3 June 201617:41
Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s television interview with 360 Gradusov
Podmoskovie, Odintsovo, June 3, 2016
Question: How is the Russia-US dialogue on Syria going?
Sergey Lavrov: It is fairly intensive. I can’t say that the
intensity of our meetings translates into the number of specific agreements,
because the situation is complex. The biggest snag is that we are convinced of
the need to take concrete, more effective and stronger action against ISIS and
Jabhat al-Nusra. We believe that everything else is of secondary importance. To
be sure, it is important to ensure humanitarian access to all locations that
are blocked by either party, to maintain the ceasefire, and to deal with violations.
It is important to launch a political process, which the radical opposition is
impeding by refusing to sit at the negotiating table and laying out preliminary
requirements. As important as these things are, terrorism represents a common
threat, and there should be no doubt about it. Most of our Western partners
acknowledge in private conversations that there should be no excuses when it
comes to defeating ISIS and Jabhat al-Nusra, which, to make matters worse, is
trying to link up with other groups. We are told that we should not attack
them, because there’s also the “normal” opposition there. However, this part of
the opposition should withdraw from the terrorist positions, and this has long
since been agreed.
Our American partners are still leaning towards those who put forward
preconditions. Today I spoke with US State Secretary Kerry again. It was, I
believe, our 34th conversation since January. We discuss these
matters in detail. In addition, there’s a Russian-American video conferencing
channel at our base in Hmeymim. We have a communication channel with the US
representatives sitting in the Jordanian capital. They talk on an almost daily
basis. As you may be aware, a joint Russian-American Centre for Syria Truce
Monitoring was set up in Geneva.
So, the communications infrastructure is in place. Most importantly, we
should try to get past the preconditions, which need to be put on the back
burner, and get down to fighting terrorists.
Question: Are there any concerns that Kiev might take unilateral steps towards
political reform without agreeing them with Donbass?
Sergey Lavrov: There were rumours a few days ago that a
package of documents may be submitted to Ukraine’s Verkhovna Rada. That is to
say, they will appear to meet the requirements of the Minsk agreements, but in
fact these documents, unless they are agreed upon with Donbass, will undermine
the Minsk agreements.
We asked our Normandy format partners – the French and the Germans – to
prevent this from happening, because it could create a major additional
impediment to implementing the Minsk agreements. They clearly stipulate that
the constitutional reform, the law on local elections, and the law on the
special status of Donbass must be coordinated with the representatives of
Lugansk and Donetsk. The next step should include a complete amnesty for the
participants of these events on both sides – exactly as was done with regard to
the participants of the Maidan protests in February 2014. That sums up the
current situation.
Question: Will we meet more often now that a branch of MGIMO University opened
in Odintsovo? Can we hope for a longer and more in-depth interview with you?
Sergey Lavrov: Let's make a deal. I would certainly be
willing to. It’s important. A branch doesn’t have to open in Odintsovo for that
to happen. However, once the branch opens, I’m convinced that the Foreign
Ministry staff, my deputies, directors of departments and especially former
diplomats will gladly accept an invitation to carry out additional functions, seminars,
lectures, or round table discussions. We will see each other more often, no
doubt about it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.