in a speech at the 2019 Project Syndicate, said, “Nationalism is the greatest threat to the open society … We need global institutions with real enforcement powers.”

 

In the 2021 Annual Report of the Rothschild-owned Bank for International Settlements (BIS), was this comment: “National policy autonomy must be constrained to maintain financial globalization.” It is important to not underestimate the power of the BIS. It is an evil organisation. The “BIS Model” is based on debt dependency which requires weak states because weak nations surrender control to creditors (the Jewish bankers) during crises. A useful current case study is Greece who, in 2015, transferred budget authority to EU/IMF bankers in exchange for bailouts. If you don’t know about Greece, you should read the initial portion of my earlier essay Humanity at the Crossroads”. [12] It discusses Greece and how the country became virtually a failed state totally owned and controlled by a few bankers. As noted above, the “government” of Greece still exists, but it has no power.

 

The bankers attack nationalism so viciously not because it’s inherently harmful, but because it empowers a domestic government’s checks on the power of Jewish capital. It also enables the nationalisation of resources, as with Iran’s oil and Mexico’s lithium mines. And further, nationalism severely threatens the ISDS tribunal system that overrides national courts.

 

ISDS

 

 

“As European empires crumbled in the 20th century, the power structures that had dominated the world for centuries were up for renegotiation. Yet instead of a rebirth for democracy, what emerged was a silent coup – namely, the unstoppable rise of global corporate power.” [13] [14]

 

“What is called the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (or ISDS) is a powerful yet obscure global legal system through which multinational corporations can sue entire countries directly at shadowy international tribunals.” Its purpose is to enshrine the impoverishment of small nations by providing unimpeachable international “rights” for private Jewish bankers. This process has the power to prevent national financial legislation from hindering the ability of these bankers to plunder the Global South. It gives Jewish capital the right to force poor nations to surrender their essential raw materials and to prevent the taxation of those who take them.

 

The ISDS was created in the 1960s by the Jewish bankers in The City of London, the BIS, the World Bank and the IMF. It was done because the bankers saw an urgent need to protect Jewish “investors” in “lands seething with nationalism.” Eugene Black, a Jew, then president of the World Bank, condemned what he termed “a hostile attitude, by governments and peoples alike, toward the profit motive”. The hostility toward the profit motive was of course the simultaneous elimination of national sovereignty. The ISDS became a kind of automatic clause to be forcibly inserted into every international agreement on trade, and in every treaty, with poor nations. “The ISDS system was enshrined in thousands of international treaties that granted foreign investors access to it in case of disputes with governments. They effectively gave a state’s advance “consent” for foreign investors to file claims at places like ICSID. Almost all of these cases were filed by companies based in rich countries, against governments in poor countries.” [15] [16]

 

 

Eugene Black, left, with Israel’s Prime Minister David Ben Gurion in Jerusalem, May 6, 1960. (National Photo Collection of Israel, Wikimedia Commons, Public domain). Source:

 

The ISDS is truly an insidious piece of work. It permits corporations to sue governments for “lost profits”, in the most egregious circumstances. As one example, the Philip Morris tobacco company sued the tiny country of Uruguay for more than $2 billion, for lost profits due to anti-smoking laws. Something similar occurred with Australia, where revised tobacco packaging resulted in lost sales and the Australian government was sued for billions. The country eventually won this one, but it cost them more than $50 million to defend itself.

 

Another such case involved El Salvador. A Jewish-Canadian mining company wanted to open a gold mine, but had no rights to the respective lands and no plans to contain the severe pollution resulting from the mining process. A woman whose name should be recorded in infamy, Catherine McLeod-Seltzer, the President of the mining company, sued El Salvador for more than $300 million, about half of the little country’s annual tax revenue, representing the profits she would have made if she had been able to open the mine. [17] But, due to other disastrous mining ventures, El Salvador already had almost no un-contaminated fresh water, and this proposed mining venture would have contaminated the 10% remaining. Heedless of this humanitarian concern, Catherine McLeod-Seltzer filed a claim that El Salvador “wrongfully refused to grant permits for its exploration and exploitation projects, which rendered [Pacific Rim’s] mineral discovery in El Salvador worthless”. El Salvador eventually won, but this result was an extreme rarity. [18]

 

The cases ignore the victim nation’s government and courts, and disputes are heard by secret tribunals in the ISDS. This allows corporations to subvert a government’s bid to protect its people and environment, all in the name of profits for a foreign investor. “It disproportionately affects countries with extractive industries in the global South. As of 2013, there were 169 such cases pending, of which 60 (35.7%) were related to oil, mining, or gas. Latin American and Caribbean governments constitute only 14% of all member governments; yet they make up 50% of the dispute cases.” [19]

 

In this excerpt from their book ‘Silent Coup’, [20] Claire Provost and Matt Kennard discuss the key legal mechanism used by multinational corporations to override governments around the world. Jewish bankers denounced what they termed “independence movements” by poor countries, those newly-freed from centuries of colonialism, because there were “vast landholdings that could be expropriated”. But these “investments” were thwarted by small states “interfering in the rights of Jewish capital”, refusing to give up their essential raw materials, and even having the effrontery to tax the investors’ profits. They therefore concocted an obscure legal system “through which multinational corporations can sue entire countries directly at shadowy international tribunals”. This system became the ISDS, created because Jewish bankers and industrialists felt an existential need “to protect investors in lands seething with nationalism”.

 

It’s true that not every corporation that took advantage of the provisions of the ISDS was owned by Jews, but those Gentiles were the accidental beneficiaries of a system not designed or intended for them. If the bankers control freshwater (Goldman owns 23% of global water utilities, and Nestlé a large percentage) and carbon rights (BlackRock’s ESG funds hold 17% of carbon credits), human survival becomes a traded commodity.

 

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)

 

 

This is without question the most ambitious bullying project ever attempted by the Jewish bankers in The City of London, far exceeding their attempted fascist coup on the US government [21], or even their looting of the gold of all the world’s central banks prior to World War II. [22] This was an enterprise designed to effectively eliminate the actual sovereignty of nation-states and turn the world into an agglomerate of geographical puppets with no purpose other than to serve the financial and political interests of these bankers.

 

The precise approach being taken on the TPP was that multi-national corporations had (or would have from then on) a level of sovereignty surpassing that of sovereign nations and that their interests would have a higher priority, with the result that any government hindering the profits, or indeed any actions, of a multinational company, for any reason, under any circumstances, would have to compensate that firm for profits it might have made, but didn’t.

 

This would apply even in a case where, for example a nation must reduce interest rates to boost its economy during a time of recession. Citibank could then appeal to the Jewish-controlled TPP arbitration panel for compensation for lost profits, and the government would be forced to pay. If China decided to subsidise the purchase of electric vehicles for the sake of long-term environmental concerns, GM could appeal to the TPP for compensation for its lost profits from gasoline-burning vehicles. If a country banned cigarette-smoking, tobacco companies could sue the government for all their lost profits – in perpetuity. If a country refused to permit the importation of meat containing carcinogenic chemicals, the company could sue – and obtain – compensation for all its lost profits. If a country passed laws to protect its environment or water aquifers or forestry, foreign companies could obtain full compensation for lost profits. In effect, any nation passing any laws that in any way reduced the profits of these Jewish bankers and their multi-national companies, would have to reimburse them in full for the money they could have made, but didn’t.

 

The Jewish bankers who concocted this scheme were so concerned at the potential outcry if the terms became public, that the entire program was kept secret. After years of attempts by members of the US Congress to even see the TPP, only one congressman, Alan Grayson, was able to review only a few selected portions of the agreement, but the Obama administration declared the content “classified” and a “matter of national security”, and threatened Grayson with criminal charges if he attempted to reveal any of the content. Even then, he was permitted to view the document only in a private room where computers, mobile phones, cameras and even pencil and paper were forbidden. The level of secrecy around this agreement was unparalleled, with the nation’s own representatives – the elected US government – being kept entirely in the dark. Even the nations being asked (bludgeoned, actually) to sign this so-called “agreement” were refused access to much of its content. For example, the sections on IP ownership were deemed so secret that countries were asked to sign them without ever seeing the content of what they were signing.

 

The most frightening provisions of the TPP agreements was that they were perpetual – they would never expire – and could not be repealed or altered by any future government of any nation foolish enough to have signed them. This restriction would remain true regardless of changes in future governments, changes in public opinion, or more dramatic, proven concerns about food safety or national security. Those documents were being presented simply as “trade agreements” but they were no such thing. They were a superimposition onto all signatory nations of a series of perpetual laws with such high standing they could not be repealed by any subsequent government. The TPP agreement, its provisions and arbitration, were superordinate to any national government or its Supreme Courts, in perpetuity. It would permanently suppress the ability of all governments to put their own public interest ahead of the profits of foreign (Jewish) banks and multinational corporations.

 

TPP sponsors proposed to control the entire Internet, not only dictating standards but monitoring and policing all user activity in all nations, beyond the control of local governments. The TPP would have forced all local ISPs to conduct full-scale monitoring and espionage, or to permit the US (the NSA or Mossad, in fact) to conduct it, with full power for enforcement, punishment, imprisonment of local citizens in any nation, and to remove individuals from the internet altogether. The TPP provisions even claimed the right of its tribunals to automatically bypass local governments and courts, and punish by criminal sanction – entirely on their own authority – any ISP in any nation that violated their interests. The TPP proposed to take control of domestic labor regulations, workplace safety standards, social welfare regulations, all food standards, and much more, removing them from the control of domestic governments by superseding domestic laws. It attempted to control the nature and delivery of health care to citizens in all nations.

 

I won’t dwell further on this topic here. I wrote a previous article on the TPP where I covered the content in detail. [23] I urge you in all earnestness to read it, because you need that information to fully understand and appreciate what is happening today.

 

A Second Look at DOGE

 

 

I have written many times before, that whenever we have a significant man-made event, whether domestic or international, the end result of that event was planned. We can think of DOGE in this context as being a significant man-made event, with actions and results. The actions were very carefully planned to produce precisely the consequences that emerged. The actions of DOGE were not an accident, and neither were the results. As I have said before, the people who plan these large events are not fools and they have done these things many times before. It will happen occasionally that they will overplay their hand or perhaps be blindsided by an unexpected interference in their plans, but such occasions are very rare. For our purposes, the only sensible assumption is that DOGE was planned in extreme detail and that events unfolded exactly as expected and with results as intended. But it is important that we not confuse the actions with the results.

 

In Part 13 of this series of essays, [24] I wrote that DOGE was a welfare program for Elon Musk. That much was true, but DOGE had a greater purpose. Let’s review: Before DOGE, Musk faced more than 65 federal investigations across 11 government agencies, with potential fines of nearly $2.5 billion for Tesla and SpaceX alone. [25] But Elon Musk, using his DOGE authority, went through all of those 11 agencies, removed their directors (sometimes with Trump’s assistance), and fired the staff of the investigating divisions. Musk also obtained files from the Office of Personnel Management, which he needed to enable him to identify the investigation staff in all the Departments so he would know which individuals to fire. There was then no one left to investigate or prosecute him. Even if the courts force the re-hiring of some of those staff, those departments would be too intimidated and too afraid to pursue Elon Musk any further. And it has already been made public that neither the FAA (for SpaceX) nor the SEC (for securities frauds on Tesla, Twitter) will “investigate” Musk any further. Elon Musk now has perpetual immunity from prosecution for all his criminal offenses and those of his companies.

 

A Professional Litigant

 

 

Musk has a long history of litigation with governments and regulators, resulting from investigations into his actions and his companies that should have resulted in criminal prosecutions. In many (perhaps most) cases where Elon Musk is a defendant in a legal action, he very quickly becomes a plaintiff as well. If he or his companies are a target of an investigation, the result is the same; Musk will immediately sue the regulator or the respective government.

 

From an article in Fortune Magazine: [26] “In only one year, Musk alone or through his companies have filed at least 23 lawsuits in federal courts alone. He has sued competitors, startups, law firms, watchdog groups, individuals, the state of California, federal agencies, and a woman who is the mother of three of his children. He has been so legally aggressive that one judge decided his litigation was more about revenge than justice: “This case is about punishing the defendants for their speech.” And he apparently will not stop until he has bankrupted or otherwise silenced all detractors. One law professor wrote that Musk “wants to punish and has the ability to do that”, and will “litigate, appeal, and relitigate disputes until he wins”. Or, until his (smaller) opponent is bankrupt. He appears to have been extraordinarily vindictive toward anyone criticizing his content moderation on Twitter (X), as well as to anyone challenging his (often questionable or fraudulent) business practices.

 

Judge-Shopping

 

 

 

All Jews with wealth and influence are “judge-shoppers”; they will look for any jurisdiction or judge where they might have an advantage, and Elon Musk is not different. This involves changing jurisdictions, finding a Jewish judge to hear a case, or a Gentile one who can be bribed, corrupted or intimidated. When Musk filed his lawsuit in the US against Media Matters, it caused a controversy because the suit was filed in Texas, and neither Twitter (X) nor Media Matters were located there. [27] NPR did an investigation and discovered that the judge who accepted the case was Reed O’Connor, a Tesla shareholder who had already come under much criticism for accepting lawsuits filed out of jurisdiction. When the case received wide public attention, O’Connor suddenly recused himself.

 

Intimidation Through Litigation

 

Elon Musk threw a tantrum after his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) was dealt a series of legal setbacks, immediately calling for the impeachment of federal judges. Source

 

One journalist wrote an account titled, “What It’s Like When Elon Musk’s Twitter Mob Comes After You“. [28] If they don’t leave voluntarily, Musk regularly deletes their accounts, especially of reporters revealing negative news about him personally or about companies like Tesla. When a court rules against him and some of his fraudulent or illegal activities, Musk demands the judges be impeached and removed. [29] When a government agency charges Musk with illegalities, he launches lawsuits against the government. [30]

 

A Tennessee University law professor said, “Elon Musk basically is just not afraid of suing on any grounds”. From Fortune again, “A law professor at Gonzaga University, told Fortune the suits Musk has filed are fueled by the billionaire’s wealth and influence. Musk “isn’t dissuaded by losing”, she said, and he has the resources to litigate, appeal, and relitigate disputes until he wins. [Musk and his companies] are bringing these lawsuits to punish whoever he’s suing for criticizing him or pointing out the truth. He’s just like, ‘I want to punish you, and I have the ability to do that.’” And even if he loses the case, he doesn’t seem to care.

 

When Musk was forced to complete his purchase of Twitter, he sued the company for paying its lawyers, claiming Twitter’s payment of its legal fees constituted “unjust enrichment” of the law firm who were “taking funds from the company cash register while the keys were being handed over”. When the DOJ filed a complaint against SpaceX about its hiring processes, Musk called the complaint “a weaponization of the DOJ for political purposes”, and filed a retaliatory lawsuit, alleging that the process for appointing judges was “unconstitutional”. When the Labor Relations Board accused SpaceX of illegal employment practices, Musk filed a retaliatory suit against the NLRB a day later, again claiming it was “unconstitutional”.

 

When the US National Labor Relations Board accused SpaceX of illegally firing some employees, Musk (and SpaceX) immediately sued the NLRB to have the agency’s proceedings declared unconstitutional. [31] What was at stake was that the Labor Board could be left permanently incapable of doing its job of protecting workers. When California acted to enforce the state laws for social media content, Musk sued the State of California to have the laws struck down. [32]

 

In Sweden, the IF Metall union was fighting Tesla (and Elon Musk) for a collective bargaining agreement. Labor unions are standard by law in Sweden, but Elon Musk refuses to permit them. Many of Tesla’s staff had been on strike for months without resolution, and eight other Swedish unions announced their own actions targeting Tesla in sympathy with the Tesla workers. From this, postal workers stopped delivering license plates to Tesla, and dockworkers stopped unloading Tesla cars. Musk immediately sued the Swedish government, accusing the government of unfairly targeting Tesla, completely ignoring the fact that Tesla was violating Swedish law by refusing to sign a collective agreement with its employees. [33]

 

The Swedish government had no responsibility for legal actions of the unions, but it will cost them a huge amount of money and aggravation to escape, and they may well force the union to make an exception and deliver Tesla’s documents. The message is clear: Tesla is above all national labor laws, above the courts, and above the government. And labor unions everywhere are not stupid; they are watching and they see exactly what is happening. If any union anywhere thinks about staging a strike, one question they will all ask is whether their strike would affect any of Elon Musk’s companies. And, by extension, any Jewish company.

 

The Example of Canada

 

March 2025: Trump spoke out against calls for a boycott of Elon Musk’s companies and said he would purchase a Tesla vehicle in what he calls a ‘show of confidence and support’ for Elon Musk. Source

 

The government of Canada had implemented a rebate program of $5,000 for each EV purchased, the rebate going to the purchaser. For various reasons involving both Donald Trump and Elon Musk, the Canadian government removed Tesla from the rebate program. [34] According to Reuters, “Canada has frozen all rebate payments for Tesla and banned the electric-vehicle maker from future EV rebate programs”, [35] [36] Tesla Canada sales immediately dropping by nearly 80%. As well, Canada’s Deputy Prime Minister proposed a 100% tariff on Tesla vehicles, and the premier of Canada’s largest province simultaneously canceled the province’s contract with Musk’s Starlink.

 

The government made this announcement on a Friday, the change being effective the following Monday morning. And guess what? Canadian Tesla dealers (all owned by the Tesla company), suddenly reported massive sales of more than 8,600 cars in only one weekend, one Tesla store alone claiming nearly 3,000 sales on a single Saturday. That would be one-quarter of Tesla’s total annual Canadian sales, all in only two days. [37] This involved almost $45 million in cash rebates which were being fraudulently claimed. Given the magnitude of the fraud and the fact that all Tesla dealerships are owned by the company, this would not have occurred without the express approval (and likely on the insistence) of Elon Musk.

 

In a claim too bizarre or surreal to believe, Musk blithely dismissed the fraud and said he would sue the Canadian government if they didn’t release the $43 million to Tesla dealers. Not only that, Musk accused the Canadian government of “stressing out Tesla employees” by conducting this “unwarranted” criminal investigation, and further that the government’s action was “contributing to protests” against Tesla. [38] One would have to search diligently to find a criminal fraud as brazen and unrepentant as this one.

 

If you or I file a lawsuit, we do so with the expectation of winning. If you crash your car into the fence around my yard and refuse to pay for repairs, I might sue you for the cost of repairing my fence. Winning that case is important to me. But things are different with Elon Musk’s lawsuits in that they aren’t about winning; they are about intimidation as a tool in the surrender of sovereignty. All of Musk’s lawsuits are superficially frivolous, bizarre even, where he clearly has no cause and no legal grounds. His lawsuit against the Canadian government is a perfect example: it is a clear, “open-and-shut” case of criminal fraud. Musk’s action is like the bank robber suing the police for arresting him. On the surface, it seems crazy, stupid. But it isn’t crazy or stupid; it is part of the agenda. Consider this:

 

Canada’s Department of Transportation is not large, and it is not a professional litigator. It does not have thousands of staff and hundreds of lawyers all skilled in prosecution of the public. It is a civilian agency tasked with managing transportation matters. If it does enter into litigation, the expense of a few hundred thousand dollars would be notable, and to spend millions on a case would be unheard of. But with Elon Musk’s lawsuit, Canada’s Transportation Department will spend not millions, but tens of millions. Musk will first try to arrange the most favorable jurisdiction for hearing the case. Then he will exercise every possibility to have the case given to the most favorable judge; a Jewish judge, if possible, but perhaps a Gentile who is, or can be, compromised or bought. He will file every possible kind of claim, however ridiculous, and he will sue, harass, intimidate, appeal, sue, harass, intimidate, appeal, ad infinitum. He will try to push his claims through all levels to the Supreme Court, if possible, and enhance the aggravation by delaying resolution for years.

 

In the meantime, B’nai B’rith, the ADL, AIPAC, the Jewish Federations of Canada, the World Jewish Congress in Canada, the local Jewish federations, will communicate, combine forces, conspire, to put pressure on Canada’s Transportation Minister, on the staff of the Department of Transportation, on the Prime Minister’s office, on various members of Parliament, to back off from their criminal prosecution of Elon Musk and Tesla, and further to return Tesla to the rebate program. Some of those members of Parliament will be threatened with the loss of the next election. Simultaneously, the (Jewish-owned) media will support Elon Musk and condemn the Canadian government for “crippling free enterprise”, and “selective prosecution”, all wrapped in a tin foil of “anti-Semitism”. The facts of Musk’s brazen fraud will be buried so deeply no Canadian will ever find them.

 

The purpose of all this is not to “win the case”. It is to remove a wealthy Jew and his companies from subjection to Canadian sovereignty. It doesn’t matter if Musk and Tesla lose the court battles. The purpose is to exhaust your opponent – financially, psychologically, personally, publicly, to exert so much pressure that the victim government capitulates. You wear them down; you create never-ending anxiety; you cause unlimited aggravation, you subject them to enormous media pressure, you cause huge and unaffordable expense. The important point is that much of Canada’s government, and certainly all the Department of Transportation, will have “learned their lesson”. If Musk or Tesla decide to execute another corporate criminal fraud in Canada, or when Tesla becomes criminally liable for the fatalities from Musk’s “self-driving” system, do you think the Canadian Department of Transportation will pursue them again? Not very likely. They aren’t stupid, and they have memories.

 

If you examine Elon Musk’s other lawsuits – against the State of California, against the FAA or NASA, Federal agencies, watchdogs, civil action groups, NGOs, advertisers, individuals, the story is the same. None of those lawsuits had any apparent merit, and “winning the case” was never a priority. It was all about silence through intimidation, about wearing down your opponent, bankrupting him with legal fees if you can, attacking his public reputation, and creating such an anxiety-ridden, media-fueled, fuss that all “authorities” and “regulators”, and even “critics”, will stay out of your way forever into the future. And that is the whole story.

 

Advertisers

Elon Musk’s X sues Lego, Nestlé and more brands, accusing them of advertising boycott. Source

 

After Musk took over Twitter, he turned it into a pornographic site, what Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo described as “a vast global sewer” [39] and the LA Times called “a racist cesspool”. [40] When 50 of the top 100 advertisers fled Twitter en-masse because of the volume of new and objectionable content, Musk told all the advertisers to “F… off”, and launched lawsuits against them, including companies like Lego, Nestlé, Tyson Foods, Abbott Laboratories, Colgate-Palmolive, Pinterest and Shell International. [41] But he didn’t stop there. There were strong indications that Musk, with his new DOGE authority and his close relationship to Donald Trump, would use that authority to severely retaliate against those companies.

 

Based on this, several advertisers had second thoughts and reinstated some of their advertising. [42] Industry insiders said some advertisers were seeking government contracts and that Musk would use his DOGE authority to retaliate against them, especially since he’d already had access to all the files on all existing and pending government contracts and negotiations. Those companies began to view the advertising expense on Twitter as an “insurance policy” against Musk’s vindictiveness. [43] Political observers said those actions were having an effect. After Unilever reinstated its spending on Twitter, it was quickly dropped from the lawsuit. One advertiser said that their agency had been warned following the legal action to be careful about what they communicated in writing – even internally – about Musk and Twitter.

 

NGOs

 

 

More with Twitter: Musk sued not only the advertisers, but also any media watchdogs that monitored offensive content and warned advertisers about this. Musk sued the World Federation of Advertisers, who were forced to discontinue their monitoring operations, saying “recent activities have … significantly drained [our] resources and finances.” He also sued another advertising monitor called Media Matters, an organisation that was small but had offices in several countries. Musk launched huge lawsuits against this group in every country in which they had an office, an effort they termed “a vendetta-driven campaign of libel tourism.” [44] The lawsuit stated, “Musk’s worldwide campaign of intimidation seeks to punish Media Matters for exercising its core First Amendment rights on a matter of public importance.” [45] The costs of all the lawsuits in the various countries had the desired effect: Media Matters filed for bankruptcy; no more a threat to Elon Musk.

 

There are many NGOs that have identified Musk and his companies as criminals or renegades. From environmentalists (SpaceX and Tesla) to animal rights groups (Neuralink), many have spoken out and tried to draw public and government attention to some of the more egregious activities. But Elon Musk made public his threats to essentially sue them all into bankruptcy if they didn’t back off, and most of these have been thoroughly silent ever since. As one example, Media Matters staffer Eric Hananoki authored 16 reports in ten months, criticizing Musk and Twitter, but he has been completely silent since the lawsuit.

 

Connecting Some Dots

 

Elon Musk was placing himself above all law and courts.

 

The purpose of this essay is to follow up from the Musk as Messiah article (Part 16), and to prove that the real purpose of DOGE and the media flood was for the elimination of national sovereignty. Musk fired all those who might oppose or investigate him, leaving no challengers in the government, bypassing both Congress and the President. He did that in more countries than the US – suing Sweden, threatening to sue Canada, the EU. The theory was that if you can inflict severe traumas against all opposition, they will be too intimidated to pursue you again. Elon Musk did this with governments, regulators, advertisers, NGOs, individuals, anyone and everyone. He was placing himself above all law and courts. He made many posts about judges, calling them corrupt and evil and demanding they be impeached and removed. US Supreme court judges said they had concern for their physical safety after all those posts.

 

Donald Trump’s tariffs may have seemed crazy and even stupid to many observers, but they were neither crazy nor stupid. They were part of the same process. Just as the TPP was not in any sense about “trade”, so the tariffs were not in any sense about trade balances. And, just as the TPP “agreement” documents were only perhaps 5% about trade, so too Trump’s “trade agreements” are only perhaps 5% about trade. The balance of these agreements, the parts which will never be made public, will with absolute certainty contain binding clauses similar to the ISDS and the TPP. They will not be about buying more American products, but about forcing the surrender of the national sovereignty of each small nation to this same group of Jewish bankers and industrialists. That is the main hidden agenda.

 

An article in the Intercept said, “What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government. This is not hyperbole. Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.”

 

Jewish Privilege

 

Jewish companies, Jewish bankers, Jewish individuals, are above all national and international law.

 

It is important to understand that this process of eliminating the sovereignty of nations has been in preparation for many decades, exercised in many different ways. DOGE was an exception because it was done on a “wholesale” basis. One important element in this is the fact that over the decades, the Jews in the US have brought things to the point where executives of large Jewish corporations have obtained full immunity against criminal prosecution. The companies may be fined, but the individuals always go free. The end purpose is to place the bankers, their industrial corporations, and – importantly – all their executives, above all national laws. In our real world today, they are accountable to no one.

 

This transfer and immunity of national sovereignty has been going on for years, but no one seems to be connecting the dots. Who do you think owns all the extreme “factory farms” with horrible conditions for the animals, and all the drugs they are fed to keep them alive? This is all part of the same thing. Regulations on food, on safety, on autos, on the environment, and so much more. The Jewish industrialists push to eliminate all controls and regulation over whatever they do, to change the laws or intimidate the law-makers. They eventually place themselves above the government, above the laws, and above the courts and the country’s Supreme Court. They will continue until Jewish companies, Jewish bankers, Jewish individuals, are above all national and international law. That was the intent of the TPP, and it was the intent in creating the Musk-Messiah and DOGE. It was all a usurpation of national sovereignty and the simultaneous creation of astonishing Jewish privilege that, from everything I have seen, appears to have gone unnoticed.

 

There are so many elements to this topic, so many events occurring almost weekly, that may seem unrelated but that are part of this same agenda of weakening and eventually eliminating all national sovereignty. A primary part of this agenda simultaneously (and carefully) builds a moat of immunity for Jews against criminal prosecution, or at least against the worst parts of it, protection which absolutely does not extend to Gentiles.

 

Think of Jeffrey Epstein, caught in most egregious and damnable situation of the widespread sexual abuse of minors combined with by far the largest sexual-entrapment ring in history. And the punishment? Epstein had to spend some evenings in a prison cell but was free during the day – during which he regularly had three young girls brought to him for sex. And the tales about Epstein committing suicide in prison are surely false. It is a virtual certainty that Jeffrey Epstein is alive and well in Israel. I won’t go into the details here, but the evidence is virtually screaming this conclusion.

 

And it isn’t only Epstein, not by a long shot. The writer Isaac Asimov was a New York Jew, and quite popular for his science-fiction writing. Some years back, Asimov’s son David Asimov was caught with “the biggest child pornography collection in [California] history”. It was a Jew, Robert Mueller of the FBI, who helped Asimov Jr. avoid a prison sentence and serve only some home detention. Mueller was also involved – assisted by the Jewish Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz – when Jeffrey Epstein was treated with similar leniency. It is difficult to avoid the accusation that “Jewish privilege” was at work in both cases. [46] One author wrote that “Our society is obsessed with uncovering and crushing examples of white privilege [but] is utterly oblivious to the existence of Jewish privilege. [47]

 

This immunity occurs in other ways too. Most readers will never know, but the US has some rather large numbers of individuals charged with the sexual use of small children. Most of the cases that have come to my attention involved not just Jews but Rabbis, Jewish “priests” exercising the normal practices of their “religion”. The local Jewish newspapers will usually record these occurrences, but they almost never appear in the local non-Jewish media because the Gentile owners fear accusations of “anti-Semitism”. And of course, they never reach the wider mainstream media because these are Jewish-owned. But in every such case I have seen, the perpetrators escape punishment. This is because, when the accusations become public and law enforcement begins to close in, the Rabbis flee to Israel where the sexual abuse of children isn’t a crime. Their escape is often accomplished with the assistance of the US State Department – which is almost entirely staffed (and over-run) with Jews. [48]

 

Apple’s Rotten Core

 

On July 19, 2010-Chinese people visit the recently opened Apple store in Pudong district opposite the Bund of Shanghai. As the second Apple store in China after the one in Beijing, the 16,000-square-meter underground space marks the start of a major retail expansion of the company which plan to open 25 stores in China by the end of next year, including a second store in Shanghai.

 

Some readers might have taken note a few years ago of a dispute between Apple and Chinese government regulators. The issue was that the regulators considered the iPad a computer and insisted Apple provide a 2-year warranty. Apple claimed the iPad was a phone and refused to comply. At a superficial level, this would appear to be a one-off case, an isolated incident, a minor spat between a large multinational and a socialist government, not really worthy of attention. But, if we bothered to dig a little deeper, we discovered that Apple was fighting the same regulation in countries all over the world, and was being sued in Europe for precisely the same offense. With that additional information, the issue changes character considerably. The matter is now one of Apple saying to all governments everywhere, “We don’t agree with your laws, so we choose to ignore them”. This is a Jewish multi-national company placing itself above national governments and laws. In fact, a shifting of sovereignty from a nation-state to a Jewish industrial corporation.

 

It is the same with KFC, McDonald’s, Nestlé, Coca-Cola, Pepsi, P&G, LV, Ralph Lauren, other “luxury” brands, and so many other Jewish-owned or controlled multi-national corporations. KFC, McDonald’s, Coca-Cola regularly underpay their staff, force unpaid overtime and much else. LV and other luxury brands renege on replacement or repair policies, as do auto makers, flaunting their “power” and claiming “unclear laws”. There is nothing unclear about the laws. And there is nothing unclear about these companies flexing their muscles, ignoring domestic laws and regulators and attempting to impose their own labor or consumer protection standards (or lack thereof) onto a sovereign nation.

 

In India, Nestlé noodles were discovered to have extremely high concentrations of lead, at which point regulators forced the removal from sale of all Nestlé noodles. But Nestlé produced a test from an “independent laboratory” of one package which was proven to contain no lead. That, with a few bribes, put Nestlé’s noodles back on the shelves. In China, Coca-Cola was discovered to have produced drinks containing huge amounts of chlorine – inserted into the beverages to kill the high concentration of e coli bacteria (which can come only from human or animal excrement). The company insisted the beverages were “perfectly safe to drink”; the Chinese regulators disagreed and Coca-Cola had to destroy 100,000 cases of contaminated beverages. You can see why the Jewish industrialists hate China.

 

We see this with the repeated appearance of prohibited drugs and chemicals in meat and foodstuffs, the inclusion of prohibited GMO food, the appearance of many toxic chemicals in a wide variety of food and clothing. In each case in China, the government refuses or destroys the imported goods, but there is inevitably a long battle with the corporations insisting the restrictive regulations are unreasonable and demanding their removal. Coincidentally, they inflict as much pressure as they are able on government officials to amend all the relevant legislation. They mostly fail, but they continue to try. If we examine all such instances, the agenda becomes startlingly clear: the Jewish industrialists want all nations to completely remove all consumer protection and labor laws.

 

These news reports seldom appear in the mass media. We might read a brief report in a local newspaper, but the information seldom strays beyond one location. In large part due to this “voluntary censorship” by the Jewish-owned media, we might not be aware of such instances as above, and would most likely consider them as isolated and unrelated occurrences. But they are never such. If we bother to do even a small amount of research, we discover that the same companies are involved in violating the same laws in every country in which they do business. And we discover simultaneously that it isn’t only one company with one trivial violation in one country, but many similar companies committing multiple simultaneous violations in many countries. It is only then that we realise this isn’t a single, simple “packaging error” but instead is a pattern inflicted on nations around the world according to a specific agenda. HSBC is fined in most every country for laundering drug money. Pfizer, GSK, and most other pharma companies commit precisely the same vile crimes in a dozen countries simultaneously, but we are never given all the facts and cannot connect all the necessary dots.

 

When we examine the evidence from all these instances, we can understand that the agenda is a determined effort to transfer national sovereignty to Jewish multi-national companies. This in the areas of finance, media, food safety, communications, consumer protection, labor, education, and much more. In each case, the companies are clearly saying, “We disagree with your laws, so we choose to ignore them”. It goes even farther than that, because concurrently with violating all these laws, executives of the banks and Jewish multi-nationals are busy exerting considerable pressure on these same governments to either reduce or eliminate all such laws that hinder their plundering.

 

The Sackler Family

The billion-dollar Sackler dynasty began with three Brooklyn-born brothers that attended medical school and purchased a small pharmaceutical company in 1952 called Purdue Frederick. The name was later changed to Purdue Pharma in 1991. It was originally known mostly for producing laxatives and earwax removal. Within their lifetimes, the brothers amassed an enormous fortune and began collecting art, wives and houses around the world. Their children and grandchildren enjoyed a life of luxury, attended the finest schools, and became fixtures on the glitzy society circuit. Source

 

Most people are at least vaguely aware of the scandal involving the Sackler family, their Purdue Pharma company, and the opioid travesty surrounding their pain-killer OxyContin. This was an enormous fraud that involved tens of billions of dollars, around one million severely-addicted drug users, and more than 500,000 deaths related to the drug. The evidence was overwhelming that the Sacklers knew of the severe addiction risk of their drug and were well aware of the rising total of related deaths, but denied it. They used fraudulent marketing tactics to sell the drug, but that was only the beginning. You have read about the “revolving doors” in the US between the regulators and the regulated; that applied here. To prevent restrictions on the sale of their drug, the Sacklers hired the FDA staff members who approved their drug for distribution. The drama would have ended sooner, but the Sacklers hired ex-government (Department of Justice) lawyers to block investigations, with the result that the DoJ dropped all criminal proceedings. The Sacklers secured immunity with their money and via their political connections. The Sacklers are described by some as the most evil family on earth.

 

This is a tale of deception, of criminal intent, of human carnage, of legal evasion and full immunity from criminal prosecution, on the surface appearing to be a total systemic failure. But it wasn’t really a failure. The system worked precisely as it was designed to work – to permit wealthy and influential Jews to live above the laws, the courts, and even the constitution of their country of residence.

 

The Sackler-owned Purdue Pharma launched OxyContin in 1996, fraudulently marketing it as a “low-addiction risk” painkiller despite knowing its dangers. They bribed doctors, manipulated and falsified research, and both lobbied and bribed FDA regulators ($400,000 per year) to expand prescriptions. This fueled an immense opioid crisis in the US, the greatest in history. When the charade could no longer continue, the Sacklers paid only a relatively small fine – while admitting no wrongdoing, and pushed Purdue Pharma into bankruptcy to shield their assets.

 

In total, the Sacklers realised about $35 billion from the sales of this one drug. When it became obvious that legal problems were coming, the Sacklers began transferring money out of the US (tens of billions of dollars) to jurisdictions where it couldn’t be attached. The Sacklers then engaged in a ruse of “philanthropy” which, aided by glowing reports in the Jewish media, served as reputation laundering. Let’s remember that $10 billion is ten thousand million. Of that ten thousand million, the Sacklers spent a few million on “philanthropy” to Harvard, the Louvre. No Sackler faced criminal charges. Their name remains on institutions like Harvard’s museum despite protests. But behind the glamorous curtain on the surface, the family used “drug addiction” of the common people as a tool to make money while triggering the worst drug abuse crisis in American history. [49] The case epitomizes “two-tiered justice”: Jewish billionaires escape accountability while low-level offenders serve decades in prison for minor offenses.

 

Kathleen Scarpone, of Kingston, N.H., protests in front of the Arthur M. Sackler Museum at Harvard University, Friday, April 12, 2019, in Cambridge, Mass. (AP Photo/Josh Reynolds). Source

 

Even the Purdue bankruptcy was a staged charade. I mentioned earlier Elon Musk’s penchant for “judge-shopping”; the Sacklers did the same. US corporate bankruptcy law has a provision by which companies can choose both the jurisdiction and judge. Purdue chose White Plains, New York, where there is only one federal bankruptcy judge: Robert Drain. Judge Drain swiftly granted Purdue’s bankruptcy filing, levying a relatively small fine, and shielding the members of the Sackler family from all legal proceedings. [50] A federal judge later ruled that the bankruptcy judge had no statutory authority to shield the Sackler family from lawsuits, but it was too late. [51] And therein lies the benefit of judge-shopping.

 

Arthur Mitchell Sackler, Image from Wikimedia Commons. Source:

 

AMEX

 

 

I will tell you a story from personal experience. Some years ago, I had an American Express card. One day my statement showed a charge for $75 that I didn’t recognise, so I called AMEX and was told the charge was for “identity theft protection”. Since I had not requested that “protection”, I asked that the charge be removed. The man claimed a lack of authority to remove the charge because it had been placed on my card by “a separate company”. I asked to be connected to that separate company, but the man claimed no ability to do that. I informed him I would not pay the charge, and to either remove it or cancel my card. But then he magically found a way to connect me to that other firm. Nice lady, friendly, helpful, but could find no record of my card. We tried my name, address, SIN number, other ways, nothing. Finally wearing of what was clearly a ruse, I informed the nice lady I would put down the phone, call AMEX to have my card canceled. “Oh, here it is!”. Nice lady removed the charge.

 

Canada has a police force known as the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), a national police force with wide jurisdiction and – in days gone by – held in very high regard. I called their local office, registered a complaint, and insisted they investigate what was clearly a massive fraud potentially involving billions of dollars since every AMEX card-holder likely received the same charge. The officer registered my complaint, took notes, and promised to call me back with a progress report. Two weeks passed with no result so I called again. I was not entirely surprised to learn that, having “looked everywhere”, they had no record of my call or my complaint.

 

This time, I was a bit more firm. I insisted on again registering my complaint, and informed them that, if I did not receive satisfactory responses, I would hire a lawyer to file a class-action lawsuit against AMEX and would include the RCMP in that action on the grounds of contributory negligence. That approach brought results. The very next morning I received a Special Delivery post from AMEX informing me that my card had been canceled. That was very clever. Since the $75 charge had been refunded, I had no basis for a civil suit against AMEX and, since I was no longer a card-holder, I had no vested interest in the case and no legal basis for initiating a class-action lawsuit. All my threats were now empty, and I heard nothing further from the RCMP.

 

The sequence of events was very clear. Someone in the local RCMP office contacted their headquarters, who in turn contacted AMEX, to inform them of the developments. There is no other possibility. Canada’s famed and fabled RCMP are as much a criminal enterprise as is AMEX. Not only that, but the RCMP would never take such obvious action without the prior implicit approval of the Canadian government; the risk of exposure would be far too great. The message was clear: Jewish bankers and financiers are above criminal law and are protected by the very people who should be prosecuting them. That is a transfer of sovereignty – from the government, the police and the courts to the Jewish bankers and their multi-national companies.

 

Nestlé – Murdering With Milk

 

 

Nestlé is a Jewish company, one of the four most-boycotted companies in the world, having been subjected to the longest-running worldwide boycott in history, now nearing 50 years. One of the main reasons is their reprehensible marketing practices with artificial baby milk. It has been reliably estimated that about 50 million infants in poor countries have died since WWII, directly because of the baby milk industry. I covered this in detail in an article titled “Nestlé – Murdering With Milk” [52] and I will leave it to you to read the details. It is a story that will make you sick. The true flavor of the people who own and manage Nestlé and their baby milk division is subtly different than you might imagine. Nestlé executives are not running around Africa or South America killing babies, and it isn’t actually their intent to kill babies. They just want money. If the babies survive the process, that’s okay. But if the babies die, then they die. The financial result is the same either way. It isn’t that Nestlé executives want babies to die. It’s just that they don’t care. If you want to see the results of the clever marketing methods utilised by today’s Nestlé and other Western baby milk companies, go to any developing nation and first visit the hospitals. Then visit the graveyards.

 

Nestlé and The World’s Water

 

 

From China’s Xinhua News Service: California has suffered a severe drought, considered to be the highest in 500 years. The California government has tried everything to stem the flow of water. A local California newspaper called the Desert Sun reported the news that angered Californians: Nestlé has been mining groundwater in the most drought-stricken areas, making bottled water and selling it abroad. Nestlé is the owner of two best-selling mineral water brands in the United States, Arrowhead Mountain Spring and Nestlé Pure Life, and has been extracting water from multiple sources in California for decades. [53] Local water agencies noted that California’s drought was so severe that local residents could not use water and yet it was being extracted and sold abroad by Nestlé. According to data, Nestlé collects about 200 million gallons of water a year.

 

Nestlé’s wells are located in desert areas, where surface water and shallow groundwater in the desert ecological environment are very scarce. You can see the environmental conditions from the photo below, yet Nestlé refuses to cease their unconscionable extraction. I would note here that this is typical. The Khazar Jewish bankers and industrialists are “extractive parasites”, and will bleed their hosts dry. But they are also transient; if the host dies, they simply move to another location, find another host, and continue.

 

California drought. But Nestle continues to extract water. Source.

 

There is much more to this story. I wrote an earlier article titled, Nestlé and the World’s Water [54]. From that article: In 2013, the Internet almost exploded when a video was posted in which Nestlé Chairman and CEO Peter Brabeck-Letmathe said that “access to water is not a public right”, water was not a human right, that it was just another foodstuff and a commodity, that it should be “privatised”, given a “market value”, and distributed by the “free market”. Not only that, he stated that to declare water a ‘right’ or a ‘human right’ was “extreme”. These are his exact words from the video:

 

“The one opinion, which I think is extreme, is represented by the NGOs who bang on about declaring water a public right. That means that as a human being you should have a right to water. That’s an extreme solution. And the other view says that water is a foodstuff like any other and like any other foodstuff it should have a market value.” [55]

 

The Huffington Post wrote that “People were shocked at the inhumanity of Brabeck’s statement, and rightly so.”

 

Nestlé is unrepentant. A few years ago, the Miami-Dade county in Florida ran some ads claiming the county’s local tap water was “cheaper, purer and safer than bottled water”, with Nestlé immediately threatening to sue the local government for making those (undoubtedly true) statements. [56] According to a Bloomberg article, a documentary titled “bottled life” demonstrated that in the US and many other locations, a truckload of water cost Nestlé only $10 but, after being bottled, was sold for $50,000. [57]

 

Pfizer’s Perfectly-Timed Epidemic

 

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla . Source

 

Pfizer is another Jewish company worthy of your notice. This is a topic I covered in a previous article that should be read by everyone, titled “Pfizer’s Perfectly-Timed Epidemic”. [58] The basic facts of the case are crystal-clear: [59] [60] [61] [62] [63]

 

– Pfizer developed a powerful new antibiotic called Trovan to treat a variety of infections – meningitis being one example.

– The company needed live trials of this drug, but it was too risky to perform these in the US.

– The WHO began another of its “life-saving” polio vaccination programs, this time in Nigeria.

– Nigeria immediately experienced one of the worst meningitis epidemics in history, the timing and location perfectly matching the WHO’s polio vaccination program.

– Pfizer offered to conduct “life-saving” assistance to the Nigerian government.

– The “assistance” proved to simply be a live trial comparing Pfizer’s Trovan with a competing product. No lives were saved. The Nigerian government tallied the deaths at about 11,000.

– Having obtained sufficient trial data, Pfizer pulled out and left Nigeria.

– Pfizer eventually reached a settlement with the Nigerian state government to pay $75m in damages and to create a fund of $35m to compensate the victims. This, after what the Guardian described as “a 15-year legal battle against Pfizer over a fiercely controversial drug trial”.

– The UK Guardian reported that leaked US government diplomatic cables revealed that “Pfizer hired investigators to look for evidence of corruption against the Nigerian attorney general in an effort to persuade him to drop the legal action”, with the apparent full knowledge and assistance of the US State Department.

– To this day Nigeria refuses WHO entry into the country and will not participate in any further “humanitarian” aid from the UN or the WHO.

– It may have escaped your notice that Pfizer is the same company that made the gene therapy masquerading as a COVID “vaccine” that your government insisted you accept under pain of punishment.

 

Epilogue

 

 

There is so much more to this story that volumes would be required to do it justice. This is still primarily about Elon Musk the Manufactured Messiah, but to elaborate on the context for the manufacturing of his persona and to understand the implications of that. Do not delude yourself into thinking this applies only to Elon Musk. If Jeff Bezos commits an offense with his Blue Origin rockets, do you think the FAA or NASA will go after him? Of course not. They aren’t stupid; they have memories and will easily make the connection that wealthy Jews are immune from prosecution. And it will go further, to Nestlé, to Pfizer, to Apple, to General Motors, to Coca-Cola and Pepsi, to P&G, to all the weapons manufacturers. And, by extension, to all Jewish bankers and multi-national corporations. And, by further extension, an extraordinary privilege to all Jews with money and/or political influence.

 

This is where our world is going, the agenda being executed, and your belief in it is not material to its execution.

 

*

Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 34 languages and his articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as well as more than 100 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chap. 2 — Dealing with Demons).

His full archive can be seen at

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/  + https://www.moonofshanghai.com/

He can be contacted at: 2186604556@qq.com

*

NOTES Part 17

[1] Humanity at the Crossroads — Connecting the Dots to Our Brave New World
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/21427/

[2] Lochiel’s Warning; Thomas Campbell
https://www.poetry.com/poem/36113/lochiel%27s-warning

[3] Time Magazine graphic
https://time.graphics/event/5708154

[4] David Rockefeller (Chairman, Chase Manhattan Bank); (1991, during a Bilderberg Meeting)
https://rense.com/general17/quote.htm

[5] Montagu Norman | Governor of the Bank of England
https://yoice.net/en/montagu-norman-capital-must-protect-itself-in-every-possible-way/

[6] The dangers of Trudeau’s ‘postnational’ Canada
https://vancouversun.com/news/staff-blogs/the-dangers-of-trudeaus-postnational-canada

[7] Beyond the Mosaic: Justin Trudeau and the Postnational Chimera
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337356438_Beyond_the_Mosaic_Justin_Trudeau_and_the_Postnational_Chimera

[8] The Planned 1933 Fascist Coup in America
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/540/

[9] How the US Became Rich — Volume 1 – Part 2 — Colonisation, Labor, and Slavery
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/4649/

[10] Mexico conference 1945 – eliminate “the scourge of economic nationalism”,
https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/mexico-city-conference-1945

[11] A People’s History of the American Empire 1945-1999
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/History/Years_Hysteria_TGSNT.html

[12] Humanity at the Crossroads — Connecting the Dots to Our Brave New World
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/21427/

[13] Silent Coup: How Corporations Overthrew Democracy
https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/silent-coup-9781350269989/

[14] German Banker & British Lord Who Wrote ‘Capitalist Magna Carta’
https://consortiumnews.com/2023/10/05/german-banker-british-lord-who-wrote-capitalist-magna-carta/

[15] Silent Coup: How Corporations Overthrew Democracy
https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/silent-coup-9781350269989/

[16] German Banker & British Lord Who Wrote ‘Capitalist Magna Carta’
https://consortiumnews.com/2023/10/05/german-banker-british-lord-who-wrote-capitalist-magna-carta/

[17] Australian company sues El Salvador for right to mine
https://www.greenleft.org.au/content/australian-company-sues-el-salvador-right-mine

[18] El Salvador’s right to decide on mining projects upheld
https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/el-salvadors-right-decide-mining-projects-upheld

[19] Australian company sues El Salvador for its right to pillage
https://www.greenleft.org.au/content/australian-company-sues-el-salvador-its-right-pillage

[20] Silent Coup: How Corporations Overthrew Democracy
https://www.amazon.com/Silent-Coup-Corporations-Overthrew-Democracy/dp/1350269980

[21] The Attempted 1933 Jewish Fascist Coup in America
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/9962/

[22] The Jews were busy in the 1930s
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/9968/

[23] The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/11545/

[24] Debunking Elon Musk – Part 13 — Neuralink, DOGE, Twitter
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/21803/

[25] The U.S. Senate report accuses Musk of fake public welfare and evasion of $2.37 billion in fines through DOGE action
https://partners.sina.cn/html/vivo/browser/article?docUrl=http%3a%2f%2ffinance.sina.cn%2fusstock%2fmggd%2f2025-04-29%2fdetail-ineuurua4544094.d.html&en_dataid=761bae9984250491d383b94287c522f48f8dc77c5aa06f0a024dab6863992ec3&isNews=1&showComments=0&uuid=492bb794b451304c9ece0d2abd32ae0e

[26] Inside Elon Musk’s 23 active lawsuits
https://fortune.com/2024/08/20/elon-musk-litigation-lawsuits-x-spacex-tesla-legal-federal-court/

[27] Media Matters sues Elon Musk’s X over ‘libel tourism’ legal assault
https://www.npr.org/2025/03/10/nx-s1-5323844/media-matters-elon-musk-new-lawsuit

[28] What It’s Like When Elon Musk’s Twitter Mob Comes After You
https://www.thedailybeast.com/what-its-like-when-elon-musks-twitter-mob-comes-after-you/

[29] Elon Musk Immediately Calls for Judges to Be Impeached After Rulings Overturn DOGE Firings
https://www.thedailybeast.com/elon-musk-immediately-calls-for-judges-to-be-impeached-after-rulings-overturn-doge-firings/

[30] Elon Musk’s X Corp sues California to undo content moderation law
https://www.reuters.com/legal/elon-musks-x-corp-sues-california-undo-content-moderation-law-2023-09-08/

[31] Elon Musk’s long list of legal battles
https://mybroadband.co.za/news/business/540187-elon-musks-long-list-of-legal-battles.htm

[32] Elon Musk’s X Corp sues California to undo content moderation law
https://www.reuters.com/legal/elon-musks-x-corp-sues-california-undo-content-moderation-law-2023-09-08/

[33] Tesla sues Sweden as strikes target carmaker
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-67546891

[34] Canada Freezes $43 Million in Tesla EV Rebates, Bans Future Eligibility Over Tariff Dispute
https://driveteslacanada.ca/news/canada-freezes-43-million-in-tesla-ev-rebates-bans-future-eligibility-over-tariff-dispute/

[35] Tesla sees 70% drop in Q1 profits amid backlash
https://globalnews.ca/news/11144171/tesla-profits-drop-q1-2025-elon-musk-backlash/

[36] Canada Threatens 45,000 Tesla Sales
https://247wallst.com/cars-and-drivers/2025/03/26/canada-threatens-45000-tesla-sales/

[37] Tesla Gamed The System To Steal Tens Of Millions In Canadian Incentives On The Final Day Of Eligibility
https://www.jalopnik.com/1807796/tesla-last-minute-canadian-incentives-eligibility-request/

[38] Tesla says $43 million in mass iZEV claims was ‘misunderstanding’
https://driving.ca/auto-news/industry/tesla-canada-izev-ev-rebate-claims-misunderstanding-lawsuit

[39] Paris mayor quits X, calling social media platform a ‘vast global sewer’
https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20231128-paris-mayor-quits-x-calling-social-media-platform-a-vast-global-sewer

[40] Why Elon Musk, the bully, is seen by many, including liberals, as a hero
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2023-12-04/elon-musk-racism-x-bully-savior-culture

[41] Elon Musk’s X sues Lego, Nestlé and more brands, accusing them of advertising boycott
https://www.npr.org/2025/02/01/nx-s1-5283271/elon-musk-lawsuit-advertisers-boycott-new

[42] Advertisers set to return to X as they seek favour with Elon Musk and Donald Trump
https://www.ft.com/content/34b6fc20-23f7-4e08-9ac4-ef05d5d66c13?s=04

[43] Media Matters sues Elon Musk’s X over ‘libel tourism’ legal assault
https://www.npr.org/2025/03/10/nx-s1-5323844/media-matters-elon-musk-new-lawsuit

[44] X sues Media Matters to silence moderation criticism
https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/20/23970274/x-elon-musk-media-matters-lawsuit-nazi-ads-filed

[45] Media Matters sues Elon Musk’s X over ‘libel tourism’ legal assault
https://www.npr.org/2025/03/10/nx-s1-5323844/media-matters-elon-musk-new-lawsuit

[46] Big Jew Is Watching You: Semitic Psychology and the Surveillance State
https://www.unz.com/article/big-jew-is-watching-you-semitic-psychology-and-the-surveillance-state/

[47] “White Privilege” vs. “Jewish Privilege”
https://www.unz.com/isteve/white-privilege-vs-jewish-privilege/

[48] The Power Behind the Throne
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/16422/

[49] Pharmaceutical companies are “addicted to money”
https://news.youth.cn/gj/202408/t20240815_15449689.htm

[50] The “righteous story” of an American pharmaceutical family: We have been involved in drugs for 25 years, but we are good people
https://www.sohu.com/a/478052146_115479

[51] Bankruptcy court had no authority to shield Sackler family in Purdue Pharma bankruptcy, judge rules
https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/bankruptcy-court-had-no-authority-to-shield-sackler-family-in-purdue-pharma-bankruptcy-judge-rules

[52] Nestlé – Murdering With Milk
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/6004/

[53] “Unscrupulous” Nestlé pumps water in the center of drought
https://www.xinhuanet.com//world/2015-10/19/c_128335401.htm

[54] Nestlé and the World’s Water
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/Nestlé-and-the-worlds-water-may-00-2021/

[55] Nestlé Chairman Peter Brabeck Says We Don’t Have a Right to Water; https://www.huffpost.com/entry/Nestlé-chairman-peter-brabeck-water_b_315015

[56] Nestlé Waters Threatens To Sue Miami-Dade Over Water Ads; https://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/10/Nestlé-waters-threatens-to-sue-miami-dade-over-water-ads/

[57] Two bottled waters produced by Nestlé in California
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2017-09-21/nestl-makes-billions-bottling-water-it-pays-nearly-nothing-for

[58] Pfizer’s Perfectly-Timed Epidemic
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/14923/

[59] Panel Faults Pfizer in ’96 Clinical Trial In Nigeria
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/06/AR2006050601338.html

[60] Secret report surfaces showing that Pfizer was at fault in Nigerian drug tests
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1471980/

[61] Nigerian Families Sue Pfizer
https://www.science.org/content/article/nigerian-families-sue-pfizer

[62] Pfizer pays out to Nigerian families of meningitis drug trial victims
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/aug/11/pfizer-nigeria-meningitis-drug-compensation

[63] Pfizer: Nigeria drug trial victims get compensation
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-14493277

*

This article may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. This content is being made available under the Fair Use doctrine, and is for educational and information purposes only. There is no commercial use of this content.

 

Other Works by this Author

 

ESSAYS ON CHINA  Volume One

ESSAYS ON CHINA Volume 2

ESSAYS ON CHINA Volume Three 

Who Starts All The Wars? — New!

What we Are Not Told :  German POWs in America – What Happened to Them?

The Richest Man in the World

The Power Behind the Throne

The Jewish Hasbara in All its Glory

PROPAGANDA and THE MEDIA 

BERNAYS AND PROPAGANDA 

Democracy – The Most Dangerous Religion

NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 1 — How the US Became Rich 

NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 2 — Life in a Failed State

NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 3 — The Branding of America

Police State America Volume One

Police State America Volume Two

Essays on America

FILLING THE VOID

BIOLOGICAL WARFARE IN ACTION

THE WORLD OF BIOLOGICAL WARFARE

False Flags and Conspiracy Theories

Kamila Valieva

 

 

LARRY ROMANOFF FREE E-BOOKS & PDF ARTICLES

 

 Copyright © Larry Romanoff, Blue Moon of Shanghai, Moon of Shanghai, 2025