January 09, 2017
There is a campaign underway to
destroy Syria's public utilities. Al-Qaeda, ISIS and the U.S. airforce are
involved. Their action is coordinated.
That is an outrageous statement? No
such coordination would ever happen? Consider:
The idea of the Islamic State was "born" in the U.S. military prison camp Bucca in Iraq.
Many of its future leader were interned there and had time and space to develop
their philosophy and to plan their future operations.
In 2012 the Defense Intelligence
Agency warned of the rise of an Islamic State entity in Syria
and Iraq:
THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY OF
ESTABLISHING A DECLARED OR UNDECLARED SALAFIST PRINCIPALITY IN EASTERN SYRIA
(HASAKA AND DER ZOR), AND THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE SUPPORTING POWERS TO
THE OPPOSITION WANT, IN ORDER TO ISOLATE THE SYRIAN REGIME…”.
In an August 2014 NYT interview with
Thomas Friedman President Obama said that the U.S. knew about the dangers of ISIS but
did nothing to stop its expansion in Iraq because it could be used to oust then
Prime Minister Maliki:
The reason, the president added,
“that we did not just start taking a bunch of airstrikes all across Iraq as
soon as ISIL came in was because that would have taken the pressure off of
[Prime Minister Nuri Kamal] al-Maliki.
In a recent talk with some U.S. paid
members of the Syrian opposition Secretary of State Kerry (video - 25:50) made a similar point but wuth regard to Syria:
"And we know that this was
growing, we were watching, we saw that DAESH was growing in strength,
and we thought Assad was threatened" Kerry told the Syrians. "(We)
thought, however," he continued. "we could probably manage that Assad
might then negotiate. But instead of negotiating he got Putin to support
him."
There are doubts that the U.S. was
only watching from afar. The beginning and growth of ISIS was financed by U.S.
Gulf "allies" which are subordinated to U.S. wishes. When the Obama
administration had to start bombing ISIS after it killed a U.S. journalist the
few bombs its airforce dropped were hitting an "ISIS fighting
position" or an "ISIS excavator". That wasn't a serious
campaign. Meanwhile thousands of Turkish tanker trucks were waiting in the
deserts to load oil from ISIS controlled wells to sell it to Turkey. Only after
the Russian President Putin showed satellite pictures of those huge truck
columns to his colleagues at a G20 meeting did the U.S. start to attack this
major source of ISIS finances.
At the end of last year the U.S.
military bombed a Syrian government position in Deir Ezzor where some 100,000
Syrians are besieged by ISIS. It killed more than Syrian 100 troops and enabled
ISIS to take important hill positions that may eventually help it to conquer
the city. This was an intentional
strike.
Currently a campaign is waged by the
Takfiri forces opposing the Syrian government and by the U.S. to deprive the people
under its protection of all public utilities - water, gas and electricity.
After the start of the current blocking of the water supplies to Damascus and
its 5-6 million inhabitants we noted:
This shut down is part of a wider,
seemingly coordinated strategy to deprive all government held areas of utility
supplies. Two days ago the Islamic State shut down a major water intake for
Aleppo from the Euphrates. High voltage electricity masts on lines feeding
Damascus have been destroyed and repair teams, unlike before, denied access.
Gas supplies to parts of Damascus are also cut.
This campaign against basic
infrastructure has since continued. U.S. support "rebel" groups take
part in it. Al-Qaeda in Syria, aka Jabhat al Nusra, does its share in Wadi
Barada. The U.S. military just bombed another Syrian power station. In 2015 it
had already waged a campaign against such installations creating huge material
damages. Since three days Deir Ezzor and surroundings have no electricity at all. Yesterday ISIS again joined the campaign
and blew up a huge gas processing facility in Hayyan in east
Homs. Hayyan is the largest such station in Syria and provided electricity,
heating gas and cooking gas for all of south Syria including the capital
Damascus.
This is a systematic, wide ranging
campaign against Syrian infrastructure designed to deprive the people living
under government protection of the basic necessities.
If you would ask the U.S. government
it would of course say that such a campaign does not exist and is totally not
coordinated by the U.S. and its Gulf proxies. It is just coincidence that U.S.
supported "rebels", al-Qaeda, ISIS and the U.S. airforce all hit the
same category of targets in Syria at the very same moment of their war against
the Syrian people.
In knowledge of the top U.S. sources
quoted above I would be inclined to doubt such an assertion.
The campaign is in prelude to the
next stage of the war for which all involved parties currently
prepare. As Obama still
gives the orders we can expect it to be more vicious and with even more
propaganda support than his failed "defense" of his proxy forces in
east-Aleppo.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.