Imperial Tool NYT Calls RT International “a Snarky
Anti-West” Kremlin Mouthpiece

The NYT long ago lost
credibility, deplorably serving as a press agent for wealth, power and
privilege - publishing virtual state-sponsored propaganda on major world and
national issues, especially when America goes to war.
In contrast, RT
International broadcasts real news, information and analysis, especially on
major geopolitical issues - why it attracts a large, growing worldwide
audience, wanting journalism the way it’s supposed to be, not state-sponsored
propaganda Western media scoundrels feature.
On Monday, RT’s
editor-in-chief Margarita Simonyan tweeted “(o)ur (bank) accounts in
Britain have been closed. All of them. ‘Decisions not to be discussed.’ Long
live freedom of speech.”
NatWest Bank announced the
closure, effective in December. So what’s going on? Russia is disgracefully
bashed in the West for maintaining its sovereign independence, free from US
dominance.
NatWest is part of the
largely state-owned Royal Bank of Scotland. Britain’s dirty hands almost certainly
are involved in closing RT’s accounts, likely complicit with Washington.
Maybe banning RT altogether
in the West is next, silencing a vital voice for truth and full disclosure if
ordered.
Instead of supporting
inviolable free expression, The Timesdisgracefully called RT “a
Kremlin-financed mouthpiece,” claiming “its broadcasts repeatedly show the West
as a sea of chaos,” citing UK broadcast regulator Ofcom unjustifiably saying it
lacks impartiality.
RT’s previous bank,
Barclays, closed its accounts in July 2015. The Times quoted Royal United
Services Institute’s Russian and European security studies assistant director
Jonathan Eyal, saying “(c)ertain questions are being raised over the
corporation and its sources of funding.”
He failed to explain the BBC
is owned, operated and controlled by Britain’s government, serving as its
mouthpiece, in contrast to RT presenting fair and balanced reporting, offering
a credible alternative voice.
Not according to The Times,
saying it portrays the West “as grim, divided, brutal, decadent, overrun with
violent immigrants and unstable (and) tends to make favorable remarks about
Donald J. Trump.”
Fact: RT truth-telling is
polar opposite US-led Western print and electronic propaganda, why it’s
unjustifiably criticized.
The Times: “Most analysts
interviewed by RT toe the line, and any who do not are rebuked.” What rubbish!
I’m banned on Western
television and radio because my views oppose America’s imperial agenda,
complicit with Britain and other rogue allies.
Yet RT interviewed me a
number of times, letting me speak as freely and candidly as I write on various
key issues - never “rebuk(ing)” or making me “toe the line.”
The Times: “It is unclear
how many viewers RT actually reaches.”
Fact: According to a
February 2016 comScore study of RT viewership via computers, mobile devices and
YouTube worldwide, it’s reaching 49 million unique users monthly.
It’s no secret why. It’s
delivering what growing millions of viewers want - real news, information and
analysis, polar opposite Western scoundrel media propaganda.
Stephen Lendman lives in
Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
His new book as editor and
contributor is titled "Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for
Hegemony Risks WW III."
http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html
Visit his blog site at
sjlendman.blogspot.com.
Listen to cutting-edge
discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the
Progressive Radio Network.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.