FR -- Manlio Dinucci -- L’art de la guerre -- Flotte USA avec 1.000 missiles en Méditerranée

 

L’art de la guerre

Flotte USA avec 1.000 missiles en Méditerranée

Manlio Dinucci

Le porte-avions USA Harry S. Truman, parti de la plus grande base navale du monde à Norfolk en Virginie, est entré en Méditerranée avec son groupe d’attaque.

  Celui-ci est composé du croiseur lance-missiles Normandy et des torpilleurs lance-missiles Arleigh Burke, Bulkeley, Forrest Sherman et Farragut, plus sous peu deux autres, le Jason Dunham et The Sullivans. Est rattachée au groupe d’attaque du Truman la frégate allemande Hessen. 

  La flotte, avec plus de 8.000 militaires à bord, a une énorme puissance de feu. Le Truman - super-porte-avions long de plus de 300 mètres, doté de deux réacteurs nucléaires- peut lancer à l’attaque, par vagues successives, 90 chasseurs et hélicoptères. Son groupe d’attaque, intégré par 4 chasseurs torpilleurs déjà en Méditerranée et par plusieurs sous-marins, peut lancer plus de 1.000 missiles de croisière. 

  Ainsi se trouvent notablement potentialisées les Forces navales USA pour l’Europe et l’Afrique, dont le quartier général est à Naples-Capodichino et la base de la Sixième Flotte à Gaeta, sous les ordres du même amiral (actuellement James Foggo) qui commande la Force Conjointe Alliée à Lago Patria (Naples).

  Ceci participe de la montée en puissance générale des forces étasuniennes en Europe, sous les ordres du même général (actuellement Curtis Scaparrotti) qui recouvre la charge de Commandant Suprême Allié en Europe. 

  Dans une audition au Congrès, Scaparrotti explique la raison de cette montée en puissance. Ce qu’il présente est un véritable scénario de guerre : il accuse la Russie de mener “une campagne de déstabilisation pour modifier l’ordre international, broyer l’Otan et miner le leadership USA dans le monde entier”.  En Europe, après “l’annexion illégale de la Crimée par la Russie et sa déstabilisation de l’Ukraine orientale”, les États-Unis, qui déploient plus de 60.000 militaires dans des pays européens de l’OTAN/NATO, ont renforcé ce déploiement par une brigade blindée et une brigade aérienne de combat, et ont constitué des dépôts pré-positionnés d’armements pour l’envoi d’autres brigades blindées. Ils ont en même temps redoublé le déploiement de leurs navires de guerre en Mer Noire.

  Pour accroître leurs forces en Europe les États-Unis ont dépensé en cinq années plus de 16 milliards de dollars, en poussant simultanément leurs alliés européens à augmenter leur propre dépense militaire de 46 milliards de dollars en trois ans pour renforcer le déploiement OTAN/NATO contre la Russie.  

  Ceci entre dans la stratégie lancée par Washington en 2014 avec le putsch de Place Maïdan et l’attaque successive contre les Russes d’Ukraine : faire de l’Europe la première ligne d’une nouvelle guerre froide pour renforcer l’influence étasunienne sur les alliés et faire obstacle à la coopération eurasiatique.

  Les ministres des Affaires étrangères de l’OTAN/NATO ont réaffirmé le 27 avril leur consensus, en préparant une extension ultérieure de l’OTAN/NATO à l’Est contre la Russie par l’entrée de Bosnie-Herzégovine, Macédoine, Géorgie et Ukraine.

  Cette stratégie requiert une préparation adéquate de l’opinion publique. À cet effet Scaparrotti accuse la Russie d’”utiliser la provocation politique, diffuser la désinformation et miner les institutions démocratiques” y compris en Italie. Il annonce ensuite que “les USA et l’OTAN/NATO combattent la désinformation russe avec une information véridique et transparente”. Dans leur sillage la Commission européenne annonce une série de mesures contre les fake news, en accusant la Russie d’utiliser “la désinformation dans sa stratégie de guerre”.

  On peut s’attendre à ce que l’OTAN/NATO et l’UE censurent ce qui nous publions ici en décrétant que la flotte USA en Méditerranée est une fake news diffusée par la Russie dans sa “stratégie de guerre”.

Edition de mardi 1er mai 2018 de Il manifesto

Traduit de l’italien par Marie-Ange Patrizio

IT -- Manlio Dinucci -- L’arte della guerra -- Flotta Usa con 1000 missili nel Mediterraneo

L’arte della guerra

Flotta USA con 1000 missili nel Mediterraneo

Manlio Dinucci

La portaerei USA Harry S. Truman, salpata dalla più grande base navale del mondo a Norfolk in Virginia, è entrata  nel Mediterraneo con il suo gruppo d’attacco. Esso è composto dall’incrociatore lanciamissili Normandy e dai cacciatorpediniere lanciamissili Arleigh Burke, Bulkeley, Forrest Sherman e Farragut, più tra poco altri due, il Jason Dunham e The Sullivans. È aggregata al gruppo d’attacco della Truman la fregata tedesca Hessen. La flotta, con a bordo oltre 8.000 uomini, ha una enorme potenza di fuoco. La Truman – superportarei lunga oltre 300 metri, dotata di due reattori nucleari – può lanciare all’attacco, a ondate successive, 90 caccia ed elicotteri. Il suo gruppo d’attacco, integrato da 4 cacciatorpediniere già nel Mediterraneo e da alcuni sottomarini, può lanciare oltre 1.000 missili da crociera.

Vengono così notevolmente potenziate le Forze navali USA per l’Europa e l’Africa, con quartier generale a Napoli-Capodichino e base della Sesta Flotta a Gaeta, agli ordini dello stesso ammiraglio (attualmente James Foggo) che comanda la Forza Congiunta Alleata a Lago Patria.

Ciò rientra nel potenziamento complessivo delle forze statunitensi in  Europa, agli ordini dello stesso generale (attualmente Curtis Scaparrotti) che ricopre la carica di Comandante Supremo Alleato in Europa. In una audizione al Congresso, Scaparrotti spiega il perché di tale potenziamento. Quello che presenta è un vero e proprio scenario di guerra: egli accusa la Russia di condurre «una campagna di destabilizzazione per cambiare l’ordine internazionale, frantumare la NATO e minare la leadership USA in tutto il mondo».

In Europa, dopo «l’annessione illegale della Crimea da parte della Russia e la sua destabilizzazione dell’Ucraina orientale», gli Stati uniti, che schierano oltre 60.000 militari in paesi europei della NATO, hanno rafforzato tale schieramento con una brigata corazzata e una brigata aerea da combattimento, e costituito depositi preposizionati di armamenti per l’invio di altre brigate corazzate. Hanno allo stesso tempo raddoppiato lo spiegamento delle loro navi da guerra nel Mar Nero.

Per accrescere le loro forze in Europa gli Stati uniti hanno speso in cinque anni oltre 16 miliardi di dollari, spingendo allo stesso tempo gli alleati europei ad accrescere la propria spesa militare di 46 miliardi di dollari in tre anni per rafforzare lo schieramento NATO contro la Russia.

Ciò rientra nella strategia avviata da Washington nel 2014 con il putsch di piazza Maidan e il conseguente attacco ai russi di Ucraina: fare dell’Europa la prima linea di una nuova guerra fredda per rafforzare l’influenza statunitense sugli alleati e ostacolare la cooperazione eurasiatica. I ministri degli esteri della NATO hanno riaffermato il 27 aprile il loro consenso, preparando una ulteriore espansione della NATO ad Est contro la Russia attraverso l’ingresso di Bosnia-Erzegovina, Macedonia, Georgia e Ucraina.

Tale strategia richiede una adeguata preparazione dell’opinione pubblica. A tal fine Scaparrotti accusa la Russia di «usare la provocazione politica, diffondere la disinformazione e minare le istituzioni democratiche» anche in Italia. Annuncia quindi che «gli USA e la NATO contrastano la disinformazione russa con una informazione veritiera e trasparente». Sulla loro scia la Commissione europea annuncia una serie di misure contro le fake news, accusando  la Russia di usare «la disinformazione nella sua strategia di guerra».

C’è da aspettarsi che NATO e UE censurino quanto qui pubblicato, decretando che quella della flotta USA nel Mediterraneo è una fake news diffusa dalla Russia nella sua «strategia di guerra».  

Il manifesto, 1 maggio 2018

NO WAR NO NATO

SIGN THIS PETITON

videos

https://www.pandoratv.it/category/opinioni/manlio-dinucci-opinioni/

in 

World powers want to stick with the Iran Nuclear Deal. The US doesn’t. Here is why.

Despite significant historical errors in US foreign policy, Iran is in error here, acting like it can dictate terms to the nations it needs help from to prosper

by 

SERAPHIM HANISCH

April 30, 2018, 00:49

Share

Today, we turn our attention to Iran and the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, commonly known as the “Iran deal” or the “Iran Nuclear Deal.”

This agreement is heralded in the geopolitical sphere as a treaty and agreement that Iran will not develop nuclear weapons. It was reached in an agreement between Iran, Germany, and the five permanent members of the UN Security Council – China, Russia, France, the United Kingdom and the United States.

Under the agreement, Iran agreed to:

• eliminate its stockpile of medium-enriched uranium,
• cut its stockpile of low-enriched uranium by 98%, and
• reduce by about two-thirds the number of its gas centrifuges for 13 years.
• For the next 15 years, Iran will only enrich uranium up to 3.67%.
• Iran also agreed not to build any new heavy-water facilities for the same period of time.
• Uranium-enrichment activities will be limited to a single facility using first-generation centrifuges for 10 years.
• Other facilities will be converted to avoid proliferation risks.
• To monitor and verify Iran’s compliance with the agreement, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) will have regular access to all Iranian nuclear facilities.

The agreement provides that in return for verifiably abiding by its commitments,

• Iran will receive relief from U.S., European Union, and United Nations Security Council nuclear-related economic sanctions.

This was a framework intended to eliminate the possibility of Iran developing a nuclear weapon, ostensibly for the purpose of using it on Israel, but some particularly bellicose rhetoric from Iran included the idea of them using a nuclear weapon on the United States in some way.

Now the main source of disagreement and bitterness appears to be centered between Iran and the United States. It does not get much real news coverage, and as is the case with many other nations on the US media’s “bad people list”, the propaganda is very easy to find and the true state of affairs is very difficult to find.

America’s number one warmonger is also one of America’s most popular politicians.

Quinnipiac University – CNN POLL: America’s most popular politician is…Nikki Haley

America’s number one warmonger is also one of America’s most popular politicians.

by 

ALEX CHRISTOFOROU

April 29, 2018, 16:37631 Views

FacebookTwitter

Share

The United States envoy to the United Nations has spent her first year plus as UN Ambassador calling for war with Syria, based on unverified social media evidence provided by Al Qaeda’s PR arm, known as The White Helmets.

Haley has also conveniently covered up Saudi Arabia’s crimes against Yemen, Israel’s crimes against Palestinians, and Ukraine’s neo-nazi military build up against the Donbass.

The Duran has been documenting Haley’s disgusting and deliberate, Deep State misinformation campaign from the very beginning.

See here: US Ambassador to UN Nikki Haley says “Assad must go”, chances are Haley will go first

Here: Russia outsmarts Nikki Haley in UN Security Council debate

Here: Here’s why Nikki Haley’s Syrian threats should not be taken seriously

And here: Nikki Haley lays down foundation for war with Russia, says chemical weapons “could be used here in New York” (Video)

Haley has her eyes set on the US Presidency come 2024, which makes the results of this latest Quinnipiac University, CNN poll so encouraging for Haley, and so very frightening for the rest of the world.

How the US treats its own: Puerto Rico still in the stone age 8 months after Hurricane

We can spend dozens of millions of US dollars to blow up empty warehouses half the world away, but we can’t put anything into drinkable water for Americans

by 

FRANK SELLERS

April 29, 2018, 11:34

Share

For all those peoples around the world, who worship America as the land of milk and honey, and believe that adopting its principles and aligning their political policies with those of America will somehow mean that they will suddenly experience a comprehensive national renaissance, or that America will reward them by exporting to them massive prosperity, just take a look at how America treats its own. Let’s take a brief look at Puerto Rico.

Around eight months ago, Hurricane Maria struck the Caribbean island, one of America’s colonies, leaving it ‘totally destroyed’. In the aftermath, with so much destruction, one might expect that the Feds would be putting together an aid package to rebuild the island’s infrastructure.

Puerto Rico, by and large, still looks and operates much as though it were still stuck in the dark ages, and at night, it definitely is, as the power grid, damaged by Hurricane Maria, remains an unreliable public infrastructure all these months later. The water situation isn’t much better as the citizenry must additionally filter the water that comes from the tap, since its quality can’t be taken for granted.