Will The
November US Presidential Election Bring The End Of The World? — Paul Craig
Roberts
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. Roberts' latest books areThe Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West000
Will The November US Presidential Election
Bring The End Of The World?
Paul
Craig Roberts
“We have
been watching for nearly a month a steady buildup of American and
NATO forces along Russia’s borders – on land, on sea and
in the air. There has been nothing like this on Russia’s
borders, such an amassing of hostile military force, since the German
invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941.”
So
concludes America’s leading Russian expert, Professor Stephen Cohen (Princeton
and New York Univesity). http://www.globalresearch.ca/russia-has-not-seen-such-amassing-of-hostile-military-forces-on-its-borders-since-1941/5526562
Professor
Cohen asks if Washington is sleepwalking and needs to wake up or whether Washington
has gone crazy and intends war.
Pepe
Escobar advises Washington to “beware what you wish for: Russia is ready for
war.”http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article44725.htm
Escobar
reports that recently the Rand Corporation, “essentially a CIA outpost,”
concluded that “Russia could overrun NATO in a mere 60 hours, if not less.” On
the level of nukes and missile systems, Russia is four generations ahead of the
US military/security complex, which is mainly interested in inflating profits
with cost overruns. US weapons systems are simply outclassed.
Nevertheless,
the Russian high command is concerned with the Russian government’s low-key
response to Washington’s aggression. The generals blame the “Atlanticists
Integrationists” who infect Putin’s government. This faction is believed to be
organized around Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev and believes Russia should make
concessions to Washington in order to be accepted as part of the West. The
incompetent Russian central bank and neoliberal economists are part of the
faction whose goal is to be part of the West regardless of its impact on
Russian independence from Washington’s Empire.
Stephen
Cohen and Alastair Crooke, a former British secret agent, almost alone in the
West have noticed that the Russian military and predominate part of the
government that emphasizes national sovereignty are putting pressure on
President Putin to eliminate those in the government who are willing to
compromise Russia’s independence in order to gain acceptance by Washington.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alastair-crooke/putin-west-war_b_9991162.html
This has
been my own opinion for some time. It is impossible to adequately stand up to
an external threat when unreliable elements are part of the threatened
government.
If Putin
is forced to remove Washington’s agents from his government, as he must do if
Russia is to survive Washington’s plots, he must not let them leave Russia. If
they escape, they will end up in Washington to be used as Washington’s Russian
government in exile. If Putin doesn’t want to put them on trial for treason,
then a form of national house arrest would be a solution.
Alastair
Crooke writes that Washington is miscalulating by seeking unipolar hegemony
and, thus, is forcing Putin into the camp of the nationalists who value
Russia’s sovereignty more than Western acceptance. Washington’s use of NATO in
an effort to corner Russia with military buildups on Russia’s land and sea
borders is forcing compromise out of Russia’s response to Washington’s aggression.
Regardless
of Escobar’s description of Russian military superiority over the West, Russian
independence is between a rock and a hard place. The rock is the American
neoconservatives’ determination to achieve hegemony over Russia. The hard place
is those within the Russian government who are more Western than Russian in
their orientation.
If Trump
becomes US president, there is some possibility, perhaps, that the
neoconservatives will cease to dominate US foreign and military policies.
Should this turn out to be the case, the Russian nationalists might ease their
pressure on Putin to remove the Atlanticist Integrationists from the
government.
If
Hillary becomes US president, the neoconservative threat to Russia will
escalate. The Atlanticist Integrationists will be eliminated from the Russian
government, and Russia will move to full war standing.
Remember
what an unprepared Russia did to the German Wehrmacht, at that time the most
powerful army ever assembled. Imagine what a prepared Russia would do to the
crazed Hillary and the incompetent neoconservatives.
As I have
previously written, pushing Russia to war means the demise of the US and Europe
and, considering the destructive power of nuclear weapons, most likely of all
life on earth.
The main
cause of this danger is the arrogance, hubris, and utter stupidity of the
American neoconservatives who are ensconced in positions of power and influence
and in Hillary’s presidential campaign.
A secondary cause is Europe’s vassal
status, which deprives Europe of a sensible foreign policy and forces Europe to
enable Washington’s aggression.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.