Inside The Secret Super Majority that
Decide Election 2016 & War with Russia
1333 ViewsJune 15, 2016 1 Comment
by GH Eliason
How well the candidate from either
party satisfies 7 questions from a particular group of people will determine
who the President of the United States will be after this election. The winner
will be the one that proves they are the most willing to go to war with Russia
and China after they are elected. Will you do your part and vote for them?
The only thing we need to agree on at
this point is 1+1=2. It can’t vary. The simple logic doesn’t care how it makes
you feel. If the information adds up without any leaps the conclusion presents
itself in the simplest form, 1+1 always =2.
The determining factors in the US
Presidential election won’t be decided in Kiev if that’s the direction you
think I’m going in. Rather, along with the super-delegates, there is a
secret super- majority that has existed for the last 40+ years in the USA and
this is the most important election they will ever hijack and decide.
The problem with facts is once you
know them, you can’t argue with them anymore.
This group has a 50-year history of
deciding elections. Included in that history are the deaths of over
100,000 Americans and millions of people in other countries. For them, this is
the most important election of all time. This time, they want to bring the war
home.
With over 235 million eligible voters
in the US, if you could count on more than 20 million of them to vote en bloc
could you win? What if they were concentrated around swing cities in swing
states across America? These are the cities with the highest number
of electoral delegates. If any candidate could count on more than 15% of
ballots cast before counting traditional party voters, could they lose?
In the 2012 election only 54% or
129 million voted out of 235 million eligible voters.
More than 20 million votes
get’s more mileage with low voter turnout. When you take party affiliation
into account it gets even more impressive. According to 2014 data, 39% identify as independents,
32% as Democrats and 23% as Republicans.
This makes it clear that 15% of the
electorate beyond your party is not only enough to win a presidential
election but supplies a mandate. But whose mandate in 2016?
An easier way to understand this is if
your candidate is predicted to win/lose by +-3-5% points in a given state and I
can deliver 7%, am I really important to you? Or if I can deliver 5-7 states
this way, do you owe me anything?
What if “WE” can deliver 15-18
important states this way in your national election? How about 20 states? Would
you go to war for me? Would you sanction my enemies or at the extreme give me
diplomatic cover if I commit or support genocide in other countries?
The Primaries-
Where 5-15% Can Turn into 80% of the Vote!
The presidential primaries are where
it really gets impressive. Why? No one votes. This
is why candidates start with radical positions that after the convention “start
to drift toward the center.” After all, they need to talk to the rest of
us.
When you take the above and apply it
to the primaries the math goes on steroids. Only .8% to 5% of eligible voters
are needed to win a state. It can translate into 40-80% of the votes cast. Don’t
believe me?
Let’s take a look at Iowa. In Iowa,
there were 2,403,229 eligible voters for the 2016 primaries. Only 15% of
registered voters showed up at the polls. That translates to 357,283 voters. Or
just enough to make up a small city.
That figure covers both Democrats and
Republicans. For either party that was just a little over 7% of registered
voters. Democrats fielded 171109 votes for
their candidates. Hilary Clinton won with a margin of .29 percent. With even a
small bloc vote the Iowa primary could be turned either way.
The Emigre Super
Blocs
The CEEC (Central and East European
Coalition) represents a combined group with 22 million bloc voters. As the CEE
immigrants came into the US, they were guided to the cities where they were
needed to build out the power blocs for their representative groups. Most
groups were a government in exile and today are the hand behind their home
country’s government. They lobby for the home country’s interests to the US
government. They also bring in money from the home countries to influence or
outright buy American politicians.
More importantly, as governments in
exile, they determined the type of government that would rule their home
country. They turned over the reins of power to the new ex-Soviet bloc
countries like Ukraine in 1991. They “advise” the home country, especially on
Russia policy.
Their PAC’s come together to work on
problems like immigration quotas or visas, relations with the US, and business.
When it suits their interests they come together and determine election
outcomes and foreign policy.
These groups have changed the outcomes
of presidential elections both separately and working together for the past 50
years.
What the Emigres
Want In 2016
Right now the CEEC emigres are working
together for the last goal all of them have which is war with Russia and China. Their
caucuses are traditionally so strong in Congress, it’s impossible to get
elected without CEEC support in major states. And Congress has been pushing
their agenda toward war with Russia since the days of Joseph McCarthy.
Their influence on eastern European and
Russia policy is unchecked. The time has come.
The 7 Questions that will determine
15% of the vote and the outcome of the 2016 US elections
The following 7 questions are what the
combined Eastern and Central European emigres are demanding for votes and
electoral votes in 2016. Following that, the proofs of how much weight their
gerrymandering has gained in American politics since the early 1950s is
supplied. Each emigre population listed had fathers and grandfathers that were
Waffen SS or supported them in some fashion. Their
families emigrated to the United States only understanding Nationalist/Nazi
political views. Their politics never changed. They raise their children to be more
committed than they were.
They even advertise their pride
in their own Waffen SS soldiers that
when combined took part in the murder of more than 2 million
people. When each of their respective countries was freed,
these same governments in exile and ethnic groups delivered the same
ultra-nationalist government models their grandparents had in WWII as Axis
countries or pre-WWII as Prometheans Group members. And no
one ever had to answer for this.
From the CEEC-“ As President, what would your
strategy be to deal with Russian aggression in Ukraine
and threats in Central and Eastern Europe? What options would you employ
to achieve Russia?s withdrawal from lands it unlawfully controls, such as
Crimea, eastern Ukraine, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Transnistria?
1. What is
your position on the current sanctions against Russia?
2.
How do you view NATO?s role in countering Russian
aggression? What is your position on maintaining U.S. /NATO equipment and
troops permanently in the CEE region? Please provide specifics.
3. Do you
favor NATO enlargement to include countries such as Georgia and Ukraine?
4. What is
your position on the Visa Waiver Program?s possible expansion to include other
CEE countries, such as Poland?
5. What is
your position on U.S. assistance to ensure energy security in the CEE region?
6. What is
your position on the proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
(TTIP)?”
Ultimately this is about one
thing, starting war with Russia and
China. For the last 50 years, the one demand all the emigre
populations have is the destruction of Russia.
According to the Independent “Nato risks a
nuclear war with Russia within a year
if it does not increase its defence capabilities in the Baltic
states, one of the alliance’s most senior retired generals has said.”
Disputin’ Putin
Russia has no interest in attacking
any of these countries. This Harvard University article puts
the nails in that coffin. Russia really isn’t interested and
you don’t have to take my word for it. If no one in these countries is worried
about a Russian invasion, why go to war with Russia or risk nuclear war just
because a few whiny nationalists want it? According to the corresponding
monograph from the US Army War College, “It was the unanimous view
[of academics] that overt military action by Russia
against the Baltic States…is unlikely in the extreme.” Sorry
Gen. Breedlove, check and mate. Your own military researchers think your
credibility is a little light these days.
If Russia isn’t a
real threat why do all these countries hate Russia so much?
First and foremost is understanding where the CEE
countries are coming from politically. Each country is a
new country that came out of the Habsburg “Spring of Nations” and are Wilson
Doctrine countries. All of these countries were bordering or close to bordering
Imperial Russia, later the Soviet Union, and today the Russian Federation.
Nationalism and Fascism were set up as
a prophylactic against Russian or Soviet influence inside each country and the
corresponding Diasporas. If you ask why they hate Russia, you are more than
likely going to get an unintelligible rant instead of a reason. They simply
don’t know and don’t care to look at the history.
Polonia & The
Polish American Congress
“Polish-Americans in the United States comprise a voting bloc sought
after by both the Democratic and Republican parties. Polish Americans
comprise 3.2% of the United States population but were estimated
at nearly 10% of the overall electorate as of 2012. The
Polish-American population is concentrated in several swing
states that make issues important to Polish-Americans more likely to be
heard by presidential candidates. According to John Kromkowski, a Catholic
University professor of political science, Polish-Americans make up
an “almost archetypical swing vote.”
If you look at Presidential
election results from 1916 to 2012 the Polish community was only
distracted twice. Their choice of candidate won every other election. They are
an archetypical swing vote. They have been described since the 1950’s as the
one emigre group that could determine a national race on their own. Every candidate has paid real
attention to this trying to gain their bloc vote. As
early as 1960 this included JFK.
The Polish-American
community is a tightly knit nationalist enclave and the only way for Kennedy
to beat Nixon was to get the Polish vote and win it in the electoral count.
But what about today? The Irish named
Senator from Connecticut, Chris Murphy, is connecting with his Polish roots
through the Polish-American Congress in an effort to be ready for a future
presidential run. Senator Murphy has started the long neglected “Polish Caucus” to
better gain support and contributions later
on.
What do the Poles want? War with Russia. This is especially clear because Poland is pushing to
make sure it happens. Bill Clinton won the Polish-American vote for helping
Poland enter NATO in 1996. He recently gave his assessment of Polish nationalist
politics.
Is Bill Clinton correct saying
that the Hungarians,
the Poles and by extension the
Polish-American community that gave them their nationalism are
looking for their own authoritarian leader and reject democracy? Yes,
he is.
What was the Polish American Congress
reaction to Bill Clinton‘s statement? “The Polish American Congress threatens to undermine
Clinton campaign.It’s therefore, no surprise the Polish American
Congress has protested, announcing it
may throw its weight in the election behind anybody not named
Clinton.” “Polish Americans are thick on the
ground in several states Hillary Clinton will need to win in
November if she plans to be our next president—including Pennsylvania,
Illinois, Michigan, New York and New Jersey.”
Does this sound like a super bloc vote
to you? The last time a candidate insulted the Polish-Americans, it
was the gaff prone Gerald Ford. Ford, until that moment, had their vote
and the election against Jimmy Carter was almost wrapped up. Despite the fact
that the president of the Polish-American Congress was friends with Ford, the
damage was done too close to the election. The Polish-American bloc went with
Carter.
Is this good for Donald Trump? Not
quite. Polonia is divided on this
issue because Clinton represents the best candidate for
longer range goals. November is a long way off. Full Polish support and war is
only a half-hearted apology away.
Just ask Anne Applebaum, wife of
former Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski a staunch Polish Nationalist
about how hypocritical we are to call a democracy, nationalism. “People close to
the couple say she inspires his foreign policy
plans and strategies” and “Europe’s history, he warned before anyone else,
would be decided in Ukraine.”
“In the United States, we dislike the
word “nationalism” and
so, hypocritically, we call it other things: “American exceptionalism,” for
example, or a “belief in American greatness.” We also argue about it as if it
were something rational—Mitt Romney wrote a book that put forth the “case for
American greatness”—rather than acknowledging that nationalism is fundamentally
emotional. In truth, you can’t really make “the case” for nationalism; you can
only inculcate it, teach it to children, cultivate it at public
events.” – Anne Applebaum
How the 2016 Super
Bloc Vote Creates David vs the Russian Goliath
Voting blocs, smoting blocs,
who gives a damn? I got bloc’d in traffic the other day! This is
America and everybody has a “voting bloc!” What ya’ didn’t know they’re on sale
at Walmart? Two for a dolla’.
Yah, I get it. Voting blocs are part
of the American experience. What you may not get is that we are discussing two
entirely different things.
When we look at American bloc voting
it has been issue oriented about American civil rights, immigration, and
American life. These are American issues brought front and center by American
people, to be decided by and for American people.
Looking at the largest American bloc
voter segments today we find “In the 2012 elections,
African-Americans accounted for about 13% of total votes, while Hispanics
accounted for about 10% of the electorate.”Add in the Asian-American bloc
vote “…, that figure is nearing 6 percent
and spiraling upward.
These represent what is purported to
be the largest voting blocs in America today and yet, “Arab Americans make up
about one percent of the US population, but
many live in the swing states that could decide the White House
race.” What’s really weird about this election is that Arab Americans are
predominately Christian and traditionally voted Republican- oopsie Mr. Trump.
What’s different about the voting
blocs I am describing is they could care less about American democracy or civil
rights. They were the constituency of governments in exile that served Nazi
Germany in WWII. They are still ultra-nationalist politically and serve the
foreign governments they set up when the Soviet Union collapsed.
If they were “democratic” would it be
reasonable to assume the countries they set up or helped set up and support
would be democratic too? Their impulse to support nationalist countries is
so overwhelming for them they could give a damn when Americans lose their lives
in wars they start for their foreign governments…so be it.
Four short examples of this are the
Polish presidential election of 2015, Ukrainian-American perceptions about
themselves, the actual reason we fought the Korean and Vietnam Wars, and the
elections of Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan. People self-describe themselves
clearly in their actions.
Remember 1+1 always=2. In 2015 Andrzej Duda was elected president
of Poland. That sounds democratic. But president Duda is profoundly
ultra-nationalist. This sounds like a problem for Poland, right? Well,
no, Polish-Americans voted in that
election and showed their true democratic colors.
More than 80% of Polish-Americans voting,
supported the Nazi, now president, Duda. The Telegraph called it the “Velvet
Road to Dictatorship.”What would be a good start for a
Nationalist/Nazi president of Poland?
How about Holocaust denial? Shown
earlier, Polish-Americans make up 10% of America’s electorate on their
own. In America, Polish-Americans that voted for Duda traditionally prefer
to vote for the Democratic ticket.
In February 2015 I wrote an article
about the illegality of Ukrainian-Americans supplying
weapons to volunteer groups in Ukraine that were
systematically killing civilians. Even though they openly stated at the time
that funding was going for weapons, knew they were openly breaking Federal Law,
the practice continues.
The Ukrainian Diaspora even
acknowledged that this is illegal in their own publication linked
below. “Supplies are all nonlethal equipment, as sending
weapons would be illegal.”
This has been going on for the entire
war in Ukraine, from Maidan onward. Open calls for weapons donation funding
became common in American social media.
How do they self-identify? Did Adolf
Hitler call himself a Nazi? Would Adolf Hitler be happy if you called him a
Nazi to his face? Or was it how his enemy identified him? Are these
Ukrainian-Americans Republican, Democrats, or Independents? Or Nazi? Do they
believe in Democracy for Ukraine? For America?
In the U.S., he had made a connection
with Ivanka Zajac, 62, a nurse who is the president of the
New York branch of the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America, an
organization that represents all Ukrainians in the U.S. and one that is
lobbying Congress to pass a law authorizing the supply of weapons to Ukraine
from the U.S…Zajac is in some ways the archetype of an Ukrainian nationalist…”
In some ways? If you go to the
official UCCA website, every group listed in member organizations were
classified as Nazi organizations by the US government in QRPLUMB VOL1_0004. Let’s
not forget the listings that openly celebrate the Ukrainian Nazi
Waffen SS, Ukrainian Veterans of the
1st Division or the Brotherhood of Veterans of
Ukrainian Insurgent Army.
Because of her position she
is naturally at the top of the food chain in the CEE organizing over 20
million election votes. But wait, how does America’s home grown voter
blocs compare with them? Its a natural question. They don’t.
A natural outgrowth of the CEEC has
been the Asian-American and Central American emigre blocs. From the 1950’s
through the 80’s these countries rose and fell in election cycle importance
through the Ukrainian nationalist World Anti-Communist League (WACL). For
the American-Asian this culminated in 1972 when Richard Nixon was
running for reelection.
Nixon was elected in 1968 with the
4th largest margin in election history. In 1972 his greatest fear was
Chiang Kai-shek, the president of Taiwan destroying his presidency
and electability through the Asian-American emigres relationship to
the CEE emigres. How could this happen? It was
the CEE bloc vote to begin with that got him elected by that margin. The
Asian-Americans by themselves were less than 1% of the vote.
The real cause for both the Korean
and Vietnam Wars was the factor the CEE groups played in elections. The
president’s of the United States of America during this period were afraid of
what thesegroups could muster on American soil with
good reason. Today the same kind of nationalist views have become mainstream
again so just look around you. To paraphrase one president and the actions of
the others “I am afraid of a Nationalist/Nazi takeover of the US government
that would make “McCarthyism look like chicken-shit.”
Seriously? Could it be true Stepan Bandera and Chiang Kai-shek
were Nazi comrades? The proof is in the pictures. The next
generations, unfortunately, stayed by the same political tree.
When you combine the
Black-Hispanic-Asian American voting blocs and subtract the pro-Contra (nationalist)
factions and the pro-Taiwan (Chiang Kai-shek, South
Korean, South Vietnamese) nationalists that are
fringe outliers to the CEEC, the CEEC vote is closer to 20% of the total US
vote, while the natural American blocs dwindle in voting power considerably.
This begs the question- Can a group
without even enough of a population to count as a bloc be a bloc to
reckon with today?
The answer came in 1980. They can if they
become a cause celeb! The election of Ronald Reagan was due to
pro-Contra CEE group funding. The entire
Iran-Contra mess was initially put together by the CEE groups leader Yaroslav
Stetsko, leader of the Ukrainian emigres. Stetsko’s WACL had 2 member states
fund Ronald Reagan’s primary campaign and then they (CEE) funded and organized
it with him all the way to victory.
It’s the same for the Baltic states
today. They are politically important because of the cause celeb. They are made
out to be David against Russia’s Goliath.
There was a recommendation for NATO to engage
as an alliance in ongoing wars –
specifically in Ukraine, Georgia, Libya, and Syria – under the hypothesis that
failure to engage weakens the effectiveness of the alliance’s deterrence
efforts. There was disagreement on whether NATO needs to publish Russia’s
specific violations.
The CEEC believes it is time to establish
permanent NATO bases in the Alliance’s eastern
member states, since any objection has been removed by Russia’s war
on Ukraine…In the face of Russia’s aggressive actions NATO …In 2014, the
Russian Federation forcibly annexed Crimea …Russia’s war on Ukraine and
continued escalation of armed conflict threatens both Ukraina’s independence
and the welfare of tens of millions of Europeans. A strong, coordinated
military force is essential to stop Russia as it continues to destabilize its
neighbors and disrespect international rules. ..Russia’s intimidation of the
Baltic countries must cease.
Support the establishment of
permanent NATO bases in these front-line countries to assure their
security. Bases currently used by NATO for training and supply purposes in
Central Europe should be made permanent and re-focused to territorial defense;
The Kremlin’s propaganda campaign justifies its aggression by
claiming that NATO has broken its promises to not pursue enlargement and is in
the process of aggressively encircling Russia. This therefore poses
a serious threat that Russia is justified in defending in the interest of its
citizens…the panelists agreed that the West needs to push back in the face of
Russia’s disregard of national sovereignty and territorial integrity.
How did all this
pan out for them? SCORE!
The war game, titled Anaconda-16,
will take place in Poland ahead of next
month’s NATO summit in Warsaw, where officials are expected
to approve permanent troops to be stationed in the country and
throughout eastern Europe, to combat what they consistently refer to
‘Russian aggression.’
“When I first came to Lithuania 22
years ago to try and help convince the local authorities to
bring unpunished Lithuanian Nazi war criminals to trial, I
tried to convince them that such proceedings were the best history lesson to
help their society honestly deal with Lithuania’s bloody Holocaust past.
Unfortunately, those efforts were only very partially successful, and
now that fight for historical truth must continue without the advantages
provided by the prosecution of local killers.” -Dr. Efraim Zuroff
Where does modern Lithuanian ultra-nationalism come
from? In their own words-“ …the birth of nationalism (and
of ethnic consciousness) occurred simultaneously in America and in Lithuania.
Further, he believes that such a development would not have been possible
without Lithuanian-American contributions.”..“Jonas Šliūpas himself, one of the prime movers of
nationalism in the United States.” The CEE(Central
& Eastern Europeans) have all been the largest promoters of nationalism in
government in the USA for the last 50 years.
Pound for pound the vote from the
Baltic’s is symbolic, but their influence on Russia policy is huge. The emigre
influence is so great in the Baltic States some have gone over and served as
Presidents. Can you imagine being so dedicated to “freeing the old country” as
an American, you decide to take over the presidency there? What
started as anti-communist showed its true light when the “wall” came down.
Russia was the new old enemy. American and other emigre populations were the
true citizens of those countries.
In this light, Estonia still hasn’t
ratified a border with Russia in all these years. What would be the reason why?
“According to Russian analysts, they
need to wage one more little victorious war in order to keep the euphoria alive
— or carry out some sort of foreign policy operation and make Russia’s
situation in the international arena even more complex in order to show voters
that they really are under siege,” said the center’s director. “An unratified
border treaty with Estonia may play some kind of role in such a combination
which we are yet unable to picture.”
Perhaps they should read Ukrainian-
American scholarship a little more closely as both countries are aligned at the
hip these days, nazis and all.
Professor Moytl, a Ukrainian-American nationalist, thought at the time
statements like this were ok.
“Although the possibility of war is
not as far-fetched as one would like it to be, it would not work to Ukraine’s disadvantage.
Indeed, the emergence of a genuinely hostile Russia would translate into
Ukraine’s rapid integration into European economic and security structures and
its concomitant transformation into a client state of the United States. As an
East European version of South Korea, Ukraine would become the recipient of
large-scale Western–in particular, American–military and economic assistance
that would guarantee its stability,if not its prosperity…. Russia’s
aggressiveness, therefore, could be Ukraine’s salvation . ” [See
Alexander J. Motyl, “Will Ukraine Survive 1994?” in the Harriman Institute
Forum, Vol. 7, No. 5 (January 1994), p. 4.]
The unratified border serves as a
friction point to start a war Estonia cannot fight. Help us NATO!Which
candidate do the Baltic states and emigres support for president?
“Because of her “hawkish” approach
towards Russia, she would most likely step up the rhetoric against
the country when in the Oval Office. This would work well for the Baltics,
especially Lithuania,” the analyst underlines. “She is kind of a bellicose
person. Hillary Clinton supported the war in Iraq and wanted US intervention in
Libya.”
One plus one equals two.
Russia’s response to all this is
amazing and not something you see much of in today’s world. It’s the kind of
statement governments across the world should take note of when they claim the
high ground.
The Russian
Response
“After World War II we tried to impose
on many Eastern European nations our model of development and we did it through
force. We must acknowledge that. There’s nothing good in it, it still affects
us today…The Americans are doing something like that now, trying to impose
their model on virtually the entire world. They will fail too.”- Vladimir
Putin, 2015 Q&A
What do the Baltic emigres want? Lithuania along with the other
Baltic states are trying to light the flames of war between
the US and Russia. At the same time, they celebrate their home grown Nazi heroes. Are
they or have they ever been democratic?
I’ve started to wonder if the high
degree of propaganda in the US is to keep you in line or keep them in line. As
we all found out this primary season your vote didn’t have enough dollars
attached to it to make a difference. The only way to combat
this right now is to get people to vote. The more people that do, the less
effective they are. Election reform, anyone?
The next part is where this article
series will liven up. Do you still doubt the power of the CEEC super bloc? If you
do go to the Vietnam Veterans Memorial “the Wall” and count the names. Does one plus one equal two?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.