Sunday, July 31, 2016

ALIEN HYBRID DNA AND UFO BLOODLINES - DARK JOURNALIST & DR. DAVID JACOBS






ALIEN HYBRID DNA AND UFO BLOODLINES - DARK JOURNALIST & DR. DAVID JACOBS

Publicado a 31/07/2016

Alien Control
Dark Journalist Daniel Liszt welcomes Temple University Professor and celebrated UFO Author Dr. David Jacobs to the show for Part 1 of a deep interview on his controversial new book, Walking Among Us: The Alien Plan to Control Humanity.

Hubrids
Jacobs details over three decades of research into the alien abduction phenomena and how it led him to the shocking conclusion that an Advanced Offworld Civilization was engaged in "Planetary Acquisition" here on Planet Earth using a complex method of creating Alien Human Hybrids or "Hubrids" that can live and act as normal human beings while carrying out an alien agenda.

Jacobs' extensive background of working closely with other top UFO researchers in the field like Harvard Professor John Mack and the founder of the Alien Abduction research movement Budd Hopkins along with his own professional experience of working in-depth on hundreds of people who claim to be abductees, adds even more substantial weight to his powerful new assertions. His current assessment regarding where we stand in relation to the bizarre and powerful phenomena of UFOs and Aliens is alarming and suggests the truly startling answer behind the decades long scenario of witnesses describing Alien/Human Hybrid development.

Security Alien Hybrids
Jacobs also details individual cases of so called "Security Hybrids" that were sent to derail his work by using telepathic mind control techniques on his subjects and threatening him to stop his deep research into the inner workings of the method of Alien Control. In Jacobs view, we won't find any benevolent or enlightened beings behind the Alien Abduction pattern. He uses a single word to describe their agenda: "Control"

Don't miss this fascinating, informative and extremely unnerving Dark Journalist episode!

Saturday, July 30, 2016

Português -- ENTREVISTA DO PRESIDENTE VLADIMIR PUTIN AO CANAL TELEVISIVO CBS E PBS - Parte 1





ENTREVISTA DO PRESIDENTE VLADIMIR PUTIN  AO CANAL TELEVISIVO CBS E PBS

Setembro 29, 2015
06:00
Novo-Ogaryovo, Moscow Region


Nota da Tradutora: A seguir menciono a fonte da única transcrição fidedigna. Tudo o que é mostrado nos sites americanos está deturpado, tendencioso e, por vezes, é incompreensível. Foi precisamente por encontrar incongruências e ter pedido a ajuda de um colega russo que vive na Ucrânia, para reproduzir o diálogo falado em russo, que cheguei ao site oficial, que o reproduz integralmente, sem manipular o texto a favor de ninguém.


CHARLIE ROSE: Quero agradecer ter-nos convidado para sua casa, numa ocasião que eu teria descrito como uma bela tarde de domingo russo. Vocês chamam-lhe Old Wives Summer (tradução literal =Verão das Esposas Idosas. Em Portugal chamamos Verão de S. Martinho)Faremos a nossa entrevista, que será transmitida no domingo. No dia seguinte, irá falar nas Nações Unidas num discurso muito esperado. Será a primeira vez que vai estar lá depois de alguns anos. O que vai dizer às Nações Unidas, à América e ao mundo?

VLADIMIR PUTIN: Visto que esta entrevista vai ser divulgada antes do meu discurso, penso não ser razoável entrar em muitos detalhes sobre o que vou falar, mas, em geral, irei mencionar certamente, alguns factos da História das Nações Unidas. Posso dizer-lhe que a decisão de criar as Nações Unidas foi tomada no nosso país, na Conferência de Yalta. Foi na União Soviética que esta decisão foi considerada. A União Soviética e a Rússia, na qualidade do Estado que sucedeu à União Soviética, é um estado membro fundador da Organização das Nações Unidas e um membro permanente do Conselho de Segurança.

Claro que vou ter de proferir algumas palavras sobre os dias de hoje, sobre a evolução da situação internacional, sobre o facto de que as Nações Unidas continuam a ser a única organização internacional universal, elaborada para manter a paz global. E, nesse sentido, hoje não há outra alternativa. Também é evidente que deve adaptar-se a um mundo em constante mudança, que discutimos sempre: como deve evoluir e a que cadência, que componentes devem ser submetidos a mudanças qualitativas. Certamente, terei de utilizar ou melhor dizendo, devo utilizar esta plataforma internacional para explicar a visão da Rússia sobre as relações internacionais de hoje, bem como o futuro desta Organização e da comunidade global.

CHARLIE ROSE: Esperamos que fale sobre a ameaça do Estado Islâmico e da vossa presença na Síria, que está relacionada com essa mesma ameaça. Qual é o propósito da vossa presença na Síria e como se relaciona com o desafio do ISIS?

VLADIMIR PUTIN: Creio, tenho quase a certeza de que, praticamente, todos os que discursarem nas Nações Unidas vão falar sobre a luta, sobre a necessidade de combater o terrorismo e também não posso evitar esse problema. É bastante compreensível, porque é uma advertência grave e um desafio para todos nós. Hoje, o terrorismo ameaça um grande número de estados, um grande número de pessoas - centenas de milhares, milhões de pessoas sofrem devido à actividade criminosa do ISIS. E todos enfrentamos a tarefa de unir os nossos esforços na luta contra este mal comum.
Como diz, no que respeita à nossa presença na Síria, a partir de hoje assumiu a forma de fornecimento de armas ao governo sírio, treino de pessoal e ajuda humanitária ao povo sírio. Agimos em harmonia com a Carta das Nações Unidas, ou seja, em conformidade com os princípios fundamentais do Direito Internacional moderno, segundo os quais, este ou aquele tipo de ajuda, incluindo a assistência militar, pode e deve ser fornecida exclusivamente ao governo legítimo de um ou de outro país, mediante o seu consentimento ou pedido e de acordo com a decisão do Conselho de Segurança das Nações Unidas. Neste caso particular, intervimos, baseados no pedido do governo sírio para prestarmos assistência militar e técnica, o que fazemos ao abrigo de contratos internacionais completamente legítimos.

CHARLIE ROSE: O Secretário de Estado John Kerry disse que os Estados Unidos se congratulam com vossa ajuda na luta contra o Estado islâmico. Outros tomaram conhecimento do facto de que são aviões de combate e sistemas MANPAD que estão  a ser usados contra o exército convencional e não contra os extremistas.

Brazilian drug lord busted after turning prison cell into luxury suite



Brazilian drug lord busted after turning prison cell into luxury suite

Published time: 30 Jul, 2016 09:15

click this link to see more pictures

View of Brazilian drug trafficker Jarvis Chimenes Pavao's cell at Tacumbu prison in Asuncion on July 28, 2016. © Norberto Duarte
View of Brazilian drug trafficker Jarvis Chimenes Pavao's cell at Tacumbu prison in Asuncion on July 28, 2016. © Norberto Duarte / AFP

A three-room suite complete with a library, high-tech kitchen, stylishly tiled walls, plasma TV and even a conference room – no, it’s not an apartment of a US rapper, it’s actually a prison cell where a Brazilian drug lord was serving his sentence.

The VIP suite belonged to Jarvis Chimenes Pavão, a convicted Brazilian drug lord, considered one of South America's most dangerous narcotics traffickers. He had been serving an eight-year sentence for money laundering since 2009 at the Tacumbu prison in Asuncion, the capital of Paraguay.


Police discovered the luxurious cell on Tuesday night at almost the same time, as a bomb was uncovered inside the prison. It is believed that the drug baron wanted to create a diversion by detonating the device, in order to allow him to escape.

Chimenes Pavão was due to be released in 2017, but it is alleged he feared being extradited back to Brazil where he would face extra charges, hence his desire to break out of jail.

During his time behind bars, he certainly lived in luxury. The three-room cell had a bathroom, a kitchen and even a conference room. It also had air conditioning, stylishly tiled walls, luxurious furniture and a library.

Chimenes Pavao also enjoyed his big DVD collection, which he liked to watch on big-screen plasma TV.

The drug lord apparently loved watching films about other famous drug lords as the full collection of "Pablo Escobar” TV series was found in his cell. Escobar was a notorious Colombian drug lord and trafficker in 1990s. Known as "The King of Cocaine", Escobar was considered the wealthiest criminal in history and one of the richest men in the world.

His lawyer, Laura Acasuso was quick to tell reporters that high-ranking officials were aware of the privileges that the drug lord had access to.

"Six or seven justice ministers and six or seven prison directors" took bribes from Chimenes Pavão, she said.

The Justice Minister Carla Bacigalupo was subsequently removed from her post and her replacement, Ever Martinez, promised to destroy the cell.

"We're going to demolish Chimenes Pavão's cell and take action against the prison directors who allowed this inmate to enjoy these privileges," he said.

However, the criminal’s lawyer says that the drug lord contributed to the renovation of the prison and paid for lodgings for prison directors and toilets for the guards. He even renovated the prison library and improved the cooks' salaries, he added.

Some inmates were also disappointed by the fact Chimenes Pavao was removed from the prison, as the drug lord has always been very generous.

"He was the most loved man in this prison," one prisoner, Antonio Gonzalez told AFP.

"I don't know what's going to become of us without him," another inmate said on condition of anonymity. He added that the drug lord paid for a football pitch and chapel at the prison and even employed bodyguards among the prisoners.


000

THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY NO LONGER EXISTS -- Paul Craig Roberts

THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY NO LONGER EXISTS
July 29, 2016 




THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY NO LONGER EXISTS
And an orchestrated war with Russia has all of us marked for extinction

Paul Craig Roberts

The Democratic Party that once was concerned with workers’ rights, the elderly, civil rights, and the constitutional protections of America liberty no longer exists. As the just completed Democratic presidential primaries and the Democratic presidential convention have clearly demonstrated, the United States now has two Republican parties in service to the One Percent.

The organized Democrats–the Democratic National Committee–have shown themselves to be even more venal and corrupt than the Republicans. Leaked emails document that the Democratic National Committee conspired with the Hillary campaign in order to steal the nomination from Bernie Sanders. It is clear that Sanders was the choice of Democratic Party voters for president, but the nomination was stolen from him by vote fraud and dirty tricks.

The DNC and the media whores have tried to discredit the incriminating emails by alleging that the leaked emails resulted from a plot by Russia’s President Vladimir Putin in behalf of “Putin’s American agent,” Donald Trump. “A vote for Trump is a vote for Putin,” as the presstitute scum put it.

This diversionary tactic has not worked. Not even Americans are stupid enough to fall for it.

Consequently, the corrupt “leader” of the DNC had to resign and was unable to deliver her speech at the nominating convention from fear of being booed off the stage.

Sanders’ supporters have abandoned Hillary and the fake “Democratic Party.” Probably most of them will vote for the Green Party candidate.

The organized Republicans–the Republican National Committee–and the zionist neoconservatives wanted to block Donald Trump from the nomination just as the DNC blocked Sanders, but could not. The neoconservatives are organizing for Hillary as she is their warmonger and Trump says he is not, but as the Presidential contest is really a contest between the two Republican parties about which gets to be the whore for the One Percent, the RNC, impressed with Hillary’s lack of voter support, seems to be sticking with Trump. Better to be a well-paid whore than to be out in the cold.

In the coming presidential election, the outcome will probably be determined by whether the powerful oligarchic interest groups decide whether Trump is an actual threat or whether they can cosy up to him and rope him in by appointing his government.

Trump’s disability is that no matter how able an individual is, that person cannot simultaneously make themselves a multi-billionaire and be knowledgeable of economic and foreign policy issues. The bald fact is that Trump, if he becomes president, does not know whom to appoint in order to have the support from his government to effect the changes for which his supporters hope he stands.

When a person becomes President, that person doesn’t suddenly become an encyclopedia with full knowledge. The President is dependent on the information flows from his government. If those information flows support the interests of Wall Street, the corrupt “banks too big to fail,” the military-security complex, the Israel Lobby, agribusiness, and the extractive industries (energy, mining, timber), the President’s decisions will support these material interests.

Donald Trump is the American people’s choice, because he is opposed to the offshoring of American jobs–a corporate practice that has enriched the One Percent at the expense of the American middle class.

Donald Trump is the American people’s choice, because he opposes the fabricated, gratuitous conflict with Russia. Even Americans understand that taking war to a major nuclear power will not end well.

Donald Trump is the American people’s choice because he realizes that NATO–an organization whose purpose disappeared 25 years ago when the Soviet Union collapsed as a result of the coup against Gorbachev by extreme elements of the Soviet Communist Party–now serves as a vehicle and cover for Washington’s aggressions, which are war crimes under the international statutes that Washington created. Washington’s wars benefit some of the One Percent at the expense of both the 99 Percent and millions of innocent peoples in many countries.

What will happen now is that the presstitutes will demonize Donald Trump even more than they have demonized Vladimir Putin. The scum presstitutes will do everything that they can possibly do to make a vote for Trump into an act of treason against America.

Now that the presstitutes have learned that they can tell the most blatant lies–Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction, Iranian nukes, Assad’s use of chemical weapons, Russian invasions–without being held accountable, they know that they can lie about Trump.

And they will. To the hilt.

But the presstitutes have lost credibility. A person has to be an imbecile to believe a word that they say.

“Progressives” will wander off the track. They will be turned off by Trump’s stand on immigration, which is where the American people stand. “Progressives” will be worried about whether the ‘fascist” Trump will persecute transgender and homosexual people or revoke the right of women to abort the unborn. To “progressives” this will seem all important as Washington and its NATO vassals hurl the world into nuclear war.

Neither can any intelligence be expected from the defunct American left-wing. The American left-wing supports the official story of 9/11, the excuse for the last 15 years of illegal wars and the American Police State. To find the American left-wing totally allied with the official explanation of what is in reality a false flag event, committed in order that the neoconservatives would have their new Pearl Harbor in order to invade the Middle East, is demonstrable proof that the American left-wing is irrelevant.

The American left interprets 9/11 and subsequent false flag events as oppressed peoples striking back at their oppressors. The emotional satisfaction of this takes the impotent American left-wing out not only of action but of relevance in commentary. The American left-wing has become an asset of the enemy–the neoconservatives who control policy in Washington.

So, where do we stand? The answer is that we are closer to nuclear annihilation than ever before. I know of what I speak. I held the highest security clearances. I was a member of a secret committee that enabled President Reagan to end the Cold War.

The President of Russia, Vladimir Putin is doing everything he can possibly do to avoid the nuclear war that the crazed American neoconservatives are bringing to humanity. For his efforts in behalf of planet Earth he is demonized 24 hours a day, seven days a week, year after year. For simply stating facts, I am described by the presstitutes as “an apologist for Putin.”

The endless lies about Russia have convinced the Russian media that Washington is mobilizing its NATO vassals for an attack on Russia. Read the transcripts to this Russian media broadcast. 

If you aren’t scared after absorbing this Russian news broadcast, you are stupid beyond belief. The message is clear: the West has declared war on Russia but is trying to keep Russia off guard by denying it.

The video of the Russian news broadcast also shows the dismissive way the Russian media was treated at the recent NATO conference in Poland. The non-entity representatives of the non-entity countries of Latvia, which has been ruthlessly looted by the West, Estonia, Lithuania, and Poland, and the Ukraine representative either refuse to speak to the Russian media or use the interview to repeat Washington’s false accusations against Russia. These imbeciles insulting Russia are representatives of countries that Russia could destroy in a few minutes. If these idiots think Washington could save them, they are as stupid as the Polish colonels who thought that the British guarantee in March 1939 meant anything and could save Poland from the rash action of sticking Poland’s fingers in Hitler’s eye. This Polish stupidity provoked by the stupid British set off World War II with the British and French declaration of war against Germany, thus consigning Poland to Soviet rule for a half century. Some guarantee! The imbecile Chamberlain who wanted peace started WWII with Britain’s worthless “guarantee.”

Does it make you feel safe that the arrogant warmongering imbeciles in Washington have convinced a nuclear power the equal of the United States that America is going to attack?

Moreover, Russia is a nuclear power allied with another nuclear power, China, which has had enough of Washington’s imbecilic provocations. Are you willing for “your” government to lead your future into nuclear war with two nuclear powers?

Here we Americans are going into a presidential election and the overpowering fact of our time–that Washington is threatening humanity with nuclear war–is not a subject for discussion! What is the matter with us Americans? Are we stupid beyond all belief? We sit stupidly, thinking that issues of no importance are the most important issues of our time while “our” insane government provokes nuclear war. Have any people in history failed their obligation to this extent? If so, who?

My case rests. There is no countervailing evidence against the fact that unadulterated evil rules the West and is driving the world to extinction. Western democracy is a total failure. Democracy could not prevent the crazed warmonger Hillary from presidential nomination despite the opposition of the American people.

How long can Russia, and China, wait before they conclude that they have to pre-empt the coming attack from Washington? Does anyone, even stupid Americans, think that once Russia and China are convinced that they are targets for attack that they will just sit there and await the attack?

Do peoples as guilty of dereliction of duty as Western peoples are have any right to survive?

Friday, July 29, 2016

Julian Assange: Choosing Between Trump or Clinton is Like Picking Between Cholera or Gonorrhea


Julian Assange: Choosing Between Trump or Clinton is Like Picking Between Cholera or Gonorrhea

JULY 25, 2016
STORY
WATCH FULL SHOW


Following the end of the Republican National Convention, Donald Trump has received a surge in his popularity. He’s now leading Hillary Clinton 44 to 39 percent in a four-way match-up, according to the most recent CNN poll. Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson received 9 percent, and Green Party candidate Dr. Jill Stein received 3 percent. But for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, the threat of a Donald Trump presidency doesn’t inspire him to back Hillary Clinton. When asked, Assange said: "You’re asking me, do I prefer cholera or gonorrhea?”



This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

AMY GOODMAN: Finally, Julian, we cut you off earlier when you were talking about what you felt were the most significant emails that you have released. Is there any last one that you’d like to mention? And also, do you have any thoughts on Donald Trump? I mean, just before we went to air, a CNN poll came out that says Donald Trump is ahead by 5 percentage points of Hillary Clinton. Now, he did just come off of the Republican convention, but many called it the worst convention in history, so it’s not automatic that he should have had this percentage lead. Of course, though, you have the crisis, the disarray, the Democratic Party is in because of these emails that you’ve released.

JULIAN ASSANGE: Well, you’re asking me, do I prefer cholera or gonorrhea? Personally, I would prefer neither. Look, I think—you know, we know how politics works in the United States. Whoever—whatever political party gets into government is going to merge with the bureaucracy pretty damn fast. It will be in a position where it has some levers in its hand. And so, as a result, corporate lobbyists will move in to help control those levers. So it doesn’t make much difference in the end. What does make a difference is political accountability, a general deterrence set to stop political organizations behaving in a corrupt manner. That can make a difference, because that changes the perception of what you can do or not do. And so, always—well, almost always, you should choose the principled position, which is to set a disciplinary signal about acting in a corrupt way, and take a philosophical position, which is our institutions can only be as good as our understanding of our institutions.

AMY GOODMAN: We want to—

JULIAN ASSANGE: Now, are you asking—the other—

AMY GOODMAN: Yes, go ahead, Julian.

JULIAN ASSANGE: The other top emails, well, as I said, I think this instruction by Luis Miranda, the head of communications, to go out and covertly spread anti-Bernie Sanders propaganda is a clear instruction combined with a chain of command. It’s not simply expressing a sentiment. It is expressing an instruction within the DNC to subvert the Bernie Sanders campaign.

Then there’s a lot of emails about the close relationship between the DNC and the media—The Washington Post involved in a co-fundraising party, an off-list co-fundraising for the DNC, calling up MSNBC during the middle of a program and saying, "Pull that segment now," Debbie Wasserman Schultz calling up the president of MSNBC in order to discipline Morning Joe, etc. That’s, you know, of course, something that we’ve all suspected happens, but this is concrete proof of it.

But, you know, I really encourage people to research the more than 8,000 attachments that we put out, separate files, including more than 175 spreadsheets. That has the real core, the financial core, of the power structure and the exercise of monetary influence over the DNC. And that’s something that’s going to seed journalistic investigations for years.

AMY GOODMAN: Julian Assange, we want to thank you for being with us. Julian Assange, founder and editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks. This is Democracy Now! You can go online at democracynow.org to read the transcript or to hear again either the audio podcast or the video, see the video of this interview. We’re broadcasting from the Democratic convention in Philadelphia. It’s the first day. It will be gaveled in in just a couple of hours from this broadcast. I’m Amy Goodman, with Juan González. When we come back, a debate. Stay with us.

JULIAN ASSANGE SLAMS “CORRUPT” HILLARY CLINTON IN FIRST INTERVIEW FOLLOWING WIKILEAKS DNC EMAIL RELEASE + transcript



Wednesday, Jul 27, 2016 2 comment(s)


JULIAN ASSANGE SLAMS “CORRUPT” HILLARY CLINTON IN FIRST INTERVIEW FOLLOWING WIKILEAKS DNC EMAIL RELEASE

DEMOCRACY NOW!
Forbidden Knowledge TV | Jul 27, 2016 | Alexandra Bruce


WikiLeaks Editor-in-Chief, Julian Assange joins Democracy Now! on the Monday following the Friday release of 20,000 DNC emails, which reveal how the Democratic Party worked to undermine and defeat Bernie Sanders' campaign. 
Assange slams Hillary Clinton as "corrupt":

"It's important that there be examples of accountability. The resignation [of DNC Chair, Debbie Wasserman Schultz] was an example of that..." Hillary has tried to immediately produce a counter example by putting out a statement, within hours, saying that Debbie Wasserman Schultz is a great friend, and that she'll incorporate her into the Clinton campaign, while she also helps Schultz with her re-election campaign to Congress.

"So that's a very interesting signal by Hillary Clinton, that if you act in a corrupt way that benefits Hillary Clinton, you will be taken care of. Why does she need to put that out?...It's a very destructive signal for a future presidency..."