29.08.2016 Author: Tony Cartalucci
What Syria’s Kurds “Think”
They are Fighting For Versus Reality
Column: Politics
Region: Middle East
Country: Syria
Reports are emerging of
widespread armed conflict between Kurdish militants and Syrian forces.
Concentrated in and around eastern Syria and the city of Hasaka, reports
indicate that Syrian forces may be on the verge of completely
withdrawing.
The Kurdish offensive is
being backed by US forces, including airpower overhead and special operations
personnel on the ground. Syrian attempts to use its own air force to counter
the spreading conflict appeared to be checked by what was essentially a defacto
no-fly zone established by the US over eastern Syria.
Reuters in their report, “Syria Kurds
win battle with government, Turkey mobilizes against them,” would state:
Syrian Kurdish forces took
near complete control of Hasaka city on Tuesday as a ceasefire ended a week of
fighting with the government, consolidating the Kurds’ grip on Syria’s
northeast as Turkey increased its efforts to check their influence.
The Kurdish YPG militia, a critical part of the U.S.-backed campaign against Islamic State, already controls swathes of northern Syria where Kurdish groups have established de facto autonomy since the start of the Syria war in 2011.
The Kurdish YPG militia, a critical part of the U.S.-backed campaign against Islamic State, already controls swathes of northern Syria where Kurdish groups have established de facto autonomy since the start of the Syria war in 2011.
Analysts and those
sympathetic to the Kurdish cause, including their perceived role in fighting
terrorist organizations in Syria including the self-proclaimed “Islamic State”
(ISIS), see this as a positive development toward a greater and independent
“Kurdistan.”
However, the facts on the
ground appear to suggest a much more likely and unfortunate future.
A Kurdish Version of Israel
The Washington Post in its
article, “Inside the
Kurdish fighting forces: the U.S.’s proxy ground troops in the war against ISIS,” claims:
Although U.S. forces in
areas controlled by the Kurds declined to be interviewed, there is evidence
everywhere of their presence and the focus on Mosul. The United States, in both
Iraq and Syria, has sought out proxy ground forces, backed by air power, to
fight the Islamic State. It is a policy that recorded a recent success with the
recapture of Ramadi by Iraqi forces, but Mosul, one of the first major prizes
to fall into the hands of the Islamic State, will provide a significant test
for both the Iraqis and Kurds. And U.S. officials say it could be many more
months before local forces have the training and equipment needed to move on a
city where the militants have hardened defenses.
But clearly, in light of
recent fighting between US-backed Kurdish militants and Syrian forces,
including a near direct confrontation between US and Syrian airpower, ISIS is
not the intended target.The US has indeed sought out “proxy ground forces” in
Syria, but long before ISIS was turned into a geopolitical brand, and to topple
the Syrian government, not clear Syria of terrorists the US itself helped move
onto the battlefield in the first place.
It is within this context
that it can be seen that the Kurds are being used to first destroy Syria and
then they themselves will be pitted against one another and whomever their
neighbors end up being as a perpetually dependent, needy “semi-state” used as a
wedge and employed by Washington, London, and Brussels well into the
foreseeable future.
Kurdish forces that allowed
themselves to be used by Western interests were used as one of several
components – the others involving sectarian extremists including Al Qaeda – to
divide and destroy Iraq, and now they are being used against Syria, and soon
against Iran.
Stratfor’s report titled, “Iranian Kurds
Return to Arms,” provides some initial insight into what will
undoubtedly evolve into a much wider Iranian conflict in the near future should
US objectives be achieved and expanded upon in eastern Syria.The use of Kurds
by Western interests is a modern-day example of classical imperial divide and
rule in motion. What the Kurds “think” they are fighting for is absolutely
irrelevant versus what in reality they are being armed, organized, and used for
by Western interests.The most likely scenario – should the majority of Kurdish
armed groups maintain this current course – sees them being used to divide and
destroy Syria, creating enduring chaos they themselves will be exposed to.
This, by necessity will lead
to heavy reliance upon outside support to survive in that chaos leading to the
creation for all intents and purposes of a Kurdish-version of Israel – a
stunted faux-state perpetually dependent on Western support and ruled through
corrupt proxy regimes unrepresentative of the people they presume governance
over. It is a future of perpetual war with Turkey, whatever remains of Syria
and Iraq, and a growing conflict with Iran driven not by genuine Kurdish
aspirations or interests, but exploited ideological aspirations serving Western
designs to undermine and topple Iranian power and institutions and reassert
Western hegemony across the region.
Kurdish Story Not Quite Over Yet
Despite the grim prospects
that face Kurdish groups that have allowed themselves to be used by Western
interests to create chaos they themselves will suffer perpetually within – this
is still not an inevitability.Russia and Iran still have significant sway among
Kurdish factions throughout the region and could help mitigate the damage a
US-led attempt to dismember Syria through Kurdish proxies will exact. While
this might involve concessions on Syria’s part regarding degrees of Kurdish
autonomy, it will ultimately cut off what has been now several years of
continuous conflict consuming the Middle Easte and North Africa.Additionally,
should moves by Syria and its allies abruptly change the dynamics on the ground
in Syria, including moves made by Turkey should it have truly drifted beyond
NATO influence, this could effectively end or at least minimize US operations
in eastern Syria and leave Kurdish militants dependent on US support isolated
and more willing to negotiate.
While these possibilities
exist, they will require immense diplomatic, political, economic, and military
effort to bring into reality.
Tony Cartalucci, Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher
and writer, especially for the online magazine“New Eastern Outlook”.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.